Wildfire effects on permafrost and soil moisture in spruce forests of Interior Alaska

Abstract

In the summer of 2015, hundreds of forest fires burned across the state of Alaska. Several uncontrolled wildfires near the town of Tanana on the Yukon River were responsible for the largest portion of the area burned statewide. In July 2017, field measurements were carried out in both unburned and burned forested areas nearly adjacent to one another, all within 15 miles of the village of Tanana. These surveys were used to first visually verify locations of different burn severity classes, (low, moderate, or high), estimated in 2016 from Landsat images (collected before and after the 2015 Tanana-area wildfires). Surface and soil profile measurements to 30-cm depth at these same locations were collected for evidence of moss layer and forest biomass burning. Soil temperature and moisture content were measured to 30-cm depth, and depth to permafrost was estimated by excavation wherever necessary. Digital thermal infra-red images of the soil profiles were taken at each site location, and root-zone organic layer samples were extracted for further chemical analysis. Results supported the hypothesis that the loss of surface organic layers is a major factor determining post-fire soil water and temperature changes and the depth of permafrost thawing. In the most severely burned forest sites, complete consumption of the living moss organic layer was strongly associated with both warming at the surface layer and increases in soil water content, relative to unburned forest sites. Soil temperatures at both 10-cm and 30-cm depths at burned forest sites were higher by 8–10 °C compared to unburned sites. Below 15 cm, temperatures of unburned sites dropped gradually to frozen levels by 30 cm, while soil temperatures at burned sites remained above 5 °C to 30-cm depth. The water content measured at 3 cm at burned sites was commonly in excess of 30% by volume, compared to unburned sites. The strong correlation between burn index values and depth to permafrost measured across all sites sampled in July 2017 showed that the new ice-free profile in severely burned forest areas was commonly 50-cm deeper than in unburned soils.

Keywords

Alaska / Landsat / Permafrost / RdNBR / Soil temperature / Soil water / Wildfire

References

[1] Abbott BW, Jones JB, Schuur EAG Biomass offsets little or none of permafrost carbon release from soils, streams, and wildfire: an expert assessment. Environ Res Lett, 2016, 11: 034014.

[2] Alaska Department of Natural Resources (ADNR) (2014) Yukon Tanana Area Plan, Division of Mining, Land & Water Resource Assessment & Development Section, Adopted Jan 2014, Anchorage, Alaska

[3] Alaska Interagency Coordination Center (AICC) (2015) Fire season weather summary. https://fire.ak.blm.gov/. Accessed Aug 2017

[4] Alaska Interagency Fire Effects Task Group (FETG) (2007) Fire effects monitoring protocol (version 1.0). Editors: J. Allen, K. Murphy, R. Jandt

[5] Alaska Public Media (2015) July 6—Five Fires Threaten Tanana on the Yukon. Accessed 30 July 2015

[6] Barrett K, McGuire AD, Hoy EE, Kasischke ES. Potential shifts in dominant forest cover in interior Alaska driven by variations in fire severity. Ecol Appl, 2011, 21: 2380-2396.

[7] Brinkman TJ, Hansen WD, Chapin FS III, Kofina G, BurnSilver S, Rupp TS. Arctic communities perceive climate impacts on access as a critical challenge to availability of subsistence resources. Clim Change, 2016, 139(3–4): 413-427.

[8] Brown RJE. Permafrost in Canada, 1970, Toronto: University of Toronto Press

[9] Brown RN, Jorgenson MT, Kielland K, Verbyla DL, Praka A, Koch JC. Landscape effects of wildfire on permafrost distribution in Interior Alaska derived from remote sensing. Remote Sens, 2016 8 8 654

[10] Eidenshink J, Schwind B, Brewer K, Zhu Z, Quayle B, Howard S. A project for monitoring trends in burn severity. Fire Ecol, 2007, 3(1): 3-21.

[11] Fairbanks Daily News-Miner (2015) Interior fortunate with summer fires: Weather, efforts of crews and residents help slow blazes. Accessed 30 July 2015

[12] Harden JW, Manies KL, Turetsky MR, Neff JC. Effects of wildfire and permafrost on soil organic matter and soil climate in interior Alaska. Glob Change Biol, 2006, 12(12): 2391-2403.

[13] InciWeb (2015) Tanana Area Fires Update, July 24. https://inciweb.nwcg.gov/incident/article/4324/26203/. Accessed 30 July 2015

[14] Jiang Y, Rocha AV, O’Donnell JA, Drysdale JA, Rastetter EB, Shaver GR, Zhuang Q. Contrasting soil thermal responses to fire in Alaskan tundra and boreal forest. J Geophys Res Earth Surf, 2015, 120: 363-378.

[15] Johnstone JF, Chapin FS III, Hollingsworth TN, Mack MC, Romanovsky V, Turetsky M. Fire, climate change, and forest resilience in interior Alaska. Can J For Res, 2010, 40: 1302-1312.

[16] Jorgenson MT, Romanovsky V, Harden J, Shur Y, O’Donnell J, Schuur EAG, Kanevskiy M, Marchenko S. Resilience and vulnerability of permafrost to climate change. Can J For Res, 2010, 40: 1219-1236.

[17] Kasischke ES, Johnstone JF. Variation in post-fire organic layer thickness in a black spruce forest complex in interior Alaska and its effects on soil temperature and moisture. Can J For Res, 2005, 35: 2164-2177.

[18] Kasischke ES, Turetsky MR. Recent changes in the fire regime across the North American boreal region: spatial and temporal patterns of burning across Canada and Alaska. Geophys Res Lett, 2006, 33: L09703.

[19] Kasischke ES, Verbyla DL, Rupp TS, McGuire AD, Murphy KA, Jandt R, Barnes JL, Hoy EE, Duffy PA, Calef M, Turetsky MR. Alaska’s changing fire regime—implications for the vulnerability of its boreal forests. Can J For Res, 2010, 40: 1313-1324.

[20] Key CH, Benson NC (2006) Landscape Assessment. In: Lutes DC, Keane RE, Carati JF, Key CH, Benson NC, Gangi LJ (eds) ‘FIREMON: fire effects monitoring and inventory system. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountains Research Station General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-164-CD, Fort Collins, CO, pp LA-1-55

[21] Koch JC, Kikuchi CP, Wickland KP, Schuster P. Runoff sources and flow paths in a partially burned, upland boreal catchment underlain by permafrost. Water Resour Res, 2014, 50: 8141-8158.

[22] Lehmann E. Nonparametrics: statistical methods based on ranks, 2006, New York: Springer.

[23] Nossov DR, Jorgenson MT, Kielland K, Kanevskiy MZ. Edaphic and microclimatic controls over permafrost response to fire in interior Alaska. Environ Res Lett, 2013, 8: 035013.

[24] Pastick NJ, Jorgenson MT, Wylie BK, Nield SJ, Johnson KD, Finley AO. Distribution of near-surface permafrost in Alaska: estimates of present and future conditions. Remote Sens Environ, 2015, 168: 301-315.

[25] Turetsky MR, Kane ES, Harden JW, Ottmar RD, Manies KL, Hoy E, Kasischke E. Recent acceleration of biomass burning and carbon losses in Alaskan forests and peatlands. Nat Geosci, 2011, 4: 27-31.

[26] United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) (1999) Soil Survey of Upper Tanana Area. United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service in cooperation with the University of Alaska Fairbanks, Agricultural and Forestry Experiment Station, and the State of Alaska Department of Natural Resources

[27] United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) (2015) Fire Management Annual Report, FY2015. https://www.fws.gov/fire/program_statistics/2015/. Accessed Aug 2017

[28] Viereck L. Wein RW, MacLean DA. The effects of fire in Black Spruce Ecosystems of Alaska and Northern Canada. The role of fire in northern circumpolar ecosystems, 1983, Chichester: Wiley 201 220

[29] Viereck LA, Dyrness CT, Batten AR, Wenzlick KJ (1992) The Alaska vegetation classification. General Technical Reports PNW-GTR-286. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, OR