Tree regeneration in gap-understory mosaics in a subtropical Shorea robusta (Sal) forest

Abstract

Spatial variation in tree-regeneration density is attributed to the specialization of tree species to light availability for germination and growth. Light availability, in turn, varies across the gap-understorey mosaic. Canopy gaps provide an important habitat for the regeneration of tree species that would otherwise be suppressed in the understory. In subtropical forests, there is still a knowledge-gap relating to how canopy disturbances influence tree-regeneration patterns at local scale, and if they disproportionately favor regeneration of certain species. We aim to analyze whether canopy gaps promote tree regeneration, and tree species are specialized to gaps or understory for germination and growth. We sampled vegetation in 128 plots (0.01 ha), equally distributed in gaps and below canopy, in two subtropical Shorea robusta Gaertn. (Sal) forests in Nepal, recording the number of tree seedlings and saplings in each plot. We compared the regeneration density of seedlings and saplings separately between gaps and the understorey. The mean densities of seedlings and saplings were higher in the gaps at both sites; although there was no difference in the seedling density of the majority of the species between the habitats. No species were confined to either gap or understorey at the seedling stage. We conclude that gaps are not critical for the germination of tree species in Sal forests but these are an important habitat for enabling seedlings to survive into saplings. The classification of trees into regeneration guilds mainly based on germination does not apply to the majority of tree species in subtropical Sal forests. Our results reaffirm that gap creation promotes tree regeneration by favouring seedling survival and growth and can influence forest management for conservation, as well as for plantations.

Keywords

Canopy-gap / Density / Regeneration / Saplings / Seedlings / Shade tolerance

References

[1] Abe S, Masaki T, Nakashizuka T. Factors influencing sapling composition in canopy gaps of a temperate deciduous forest. Vegetatio, 1995, 120: 21-31.

[2] Arevalo JR, Fernandez-Palacios JM. Treefall gaps and regeneration composition in the laurel forest of Anaga (Tenerife): a matter of size?. Plant Ecol, 2007, 188: 133-143.

[3] Augspurger CK. Light requirements of neotropical tree seedlings—a comparative-study of growth and survival. J Ecol, 1984, 72: 777-795.

[4] Brandani A, Hartshorn GS, Orians GH. Internal heterogeneity of gaps and species richness in Costa Rican tropical wet forest. J Trop Ecol, 1988, 4: 99-119.

[5] Brokaw N, Busing RT. Niche versus chance and tree diversity in forest gaps. Trends Ecol Evol, 2000, 15: 183-188.

[6] Brokaw NVL. Gap-phase regeneration in a tropical forest. Ecology, 1985, 66: 682-687.

[7] Buettel JC, Ondei S, Brook BW. Look down to see what’s up: a systematic overview of treefall dynamics in forests. Forests, 2017, 8: 123.

[8] Busing RT. Canopy cover and tree regeneration in old-growth cove forests of the Appalachian mountains. Vegetatio, 1994, 115: 19-27.

[9] Busing RT, White PS. Species diversity and small-scale disturbance in an old-growth temperate forest: a consideration of gap partitioning concepts. Oikos, 1997, 78: 562-568.

[10] Canham CD, Denslow JS, Platt WJ, Runkle JR, Spies TA, White PS. Light regimes beneath closed canopies and tree-gall gaps in temperate and tropical forests. Can J For Res, 1990, 20: 620-631.

[11] CBS. Environmental statistics of Nepal, 2011, Kathmandu: Central Bureau of Statistics.

[12] Connell JH. Some processes affecting the species composition in forest gaps. Ecology, 1989, 70: 560-562.

[13] de Carvalho LMT, Fontes MAL, de Oliveira-Filho AT. Tree species distribution in canopy gaps and mature forest in an area of cloud forest of the Ibitipoca Range, south-eastern Brazil. Plant Ecol, 2000, 149: 9-22.

[14] Dechnik-Vázquez Y, Meave J, Pérez-García E, Gallardo-Cruz J, Romero-Romero M. The effect of treefall gaps on the understorey structure and composition of the tropical dry forest of Nizanda, Oaxaca, Mexico: implications for forest regeneration. J Trop Ecol, 2016, 32: 89-106.

[15] Denslow JS. Gap partitioning among tropical rainforest trees. Biotropica, 1980, 12: 47-55.

[16] Denslow JS. Tropical rain-forest gaps and tree species-diversity. Annu Rev Ecol Syst, 1987, 18: 431-451.

[17] Devagiri GM, Khaple AK, Mohan S, Venkateshamurthy P, Tomar S, Arunkumar AN, Joshi G. Species diversity, regeneration and dominance as influenced by canopy gaps and their characteristics in tropical evergreen forests of Western Ghats, India. J For Res, 2016, 27: 799-810.

[18] Dobrowolska D, Veblen TT. Treefall-gap structure and regeneration in mixed Abies alba stands in central Poland. For Ecol Manage, 2008, 255: 3469-3476.

[19] Galhidy L, Mihok B, Hagyo A, Rajkai K, Standovar T. Effects of gap size and associated changes in light and soil moisture on the understorey vegetation of a Hungarian beech forest. Plant Ecol, 2006, 183: 133-145.

[20] Grainger MJ, van Aarde RJ. The role of canopy gaps in the regeneration of coastal dune forest. Afr J Ecol, 2013, 51: 11-20.

[21] Gravel D, Canham CD, Beaudet M, Messier C. Shade tolerance, canopy gaps and mechanisims of coexistence of forest trees. Oikos, 2010, 119: 475-484.

[22] Grierson AJC, Long DG (1983–2001) Flora of Bhutan. Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh and Royal Government of Bhutan

[23] Grubb JP. The maintenance of species-richness in plant communities: the importance of regeneration niche. Biol Rev, 1977, 52: 107-145.

[24] Hagen T (1969) Report on the Geological Survey of Nepal Preliminary Reconnaissance. Zurich Memoires de la Societe Helvetique des Sciences Naturelles

[25] Hubbell SP, Foster RB, O’Brien ST, Harms KE, Condit R, Wechsler B, Wright SJ, de Lao SL. Light-gap disturbances, recruitment limitation, and tree diversity in a neotropical forest. Science, 1999, 283: 554-557.

[26] Kyereh B, Swaine MD, Thompson J. Effect of light on the germination of forest trees in Ghana. J Ecol, 1999, 87: 772-783.

[27] Lieberman M, Lieberman D, Peralta R, Hartshorn GS. Canopy closure and the distribution of tropical forest tree species at La-Selva, Costa-Rica. J Trop Ecol, 1995, 11: 161-178.

[28] Madsen P, Hahn K. Natural regeneration in a beech-dominated forest managed by close-to-nature principles—a gap cutting based experiment. Can J For Res, 2008, 38: 1716-1729.

[29] Mallik AU, Kreutzweiser DP, Spalvieri CM. Forest regeneration in gaps 7 years after partial harvesting in riparian buffers of boreal mixedwood streams. For Ecol Manage, 2014, 312: 117-128.

[30] McCarthy J. Gap dynamics of forest trees: a review with particular attention to boreal forests. Env Rev, 2001, 9: 1-59.

[31] Miehe G, Pendry CA, Chaudhary RP. Nepal: an introduction to the natural history, ecology and human environment of the Himalayas, 2015, Edinburgh: Royal Botanic Garden.

[32] Montgomery RA, Chazdon RL. Light gradient partitioning by tropical tree seedlings in the absence of canopy gaps. Oecologia, 2002, 131: 165-174.

[33] Muscolo A, Bagnato S, Sidari M, Mercurio R. A review of the roles of forest canopy gaps. J For Res, 2014, 25: 725-736.

[34] Nagel TA, Svoboda M, Rugani T, Diaci J. Gap regeneration and replacement patterns in an old-growth Fagus-Abies forest of Bosnia-Herzegovina. Plant Ecol, 2010, 208: 307-318.

[35] Obiri JAF, Lawes MJ. Chance versus determinism in canopy gap regeneration in coastal scarp forest in South Africa. J Veg Sci, 2004, 15: 539-547.

[36] Pacala SW, Canham CD, Silander JA, Kobe RK. Sapling growth as a function of resources in a north temperate forest. Can J For Res, 1994, 24: 2172-2183.

[37] Philipson CD, Saner P, Marthews TR, Nilus R, Reynolds G, Turnbull LA, Hector A. Light-based regeneration niches: evidence from 21 Dipterocarp species using size-specific RGRs. Biotropica, 2012, 44: 627-636.

[38] Rautiainen O, Suoheimo J. Natural regeneration potential and early development of Shorea robusta Gaertn forest after regeneration felling in the Bhabar-Terai zone in Nepal. For Ecol Manage, 1997, 92: 243-251.

[39] Ruger N, Huth A, Hubbell SP, Condit R. Response of recruitment to light availability across a tropical lowland rain forest community. J Ecol, 2009, 97: 1360-1368.

[40] Runkle JR. Guidelines and sample protocol for sampling forest gaps, 1992, Portland: Pacific Northwest Research Station

[41] Sapkota IP, Tigabu M, Oden PC. Species diversity and regeneration of old-growth seasonally dry Shorea robusta forests following gap formation. J For Res, 2009, 20: 7-14.

[42] Seiwa K. Trade-offs between seedling growth and survival in deciduous broadleaved trees in a temperate forest. Ann Bot Lond, 2007, 99: 537-544.

[43] Sharma LN, Grytnes J-A, Måren IE, Vetaas OR. Do composition and richness of woody plants vary between gaps and closed canopy patches in subtropical forests?. J Veg Sci, 2016, 27: 1129-1139.

[44] Swaine MD, Whitmore TC. On the definition of ecological species groups in tropical rain forests. Vegetatio, 1988, 75: 81-86.

[45] Troup RS. The silviculture of Indian trees, 1986, Dehradun: International Book Distributors.

[46] Uhl C, Clark K, Dezzeo N, Maquirino P. Vegetation dynamics in Amazonian treefall gaps. Ecology, 1988, 69: 751-763.

[47] Welch BL. The generalization of ‘student’s’ problem when several different population variances are involved. Biometrika, 1947, 34: 28-35.

[48] Wesche K. Structure and use of a Sal-forest in southern Nepal, 1996, Eschborn: GTZ.

[49] Yamamoto S. Gap characteristics and gap regeneration in primary evergreen broad-leaved forest of western Japan. Bot Mag Tokyo, 1992, 105: 29-45.

[50] Zhu JJ, Lu DL, Zhang WD. Effects of gaps on regeneration of woody plants: a meta-analysis. J For Res, 2014, 25: 501-510.