Leaf litter and crop residue decomposition in ginkgo agroforestry systems in eastern China: Soil fauna diversity and abundance, microbial biomass and nutrient release

Abstract

The response of soil fauna to the litter decomposition process has received considerable attention, but this effect has not been fully examined in agroforestry systems. A 1-year in situ decomposition experiment was carried out in a pure ginkgo plantation and two ginkgo agroforestry systems using a litterbag method (11 different treatments were tested in three systems). We found that the application of different organic materials (crop residues) produced positive effects on the number of soil fauna in the ginkgo planting systems; the mixture of ginkgo leaves and corn leaves was the best performing treatment. Collembola and Acarina were the predominant groups in the litter bags and were mainly responsible for the differences among the treatments. Litter mixing promoted the abundance, richness, and diversity of soil fauna, and significant differences regarding the Shannon–Wiener index of the soil fauna were observed among the 11 treatments in July. Significantly higher soil MBC (microbial biomass carbon) and MBN (microbial biomass nitrogen) were observed in agroforestry systems than in pure ginkgo plantations. These results suggest that the practice of intercrop residue application plays an important role in enhancing soil ecosystem function in ginkgo agroforestry systems and may ultimately contribute to sustainable intercrop production, soil fertility, and local economic diversity.

Keywords

Ginkgo agroforestry / Litter decomposition / Soil fauna / Microbial biomass / Nutrient release

References

[1] Aponte C, García LV, Marañón T. Tree species effect on litter decomposition and nutrient release in Mediterranean oak forests changes over time. Ecosystems, 2012, 15(7): 1204-1218.

[2] Bardgett RD, Lovell RD, Hobbs PJ, Jarvis SC. Seasonal changes in soil microbial communities along a fertility gradient of temperate grasslands. Soil Biol Biochem, 1999, 31(7): 1021-1030.

[3] Battle M, Bender ML, Tans PP, White JWC, Ellis JT, Conway T, Francey RJ. Global carbon sinks and their variability inferred from atmospheric O₂ and δ¹³C. Science, 2000, 287(5462): 2467-2470.

[4] Beer C, Reichstein M, Tomelleri E, Ciais P, Jung M, Carvalhais N, Rödenbeck C, Arain MA, Baldocchi D, Bonan GB, Bondeau A, Cescatti A, Lasslop G, Lindroth A, Lomas M, Luyssaert S, Margolis H, Oleson KW, Roupsard O, Veenendaal E, Viovy N, Williams C, Woodward FI, Papale D. Terrestrial gross carbon dioxide uptake: global distribution and covariation with climate. Science, 2010, 329(5993): 834-838.

[5] Belovsky GE, Slade JB. Insect herbivory accelerates nutrient cycling and increases plant production. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2000, 97(26): 14412-14417.

[6] Bradford MA, Berg B, Maynard DS, Wieder WR, Wood SA. Understanding the dominant controls on litter decomposition. J Ecol, 2015, 104(1): 229-238.

[7] Burton J, Chen CR, Xu ZH, Ghadiri H. Soil microbial biomass, activity and community composition in adjacent native and plantation forests of subtropical Australia. J Soils Sediments, 2010, 10: 1267-1277.

[8] Cebrian J. Patterns in the fate of production in plant communities. Am Nat, 1999, 154(4): 449-468.

[9] Coûteaux MM, Bottner P, Berg B. Litter decomposition, climate and litter quality. Trends Ecol Evol, 1995, 10(2): 63-66.

[10] De Ruiter PC, Moore JC, Zwart KB, Bouwman LA, Hassink J, Bloem J, De Vos JA, Marinissen JCY, Didden WAM, Lebrink G, Brussaard L. Simulation of nitrogen mineralization in the belowground food webs of two winter wheat fields. J Appl Ecol, 1993, 30(1): 95-106.

[11] Fujii S, Makita N, Mori AS, Takeda H. Plant species control and soil faunal involvement in the processes of above- and below-ground litter decomposition. ESA Conv, 2014, 146(10): 2013-2018.

[12] Goyal S, Chander K, Mundra MC, Kapoor KK. Influence of inorganic fertilizers and organic amendments on soil organic matter and soil microbial properties under tropical conditions. Biol Fertil Soils, 1999, 29(2): 196-200.

[13] Guo LB, Sims REH. Eucalypt litter decomposition and nutrient release under a short rotation forest regime and effluent irrigation treatments in New Zealand: II. Internal effects. Soil Biol Biochem, 2002, 34(7): 913-922.

[14] Hamman ST, Burke IC, Stromberger ME. Relationship between microbial community structure and soil environmental conditions in a recently burned system. Soil Biol Biochem, 2007, 39(7): 1703-1711.

[15] Hargreaves SK, Hofmockel KS. Physiological shifts in the microbial community drive changes in enzyme activity in a perennial agroecosystem. Biogeochemistry, 2014, 117(1): 67-79.

[16] Högberg MN, Högberg P, Myrold DD. Is microbial community composition in boreal forest soils determined by pH, C-to-N ratio, the trees, or all three?. Oecologia, 2007, 150(4): 590-601.

[17] Huang X, Liu S, Wang H, Hu Z, Li Z, You Y. Changes of soil microbial biomass carbon and community composition through mixing nitrogen-fixing species with Eucalyptus urophylla, in subtropical China. Soil Biol Biochem, 2014, 73(6): 42-48.

[18] Janssen SL, Persson J (1982) Mineralization and immobilization of soil nitrogen. In: Stevenson FJ (ed) Nitrogen in agricultural soils. Agron Monogr 22 ASA, CSSA, SSSA, Madison, WI, pp 229–252

[19] Jewell MD, Shipley B, Paquette A, Messier C, Reich PB. A traits-based test of the home-field advantage in mixed-species tree litter decomposition. Ann Bot, 2015, 116(5): 781-788.

[20] Jin HM, Sun JX, Liu JF. Changes in soil microbial biomass and community structure with addition of contrasting types of plant litter in a semiarid grassland ecosystem. J Plant Ecol, 2010, 3(3): 209-217.

[21] Lalor BM, Cookson WR, Murphy DV. Comparison of two methods that assess soil community level physiological profiles in a forest ecosystem. Soil Biol Biochem, 2007, 39(2): 454-462.

[22] Lavelle P. Soil function in a changing world: the role of invertebrate ecosystem engineers. Eur J Soil Sci, 1997, 33(4): 159-193.

[23] Lummer D, Scheu S, Butenschoen O. Connecting litter quality, microbial community and nitrogen transfer mechanisms in decomposing litter mixtures. Oikos, 2012, 121(10): 1649-1655.

[24] Ma XQ, Liu CJ, Hannu I, Westman CJ, Liu AQ. Biomass, litterfall and the nutrient fluxes in Chinese fir stands of different age in subtropical China. J For Res, 2002, 13(3): 165-170.

[25] Peña-Peña K, Irmler U. Moisture seasonality, soil fauna, litter quality and land use as drivers of decomposition in Cerrado soils in SE-Mato Grosso, Brazil. Appl Soil Ecol, 2016, 107: 124-133.

[26] Reichle E, Mcbrayer JF, Ausmus S. Ecological energetics of decomposer invertebrates in a deciduous forest and total respiration budget. Progress in soil zoology, 1975, Prague: Academia Publishing House of Slovak Academy of Sciences 283 292

[27] Sauvadet M, Chauvat M, Brunet N, Bertrand I. Can changes in litter quality drive soil fauna structure and functions?. Soil Biol Biochem, 2017, 107: 94-103.

[28] Schimel JP, Hättenschwiler S. Nitrogen transfer between decomposing leaves of different N status. Soil Biol Biochem, 2007, 39: 1428-1436.

[29] Shah Z, Ahmad RS, Rahman HU. Soil microbial biomass and activities as influenced by green manure legumes and N fertilizer in rice-wheat system. Pak J Bot, 2010, 42(4): 2589-2598.

[30] Sharma G, Sharma R, Sharma E. Influence of stand age on nutrient and energy release through decomposition in alder-cardamom agroforestry systems of the eastern Himalayas. Ecol Res, 2008, 23(1): 99-106.

[31] Troeh FR, Thompson LM. Soils and soil fertility, 1993 5 Oxford: Oxford University Press 462

[32] Vance ED, Brookes PC, Jenkinson DS. An extraction method for measuring soil microbial biomass C. Soil Biol Biochem, 1987, 19(6): 703-707.

[33] Verhoef HA, Brussaard L. Decomposition and nitrogen mineralization in natural and agro-ecosystems: the contribution of soil animals. Biogeochemistry, 1990, 11(3): 175-211.

[34] Vohland K, Schroth G. Distribution patterns of the litter macrofauna in agroforestry and monoculture plantations in central Amazonia as affected by plant species and management. Appl Soil Ecol, 1999, 13(1): 57-68.

[35] Wolters V. Soil invertebrates-effects on nutrient turnover and soil structure-s review. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci, 1991, 154(6): 389-402.

[36] Yi ZG, Fu SL, Yi WM, Zhou GY, Mo JM, Zhang DQ, Ding MM, Wang XM, Zhou LX. Partitioning soil respiration of subtropical forests with different successional stages in south China. For Ecol Manage, 2007, 243: 178-186.

[37] Yin WY. Pictorial keys to soil animals of China, 1998, Beijing: Science Press 209 293

[38] Zeng DH, Rong M, Chang S, Li LJ, Dan Y. Carbon mineralization of tree leaf litter and crop residues from poplar-based agroforestry systems in Northeast China: a laboratory study. Appl Soil Ecol, 2010, 44(2): 133-137.