Drought stress, mercuric chloride, and β-mercaptoethanol effects on hydraulic characteristics of three cultivars of wolfberry (Lycium chinense)

Abstract

In order to further understand the effects of drought stress on hydraulic characteristics and the relationship between hydraulic conductivity and aquaporins or water channels of root systems of three wolfberry cultivars (Lycium chinense Mill.), hydraulic conductivity of 2-year-old pot-grown seedlings was measured under drought stress, rewatering, and treatment with exogenous mercuric chloride and β-mercaptoethanol. Under moderate and severe drought stress levels, the most significant decrease of hydraulic conductivity was 37.3% and 24.0%, respectively, in the ‘Ningqi 5’ cultivar compared with the non-stressed control. After rewatering, the rate of recovery in specific conductivity was most rapid in the ‘Mengqi 1’ cultivar, at 0.058 and 0.072 kg MPa⁻¹ m⁻² s⁻¹ h⁻¹ under moderate and severe drought stress levels, respectively. The ‘Mengqi 1’ cultivar had the highest recovery degree of hydraulic conductivity under two concentrations of β-ME (500 or 1000 μmol L^− 1), reaching 82.4% and 88.5%, respectively, of the initial conductivity. The adaptive capacity of hydraulic conductivity in the ‘Ningqi 5’ cultivar was weaker than in the ‘Ningqi 1’ and ‘Mengqi 1’ cultivars under drought stress. The recovery capacity of hydraulic conductivity in ‘Mengqi 1’ cultivar was stronger than the ‘Ningqi 1’ and ‘Ningqi 5’ cultivars after rewatering. Aquaporins of the ‘Ningqi 1’ cultivar root systems had the highest binding affinity with mercuric chloride, which was the most likely cause in the decrease in hydraulic conductivity, whereas aquaporins of ‘Mengqi 1’ root systems had the weakest binding affinity. The inhibitory effect of mercuric chloride was readily eliminated by β-mercaptoethanol in the ‘Mengqi 1’ cultivar. The hydraulic characteristics of this cultivar were more sensitive to drought, mercuric chloride and β-mercaptoethanol than the other cultivars.

Keywords

β-Mercaptoethanol / Aquaporins / Hydraulic conductivity / Mercuric chloride / Wolfberry (Lycium chinense)

References

[1] Aasamaa K, Sõber A. Seasonal courses of maximum hydraulic conductance in shoots of six temperate deciduous tree species. Funct Plant Biol, 2005, 32: 1077-1087.

[2] Albino M, Robert JJ. Effects of mercuric chloride on the hydraulic conductivity of tomato root systems. Plant Physiol, 1995, 109: 331-335.

[3] An F, Zhang SX. Studies of roots and shoots vulnerability to xylem embolism in seven woody plants. Acta Ecol Sin, 2005, 25(8): 1928-1933.

[4] An F, Zhang SX, Zhao PJ. Relations between xylem embolisms and physiological indexes in eight woody plants. I. Relationships with xylem water potentials. Acta Bot Boreal-Occident Sin, 2005, 25(8): 1595-1600.

[5] Aroca R, Ferrante A, Vernieri P, Chrispeels MJ. Drought, abscisic acid and transpiration rate effects on the regulation of PIP aquaporin gene expression and abundance in Phaseolus vulgaris plants. Ann Bot, 2006, 98: 1301-1310.

[6] Beaudette PC, Chlup M, Yee J, Emery RJ. Relationships of root conductivity and aquaporin gene expression in Pisum sativum: diurnal patterns and the response to HgCl₂ and ABA. J Exp Bot, 2007, 58(6): 1291-1300.

[7] Belimov AA, Dodd IC, Safronova VI, Malkov NV, Davies WJ, Tikhonovich IA. The cadmium tolerant pea (Pisum sativum L.) mutant SGECd^t is more sensitive to mercury: assessing plant water relations. J Exp Bot, 2015, 66(8): 2359-2369.

[8] Bogeat-Triboulot MB, Martin R, Chatelet D, Cochard H. Hydraulic conductance of root and shoot measured with the transient and dynamic modes of the high-pressure flowmeter. Ann For Sci, 2002, 59: 389-396.

[9] Carvasal M, Cooke DT, Clorkson DT. Responses of wheat plants to nutrient deprivation may involve the regulation of water-channel function. Planta, 1996, 199: 372-381.

[10] Centritto M. Photosynthetic limitations and carbon partitioning in cherry in response to water deficit and elevated. Agric Ecosyst Environ, 2005, 106: 233-242.

[11] Cobb AR, Choat B, Holbrook NM. Dynamics of freeze-thaw embolism in Smilax rotundifolia (Smilacaceae). Am J Bot, 2007, 94: 640-649.

[12] Cochard H. Vulnerability of several conifers to air embolism. Tree Physiol, 1992, 11: 73-83.

[13] Cochard H, Venisse JS, Barigah TS, Brunel N, Herbette S, Guilliot A. Putative role of aquaporins in variable hydraulic conductance of leaves in response to light. Plant Physiol, 2007, 143: 122-133.

[14] Eilmann B, Zweifel R, Buchmann N, Graf Pannatier E, Rigling A. Drought alters timing, quantity, and quality of wood formation in Scots pine. J Exp Bot, 2011, 62: 2763-2771.

[15] Ennajeh M, Tounekti T, Vadel AM, Khemira H, Cochard H. Water relations and drought-induced embolism in Olive (Olea europaea) varieties ‘Meski’ and ‘Chemlali’ during severe drought. Tree Physiol, 2008, 28: 971-976.

[16] Gomes D, Agasse A, Thiébaud P, Delrot S, Gerós H, Chaumont F. Aquaporins are multifunctional water and solute transporters highly divergent in living organisms. Biochim Biophys Acta, 2009, 1788: 1213-1228.

[17] Grebner GT, Chaloner WG. Iqbal M. Environmental influences on cambial activity. The vascular cambium, 1990, Taunton: Research Studies Press Ltd 159 199

[18] Hacke UG, Sperry JS. Functional and ecological xylem anatomy. Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst, 2001, 4: 97-115.

[19] Holmberg N, Bülow L. Improving stress tolerance in plant by gene transfer. Trends Plant Sci, 1998, 3: 61-66.

[20] Ionenko IF, Anisimov AV, Karimova FG. Water transport in maize roots under the influence of mercuric chloride and water stress: a role of water channels. Biol Plant, 2006, 50(1): 74-80.

[21] Javot H, Maurel C. The role of aquaporins in root water uptake. Ann Bot, 2002, 90: 301-313.

[22] Kirdyanov A, Hughes M, Vaganov E, Schweingruber F, Silkin P. The importance of early summer temperature and date of snow melt for tree growth in the Siberian Subarctic. Trees Struct Funct, 2003, 17(1): 61-69.

[23] Lee SH, Singh AP, Chung GC. Rapid accumulation of hydrogen peroxide in cucumber roots due to exposure to low temperature appears to mediate decreases in water transport. J Exp Bot, 2004, 55: 1733-1741.

[24] Lovisolo C, Schubert A. Mercury hinders recovery of shoot hydraulic conductivity during grapevine rehydration: evidence from a whole-plant approach. New Phytol, 2006, 172: 469-478.

[25] Maggio A, Joly RJ. Effects of mercuric chloride on the hydraulic conductivity of tomato root systems. Plant Physiol, 1995, 109: 331-335.

[26] Maurel C, Verdoucq L, Luu DT, Santoni V. Plant aquaporins: membrane channels with multiple integrated functions. Annu Rev Plant Biol, 2008, 59: 595-624.

[27] Meijie Y, Makiko Y, Norikazu Y, Fukuju Y, Liu G, Du S. A comparison of pressure-volume curves with and without rehydration pretreatment in eight woody species of the semiarid Loess Plateau. Acta Physiol Plant, 2013, 35: 1051-1060.

[28] Meinzer FC, McCulloh KA. Xylem recovery from drought-induced embolism: Where is the hydraulic point of no return?. Tree Physiol, 2013, 33(4): 331-334.

[29] Mu ZX, Zhang SQ, Zhang LS, Liang ZS. Hydraulic conductivity of whole root system is better than hydraulic conductivity of single root in correlation with the leaf water status of maize. Bot Stud, 2006, 47(2): 145-151.

[30] Nardini A, Salleo S, Andri S. Circadian regulation of leaf hydraulic conductance in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L. cv Margot). Plant Cell Environ, 2005, 28: 750-759.

[31] Noronha H, Agasse A, Martins AP, Berny MC, Gomes D, Zarrouk O, Thiebaud P, Delrot S, Sovera G, Chaumont F, Gerós H. The grape aquaporin VvSIP1 transports water across the ER membrane. J Exp Bot, 2014, 65(4): 981-993.

[32] North GB, Nobel PS. Hydraulic conductivity of concentric root tissues of Agave deserti Engelm. under wet and drying conditions. New Phytol, 1995, 130(1): 47-57.

[33] Sellin A, Ounapuu E, Kupper P. Effects of light intensity and duration on leaf hydraulic conductance and distribution of resistance in shoots of silver birch (Betula pendula). Physiol Plant, 2008, 134: 412-420.

[34] Seong HL, Gap CC, Ernst S. Gating of aquaporins by low temperature in roots of chilling−sensitive cucumber and chilling−tolerant figleaf gourd. J Exp Bot, 2005, 56: 985-995.

[35] Steudle E, Peterson CA. How does water get through roots?. J Exp Bot, 1998, 49: 775-788.

[36] Tofimova MS, Zhestkova IM. Osmotic water permeability of vacuolar and plasma membranes isolated from maize roots. Russ J Plant Physiol, 2001, 48(3): 287-293.

[37] Tyerman SD, Niemietz CM, Bramley H. Plant aquaporins: multifunctional water and solute channels with expanding roles. Plant Cell Environ, 2002, 25: 173-194.

[38] Tyree MT, Yang S, Cruiziat P, Sinclair B. Novel methods of measuring hydraulic conductivity of tree root systems and interpretation using AMAIZED, a maize root dynamic model for water and solute transport. Plant Physiol, 1994, 104: 189-199.

[39] Tyree MT, Patino S, Bennink J, Alexander J. Dynamic measurements of root hydraulic conductance using a high-pressure flowmeter in the laboratory and field. J Exp Bot, 1995, 46: 83-94.

[40] Tyree MT, Salleo S, Nardini A. Refilling of embolized vessels in young stems of Laurus nobilis L.: Do we need a new paradigm. Plant Physiol, 1999, 120: 1-22.

[41] Tyree MT, Nardini A, Salleo S, Sack L, Omari BE. The dependence of leaf hydraulic conductance on irradiance during HPFM measurements: any role for stomatal response?. J Exp Bot, 2005, 56: 737-744.

[42] Vandeleur RK, Mayo G, Shelden MC, Gilliham M, Kaiser BN, Tyerman SD. The role of plasma membrane intrinsic protein aquaporins in water transport through roots: diurnal and drought stress responses reveal different strategies between isohydric and anisohydric cultivars of grapevine. Plant Physiol, 2009, 149: 445-460.

[43] Verdoucq L, Grondin A, Maurel C. Structure-function analysis of plant aquaporin AtPIP2;1 gating by divalent cations and protons. Biochem J, 2008, 415: 409-416.

[44] Voicu MC, Zwiazek JJ. Inhibitor studies of leaf lamina hydraulic conductance in trembling aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx.) leaves. Tree Physiol, 2010, 30: 193-204.

[45] Voicu MC, Zwiazek JJ, Tyree MT. Light response of hydraulic conductance in bur oak (Quercus macrocarpa) leaves. Tree Physiol, 2008, 28: 1007-1015.

[46] Wan XC, Ernst S, Wolfram H. Gating of water channels (aquaporins) in cortical cells of young corn roots by mechanical stimuli (pressure pulses): effects of ABA and of HgCl₂. J Exp Bot, 2004, 55: 411-422.

[47] Wang SY, Deng XP, Xue S, Xue SL. Comparison research on water transportation of non-drought and drought-stressed tomato root system. J Northwest A & F Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2003, 31(2): 105-108.

[48] Xu SR, Zhang EH, Ma RL, Wang Q, Liu QL, Wu R. Hydraulic characteristics of Lycium barbarum L. seedling under drought stress and re-watering conditions. Chin J Eco-agric, 2017, 25(8): 1190-1197.

[49] Yang S, Yuan XN, Wang ZX, Zhu P, Jia GX. Effects of HgCl₂ stress on the upper leaf necroses and water use efficiency of oriental hybrid lilies. J Beijing For Univ, 2016, 38(5): 114-119.

[50] Yao LM, Li FS, Shen XJ, Tong L. Research progress on soil factors affecting root hydraulic conductance. J J Northwest A & F Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2011, 39(5): 65-72.

[51] Yin XH, Hao GY. Divergence between ring– and diffuse–porous wood type in broadleaf tree of Changbai Mountains results in substantial differences in hydraulic traits. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2018, 29(2): 352-360.

[52] Zhao HB, Zhang ZB, Xu P, Cao HX. Water use efficiency and chlorophyll content of wheat seedling under the inhibition of HgCl₂. Acta Bot Boreal, 2007, 27(12): 2478-248.