Perspectives on protected area and wildfire management in the Black Sea region
George N. Zaimes , Petros A. Tsioras , Chrysovalantis Kiosses , Mustafa Tufekcioglu , Sergiy Zibtsev , Ilya Trombitsky , Razvan Uratu , Luiza Gevorgyan
Journal of Forestry Research ›› 2018, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (1) : 257 -268.
Perspectives on protected area and wildfire management in the Black Sea region
Protected areas are necessary for the conservation and enhancement of biodiversity. Wildfires are major threats to forests and other natural areas, because they may cause irreversible damages. The aim of this study was to analyze the perspective of experts (N = 284), from six countries of the Black Sea, on the current status and problems of protected areas and wildfires. Understanding their points of view could enhance future management on these issues in the region. Data collection was carried out for 9 months, using a web-based questionnaire. Wildfires were perceived as a serious problem in Turkey, Armenia and Greece but as a substantially less serious problem in Romania, Ukraine and Moldova. In Greece, Armenia, and especially Ukraine, the current designated protected areas are considered sufficient to maintain biodiversity, while in Romania, Turkey, and especially Moldova, more areas should be designated as protected. A major need in all countries (except for Turkey) is the increased use of information and communication technologies for both wildfire suppression and protected area management. Experts were divided on whether wildfire suppression and management of protected areas are interconnected. However, there is growing awareness of the adverse impacts of climate change in protected areas and the frequency of wildfires in the future. The most frequently suggested measures to alleviate these impacts were: changes in forest management and increasing public awareness for wildfire suppression, along with changes in forest management and increased staff training to enhance protected area conservation.
Climate change / Experts / Forested areas / Web-based questionnaires
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
European Commission (2015a) Natura 2000. In: Environment. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/natura2000/. Accessed 7 Sept 2014 |
| [15] |
European Commission (2015b) Biomass potential. In: Agriculture and Rural Development. http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/bioenergy/potential/index_en.htm. Accessed 4 Apr 2017 |
| [16] |
European Council (2009) Directive 2009/147/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 November 2009 on the Conservation of Wild Birds http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32009L0147. Accessed 7 Sept 2017 |
| [17] |
European Enviroment Agency (2017a) Climate change, impacts and vulnerability in Europe 2016. An indicator-based report. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, p 419. https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/climate-change-impacts-and-vulnerability-2016. Accessed 4 Nov 2017 |
| [18] |
European Enviroment Agency (2017b) Climate change adaptation and disaster risk reduction in Europe. Enhancing coherence of the knowledge base, policies and practices. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, p 172. https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/climate-change-adaptation-and-disaster. Accessed 4 Nov 2017 |
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
IPCC. |
| [28] |
IUCN (2005) Benefits beyond boundaries. In: Proceedings of the Vth IUCN World Parks Congress. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, p 306 |
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
|
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
|
| [40] |
|
| [41] |
San-Miguel-Ayanz J, Houston Durrant T, Boca R, Libertà G, Boccacci F, Di Leo M, López Pérez J, Schulte E, Benchikha A, Abbas M, Humer F, Konstantinov V, Pešut I, Szabo N, Papageorgiou K, Toumasis I, Kütt V, Kõiv K, Ruuska R, Anastasov T, Timovska M, Michaut P, Joannelle P, Lachmann M, Alexiou E, Debreceni P, Nagy D, Nugent C, Piccoli D, Micillo F, Colletti L, Di Fonzo M, Di Liberto F, Leisavnieks E, Mitri G, Glazko Z, Assali F, Alaoui M’harzi H, Botnen D, Piwnicki J, Szczygieł R, Janeira M, Borges A, Mara S, Sbirnea R, Eritsov A, Longauerová V, Jakša J, Enriquez E, Sandahl L, Reinhard M, Conedera M, Pezzatti B (2016) Forest fires in Europe, Middle East and North Africa 2015 Publications Office of the European Union, p 117 |
| [42] |
|
| [43] |
|
| [44] |
Silva JS, Rego F, Fernandes P, Rigolet E (2010) Towards integrated fire management—outcomes of the European project Fire Paradox. Research Report—European Forest Institute (EFI), p 229 |
| [45] |
|
| [46] |
|
| [47] |
|
| [48] |
|
| [49] |
|
| [50] |
|
| [51] |
|
| [52] |
|
| [53] |
|
| [54] |
|
| [55] |
|
| [56] |
|
| [57] |
|
| [58] |
|
| [59] |
Zaimes GN, Tufekcioglu M, Tufekcioglu A, Zibtsev S, Kaziolas D, Yavuz M, Trombitsky I, Emmanouloudis D, Uratu R, Ghulijanyan A, Borsuk A (2014) Innovative and sustainable use of stream water to suppress fires in protected areas: overview of the Streams-2-SUPPRESS-Fires Project. In: Proceedings of the International Caucasian Forestry Symposium. Artvin, Turkey, pp 345–353 |
| [60] |
Zaimes GN, Tufekcioglu M, Zibtsev S, Yavuz M, Emmanouloudis D, Kaziolas D, Corobov R, Uratu R, Ghulijanyan A, Borsuk A, Trombitsky I (2015) Developing a holistic and complete approach for wildfire suppression for the Black Sea region. In: International forest fire conference in Black Sea region. Kastamonu, Turkey, pp 9–18 |
| [61] |
Zibtsev S, Mitsopoulos I, Mallinis G, Saglam B, Borsuk A, Zaimes GN, Yavuz M, Galupa D, Emmanouloudis D, Uratu R, Moisei R, Ghulijanyan A (2013) Wildland fires in the Black Sea region: Impact, management and needs for innovative technologies. Earth Bioresources and Life Quality. https://nubip.edu.ua/sites/default/files/u98/WILD%20LAND%20FIRES%20IN%20THE%20BLACK%20SEA%20REGION.pdf. Accessed 1 Oct 2017 |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |