Ecophysiological acclimatization to cyclic water stress in Eucalyptus

Abstract

Drought is considered the main environmental factor limiting productivity in eucalyptus plantations in Brazil. However, recent studies have reported that exposure to water deficit conditions enables plants to respond to subsequent stresses. Thus, this study investigates the ecophysiological acclimatization of eucalyptus clones submitted to recurrent water deficit cycles. Eucalyptus seedlings were submitted to three recurrent water deficit cycles and anatomical, morphological and physiological changes were analyzed. The results were: (1) Eucalyptus seedlings responded to water deficits by directing carbohydrates to root and stem growth; (2) Size and number of stomata were reduced; (3) Stomatal conductance decreased which allowed the plants to reduce water losses through transpiration, increasing instantaneous water use efficiency; (4) The relationship between gas exchanges and available water contents allowed the seedlings to uptake the retained soil water at higher tensions; and, (5) Physiological recovery from subsequent water deficits became faster. As a result of these changes, the eucalyptus seedlings recovered from the same degree of water stress more rapidly.

Keywords

Carbon partition / Drought / Gas exchange / Morpho-physiological changes / Photosynthetic apparatus

References

[1] Adams MA, Turnbull TL, Sprent JI, Buchmann N. Legumes are different: leaf nitrogen, photosynthesis, and water use efficiency. Proc Natl Acad Sci, 2016, 113: 4098-4103.

[2] Amdt S, Cliford S, Wanek W, Jones H, Popp M. Physiological and morphological adaptations of the fruit tree Ziziphus rotundifolia in response to progresif drought stress. Tree Physiol, 2001, 21: 705-715.

[3] Asensi-Fabado MA, Oliván A, Munné-Bosch S. A comparative study of the hormonal response to high temperatures and stress reiteration in three Labiatae species. Environ Exp Bot, 2013, 94: 57-65.

[4] Baldocchi DD, Xu L. What limits evaporation from Mediterranean oak woodlands—The supply of moisture in the soil, physiological control by plants or the demand by the atmosphere?. Adv Water Resour, 2007, 30: 2113-2122.

[5] Bloom AJ, Chapin SF, Mooney HA. Plants-an economic analogy. Annu Rev Ecol, 1985, 16: 363-392.

[6] Bota J, Medrano H, Flexas J. Is photosynthesis limited by decreased Rubisco activity and RuBP content under progressive water stress?. New Phytol, 2004, 162: 671-681.

[7] Bruce TJA, Matthes MC, Napier JA, Pickett JA. Stressful “memories” of plants: evidence and possible mechanisms. Plant Sci, 2007, 173: 603-608.

[8] Cano FJ, López R, Warren CR. Implications of the mesophyll conductance to CO₂ for photosynthesis and water-use efficiency during long-term water stress and recovery in two contrasting eucalyptus species. Plant, Cell Environ, 2014, 37: 2470-2490.

[9] Chaves MM, Oliveira MM. Mechanisms underlying plant resilience to water deficits: prospects for water-saving agriculture. J Exp Bot, 2004, 55: 2365-2384.

[10] Christina M, Le Maire G, Battie-Laclau P, Nouvellon Y, Bouillet J, Jourdan C, de Moraes Gonçalves J, Laclau J. Measured and modeled interactive effects of potassium deficiency and water deficit on gross primary productivity and light-use efficiency in eucalyptus grandis plantations. Glob Chang Biol, 2015, 21: 2022-2039.

[11] Condon AG, Richards R, Rebetzke G, Farquhar G. Improving intrinsic water use efficiency and crop yield. Crop Sci, 2002, 42: 122-131.

[12] Correia B, Pintó-Marijuan M, Neves L, Brossa R, Dias M, Costa A, Castro B, Araújo C, Santos C, Chaves M, Pinto G. Water stress and recovery in the performance of two Eucalyptus globulus clones: physiological and biochemical profiles. Physiol Plant, 2014, 150: 580-592.

[13] Costa F, Shvaleva A, Maroco JP, Almeida M, Chaves M, Pereira J. Responses to water stress in two Eucalyptus globulus clones differing in drought tolerance. Tree Physiol, 2004, 24: 1165-1172.

[14] Davies WJ, Zhang J. Root signals and the regulation of growth and development of plants in drying soil. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol, 1991, 42: 55-76.

[15] De Diego N, Sampedro MC, Barrio RJ, Saiz-Fernández I, Moncaleán P, Lacuesta M. Solute accumulation and elastic modulus changes in six radiata pine breeds exposed to drought. Tree Physiol, 2013, 33: 69-80.

[16] Ding Y, Fromm M, Avramova Z. Multiple exposures to drought “train” transcriptional responses in Arabidopsis. Nat Commun, 2012, 3: 740.

[17] Donagema GK, de Campos DVB, Calderano SB, Teixeira W, Viana J. Manual de métodos de análise de solo, 2011 2 Rio de Janeiro: Embrapa Solos.

[18] Evans JR, Jakobsen I, Ögren E. Photosynthetic light-response curves–2. Gradients of light absorption and photosynthetic capacity. Planta, 1993, 189: 191-200.

[19] Flexas J, Ribas-Carbo M, Bota J, Galmés J, Henkle M, Martínez-Cañellas S, Medrano H. Decreased Rubisco activity during water stress is not induced by decreased relative water content but related to conditions of low stomatal conductance and chloroplast CO₂ concentration. New Phytol, 2006, 172: 73-82.

[20] Friendly M, Sigal M. Recent advances in visualizing multivariate linear models. Rev Colomb Estat, 2014, 37: 261-283.

[21] Galmés J, Medrano H, Flexas J. Photosynthetic limitations in response to water stress and recovery in Mediterranean plants with different growth forms. New Phytol, 2007, 175: 81-93.

[22] Gittins R. Canonical analysis: a review with applications in ecology springer-v, 1985, Berlin: Spriger 360

[23] Grassi G, Magnani F. Stomatal, mesophyll conductance and biochemical limitations to photosynthesis as affected by drought and leaf ontogeny in ash and oak trees. Plant, Cell Environ, 2005, 28: 834-849.

[24] Hepworth C, Doheny-Adams T, Hunt L, Cameron D, Gray J. Manipulating stomatal density enhances drought tolerance without deleterious effect on nutrient uptake. New Phytol, 2015, 208: 336-341.

[25] Hura T, Hura K, Dziurka K, Ostrowska A, Baczek-Kwinta R, Grzesiak M. An increase in the content of cell wall-bound phenolics correlates with the productivity of triticale under soil drought. J Plant Physiol, 2012, 169: 1728-1736.

[26] IBÁ (2016) Annual Report 2016. In: INDÚSTRIA Bras. ÁRVORES. http://iba.org/images/shared/Biblioteca/IBA_RelatorioAnual2016_.pdf. Accessed 5 Oct 2017

[27] Iwasaki M, Paszkowski J, Freeling M. Epigenetic memory in plants. EMBO J, 2014, 33: 1987-1998.

[28] Jarvis PG, McNaughton KG. Stomatal control of transpiration: scaling up from leaf to region. Adv Ecol Res, 1986, 15: 1-49.

[29] Kadam NN, Yin X, Bindraban PS, Struik P, Jagadish K. Does morphological and anatomical plasticity during the vegetative stage make wheat more tolerant of water deficit stress than rice?. Plant Physiol, 2015, 167: 1389-1401.

[30] Kamakura M, Kosugi Y, Takanashi S, Tobita H, Uemura A, Utsugi H. Observation of the scale of patchy stomatal behavior in leaves of Quercus crispula using an Imaging-PAM chlorophyll fluorometer. Tree Physiol, 2012, 32: 839-846.

[31] Keenan TF, Hollinger DY, Bohrer G, Dragoni D, Munger G, Schimid H, Richardson A. Increase in forest water-use efficiency as atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations rise. Nature, 2013, 499: 324-327.

[32] Kinoshita T, Seki M. Epigenetic memory for stress response and adaptation in plants. Plant Cell Physiol, 2014, 55: 1859-1863.

[33] Kosugi Y, Takanashi S, Matsuo N, Nik AR. Midday depression of leaf CO₂ exchange within the crown of Dipterocarpus sublamellatus in a lowland dipterocarp forest in Peninsular Malaysia. Tree Physiol, 2009, 29: 505-515.

[34] Ladiges PY. Some aspects of tissue water relations in three populations of Eucalyptus viminalis labill. New Phytol, 1975, 75: 53-62.

[35] Le Gall H, Philippe F, Domon J-M, Gillet F, Pelloux J, Rayon C. Cell wall metabolism in response to abiotic stress. Plants, 2015, 4: 112-166.

[36] Li Y, Xu SS, Gao J, Pan S, Wang G. Chlorella induces stomatal closure via NADPH oxidase-dependent ROS production and its effects on instantaneous water use efficiency in Vicia faba. PLoS ONE, 2014 9 3 e93290

[37] Mansouri S, Radhouane L. Is stomatal density an ideal tool to explain drought effect on photosynthesis in tunisian barley varieties?. J Chem Biol Phys Sci, 2015, 5: 2865-2876.

[38] Maseda PH, Fernández RJ. Growth potential limits drought morphological plasticity in seedlings from six Eucalyptus provenances. Tree Physiol, 2015, 36: 243-251.

[39] Merchant A, Peuke AD, Keitel C, Macfarlane C, Warren C, Adams M. Phloem sap and leaf 13C, carbohydrates, and amino acid concentrations in Eucalyptus globulus change systematically according to flooding and water deficit treatment. J Exp Bot, 2010, 61: 1785-1793.

[40] Molinier J, Ries G, Zipfel C, Hohn B. Transgeneration memory of stress in plants. Nature, 2006, 442: 1046-1049.

[41] Peguero-Pina JJ, Sancho-Knapik D, Barrón E, Camarero J, Vilagrosa A, Gill-Pelegron E. Morphological and physiological divergences within Quercus ilex support the existence of different ecotypes depending on climatic dryness. Ann Bot, 2014, 114: 301-313.

[42] Peguero-Pina JJ, Sisó S, Sancho-Knapik D, Díaz-Espejo A, Flexas J, Galmés J, Gil-Pelegrín E. Leaf morphological and physiological adaptations of a deciduous oak (Quercus faginea Lam.) to the Mediterranean climate: a comparison with a closely related temperate species (Quercus robur L.). Tree Physiol, 2016, 36: 287-299.

[43] Prezotti LC, Gomes JA, Dadalto GG (2007) Manual de recomendação de calagem e adubação para o Estado do Espírito Santo: 5^a aproximação., INCAPER. Vitória

[44] R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing, 2017, Vienna: R foundation for statistical computing.

[45] Reynolds JF, Thornley JHM. A shoot:root partitioning model. Ann Bot, 1982, 49: 585-597.

[46] Ricardi MM, González RM, Zhong S, Domínguez P, Duffy T, Turjanski P, Salter J, Alleva K, Carrai F, Giovannoni J, Estévez J, Iusem N. Genome-wide data (ChIP-seq) enabled identification of cell wall-related and aquaporin genes as targets of tomato ASR1, a drought stress-responsive transcription factor. BMC Plant Biol, 2014, 14: 29.

[47] Steudle E. Water uptake by roots: effects of water deficit. J Exp Bot, 2000, 51: 1531-1542.

[48] Steudle E. Water uptake by plant roots: an integration of views. Plant Soil, 2000, 226: 45-56.

[49] Taiz L, Zeiger E. Plant Physiology, 2013 5 Porto Alegre: Artmed.

[50] Tezara W, Mitchell V, Driscoll SP, Lawlor DW. Effects of water deficit and its interaction with CO₂ supply on the biochemistry and physiology of photosynthesis in sunflower. J Exp Bot, 2002, 53: 1781-1791.

[51] Thimmanaik S, Kumar SG, Kumari GJ, Suryanarayana N, Sudhakar C. Photosynthesis and the enzymes of photosynthetic carbon reduction cycle in mulberry during water stress and recovery. Photosynthetica, 2002, 40: 233-236.

[52] Thumma BR, Sharma N, Southerton SG. Transcriptome sequencing of Eucalyptus camaldulensis seedlings subjected to water stress reveals functional single nucleotide polymorphisms and genes under selection. BMC Genom, 2012, 13: 364.

[53] Villar E, Klopp C, Noirot C, Novaes E, Kirst M, Plomion C, Gion J. RNA-Seq reveals genotype-specific molecular responses to water deficit in eucalyptus. BMC Genom, 2011, 12: 538.

[54] Warren CR, Aranda I, Cano FJ. Responses to water stress of gas exchange and metabolites in Eucalyptus and Acacia spp. Plant, Cell Environ, 2011, 34: 1609-1629.

[55] White DA, Crombie DS, Kinal J, Battaglia M, McGrath J, Mendham D, Walker S. Managing productivity and drought risk in Eucalyptus globulus plantations in south-western Australia. For Ecol Manage, 2009, 259: 33-44.

[56] Xu Z, Zhou G. Responses of leaf stomatal density to water status and its relationship with photosynthesis in a grass. J Exp Bot, 2008, 59: 3317-3325.

[57] Xu Z, Zhou G, Shimizu H. Plant responses to drought and rewatering. Plant Signal Behav, 2010, 5: 649-654.

[58] Zhou S, Medlyn B, Sabaté S, Sperlich D, Prectice J. Short-term water stress impacts on stomatal, mesophyll and biochemical limitations to photosynthesis differ consistently among tree species from contrasting climates. Tree Physiol, 2014, 34: 1035-1046.