Evaluation and scenario simulation for forest ecological security in China

Qin Zhang , Guangyu Wang , Feng Mi , Xuanchang Zhang , Lianzhen Xu , Yufang Zhang , Xiaoli Jiang

Journal of Forestry Research ›› 2019, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (5) : 1651 -1666.

PDF
Journal of Forestry Research ›› 2019, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (5) : 1651 -1666. DOI: 10.1007/s11676-018-0773-8
Original Paper

Evaluation and scenario simulation for forest ecological security in China

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Continuously growing populations and rapid economic development have led to the excessive use of forest resources, and the forest ecosystem is threatened. In response, forest ecological security (FES) has attracted attention. In this study, an integrated dynamic simulation model was constructed using the system dynamic method, and it was used to evaluate the FES in China from 1999 to 2014. A scenario analysis was then used to evaluate the changes in the FES under five forestry policy scenarios for the 2015–2050 period, including the baseline, afforestation policy, harvesting policies, management policy, investment policy, and a policy mix. The results showed that the evaluation values of the FES increased during the period from 1999 to 2002, the period from 2004 to 2010 and the year 2014, and they decreased in 2003 and during the period from 2011 to 2013. During the 2015–2050 simulation period, the FES improved continuously. In particular, China would enter a new stage when the economic systems, social systems and ecosystems were in harmony after 2040. To improve the FES and the current status of the FES, a scenario analysis showed the most suitable scenario to be Scenario 5 from 2015 to 2020 and Scenario 2 from 2021 to 2050. To relieve pressure, the most suitable scenario would be Scenario 5 from 2015 to 2040 and from 2046 to 2050, and the most suitable scenario would be Scenario 4 for 2041–2045. A policy mix (Scenario 5) would be most efficient under current conditions, while the effects of all the benefits of the forestry policies would weaken over the long term. The integrated method can be regarded as a decision support tool to help policy makers understand FES and promulgate a reasonable forestry policy.

Keywords

Dynamic change trend / Forest ecological security / Integrated evaluation method / System dynamic model / Policy simulation

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Qin Zhang, Guangyu Wang, Feng Mi, Xuanchang Zhang, Lianzhen Xu, Yufang Zhang, Xiaoli Jiang. Evaluation and scenario simulation for forest ecological security in China. Journal of Forestry Research, 2019, 30(5): 1651-1666 DOI:10.1007/s11676-018-0773-8

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Aidar IF, Santos AOR, Bartelli BF, Martins GA, Nogueira-Ferreira FH. Nesting ecology of stingless bees (Hymenoptera, Meliponina) in urban areas: the importance of afforestation. Biosci J, 2013, 29: 1361-1369.

[2]

Albers HJ, Goldbach MJ. Irreversible ecosystem change, species competition, and shifting cultivation. Resour Energy Econ, 2000, 22: 261-280.

[3]

Blumberga A, Blumberga D, Bazbauers G, Zogla G, Laicane I. Sustainable development modelling for the energy sector. J Clean Prod, 2014, 63: 134-142.

[4]

Cai T, Kong F, Jiang D. Present situation, problem and countermeasure of forest classified management in China. J Northeast For Univ, 2003, 31: 42-44.

[5]

Chen JR. On value conflicts in the forest tenure reform and its solution in China. J Chongqing Univ, 2009, 6: 90-95.

[6]

Cherry WA. Comments: what is ecological security?. Peace Res, 1995, 27: 87-89.

[7]

Chu J, Zhang Z. Evolution of relationship between ecological security and food safety in forest system from the perspective of civilization progress. World For Res, 2016, 1: 1-7.

[8]

Dai L, Zhao W, Shao G, Lewis BJ, Yu D, Zhou L, Zhou W. The progress and challenges in sustainable forestry development in China. Int J Sustain Dev World Ecol, 2013, 20: 394-403.

[9]

Dillies MA, Rau A, Aubert J, Hennequetantier C, Jeanmougin M, Servant N, Keime C, Marot G, Castel D, Estelle J. A comprehensive evaluation of normalization methods for Illumina high-throughput RNA sequencing data analysis. Brief Bioinform, 2013, 14: 671.

[10]

Ferretti M. Forest health assessment and monitoring-issues for consideration. Environ Monit Assess, 1997, 48: 45-72.

[11]

Forrester JW. Industrial dynamics: a major breakthrough for decision makers. Harv Bus Rev, 1958, 36: 37-66.

[12]

Fu BJ, Yu DD, Lu N. An indicator system for biodiversity and ecosystem services evaluation in china. Acta Ecol Sin, 2017, 37: 341-348.

[13]

Gu SZ, Hu YJ, Zhou H. Ecological civilization construction: scientific connotation and basic paths. Resour Sci, 2013, 35: 2-13.

[14]

Hansen MC, Stehman SV, Potapov PV. Quantification of global gross forest cover loss. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2010, 107: 8650-8655.

[15]

He YM, Li JG. How to improve the survival rate of afforestation and its quality. Heilongjiang Sci, 2017, 8: 94-95.

[16]

Jiang T, Kundzewicz ZW, Su B. Changes in monthly precipitation and flood hazard in the Yangtze River Basin, China. Int J Climatol, 2008, 28: 1471-1481.

[17]

Keenan RJ, Reams GA, Achard F, Freitas JVD, Grainger A, Lindquist E. Dynamics of global forest area: results from the FAO Global Forest Resources Assessment 2015. For Ecol Manag, 2015, 352: 9-20.

[18]

Köhl M, Lasco R, Cifuentes M, Jonsson Ö, Korhonen KT, Mundhenk P, Navar JDJ, Stinson G. Changes in forest production, biomass and carbon: results from the 2015 UN FAO Global Forest Resource Assessment. For Ecol Manag, 2015, 352: 21-34.

[19]

Koop G, Tole L. Country ‘choices’ or deforestation paths: a method for global change analysis of human–forest interactions. J Environ Manag, 2001, 63: 133-148.

[20]

Kou G, Sun Q, Peng Y. An entropy-weighted clustering method for environmental pollution assessment in China, 2011, Berlin: Springer 177 188

[21]

Li N. Sustainable forest management in China: achievements in the past and challenges ahead, 2014, Dordrecht: Springer 93 122

[22]

Li LI, Cheng YH. Analysis of interests interaction of all interests subject in collective forest right reform. Chin For Econ, 2009, 6: 1-4.

[23]

Li YL, Jia J, Dai F, Ma CL. Study on the government investment in forestry and the forest source development. Issues For Econ, 2012, 10: 44-48.

[24]

Li F, Lu S, Sun Y, Li X, Xi B, Liu W. Integrated evaluation and scenario simulation for forest ecological security of Beijing based on system dynamics model. Sustainability, 2015, 7: 13631-13659.

[25]

Liu M. Study on forestry investment. For Econ, 2011, 4: 43-49.

[26]

Liu P, Yin R, Li H. China’s forest tenure reform and institutional change at a crossroads. For Policy Econ, 2016, 72: 92-98.

[27]

Long X, Zhang X. Probing into the reform of forest cutting quota management. For Resour Manag, 2005, 1: 14-17.

[28]

Lu Y, Wang X, Xie Y, Li K, Xu Y. Integrating future land use scenarios to evaluate the spatio-temporal dynamics of landscape ecological security. Sustainability, 2016, 8: 1242.

[29]

Macdicken K, Jonsson Ö, Piña L, Maulo S, Adikari Y, Garzuglia M, Lindquist E, Reams GD, Annunzio R. Global Forest Resources Assessment 2015: how are the world’s forests changing, 2015, Roma: FAO 3 4

[30]

Mi F, Pan W, Zhu N, Li H. Application of fuzzy comprehensive evaluation in forest ecological security warning. J Northeast For, 2013, 41: 66-71.

[31]

Mi F, Tan Z, Gu Y, Lu S, Zhang D. Difference analysis and evaluation of Chinese forest ecological security. Sci Silva Sin, 2015, 51: 107-115.

[32]

Rogers KS (1997) Ecological security and multinational corporations. http://www.ciaonet.org/wps/ecs07.html. Accessed 17.06.09

[33]

Shen W. Research on forest cutting quota management. For Resour Manag, 2004, 6: 1-4.

[34]

Shi CN, Wang LQ. Status quo and changes analysis of forest resources quality in China. Sci Silva Sin, 2009, 45: 90-97.

[35]

Spilsbury MJ, Kaimowitz D. Forestry research, innovation and impact in developing countries—from economic efficiency to the broader public good. For Chron, 2002, 78: 103-107.

[36]

Sun J. Connotation and architecture of non-commercial forest management in China. World For Res, 2011, 4: 45-49.

[37]

Sun Y, Liu N, Shang J, Zhang J. Sustainable utilization of water resources in china: a system dynamics model. J Clean Prod, 2016, 142: 613-625.

[38]

Sušnik J, Vamvakeridou-Lyroudia LS, Savić DA, Kapelan Z. Integrated system dynamics modelling for water scarcity assessment: case study of the Kairouan region. Sci Total Environ, 2012, 440: 290-306.

[39]

Troy A. Development of an object-based framework for classifying and inventorying human-dominated forest ecosystems. Int J Remote Sens, 2009, 30: 6343-6360.

[40]

Van DVG, Brett AP, Burgess E, Cecilcockwell D, Chicoine A, Difiore P, Harding J, Millian C, Olivi E, Piaskowy S. Democracy, GDP, and the impact of natural disasters. Geotime, 2007, 10: 36-39.

[41]

Vuuren DPV, Bouwman LF. Exploring past and future changes in the ecological footprint for world regions. Ecol Econ, 2005, 52: 43-62.

[42]

Wang QA, Wang H. An analysis of the connotation of ecological civilization and its revelation to ecological civilization construction in China: based on the extension of the connotation of civilization. J Poyang Lake, 2012, 7635: 332-347.

[43]

Wang G, Cheng G, Qian J. Several problems in ecological security assessment research. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2003, 14: 1551.

[44]

Wang G, Innes JL, Lei J, Dai S, Wu SW. China’s forestry reforms. Science, 2007, 318: 1556-1557.

[45]

Wang G, Innes JL, Wu SW, Dai S. Towards a new paradigm: the development of China’s forestry in the 21st century. Int For Rev, 2008, 10: 619-631.

[46]

Wang J, Yang L, Yayun LI, Zhang D. The country forest ecological security index of china: empirical data from fifteen experimental unit countries in five provinces. Acta Ecol Sin, 2016, 36: 6636-6645.

[47]

Xiao B, Niu D, Guo X. Can china achieve its 2020 carbon intensity target? A scenario analysis based on system dynamics approach. Ecol Indic, 2016, 71: 99-112.

[48]

Yin R, Yao S, Huo X. China’s forest tenure reform and institutional change in the new century: what has been implemented and what remains to be pursued?. Land Use Policy, 2013, 30: 825-833.

[49]

Yu D, Zhou L, Zhou W, Ding H, Wang Q, Wang Y, Wu X, Dai L. Forest management in Northeast China: history, problems, and challenges. Environ Manag, 2011, 48: 1122-1135.

[50]

Zhang P, Shao G, Zhao G, Master DCL, Parker GR, Dunning JBJ, Li Q. China’s forest policy for the 21st century. Science, 2000, 288: 2135-2136.

[51]

Zhang K, Song C, Zhang Y, Zhang Q. Natural disasters and economic development drive forest dynamics and transition in China. For Policy Econ, 2015, 76: 68-76.

[52]

Zhao G, Shao GF, Zhang PC, Bai GX. China’s new forest policy-response. Science, 2000, 289: 2049-2050.

[53]

Zhao T, Ke S, Gao L. The impact of forest calamity on China’s forestry economic growth. J Beijing For Univ, 2004, 235: 303-314.

[54]

Zhi L, Li Y, Zheng K, Wang H, Su J, Yang F. Index system research on assessment of support capacity in the collective non-commercial forest’s management and protection in natural forest protection project areas-taking western China as an example. For Econ, 2016, 12: 26-33.

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

163

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/