Does the root to shoot ratio show a hormetic response to stress? An ecological and environmental perspective

Evgenios Agathokleous , Regina G. Belz , Mitsutoshi Kitao , Takayoshi Koike , Edward J. Calabrese

Journal of Forestry Research ›› 2019, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (5) : 1569 -1580.

PDF
Journal of Forestry Research ›› 2019, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (5) : 1569 -1580. DOI: 10.1007/s11676-018-0863-7
Commentary

Does the root to shoot ratio show a hormetic response to stress? An ecological and environmental perspective

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Root/shoot (R/S) ratio is an important index for assessing plant health, and has received increased attention in the last decades as a sensitive indicator of plant stress induced by chemical or physical agents. The R/S ratio has been discussed in the context of ecological theory and its potential importance in ecological succession, where species follow different strategies for above-ground growth for light or below-ground competition for water and nutrients. We present evidence showing the R/S ratio follows a biphasic dose–response relationship under stress, typical of hormesis. The R/S ratio in response to stress has been widely compared among species and ecological succession classes. It is constrained by a variety of factors such as ontogeny. Furthermore, the current literature lacks dose–response studies incorporating the full dose–response continuum, hence limiting scientific understanding and possible valuable application. The data presented provide an important perspective for new-generation studies that can advance current ecological understanding and improve carbon storage estimates by R/S ratio considerations. Hormetic response of the R/S ratio can have an important role in forestry for producing seedlings with desired characteristics to achieve maximum health/productivity and resilience under plantation conditions.

Keywords

Biological plasticity / Biphasic response / Hormesis / Plant stress / Root/shoot ratio

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Evgenios Agathokleous, Regina G. Belz, Mitsutoshi Kitao, Takayoshi Koike, Edward J. Calabrese. Does the root to shoot ratio show a hormetic response to stress? An ecological and environmental perspective. Journal of Forestry Research, 2019, 30(5): 1569-1580 DOI:10.1007/s11676-018-0863-7

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Abbas T, Nadeem MA, Tanveer A, Zohaib A. Low doses of fenoxaprop-p-ethyl cause hormesis in littleseed canarygrass and wild oat. Planta Daninha, 2016, 34: 527-533.

[2]

Agathokleous E. Environmental hormesis, a fundamental non-monotonic biological phenomenon with implications in ecotoxicology and environmental safety. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf, 2018, 148: 1042-1053.

[3]

Agathokleous E, Kitao M. Ethylenediurea (EDU) induces hormesis in plants. Dose-Response, 2018, 16: 2.

[4]

Agathokleous E, Saitanis CJ, Wang X, Watanabe M, Koike T. A review study on past 40 years of research on effects of tropospheric O3 on belowground structure, functioning, and processes of trees: a linkage with potential ecological implications. Water Air Soil Pollut, 2016, 227: 33.

[5]

Agathokleous E, Kitao M, Calabrese EJ. Emission of volatile organic compounds from plants shows a biphasic pattern within an hormetic context. Environ Pollut, 2018, 239: 318-321.

[6]

Agathokleous E, Kitao M, Calabrese EJ. The rare earth element (REE) lanthanum (La) induces hormesis in plants. Environ Pollut, 2018, 238: 1044-1047.

[7]

Agathokleous E, Kitao M, Calabrese EJ. Human and veterinary pharmaceuticals induce hormesis in plants: scientific and regulatory issues and an environmental perspective. Environ Int, 2018, 120: 489-495.

[8]

Agathokleous E, Kitao M, Calabrese EJ. Biphasic effect of abscisic acid on plants: a hormetic viewpoint. Botany, 2018, 96: 637-642.

[9]

Agathokleous E, Belz RG, Calatayud V, De Marco A, Hoshika Y, Kitao M, Saitanis CJ, Sicard P, Paoletti E, Calabrese EJ. Predicting the effect of ozone on vegetation via the linear non-threshold (LNT), threshold and hormetic dose–response models. Sci Total Environ, 2019, 649: 61-74.

[10]

Agren GI, Franklin O. Root:shoot ratios, optimization and nitrogen productivity. Ann Bot, 2003, 92: 795-800.

[11]

Aikio S, Mari Markkola A. Optimality and phenotypic plasticity of shoot-to-root ratio under variable light and nutrient availabilities. Evolut Ecol, 2002, 16: 67-76.

[12]

An M, Johnson IR, Lovett JV. Mathematical modeling of allelopathy: biological response to allelochemicals and its interpretation. J Chem Ecol, 1993, 19: 2379-2388.

[13]

Anav A, De Marco A, Proietti C, Alessandri A, Dell’Aquila A, Cionni I, Friedlingstein P, Khvorostyanov D, Menut L, Paoletti E, Sicard P, Sitch S, Vitale M. Comparing concentration-based (AOT40) and stomatal uptake (PODY) metrics for ozone risk assessment to European forests. Glob Change Biol, 2016, 22: 1608-1627.

[14]

Bastien D, Philippe D, Alodie B, Marie-Laure F. How cadmium affects the fitness and the glucosinolate content of oilseed rape plantlets. Environ Exp Bot, 2018, 155: 185-194.

[15]

Belz RG, Duke SO. Duke SO, Kudsk P, Solomon K. Herbicide-Mediated Hormesis. Pesticide dose: effects on the environment and target and non-target organisms, 2017, Washington: American Chemical Society 135 148

[16]

Belz RG, Leberle C (2012) Low dose responses of different glyphosate formulations on plants. In: 25th German conference on weed biology and weed control, 13–15 March 2012. Julius-Kühn-Archiv, Braunschweig, pp 427–434

[17]

Belz RG, Piepho H-P. Modeling effective dosages in hormetic dose–response studies. PLoS ONE, 2012, 7: e33432.

[18]

Belz RG, Piepho HP. Variability of hormetic dose responses of the antiauxin PCIB on Lactuca sativa in a plant bioassay. Weed Res, 2013, 53: 418-428.

[19]

Belz RG, Piepho H-P. Statistical modeling of the hormetic dose zone and the toxic potency completes the quantitative description of hormetic dose responses. Environ Toxicol Chem, 2015, 34: 1169-1177.

[20]

Belz RG, Piepho H-P. Predicting biphasic responses in binary mixtures: pelargonic acid versus glyphosate. Chemosphere, 2017, 178: 88-98.

[21]

Belz RG, Cedergreen N, Sørensen H. Hormesis in mixtures—can it be predicted?. Sci Total Environ, 2008, 404: 77-87.

[22]

Belz RG, Patama M, Sinkkonen A. Low doses of six toxicants change plant size distribution in dense populations of Lactuca sativa. Sci Total Environ, 2018, 631–632: 510-523.

[23]

Bonifas KD, Walters DT, Cassman KG, Lindquist JL. Nitrogen supply affects root:shoot ratio in corn and velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti). Weed Sci, 2005, 53: 670-675.

[24]

Brain P, Cousens R. An equation to describe dose responses where there is stimulation of growth at low doses. Weed Res, 1989, 29: 93-96.

[25]

Calabrese EJ, Blain RB. Hormesis and plant biology. Environ Pollut, 2009, 157: 42-48.

[26]

Calabrese EJ, Blain RB. The hormesis database: the occurrence of hormetic dose responses in the toxicological literature. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol, 2011, 61: 73-81.

[27]

Cap MC, Eşen D. Effects of application date and rate of foliar-applied glyphosate on pine seedlings in Turkey. J For Res, 2018, 29: 583-591.

[28]

Cedergreen N. Herbicides can stimulate plant growth. Weed Res, 2008, 48: 429-438.

[29]

Cedergreen N, Ritz C, Streibig JC. Improved empirical models describing hormesis. Environ Toxicol Chem, 2005, 24: 3166-3172.

[30]

Cedergreen N, Streibig JC, Kudsk P, Mathiassen SM, Duke SO. The occurrence of hormesis in plants and algae. Dose Response, 2007, 5: 150-162.

[31]

Cedergreen N, Felby C, Porter JR, Streibig JC. Chemical stress can increase crop yield. Field Crops Res, 2009, 114: 54-57.

[32]

Chen L, Wang C, Dell B, Zhao Z, Guo J, Xu D, Zeng J. Growth and nutrient dynamics of Betula alnoides seedlings under exponential fertilization. J For Res, 2018, 29: 111-119.

[33]

d’Aquino L, de Pinto MC, Nardi L, Morgana M, Tommasi F. Effect of some light rare earth elements on seed germination, seedling growth and antioxidant metabolism in Triticum durum. Chemosphere, 2009, 75: 900-905.

[34]

Davidson RL. Effect of root/leaf temperature differentials on root/shoot ratios in some pasture grasses and clover. Ann Bot, 1969, 33: 561-569.

[35]

Davidson RL. Effects of soil nutrients and moisture on root/shoot ratios in Lolium perenne L. and Trifolium repens L. Ann Bot, 1969, 33: 571-577.

[36]

Diatloff E, Smith FW, Asher CJ. Rare earth elements and plant growth: III. Responses of corn and mungbean to low concentrations of cerium in dilute, continuously flowing nutrient solutions. J Plant Nutr, 1995, 18: 1991-2003.

[37]

Duke SO, Cedergreen N, Velini ED, Belz RG. Hormesis: is it an important factor in herbicide use and allelopathy?. Outlooks Pest Manag, 2006, 17: 29-33.

[38]

Durigan G, Melo ACG, Brewer JS. The root to shoot ratio of trees from open- and closed-canopy cerrado in south-eastern Brazil. Plant Ecol Divers, 2012, 5: 333-343.

[39]

Gedroc JJ, McConnaughay KDM, Coleman JS. Plasticity in root/shoot partitioning: optimal, ontogenetic, or both?. Funct Ecol, 1996, 10: 44.

[40]

Gorni PH, Pacheco AC. Growth promotion and elicitor activity of salicylic acid in Achillea millefolium L. Afr J Biotechnol, 2016, 15: 657-665.

[41]

Grantz DA, Gunn S, Vu H-B. O3 impacts on plant development: a meta-analysis of root/shoot allocation and growth. Plant Cell Environ, 2006, 29: 1193-1209.

[42]

Grossman JD, Rice KJ. Evolution of root plasticity responses to variation in soil nutrient distribution and concentration. Evol Appl, 2012, 5: 850.

[43]

He Y-W, Loh C-S. Cerium and lanthanum promote floral initiation and reproductive growth of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Sci, 2000, 159: 117-124.

[44]

Jin C, Chen Q, Sun R, Zhou Q, Liu J. Eco-toxic effects of sulfadiazine sodium, sulfamonomethoxine sodium and enrofloxacin on wheat, Chinese cabbage and tomato. Ecotoxicology, 2009, 18: 878-885.

[45]

Kajimoto T, Matsuura Y, Osawa A, Abaimov AP, Zyryanova OA, Isaev AP, Yefremov DP, Mori S, Koike T. Size-mass allometry and biomass allocation of two larch species growing on the continuous permafrost region in Siberia. For Ecol Manag, 2006, 222: 314-325.

[46]

Kleyer M, Minden V. Why functional ecology should consider all plant organs: an allocation-based perspective. Basic Appl Ecol, 2015, 16: 1-9.

[47]

Koike T, Kitao M, Quoreshi AM, Matsuura Y. Growth characteristics of root–shoot relations of three birch seedlings raised under different water regimes. Plant Soil, 2003, 255: 303-310.

[48]

Kress LW, Skelly JM. Response of several eastern forest tree species to chronic doses of ozone and nitrogen dioxide. Plant Dis, 1982, 66: 1149-1152.

[49]

Li X, Chen L, Forde BG, Davies WJ. The biphasic root growth response to abscisic acid in Arabidopsis involves interaction with ethylene and auxin signalling pathways. Front Plant Sci, 2017, 8: 1493.

[50]

Liang C, Wang W. Antioxidant response of soybean seedlings to joint stress of lanthanum and acid rain. Environ Sci Pollut Res, 2013, 20: 8182-8191.

[51]

Liu Y, Wang Y, Wang F, Liu Y, Cui J, Hu L, Mu K. Control effect of lanthanum against plant disease. J Rare Earths, 2008, 26: 115-120.

[52]

Liu Y, Chen X, Duan S, Feng Y, An M. Mathematical modeling of plant allelopathic hormesis based on ecological-limiting-factor models. Dose-Response, 2011, 9: 117-129.

[53]

Lohier T, Jabot F, Meziane D, Shipley B, Reich PB, Deffuant G. Explaining ontogenetic shifts in root–shoot scaling with transient dynamics. Ann Bot, 2014, 114: 513-524.

[54]

Luo W, Jiang Y, X, Wang X, Li M-H, Bai E, Han X, Xu Z. Patterns of plant biomass allocation in temperate grasslands across a 2500-km transect in Northern China. PLoS ONE, 2013, 8: e71749.

[55]

Ma Y, Zou H, Gu H, Shi D, Gao W, Zhang Y, Xie Y. Stimulatory effect of lanthanum nitrate on the root tuber yield of Pseudostellaria heterophylla via improved photosynthetic characteristics. J Rare Earths, 2017, 35: 610-620.

[56]

Mašková T, Herben T. Root:shoot ratio in developing seedlings: how seedlings change their allocation in response to seed mass and ambient nutrient supply. Ecol Evol, 2018, 8: 7143-7150.

[57]

Migliore L, Godeas F, De Filippis SP, Mantovi P, Barchi D, Testa C, Rubattu N, Brambilla G. Hormetic effect(s) of tetracyclines as environmental contaminant on Zea mays. Environ Pollut, 2010, 158: 129-134.

[58]

Migliore L, Rotini A, Cerioli NL, Cozzolino S, Fiori M. Phytotoxic antibiotic sulfadimethoxine elicits a complex hormetic response in the weed Lythrum salicaria L. Dose Response, 2010, 8: 414-427.

[59]

Minden V, Deloy A, Volkert AM, Leonhardt SD, Pufal G. Antibiotics impact plant traits, even at small concentrations. AoB Plants, 2017, 9: plx010.

[60]

Monk C. Ecological importance of root/shoot ratios. Bull Torrey Bot Club, 1966, 93: 402.

[61]

Pan M, Chu LM. Phytotoxicity of veterinary antibiotics to seed germination and root elongation of crops. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf, 2016, 126: 228-237.

[62]

Payne RJ, Dise NB, Stevens CJ, Gowing DJ, Partners BEGIN. Impact of nitrogen deposition at the species level. PNAS, 2013, 110: 984-987.

[63]

Reynolds HL, D’Antonio C. The ecological significance of plasticity in root weight ratio in response to nitrogen: opinion. Plant Soil, 1996, 185: 75-97.

[64]

Sanquetta CR, Corte APD, da Silva F. Biomass expansion factor and root-to-shoot ratio for Pinus in Brazil. Carb Bal Manag, 2011, 6: 6.

[65]

Schabenberger O, Birch JB. Statistical dose–response models with hormetic effects. Hum Ecol Risk Assess, 2001, 7: 891-908.

[66]

Schabenberger O, Tharp BE, Kells JJ, Penner D. Statistical tests for hormesis and effective dosages in herbicide dose response. Agron J, 1999, 91: 713-721.

[67]

Sicard P, Anav A, De Marco A, Paoletti E. Projected global ground-level ozone impacts on vegetation under different emission and climate scenarios. Atmos Chem Phys, 2017, 17: 12177-12196.

[68]

Sugai T, Kam D-G, Agathokleous E, Watanabe M, Kita K, Koike T. Growth and photosynthetic response of two larches exposed to O3 mixing ratios ranging from pre-industrial to near future. Photosynthetica, 2018, 56: 901-910.

[69]

US EPA. Strengthening transparency in regulatory science. Federal Regist, 2018, 83: 18768-18774.

[70]

Waman AA, Bohra P, Norman A. Chemical pre-treatments improve seed germination and seedling growth in Semecarpus kurzii: an ethnomedicinally important plant. J For Res, 2018, 29: 1283-1289.

[71]

Wang C-R, Tian Y, Wang X-R, Yu HX, Lu XW, Wang C, Wang H. Hormesis effects and implicative application in assessment of lead-contaminated soils in roots of Vicia faba seedlings. Chemosphere, 2010, 80: 965-971.

[72]

Wilson JB. A review of evidence on the control of shoot:root ratio, in relation to models. Ann Bot, 1988, 61: 433-449.

[73]

Wu P, Ma X, Tigabu M, Huang Y, Zhou L, Cai L, Hou X, Oden PC. Comparative growth, dry matter accumulation and photosynthetic rate of seven species of Eucalypt in response to phosphorus supply. J For Res, 2014, 25: 377-383.

[74]

Xiang W, Wu W, Tong J, Deng X, Tian D, Zhang L, Liu C, Peng C. Differences in fine root traits between early and late-successional tree species in a Chinese subtropical forest. Forestry, 2013, 89: 343-351.

[75]

Xie X, Zhou Q, He Z, Bao Y. Physiological and potential genetic toxicity of chlortetracycline as an emerging pollutant in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Environ Toxicol Chem, 2010, 29: 922-928.

[76]

Xie X, Zhou Q, Lin D, Guo J, Bao Y. Toxic effect of tetracycline exposure on growth, antioxidative and genetic indices of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Environ Sci Pollut Res, 2011, 18: 566-575.

[77]

Zangaro W, Lescano LEAM, Matsuura EM, Rondina ABL, Nogueira MA. Differences between root traits of early- and late-successional trees influence below-ground competition and seedling establishment. J Trop Ecol, 2016, 32: 300-313.

[78]

Zhou J, Guo L, Zhang J, Zhou S, Yang G, Zhao M, Huang L. Effects of LaCl3 on photosynthesis and the accumulation of tanshinones and salvianolic acids in Salvia miltiorrhiza seedlings. J Rare Earths, 2011, 29: 494-498.

[79]

Zobel M, Zobel K. Studying plant competition: from root biomass to general aims. J Ecol, 2002, 90: 578-580.

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

202

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/