Estimating oak forest parameters in the western mountains of Iran using satellite-based vegetation indices
Adel Nouri , Bahman Kiani , Mohammad Hossein Hakimi , Mohammad Hossein Mokhtari
Journal of Forestry Research ›› 2018, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (2) : 541 -552.
Remote sensing is an important tool for studying and modeling forest stands. Vegetation indices obtained from Landsat-8 remotely sensed data were used to estimate the forest parameters in the western mountains of Iran. Thirty-four sample points were selected on the map of Bayangan County, Kermanshah province, Iran. At each point, a cluster of five rectangular plots of 8100 m2 and 200 m apart was established. Some clusters were primarily sampled to determine the variance of the forest parameters. The coefficient of variation was used as a criterion for sample allocation. Stand density, canopy cover and basal area per hectare were calculated for each plot. Vegetation indices were extracted from the Landsat-8 images for each plot. Simple linear and nonlinear regressions were conducted to develop the models. The models were validated using an independent data set. Stability of model parameters was statistically evaluated. The results showed that Normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) and Transformed normalized difference vegetation index (TNDVI) followed by Simple ratio vegetation index (SRVI) were the best predictors, explaining up to 91% of the variations with high precision. For NDVI, Soil adjusted vegetation index 2 (SAVI2) and SRVI, the cubic model was more appropriate than the linear model for predicting the forest parameters. For this model, the R-square value increased while NRMSE decreased significantly. For Infrared percentage vegetation index (IPVI), the quadratic model was better, but, for other vegetation indices, nonlinear models were not superior to linear ones. Finally, it can be concluded that Landsat-8 imagery is suitable for predicting forest parameters in the oak forests of western Iran. Of course, large plots must be selected, and pre-classification is necessary to gain accurate and precise estimations.
Basal area / Canopy cover / Density / Landsat-8 / Modeling
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
Deering DW, Rouse JW, Haas RH, Schell JA (1975) Measuring forage production of grazing units from Landsat MSS data. In: Proceedings of the 10th international symposium on remote sensing of environment, vol. II, pp 1169–1178 |
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
Gunlu A, Ercanli I, Sengurt M, Tezcan Yayla A (2012) Modeling stand volume using Landsat TM data for fir stands (Abies bornmuelleriana) located in Buyukuz planning unit, Turkey. J Kast For 65–71 |
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
Hudak AT, Evans JS, Falkowski MJ, Crookston NL, Gessler PE, Morgan P, Smith AMS (2005) Predicting plot basal area and tree density in mixed-conifer forest from LIDAR and Advanced Land Imager (ALI) data. In: Proceedings of the 26th Canadian symposium on remote sensing in Wolfville, 14–16 June, Nova Scotia, pp 201–208 |
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
Kiani B (2015) Applying modern statistics in natural resources, Yazd University Publications, p 522 |
| [22] |
Kiani B (2017) Forest biometrics: sampling designs and measurement methods in forest sciences. Pelk Publications, Tehran, p 464 |
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
Renoud GH, Darvishsefat AA, Namiranian M (2015) Evaluation of Capability of Landsat 8 data for predicting basal area of Iranian Beach forests (case study: Kheirood forest). In: First national conference on spatial engineering, Tehran University, p 9 |
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
Rouse JW, Haas RH, Schell JA, Deering DW (1973) Monitoring vegetation systems in the Great Plains with ERTS. In: Third ERTS symposium, NASA SP-351, vol I, pp 309–317 |
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
|
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
|
| [40] |
|
| [41] |
|
| [42] |
USGS (2016) Landsat 8 data users handbook, 106 p. https://landsat.usgs.gov/landsat-8-l8-data-users-handbook. Accessed 23 June 2018 |
| [43] |
|
| [44] |
|
| [45] |
|
| [46] |
|
| [47] |
|
| [48] |
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |