Leaf area index estimated by direct, semi-direct, and indirect methods in European beech and sycamore maple stands

Abstract

Leaf area index (LAI) is one of the most important characteristics of forest stands that affects the fundamentals of tree physiological processes, biomass production, and mechanical stability. The LAI results obtained by the semi-direct and indirect methods (the needle technique and an LAI-2000 PCA) in three European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) stands and one sycamore maple (Acer pseudoplatanus L.) stand were compared with LAI estimated by litter traps during the 2013 growing season. Seasonal LAI was estimated using an LAI-2000 PCA which showed similar trends among the stands and strongly corresponded to phenological phases of deciduous stands in Europe, with the fastest rate of leaf area increment occurring during the first month following bud break. During the growing season, maximum stand LAI value was on June 19th and reached 4.5–5.1, and 4.0 in the beech and maple stands, respectively. The needle technique significantly underestimated (p < 0.05) direct LAI on average by 22.0% and 40.0% in the beech and maple stands, respectively. The LAI-2000 PCA insignificantly underestimated (p > .05) LAI on average by 15.1% and 5.8% in the beech and maple stands, respectively. All methods for LAI estimation at the stand level could be applicable in deciduous forest stands (beech, maple) with similar site and stand characteristics. However, calibration by direct method is necessary to obtain the required precision.

Keywords

Leaf area index / Specific leaf area / Litter trap / Needle technique / LAI-2000 PCA

References

[1] Anderson MC. Sestak Z, Catsky J, Jarvis PG. Radiation and crop structure. Plant photosynthetic production: manual of methods, 1971, Hague: Junk.

[2] Bartelink HH. Allometric relationships for biomass and leaf area of beech (Fagus sylvatica L.). Ann For Sci, 1997, 54(1): 39-50.

[3] Battaglia M, Cherry ML, Beadle CL, Sands PJ, Hingston A. Prediction of leaf area index in eucalypt plantations: effect of water stress and temperature. Tree Physiol, 1998, 18: 521-528.

[4] Behera SK, Behera MD, Tuli R. An indirect method of estimating leaf area index in a tropical deciduous forest of India. Ecol Ind, 2015, 58: 356-364.

[5] Bequet R (2011) Environmental determinants of the temporal and spatial variability in leaf area index of Fagus sylvatica L., Quercus robur L., and Pinus sylvestris L. Dissertation, University of Antwerp

[6] Botkin DB (1986) Remote sensing of the biosphere. National Academy of Sciences, Report of the Committee on Planetary Biology. National Research Council, Washington, DC

[7] Bréda NJJ. Ground-based measurements of leaf area index: a review of methods, instruments and current controversies. J Exp Bot, 2003, 54: 2403-2417.

[8] Bréda NJJ, Granier A. Intra- and interannual variations of transpiration. Leaf area index and radial growth of a sessile oak stand (Quercus petraea). Ann For Sci, 1996, 53(2–3): 521-536.

[9] Čater M, Schmid I, Kazda M. Instantaneous and potential radiation effect on underplanted European beech below Norway spruce canopy. Eur J For Res, 2013, 132: 23-32.

[10] Čermák J. Leaf area distribution in large trees and stands of the floodplain forest in southern Moravia. Tree Physiol, 1998, 18(11): 727-737.

[11] Chason JW, Baldocchi DD, Huston MA. A comparison of direct and indirect methods for estimating forest canopy leaf area. Agric For Meteorol, 1991, 57(1–3): 107-128.

[12] Chen JM, Black TA. Measuring leaf area index of plant canopies with branch architecture. Agric For Meteorol, 1991, 57(1–3): 1-12.

[13] Chen JM, Cihlar J. Plant canopy gap-size analysis theory for improving optical measurements of leaf-area index. Appl Opt, 1995, 34(27): 6211-6222.

[14] Chen JM, Cihlar J. Quantifying the effect of canopy architecture on optical measurements of leaf area index using two gap size analysis methods. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens, 1995, 33(3): 777-787.

[15] Chianucci F, Salvati L, Giannini T, Chiavetta U, Corona P, Cutini A. Long-term response to thinning in a beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) coppice stand under conversion to high forest in Central Italy. Silva Fennica, 2016

[16] Coder KD. Drought damage to trees, 1999, Athens: University of Georgia, FOR99-007.

[17] Cutini A, Matteucci G, Mugnoza GS. Estimation of leaf area index with the Li-Cor LAI 2000 in deciduous forests. For Ecol Manage, 1998, 105(1–3): 55-65.

[18] Dufrêne E, Bréda NJJ. Estimation of deciduous forest leaf area index using direct and indirect methods. Oecologia, 1995, 104(2): 156-162.

[19] Eckrich CA, Flaherty EA, Ben-David M. Estimating leaf area index in Southeast Alaska: a comparison of two techniques. PLoS ONE, 2013 8 11 e77642

[20] Eriksson H, Eklundh L, Hall K, Lindroth A. Estimating LAI in deciduous forest stands. Agric For Meteorol, 2005, 129(1–2): 27-37.

[21] Eschenbach C, Kappen L. Leaf area index determination in an alder forest: a comparison of three methods. J Exp Bot, 1996, 47(9): 1457-1462.

[22] Fassnacht KS, Gower ST, Norman JM, McMurtrie RE. A comparison of optical and direct methods for estimating foliage surface area index in forests. Agric For Meteorol, 1994, 71(1–2): 183-207.

[23] Filewod B, Thomas SC. Impacts of a spring heat wave on canopy processes in a northern hardwood forest. Glob Chang Biol, 2014, 20(2): 360-371.

[24] Finotti R, Rodrigues FS, Cerqueira R, Vinícius VM. A method to determine the minimum number of litter traps in litterfall studies. Biotropica, 2003, 35(3): 419-421.

[25] Garnier E, Shipley B, Roumet C, Laurent G. A standardized protocol for the determination of specific leaf area and leaf dry matter content. Funct Ecol, 2001, 15: 688-695.

[26] Garrigues S, Shabanov NV, Swanson K, Morisette JT, Baret F, Myneni RB. Intercomparison and sensitivity analysis of leaf area index retrievals from LAI-2000, AccuPAR, and digital hemispherical photography over croplands. Agric For Meteorol, 2008, 148: 1193-1209.

[27] Giagli K, Veteška O, Vavrčík H, Gryc V. Monitoring of seasonal dynamics in two age-different European beech stands. Wood Res, 2015, 60(6): 1005-1016.

[28] Gond V, de Pury DGG, Veroustraete F, Ceulemans R. Seasonal variations in leaf area index, leaf chlorophyll, and water content; scaling up to estimate fAPAR and carbon balance in a multilayer, multispecies temperate forest. Tree Physiol, 1999, 19: 673-679.

[29] Goodall DW. Some considerations in the use of point quadrats for the analysis of vegetation. Aust J Biol Sci, 1952, 5(1): 1-41.

[30] Gower ST, Norman JM. Rapid estimation of leaf area index in conifer and broad-leaf plantations. Ecology, 1991, 72(5): 1896-1900.

[31] Gower ST, Kucharik CJ, Norman JM. Direct and indirect estimation of leaf area index, fAPAR, and net primary production of terrestrial ecosystems. Remote Sens Environ, 1999, 70(1): 29-51.

[32] Holst T, Hauser S, Kirchgäßner A, Matzarakis A, Mayer H, Schindler D. Measuring and modelling plant area index in beech stands. Int J Biometeorol, 2004, 48: 192-201.

[33] Homolová L, Lukeš P, Malenovský Z, Lhotáková Z, Kaplan V, Hanuš J. Measurement methods and variability assessment of the Norway spruce total leaf area: implications for remote sensing. Trees-Struct Funct, 2013, 27(1): 111-121.

[34] Jonckheere I, Fleck S, Nackaerts K, Muys B, Coppin P, Weiss M, Baret F. Review of methods for in situ leaf area index determination. Part I. Theories, sensors, and hemispherical photography. Agric For Meteorol, 2004, 121(1–2): 19-35.

[35] Jurik TW, Briggs GM, Gates DM. A comparison of four methods for determining leaf area index in successional hardwood forests. Can J For Res, 1985, 15(6): 1154-1158.

[36] Krupková L, Marková I, Havránková K, Pokorný R, Urban O, Šigut L, Pavelka M, Cienciala E, Marek MV. Comparison of different approaches of radiation use efficiency of biomass formation estimation in Mountain Norway spruce. Trees-Struct Funct, 2017, 31(1): 325-337.

[37] Kucharik CJ, Norman JM, Gower ST. Measurements of branch area and adjusting leaf area index indirect measurements. Agric For Meteorol, 1998, 91(1–2): 69-88.

[38] Küßner R, Mosandl R. Comparison of direct and indirect estimation of leaf area index in mature Norway spruce stands of eastern Germany. Can J For Res, 2000, 30(3): 440-447.

[39] Lang ARG, McMurtrie RE, Benson ML. Validity of surface area indices of Pinus radiata estimated of the sun´s beam. Agric For Meteorol, 1991, 57: 157-170.

[40] Le Dantec V, Dufrêne E, Saugier B. Interannual and spatial variation in maximum leaf area index of temperate deciduous stands. For Ecol Manage, 2000, 134(1–3): 71-81.

[41] LI-COR Bioscience, USA (1991) LAI-2000 Plant Canopy Analyzer. Instruction manual, 179 p

[42] Majasalmi T, Rautiainen M, Stenberg P, Rita H. Optimizing the sampling scheme for LAI-2000 measurements in a boreal forest. Agric For Meteorol, 2012, 154–155: 38-43.

[43] Marshall JD, Waring RH. Comparison of methods of estimating leaf-area index in old-growth Douglas-fir. Ecology, 1986, 97(4): 975-979.

[44] Mason EG, Diepstraten M, Pinjuv GL, Lasserre JP. Comparison of direct and indirect leaf area index measurements of Pinus radiata D. Don. Agric For Meteorol, 2012, 166–167: 113-119.

[45] McShane MC, Carlile DW, Hinds WT. The effect of collector size on forest litter-fall collection and analysis. Can J For Res, 1983, 13(6): 1037-1042.

[46] Menšík L, Kulhavý J, Kantor P, Remeš M. Humus conditions of stands with different proportion of Douglas fir in the Hůrky Training Forest District and Křtiny Training Forest Enterprise. J For Sci, 2009, 55(8): 345-356.

[47] Michelot A, Bréda NJJ, Damesin C, Dufrêne E. Differing growth responses to climatic variations and soil water deficits of Fagus sylvatica, Quercus petraea and Pinus sylvestris in a temperate forest. For Ecol Manage, 2012, 265: 161-171.

[48] Morrison IK. Effect of trap dimensions on litter-fall collected in an Acer saccharum stand in northern Ontario. Can J For Res, 1991, 21(6): 939-941.

[49] Mussche S, Samson R, Nachtergale L, De Schrijver A, Lemeur R, Lust N. A comparison of optical and direct methods for monitoring the seasonal dynamics of leaf area index in deciduous forests. Silva Fennica, 2001, 35(4): 373-384.

[50] Neumann HH, Hartog GD, Shaw RH. Leaf area measurements based on hemispheric photographs and leaf-litter collection in a deciduous forest during autumn leaf-fall. Agric For Meteorol, 1989, 45(3–4): 325-345.

[51] Nizinski JJ, Saugier B. A model of leaf budding and development for a mature Quercus forest. J Appl Ecol, 1988, 25(2): 643-655.

[52] Norman JM. Ehleringer J, Fields C. Scaling processes between leaf and canopy levels. Scaling processes between leaf and landscape levels, 1992, San Diego: Academic Press 41 76

[53] Norman JM, Campbell GS. Pearcy RW, Mooney HA, Ehrelinger JR, Rundel PW. Canopy structure. Physiological plant ecology: field methods and instrumentation, 1989, London: Chapman and Hall.

[54] Olivas PC, Oberbauer SF, Clark DB, Clark DA, Ryan MG, O´Brien JJ, Ordoñez H. Comparison of direct and indirect methods for assessing leaf area index across a tropical rain forest landscape. Agric For Meteorol, 2013, 177: 110-116.

[55] Pokorný R, Marek MV. Test of accuracy of LAI estimation by LAI-2000 under artificially changed leaf to wood area proportions. Biol Plant, 2000, 43(4): 537-544.

[56] Pokorný R, Opluštilová M. Leaf area index and its development in selected spruce and beech stands in the Ore Mountains. J For Sci, 1999, 45(4): 192-196.

[57] Pokorný R, Stojnič S. Leaf area index of Norway spruce stands in relation to age and defoliation. Beskydy, 2012, 5(2): 173-180.

[58] Pokorný R, Tomaskova I, Havrankova K. Temporal variation and efficiency of leaf area index in young mountain Norway spruce stand. Eur J For Res, 2008, 127–5: 359-367.

[59] Ross J. The radiation regime and architecture of plant stands, 1981, Hague: Junk

[60] Running SW, Nemani RR, Peterson DL, Band LE, Potts DF, Pierce LL, Spanner MA. Mapping regional forest evapotranspiration and photosynthesis by coupling satellite data with ecosystem simulation. Ecology, 1989, 70(4): 1090-1101.

[61] Saigusa N, Yamamoto S, Murayama S, Kondo H, Nishimura N. Gross primary production and net ecosystem exchange of a cool-temperate deciduous forest estimated by the eddy covariance method. Agric For Meteorol, 2002, 112(3–4): 203-215.

[62] Sampson DA, Allen HL. Direct and indirect estimates of leaf area index (LAI) for lodgepole and loblolly pine stands. Trees-Struct Funct, 1995, 9(3): 119-122.

[63] Thimonier A, Sedivy I, Schleppi P. Estimating leaf area index in different types of mature forest stands in Switzerland: a comparison of methods. Eur J For Res, 2010, 129(4): 543-562.

[64] Viewegh J, Kusbach A, Mikeska M. Czech forest ecosystem classification. J For Sci, 2003, 49(2): 74-82.

[65] Vile D, Garnier E, Shipley B, Laurent G, Navas ML, Roumet C, La Vorel S, Díaz S, Hodgson JG, Lloret F, Midgley GF, Poorter H, Rutherford MC, Wilson PJ, Wright IJ. Specific leaf area and dry matter content estimate thickness in laminar leaves. Ann Bot, 2005, 96: 1129-1136.

[66] Warren Wilson J. Analysis of the spatial distribution of foliage by two-dimensional point quadrats. New Phytol, 1959, 58(1): 92-99.

[67] Warren Wilson J. Inclined point quadrats. New Phytol, 1960, 59(1): 1-7.

[68] Warren Wilson J. Estimation of foliage denseness and foliage angle by inclined point quadrants. Aust J Bot, 1963, 11(1): 95-105.

[69] Watson DJ. Comparative physiological studies in the growth of field crops: I. Variation in net assimilation rate and leaf area between species and varieties, and within and years. Ann Bot, 1947, 11(41): 41-76.

[70] Wittwer S (1983) Land related global habitability science issues. NASA Technical Memorandum Number 85841. National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, DC

[71] Urban J, Bednářová E, Plichta R, Gryc V, Vavrčík H, Hacura J, Fajstavr M, Kučera J. Links between phenology and ecophysiology in a European beech forest. iForest, 2014, 8: 438-447.

[72] Yang Y, Yanai RD, See CR, Arthur MA. Sampling effort and uncertainty in leaf litterfall mass and nutrient flux in northern hardwood forests. Ecosphere, 2017 8 11 e01999

[73] Zvereva EL, Zverev V, Kozlov MV. Little strokes fell great oaks: minor but chronic herbivory substantially reduces birch growth. Oikos, 2012, 152: 2036-2044.