Urban land-use impacts on composition and spatiotemporal variations in abundance and biomass of earthworm community

Abstract

Soil fauna can sensitively respond to alterations in soil environment induced by land-use changes. However, little is known about the impact of urban land-use changes on earthworm communities. In this study, three land-use types (i.e., forest, nursery and abandoned lands) were chosen to identify differences in diversity, abundance and biomass of earthworm community in Kunming City. Urban land-use had a pronounced difference in species composition, evenness and diversity of earthworm communities. Forest land had the highest density, biomass and diversity of the earthworm communities. Total abundance was dominated by endogeic species in nursery land (70%) and abandoned land (80%), whereas in the forest land, the earthworm community comprised epigeic, endogeic and anecic species. Temporal changes in earthworm density and biomass were also significantly affected by land-use change. Total density and biomass of earthworms in the forest and nursery lands were highest in September, but highest in the abandoned land in October. The influence of soil physicochemical properties on the earthworm density and biomass also varied with land-use types. Soil temperature significantly affected earthworm density and biomass in the three land-use types. Soil pH was positively correlated with earthworm biomass in the forest land, but negatively associated with earthworm density in the abandoned land. Soil organic matter was positively correlated only with density and biomass of earthworms in the nursery and abandoned lands. Our results suggest that the species composition, abundance and biomass of earthworm communities can be determined by the modification of soil properties associated with urban land-use type.

Keywords

Biomass / Density / Earthworm community / Soil physicochemical properties / Spatiotemporal dynamics

References

[1] Araujo Y, Luizão FJ, Barros E. Effect of earthworm addition on soil nitrogen availability, microbial biomass and litter decomposition in mesocosms. Biol Fert Soils, 2004, 39(3): 146-152.

[2] Baker GH. Recognising and responding to the influences of agriculture and other land-use practices on soil fauna in Australia. Appl Soil Ecol, 1998, 9(1): 303-310.

[3] Bertin C, Yang X, Weston LA. The role of root exudates and allelochemicals in the rhizosphere. Plant Soil, 2003, 256(1): 67-83.

[4] Bini D, Cristiane ADS, Kellen BDC, Nagomi K, Galdino A, Waldemar Z, Marco AN. Effects of land use on soil organic carbon and microbial processes associated with soil health in southern Brazil. Eur J Soil Biol, 2013, 55(3): 117-123.

[5] Birkhofer K, Schöning I, Alt F, Herold N, Klarner B, Maraun M, Begerow D. General relationships between abiotic soil properties and soil biota across spatial scales and different land-use types. PLoS ONE, 2012 7 8 e43292

[6] Blakemore RJ. Ecology of earthworms under the ‘Haughley Experiment’ of organic and conventional management regimes. Biol Agric Hortic, 2000, 18(2): 141-159.

[7] Bohlen PJ, Scheu S, Hale CM, McLean MA, Migge S, Groffman PM, Parkinson D. Non-native invasive earthworms as agents of change in northern temperate forests. Front Ecol Environ, 2004, 2(8): 427-435.

[8] Cerdà A. Soil aggregate stability under different Mediterranean vegetation types. CATENA, 1998, 32(2): 73-86.

[9] Decaëns T, Mariani L, Lavelle P. Soil surface macrofaunal communities associated with earthworm casts in grasslands of the Eastern Plains of Colombia. Appl Soil Ecol, 1999, 13(1): 87-100.

[10] Decaëns T, Bureau F, Margerie P. Earthworm communities in a wet agricultural landscape of the Seine Valley (Upper Normandy, France): the 7th international symposium on earthworm ecology· Cardiff· Wales· 2002. Pedobiologia, 2003, 47(5–6): 479-489.

[11] Dempsey MA, Fisk MC, Yavitt JB, Fahey TJ, Balser TC. Exotic earthworms alter soil microbial community composition and function. Soil Biol Biochem, 2013, 67: 263-270.

[12] Dlamini TC, Haynes RJ. Influence of agricultural land use on the size and composition of earthworm communities in northern KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Appl Soil Ecol, 2004, 27(1): 77-88.

[13] Du J, Yang XD, Zhang H, Yu GB. Quantitative distribution of earthworms and its relationships with environmental factors in tropical secondary forest and rubber plantation in Xishuangbanna. Chin J Ecol, 2008, 27(11): 1941-1947.

[14] Edwards CA, Bohlen PJ. Biology and ecology of earthworms, 1996, London: Chapman & Hall.

[15] Eisenhauer N, Partsch S, Parkinson D, Scheu S. Invasion of a deciduous forest by earthworms: changes in soil chemistry, microflora, microarthropods and vegetation. Soil Biol Biochem, 2007, 39(5): 1099-1110.

[16] Emmerling C, Schloter M, Hartmann A, Kandeler E. Functional diversity of soil organisms-a review of recent research activities in Germany. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci, 2015, 165(4): 408-420.

[17] Gong L, Ran Q, He G, Tiyip T. A soil quality assessment under different land use types in Keriya river basin, Southern Xinjiang, China. Soil Tillage Res, 2015, 146: 223-229.

[18] González G, García E, Cruz V, Borges S, Zalamea M, Rivera MM. Earthworm communities along an elevation gradient in Northeastern Puerto Rico. Eur J Soil Biol, 2007, 43(54): S24-S32.

[19] Groffman PM, Fahey TJ, Fisk MC, Yavitt JB, Sherman RE, Bohlen PJ, Maerz JC. Earthworms increase soil microbial biomass carrying capacity and nitrogen retention in northern hardwood forests. Soil Biol Biochem, 2015, 87: 51-58.

[20] Hale CM, Frelich LE, Reich PB. Changes in hardwood forest understory plant communities in response to European earthworm invasions. Ecology, 2006, 87(7): 1637-1649.

[21] Hättenschwiler S, Tiunov AV, Scheu S. Biodiversity and litter decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst, 2005, 36(36): 191-218.

[22] Jouquet P, Zangerlé A, Rumpel C, Brunet D, Bottinelli N, Tran Duc T. Relevance and limitations of biogenic and physicogenic classification: a comparison of approaches for differentiating the origin of soil aggregates. Eur J Soil Sci, 2009, 60(6): 1117-1125.

[23] Li QF, Zhang JE, Qin Z. Soil faunal community structure in winter season under various land use types in Guangzhou. Chin J Eco-Agric, 2013, 20(11): 1521-1526.

[24] Omondi EC, Ridenour M, Ridenour C, Smith R. The effect of intercropping annual ryegrass with pinto beans in mitigating iron deficiency in calcareous soils. J Sustain Agric, 2010, 34(3): 244-257.

[25] Plum NM, Filser J. Floods and drought: response of earthworms and potworms (Oligochaeta: Lumbricidae, Enchytraeidae) to hydrological extremes in wet grassland. Pedobiologia, 2005, 49(5): 443-453.

[26] Ruan H, Li Y, Zou X. Soil communities and plant litter decomposition as influenced by forest debris: variation across tropical riparian and upland sites. Pedobiologia, 2005, 49(6): 529-538.

[27] Sheehan C, Kirwan L, Connolly J, Bolger T. The effects of earthworm functional group diversity on nitrogen dynamics in soils. Soil Biol Biochem, 2006, 38(9): 2629-2636.

[28] Tian G, Olimah JA, Adeoye GO, Kang BT. Regeneration of earthworm populations in a degraded soil by natural and planted fallows under humid tropical conditions. Soil Sci Soc Am J, 2000, 64(1): 222-228.

[29] Uren NC. Types, amounts, and possible functions of compounds released into the rhizosphere by soil-grown plants, 2007, Boca Raton: CRC Press 1 21

[30] Wang SJ, Ruan HH. Feedback mechanisms of soil biota to aboveground biology in terrestrial ecosystems. Biodivers Sci, 2008, 16(4): 407-416.

[31] Wang SJ, Cai QJ, Ruan HH. Soil nematode community response to vegetation restoration in northern Fujian. Biodivers Sci, 2007, 15(4): 356-364.

[32] Wang X, Li HX, Zhu L, Liu B, Hu F. Effects of earthworms on soil N mineralization. Acta Pedol Sin, 2008, 45(4): 641-648.

[33] Wang SJ, Ruan HH, Wang JS, Xu ZK, Wu YY. Composition structure of soil fauna community under the typical vegetations in the Wuyi mountains, China. Acta Ecol Sin, 2010, 30(19): 5174-5184.

[34] Wang SJ, Tan Y, Fan H, Ruan H, Zheng A. Responses of soil microarthropods to inorganic and organic fertilizers in a poplar plantation in a coastal area of eastern China. Appl Soil Ecol, 2015, 89: 69-75.

[35] Wang SJ, Wang H, Li JH. Effects of different land use types on spatial-temporal distribution of earthworm density and biomass. Chin J Ecol, 2017, 36(1): 118-123.

[36] Wardle DA, Bardgett RD, Klironomos JN, Setälä H, Van Der Putten WH, Wall DH. Ecological linkages between aboveground and belowground biota. Science, 2004, 304(5677): 1629-1633.

[37] Yu ZY, Wei WH, Xue QY, Wang J. Effect of environment factors on the reproduction of Pheretima pingi. J Nanjing Norm Univ Nat Sci Ed, 2007, 30(3): 107-111.

[38] Zhang WX, Li JX, Guo MF, Liao CH. Seasonal variation of earthworm community structure as correlated with environmental factors in three plantations of Heshan, Guangdong, China. Acta Ecol Sin, 2005, 25(6): 1362-1370.

[39] Zhang WX, Chen MD, Zhao CC. Functions of earthworm in ecosystem. Biodivers Sci, 2007, 15(2): 142-153.

[40] Zhang N, Liao Y, Sun FL, Wang C, Sun ZJ. Earthworm population characteristics in soils different in land use and their relationships with biological fertility of the soils. Acta Pedol Sin, 2012, 49(2): 364-372.