Local perceptions of the conversion of cropland to forestland program in Jiangxi, Shaanxi, and Sichuan, China

Abstract

Numerous land-use policies have been implemented in China in recent decades for ecological restoration and conservation to reduce environmental disasters and promote environmental sustainability. Many of these policies follow a top-down approach to implementation and as such, emphasize the hierarchical control within government structures. An understanding of local perceptions of land-use policies is important if the disconnect between policy makers and the target population is to be reduced and if program support is to improve. This study aimed to help improve local implementation, attitude toward, and engagement by examining the influence of socio-economic characteristics on the target population’s (local farmers) perception of the conversion of cropland to forestland program (CFPP) land use policy in Jiangxi, Sichuan, and Shaanxi provinces. It uses logistical regression models, with robust aspects of perception including confidence, support, transparency, prospects, fairness, and willingness to participate. Results indicate that social aspects as well as economic aspects are most important in influencing farmers’ perceptions towards the CFPP. The farmers who have received technical support, rural male habitants, educated, and non-middle-aged farmers exhibit more positive perceptions of the program and are much more likely to support it, whereas farmers without any technical support or formal education, and female and middle-aged farmers are less likely to support the program. Importantly, this study also reveals the differences in responses, experiences and perceptions of the farmers living across different provinces. These empirical results provide insight into the influence of socio-economic characteristics on the perception of farmers towards land-use policies, which has important implications for designing targeted policy instruments and increasing farmer support for these policies. This knowledge can be harnessed and further evaluated in future research to improve citizen engagement, support, and understanding in order to help ecological restoration and conservation objectives be more effectively achieved.

Keywords

Forest policy / Ecological restoration / Local perception / Social sustainability / Land-use and change / China

References

[1] Bennett MT. China’s sloping land conversion program: institutional innovation or business as usual?. Ecol Econ, 2008, 65(4): 699-711.

[2] Bennett MT, Xie C, Hogarth NJ, Peng D, Putzel L. China’s Conversion of Cropland to Forest Program for household delivery of ecosystem services: how important is a local implementation regime to survival rate outcomes?. Forests, 2014, 5(9): 2345-2376.

[3] Cao S, Xu C, Chen L, Wang X. Attitudes of farmers in China’s northern Shaanxi Province towards the land-use changes required under the Grain for Green Project, and implications for the project’s success. Land-Use Policy, 2009, 26(4): 1182-1194.

[4] Choi YD. Theories for ecological restoration in changing environment: toward ‘futuristic’ restoration. Ecol Res, 2004, 19: 75-81.

[5] Delang CO, Wang W. Chinese forest policy reforms after 1998: the case of the Natural Forest Protection Program and the Slope Land Conversion Program. Int For Rev, 2013, 15(3): 290-304.

[6] Delang CO, Yuan Z. Farmers’ Compensation. China’s Grain for Green Program, 2015, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing 51 66

[7] DeLeon P, DeLeon L. What ever happened to policy implementation? An alternative approach. Publ Adm Res Theor, 2002, 12(4): 467-492.

[8] Dongmei Y, Aihua X, Zuhui H. A comparative analysis of Doppler radar products in Hail, Gale and short-time heavy rainfall in Jiangxi. Meteorological, 2007, 3: 006.

[9] Fang JQ, Xie ZR. Deforestation in preindustrial China: the Loess Plateau region as an example. Chemosphere, 1994, 29(5): 983-999.

[10] Feng L, Xu J. Farmers’ willingness to participate in the next-stage Grain-for-Green Project in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area, China. Environ Manag, 2015, 56(2): 505-518.

[11] He L, Tang Y. Soil development along primary succession sequences on moraines of Hailuogou Glacier, Gongga Mountain, Sichuan, China. CATENA, 2008, 72(2): 259-269.

[12] Heckman JJ. China’s human capital investment. China Econ Rev, 2005, 16(1): 50-70.

[13] Hua F, Wang X, Zheng X, Fisher B, Wang L, Zhu J, Wilcove DS. Opportunities for biodiversity gains under the world’s largest reforestation programme. Nat Commun, 2016, 7: 12717.

[14] Kim GS, Lim CH, Kim SJ, Lee J, Son Y, Lee WK. Effect of national-scale afforestation on forest water supply and soil loss in South Korea, 1971–2010. Sustainability, 2017 9 6 1017

[15] Koontz TM, Newig J. From planning to implementation: top-down and bottom-up approaches for collaborative watershed management. Policy Stud J, 2014, 42(3): 416-442.

[16] Leiserowitz A. Climate change risk perception and policy preferences: the role of affect, imagery, and values. Clim Change, 2006, 77(1): 45-72.

[17] Liang Y, Li S, Feldman MW, Daily GC. Does household composition matter? The impact of the Grain for Green Program on rural livelihoods in China. Ecol Econ, 2012, 75: 152-160.

[18] McFadden DL. Econometric analysis of qualitative response models. Handb Econom, 1984, 2: 1395-1457.

[19] Milder J, Scherr S, Bracer C. Trends and future potential of payment for ecosystem services to alleviate rural poverty in developing countries. Ecol Soc, 2010 15 2 4

[20] NBS (2015) [National Bureau of Statistics of China]. Number of Rural Households and Rural Population (Annual by Province), Retrieved from http://data.stats.gov.cn/english/easyquery.htm?cn=E0103

[21] NBS (2016) [National Bureau of Statistics of China]. Average Wage of Employed Persons in Urban Units, Agriculture, Forestry, Animal Husbandry and Fishery (yuan) (Annual by Province), Retrieved from http://data.stats.gov.cn/english/easyquery.htm?cn=E0103

[22] Park MS, Youn YC. Reforestation policy integration by the multiple sectors toward forest transition in the Republic of Korea. For Policy Econ, 2017, 76: 45-55.

[23] Peng H, Cheng G, Xu Z, Yin Y, Xu W. Social, economic, and ecological impacts of the “Grain for Green” project in China: a preliminary case in Zhangye, Northwest China. J Environ Manag, 2007, 85(3): 774-784.

[24] Qu M, Lin Y, Liu C, Yao S, Cao Y. Farmers’ perceptions of developing forest based bioenergy in China. Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 2016, 58: 581-589.

[25] Ravindranath NH, Chaturvedi RK, Murthy IK. Forest conservation, afforestation and reforestation in India: implications for forest carbon stocks. Curr Sci India, 2008, 95(2): 216-222.

[26] Rodríguez LG, Hogarth NJ, Zhou W, Xie C, Zhang K, Putzel L. China’s conversion of cropland to forest program: a systematic review of the environmental and socioeconomic effects. Environ Evid, 2016 5 1 21

[27] SFA (2003–2015) [State Forestry Administration]. Annual Reports for Monitoring and Assessment of the Socio-economic Impacts of China’s Key Forestry Programs. Beijing, China: China Forestry Publishing House, Section 3

[28] SFA (2014) [State Forestry Administration]. China Forestry Development Report. Beijing, China: China Forestry Publishing house, pp 24–41

[29] SFA (2017) [State Forestry Administration]. China Forestry Development Report. Beijing, China: China Forestry Publishing house, pp 362–365

[30] Shi S, Li Z, Wang H, Von Arx G, Lü Y, Wu X, Wang X, Liu G, Fu B. Roots of forbs sense climate fluctuations in the semi-arid Loess Plateau: herb-chronology based analysis. Sci Rep, 2016, 6: 28435.

[31] Sjögersten S, Atkin C, Clarke ML, Mooney SJ, Wu B, West HM. Responses to climate change and farming policies by rural communities in northern China: a report on field observation and farmers’ perception in dryland north Shaanxi and Ningxia. Land Use Policy, 2013, 32: 125-133.

[32] Smil V. China’s Past, China’s Future, 2004, London: Routledge 144

[33] Song C, Zhang Y, Mei Y, Liu H, Zhang Z, Zhang Q, Jagger P. Sustainability of forests created by China’s Sloping Land Conversion Program: a comparison among three sites in Anhui, Hubei and Shanxi. For Policy Econ, 2014, 38: 161-167.

[34] Su BD, Xiao B, Zhu DM, Jiang T. Trends in frequency of precipitation extremes in the Yangtze River basin, China: 1960–2003. Hydrol Sci J, 2005, 50(3): 479-492.

[35] Szumilas M. Explaining odds ratios. J Can Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry, 2010 19 3 227

[36] Uchida E, Xu J, Rozelle S. Grain for green: cost-effectiveness and sustainability of China’s conservation set-aside program. Land Econ, 2005, 81(2): 247-264.

[37] Uchida E, Rozelle S, Xu J. Conservation payments, liquidity constraints, and off-farm labor: impact of the Grain-for-Green Program on rural households in China. Am J Agric Econ, 2009, 91(1): 70-86.

[38] UNCCD (2006) [United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification (UNCCD). National Action Plan to Combat Desertification/Land degradation in the Democratic People’s Republic Korea (2006–2010). http://www.unccd.int/, pp 7, 10, 12, 16–18

[39] Vaidya A, Mayer AL. Use of the participatory approach to develop sustainability assessments for natural resource management. Int J Sust Dev World, 2014, 21(4): 369-379.

[40] Wang G. The development of China’s forestry sector and the opportunities for Canada, 2009, Canadian: International Council 9

[41] Wang C, Maclaren V. Evaluation of economic and social impacts of the sloping land conversion program: a case study in Dunhua County, China. For Policy Econ, 2012, 14(1): 50-57.

[42] Wang G, Innes JL, Lei JF, Dai S, Wu S. China’s forestry reforms. Science, 2007, 318: 1556-1557.

[43] Wang G, Innes JL, Wu S, Dai S. Towards a new paradigm: the development of China’s forestry in the 21st century. Int For Rev, 2008, 10(4): 619-631.

[44] Xu J, Yin R, Li Z, Liu C. China’s ecological rehabilitation: unprecedented efforts, dramatic impacts, and requisite policies. Ecol Econ, 2006, 57(4): 595-607.

[45] Xu JY, Liu WH, Chang J, Ma L. Exploring strategies about ecological improvement based on local responses in northern agro-pastoral ecotone. Acta Ecol Sin, 2010, 30(22): 6126-6134.

[46] Yanqiong Y, Guojie C, Hong F. Impacts of the “Grain for Green” project on rural communities in the Upper Min River Basin, Sichuan, China. Mt Res Dev, 2003, 23(4): 345-352.

[47] Yao S, Guo Y, Huo X. An empirical analysis of the effects of China’s land conversion program on farmers’ income growth and labor transfer. Environ Manag, 2010, 45(3): 502-512.

[48] Yin R, Yin G. China’s primary programs of terrestrial ecosystem restoration: initiation, implementation, and challenges. Environ Manag, 2010, 45(3): 429-441.

[49] Yin RS, Xu JT, Li Z, Liu C. China’s ecological rehabilitation: the unprecedented efforts and dramatic impacts of reforestation and slope protection in western China. China Environ Ser, 2005, 6: 17-32.

[50] Zhai DL, Xu JC, Dai ZC, Cannon CH, Grumbine RE. Increasing tree cover while losing diverse natural forests in tropical Hainan, China. Reg Environ Change, 2014, 14: 611-621.

[51] Zhang Q, Jiang T, Gemmer M, Becker S. Precipitation, temperature and runoff analysis from 1950 to 2002 in the Yangtze basin, China. Hydrol Sci J, 2005, 50(1): 65-80.

[52] Zhang L, Tu Q, Mol AP. Payment for environmental services: the sloping land conversion program in Ningxia autonomous region of China. China World Econ, 2008, 6(2): 66-81.

[53] Zhou ZC, Gan ZT, Shangguan ZP, Dong ZB. China’s Grain for Green Program has reduced soil erosion in the upper reaches of the Yangtze River and the middle reaches of the Yellow River. Int J Sustain Dev World, 2009, 16(4): 234-239.

[54] Zhu C (2014) Study on the Economic behaviour of rural households in the context of Grain for Green Project-based on empirical study of Southern Shaanxi. PhD Thesis. Nanjing: Nanjing Agriculture University, p 72

[55] Zong Y, Chen X. The 1998 flood on the Yangtze, China. Nat Hazards, 2000, 22: 165-184.