Micropropagation of Pinus densiflora and the evaluation of nematode resistance of regenerated microshoots in vitro

Lihua Zhu , Xiaofang Chu , Tingyu Sun , Jianren Ye , Xiaoqin Wu

Journal of Forestry Research ›› 2019, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (2) : 519 -528.

PDF
Journal of Forestry Research ›› 2019, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (2) : 519 -528. DOI: 10.1007/s11676-018-0681-y
Original Paper

Micropropagation of Pinus densiflora and the evaluation of nematode resistance of regenerated microshoots in vitro

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

To accelerate the breeding and selection of Pinus densiflora Siebold and Zucc. resistance to pine wilt disease, a micropropagation system was established and nematode resistance evaluated in vitro. Cotyledon-hypocotyl explants from 28-day-old seedlings were first cultured on Gresshoff and Doy medium supplemented with 4.0 mg L−1 6-benzyladenine and 0.2 mg L−1 α-naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA) to stimulate the formation of buds. Induced buds were subsequently subcultured on Gupta and Durzan medium supplemented with 0.1% (w/v) activated charcoal for elongation. Stem sections derived from shoots were used as explants for the further multiplication. Roots were formed from shoots transferred to woody plant medium containing 0.2 mg L−1 NAA for 4 weeks. The nematode resistance test showed that symptoms in micropropagated shoots after infection with pine wood nematode (PWN) were similar to those in plants infected in the field. The wilting rate varied from 20 to 100% among different clones 18 days after inoculation. The most susceptible clone was Clone 6-4 with a 100% wilting rate, while Clone 8-4 showed a relatively high resistance with a 20% wilting rate. The number of nematodes recovered from Clone 8-4 shoots was significantly lower (P = 0.05) than from Clones 5-10 and 16-4. This work contributes to the breeding of PWN resistance in P. densiflora.

Keywords

Pinus densiflora / Micropropagation / Shoot proliferation / Bursaphelenchus xylophilus / Nematode resistance

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Lihua Zhu, Xiaofang Chu, Tingyu Sun, Jianren Ye, Xiaoqin Wu. Micropropagation of Pinus densiflora and the evaluation of nematode resistance of regenerated microshoots in vitro. Journal of Forestry Research, 2019, 30(2): 519-528 DOI:10.1007/s11676-018-0681-y

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Abelleira A, Picoaga A, Mansilla JP, Aguin O. Detection of Bursaphelenchus xylophilus, causal agent of pine wilt disease on Pinus pinaster in Northwestern Spain. Plant Dis, 2011, 95: 776.

[2]

Álvarez JM, Majada J, Ordás RJ. An improved micropropagation protocol for maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Ait.) isolated cotyledons. Forestry, 2009, 82(2): 175-184.

[3]

Armijos-González R, Pérez-Ruiz C. In vitro germination and shoot proliferation of the threatened species Cinchona officinalis L (Rubiaceae). J For Res, 2016, 27(6): 1229-1236.

[4]

Chandra R, Kamle M, Bajpai A, Muthukumar M, Kalim S. In vitro selection: a candidate approach for disease resistance breeding in fruit crops. Asian J Plant Sci, 2010, 9(8): 437-446.

[5]

Choi MS, Lee SG, Park YG, Liu JR. Micropropagation of Pinus densiflora for Erectauyeki. Korean J Plant Tissue Cult, 1993, 20(6): 315-320.

[6]

Cortizo M, de Diego N, Moncaleán P, Ordás RJ. Micropropagation of adult stone pine (Pinus pinea L.). Trees, 2009, 23(4): 83-842.

[7]

Cuenca B, Fernández MR, Ocaña L, Salinero C, Pintos C, Mansilia JP, Rial C. Selection of Castanea sativa Mill. for resistance to Phytophthora cinnamomi: testing of selected clones. Acta Hortic, 2010, 866: 111-119.

[8]

Daub ME. Tissue culture and the selection of resistance to pathogens. Ann Rev Phytopathol, 1986, 24: 159-186.

[9]

Diegoa ND, Montalbána IA, Moncaleána P. Improved micropropagation protocol for maritime pine using zygotic embryos. Scand J For Res, 2011, 26(3): 202-211.

[10]

Diner AM, Mott RL. In vitro inoculation of western white pine tissue culture propagules with vegetative hyphae of Cronartium ribicola. Phytopathol, 1985, 75(10): 1130-1131.

[11]

Elsen A, Stoffelen R, Tuyet NT, BaimeyH Dupré, de Boulois H, De Waele D. In vitro screening for resistance to Radopholus similis in Musa spp. Plant Sci, 2002, 163: 407-416.

[12]

Faria JMS, Sena I, Silva IV, Ribeiro B, Barbosa P, Ascensão L, Bennett RN, Mota M, Figueiredo AC. In vitro co-cultures of Pinus pinaster with Bursaphelenchus xylophilus: a biotechnological approach to study pine wilt disease. Planta, 2015, 241(6): 1325-1336.

[13]

Farjon A, Filer D. An atlas of the world’s conifers: an analysis of their distribution, biogeography, diversity and conservation status, 2013, Leiden: Brill Academic Publisher p271 p272

[14]

Flores PS, Otoni WC, Dhingra OD, Diniz SPSS, Santos TM, Bruckner CH. In vitro selection of yellow passion fruit genotypes for resistance to Fusarium vascular wilt. Plant Cell, Tissue Organ Cult, 2012, 108: 37-45.

[15]

Forestry Agency (2004) Annual report on trends of forest and forestry-fiscal year 2003 (in Japanese). Forestry Agency, The Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries of Japan

[16]

Fukuda T, Fujii Y, Kanamitsu K. Production of resistant pine against the nematode disease through tissue culture techniques. J Jpn Wood Res Soc, 1989, 35: 1139-1143.

[17]

Futai K. Zhao BG, Futai K, Sutherland JR, Takeuchi Y. Pine wilt in Japan: from first incidence to the present. Pine wilt disease, 2008, Tokyo: Springer 5 12

[18]

Goto S, Sasaki S (1999) Micropropagation and development of early examination system in vitro for nematode-resistance in Japanese black pine. In: Proceedings of sustainability of pine forests in relation to pine wilt and decline. Proceedings of international symposium, Tokyo, pp 178–180

[19]

Gupta PK, Durzan DJ. Shoot multiplication from mature trees of Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) and sugar pine (Pinus lambertiana). Plant Cell Rep, 1985, 4: 177-179.

[20]

Hargreaves CL, Grace LJ, van der Maas SA, Menzies MI, Kumar S, Holden DG, Foggo MN, Low CB, Dibley MJ. Comparative in vitro and early nursery performance of adventitious shoots from cryopreserved cotyledons and axillary shoots from epicotyls of the same zygotic embryo of control-pollinated Pinus radiata. Can J For Res, 2005, 35: 2629-2641.

[21]

Ishii K, Maruyama E, Hosoi Y. Morohoshi N, Komamine T. Somatic embryogenesis of Japanese conifers. Molecular breeding of woody plants, 2001, Amsterdam: Elsevier 297 304

[22]

Isikawa H. Generation of adventitious plant organs by tissue culture methods in forest trees. Bull For For Prod Res Inst, 1987, 343: 119-153.

[23]

Jang JC, Tainter FH. Cellular responses of pine callus to infection by Phytophthora cinnamomi. Annu Rev Phytopathol, 1990, 80: 1347-1352.

[24]

Jung J, Han H, Ryu SH, Kim W. Microsatellite variation in the pinewood nematode, Bursaphelenchus xylophilus (Steiner and Buhrer) Nicklein South Korea. Genes Genomics, 2010, 32: 151-158.

[25]

Kalia RK, Arya S, Kalia S, Arya ID. Plantlet regeneration from fascicular buds of seedling shoot apices of Pinus roxburghii Sarg. Biol Plant, 2007, 51: 653-659.

[26]

Kim YW, Moon HK. Enhancement of somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration in Japanese red pine (Pinus densiflora). Plant Biotechnol Rep, 2014, 8: 259-266.

[27]

Kurinobu S. Current status of resistance breeding of Japanese pine species to pine wilt disease. For Sci Technol, 2008, 12(4): 51-57.

[28]

Lelu-Walter MA, Bernier-Cardou M, Klimaszewska K. Clonal plant production from self- and cross-pollinated seed families of Pinus sylvestris (L.) through somatic embryogenesis. Plant Cell, Tissue Organ Cult, 2008, 92: 31-45.

[29]

Maruyama TE, Hosoi Y. Post-maturation treatment improves and synchronizes somatic embryo germination of three species of Japanese pines. Plant Cell, Tissue Organ Cult, 2012, 110: 45-52.

[30]

Maruyama TE, Hosoi Y, Ishii K. Propagation of Japanese red pine (Pinus densiflora Zieb. and Zucc.) via somatic embryogenesis. Propag Ornam Plants, 2005, 5: 199-204.

[31]

Menzies MI, Holden DG, Klomp BK. Recent trends in nursery practice in New Zealand. New For, 2001, 22: 3-17.

[32]

Montalbán IA, De Diego N, Moncaleán P. Testing novel cytokinins for improved in vitro adventitious shoots formation and subsequent ex vitro performance in Pinus radiata. Forestry, 2011, 84: 363-373.

[33]

Mota M, Braasch H, Bravo MA, PenasA C, Burgermeister W, Metge K, Sousa E. First report of Bursaphelenchus xylophilus in Portugal and in Europe. Nematology, 1999, 1: 727-734.

[34]

Nairn BJ. Ahuja MR. Commercial micropropagation of radiata pine. Micropropagation of woody plants, 1993, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publisher 383 394

[35]

Nandwani D, Kumaria S, Tandon P. Micropropagation of Pinus kesiya Royle ex Gord (Khasi pine). Gartenbauwissenschaft, 2001, 66: 68-71.

[36]

Nose M, Shiraishi S. Zhao BG, Futai K, Sutherland JR, Takeuchi Y. Breeding for resistance to pine wilt disease. Pine wilt disease, 2008, Tokyo: Springer 334 350

[37]

Noshad D, King JN, Ekramoddoullah A (2009) In vitro and in vivo investigation into the characterization of resistance against White Pine Blister Rust. In: Noshad D, Noh E, King J, Sniezko R (eds) Breeding and genetic resources of five-needle pines. Proceedings of the Conference 2008, Korea. Korea Forest Research Institute, pp 79–80

[38]

Nunes S, Sousa D, Pereira VT, Correia S, Marum L, Santos C, Dias MC. Efficient protocol for in vitro mass micropropagation of slash pine. Vitro Cell Dev-PL, 2018, 54(2): 175-183.

[39]

Oliveira LF, Quoirin M, Koehler HS, Amano E, Higa AR, Ribas LLF. Propagation from axillary buds and anatomical study of adventitious roots of Pinus taeda L. Afr J Biotechnol, 2013, 12(35): 5413-5422.

[40]

Ostry ME. Klopfenstein NB, Chun YW, Kim MS, Ahuja MR. In vitro screening and selection for disease resistance. Micropropagation, genetic engineering, and molecular biology of populus, 1997, Fort Collins: Rocky Mountain Forest and Range 155 160

[41]

Ostry ME, Pijut PM, Skilling DD. Screening Larch in vitro for resistance to Mycosphaerella laricina. Plant Dis, 1991, 75(12): 1222-1224.

[42]

Parasharami VA, Poonawala IS, Nadgauda RS. Bud break and plantlet regeneration in vitro from mature trees of Pinus roxburghii Sarg. Curr Sci, 2003, 84: 203-208.

[43]

Ragazzi A, Moricca S, Della Valle I. Growth of axenic cultures of Cronartium flaccidum on callus tissue from Pinus nigra var. Laricio and Pinus sylvestris. Eur J For Path, 1995, 25: 31-37.

[44]

Ragonezi C, Klimaszewska K, Castro MR, Lima M, de Oliveira P, Zavattieri MA. Adventitious rooting of conifers: influence of physical and chemical factors. Trees, 2010, 24(6): 975-992.

[45]

Rodríguez Y, Mosqueda M, Companioni B, Arzola M, Borrás O, Pérez MC, Lorenzo JC, Santos R. Bioassay for in vitro differentiation of pineapple cultivar resistance levels to heart rot disease. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant, 2002, 38: 613-616.

[46]

Sharma NK, Skidmore DI. In vitro expression of partial resistance to Phytophthora palmivora by shoot cultures of papaya. Plant Cell, Tissue Organ Cult, 1988, 14(3): 187-196.

[47]

Shoji M, Sato H, Nakagawa R, Funada R, Kubo T, Ogita S. Influence of osmotic pressure on somatic embryo maturation in Pinus densiflora. J For Res, 2006, 11: 449-453.

[48]

Sobrosa RC, Martins-Corder MP. Genetic and biotechnological breeding for disease resistance in forest species: a review. Crop Breed Appl Biotechnol, 2001, 1(4): 385-398.

[49]

Stojičić D, Janošević D, Uzelac B, Čokeša V, Budimir S. Micropropagation of Pinus peuce. Biol Plant, 2012, 56(2): 362-364.

[50]

Sul IW, Korban SS. Effects of salt formulations, carbon sources, cytokinins, and auxin on shoot organogenesis from cotyledons of Pinus pinea L. Plant Growth Regul, 2004, 43: 197-205.

[51]

Švábová L, Lebeda A. In vitro selection for improved plant resistance to toxin-producing pathogens. J Phytopathol, 2005, 153: 52-64.

[52]

Taniguchi T. Morohoshi N, Komamine A. Plant regeneration from somatic embryos in Pinus thunbergii and Pinus densiflora. Molecular breeding of woody plants, 2001, Amsterdam: Elsevier Science B V 319 324

[53]

Thomas TD. The role of activated charcoal in plant tissue culture. Biotechnol Adv, 2008, 26(6): 618-631.

[54]

Toda T. Studies on the breeding for resistance to the pine wilt disease in Pinus densiflora and P. thunbergii. Bull For Tree Breed Center, 2004, 20: 83-217.

[55]

Tripathi L, Odipio J, Tripathi JN, Tusiime G. A rapid technique for screening banana cultivars for resistance to Xanthomonas wilt. Eur J Plant Pathol, 2008, 121: 9-19.

[56]

Utkhede RS. In vitro screening of the world apple germplasm collection for resistance to Phytophthora cactorurn crown rot. Sci Hortic, 1986, 29: 205-210.

[57]

Wenzel G. Strategies in unconventional breeding for disease resistance. Annu Rev Phytopathol, 1985, 23: 149-172.

[58]

Wu YL, Yi GJ, Peng XX. Rapid screening of Musa species for resistance to Fusarium wilt in an in vitro bioassay. Eur J Plant Pathol, 2010, 128: 409-415.

[59]

Zhao L, Mota M, Vieira P, Butcher RA, Sun J. Interspecific communication between pinewood nematode, its insect vector, and associated microbes. Trends Parasitol, 2014, 30(6): 299-308.

[60]

Zhu LH, Wu XQ, Dai PP, Zhang HY. In vitro plantlet regeneration from seedling explants of Pinus densiflora. J Nanjing For Univ Nat Sci Ed, 2010, 34(2): 11-14. (in Chinese)

[61]

Zhu LH, Wu XQ, Qu HY, Ji J, Ye JR. Micropropagation of Pinus massoniana and mycorrhiza formation in vitro. Plant Cell, Tissue Organ Cult, 2010, 102: 121-128.

[62]

Zhu LH, Ye J, Negi S, Xl Xu, Zl Wang. Pathogenicity of aseptic Bursaphelenchus xylophilus. PLoS ONE, 2012 7 5 e38095

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

242

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/