Environmental parameters and tree physiology in two semiarid land use systems in Brazil

Abstract

To determine if reduced tree densities (number of trees per unit area) lead to changes in micro-meteorological and tree physiological characteristics, two areas with different tree densities were assessed. One was an agrosilvopastoral system (AGP) with low tree density, and the other, a secondary forest (SF) with greater tree numbers, both located in a semiarid region of Brazil. Data were collected simultaneously by two automated weather stations: rainfall, air (T_a) and soil temperatures (T_s5cm), relative humidity (RH_air), photosynthetically active radiation (PAR), soil moisture at two depths (M_s30cm and M_s50cm), and wind velocity (V_w). Net photosynthesis in Cordia oncocalyx Allemão trees was measured with an infrared gas analyzer in February, March, May, July, August and September 2011, which encompasses a rainy period followed by a dry period. Average values of T_a, T_s5cm, V_w and PAR were greater and average values of RH_air and M_s50cm were lesser in the AGP. Photosynthetic rates were greater in plants growing under the AGP at the onset of the dry season when V_w, PAR and T_s5cm were greater and M_s50cm was lesser. Photosynthetic rates correlated strongly with physical parameters during the dry season, especially under SF. Differences in tree numbers between AGP and SF led to differences in physical environmental parameters; however, the latter had less influence on photosynthetic rates in C. oncocalyx during the rainy season. During the dry season, all physical parameters had an impact on net photosynthesis under SF but not under AGP. This indicates a certain independence of plants in AGP.

Keywords

Agrosilvopastoral system / Net photosynthesis / Secondary forest / Tree density

References

[1] Aguiar MIA, Maia SMF, Oliveira TS, Mendonça ES, Araújo-Filho JA. Perdas de solo, água e nutrientes em sistemas agroflorestais no município de Sobral, CE. Rev Ciênc Agron, 2006, 37(3): 270-278.

[2] Andrade-Lima D. The caatingas dominium. Rev Bras Bot, 1981, 4(1): 149-153.

[3] Anning AK, McCarthy BC. Competition, size and age affect tree growth response to fuel reduction treatments in mixed-oak forests of Ohio. For Ecol Manag, 2013, 307: 74-83.

[4] Araújo EL, Tabarelli M. Araújo EL, Moura NA, Sampaio ESVB, Gestinari LMS, Carneiro JMT. Estudos de ecologia de populações de plantas do nordeste do Brasil. Biodiversidade, conservação e uso sustentável da flora do Brasil, 2002, Recife: Imprensa Universitária 135 142

[5] Ayres M, Ayres-JR M, Ayres DL, Santos AA. Bioestat —Aplicações estatísticas nas áreas das ciências biomédicas, 2007, Belém: Ong Mamirauá.

[6] Balieiro FC, Ceddia MB, Pereira MG, Resende AS, Franco AA. Biomassa de raízes e regime hídrico do solo em plantio de Pseudosamanea guachapele (Kunth) Harms em um Planossolo Háplico. Floresta, 2005, 35(2): 221-230.

[7] Barbosa DCA, Barbosa MCA, Lima LCM. Leal IR, Tabarelli M, Silva JMC. Fenologia de espécies lenhosas da caatinga. Ecologia e conservação da caatinga, 2003, Recife: Universitária UFPE 657 693

[8] Blonquist JM Jr, Norman JM, Bugbee B. Automated measurement of canopy stomatal conductance based on infrared temperature. Agric For Meteorol, 2009, 149(11): 1931-1945.

[9] Brooks RT, Kyker-Snowman TD. Forest floor temperature and relative humidity following timber harvesting in southern New England, USA. For Ecol Manag, 2008, 254(1–3): 65-73.

[10] Bueno ACR, Prudente DA, Machado EC, Ribeiro RV. Daily temperature amplitude affects the vegetative growth and carbon metabolism of orange trees in a rootstock-dependent manner. J Plant Growth Regul, 2012, 31(3): 309-319.

[11] Campanha MM, Aguiar MI, Maia SM, Oliveira TS, Mendonça ES, Araújo-Filho JA. Perdas de solo, água e nutrientes pela erosão hídrica em diferentes sistemas de manejo agroflorestal no semiárido cearense, Embrapa, 2008, Sobral: Circular Técnica 37

[12] Campanha MM, Araújo SF, Menezes MO, Silva VMA, Medeiros HR. Structure of plant community of shrubs and trees in an agrosilvopastoral system, in Sobral–CE. Rev Caatinga, 2011, 24(3): 94-101.

[13] Carvalho PER. Pau-branco-do-sertão (Auxemma oncocalyx), Embrapa Florestas, 2008, Colombo: Circular Técnica 153

[14] Clinton BD. Light, temperature, and soil moisture responses to elevation, evergreen understory, and small canopy gaps in the southern Appalachians. For Ecol Manag, 2003, 186(1–3): 243-255.

[15] Costa RC, Araújo FS. Physiognomy and structure of a caatinga with Cordia oncocalyx (Boraginaceae), a new type of community in Andrade-Lima’s classification of caatingas. Rodriguésia, 2012, 63(2): 269-276.

[16] Dang QL, Cheng S. Effects of soil temperature on ecophysiological traits in seedlings of four boreal tree species. For Ecol Manag, 2004, 194(1–3): 379-387.

[17] Dombroski JLD, Praxedes SC, Freitas RMO, Pontes FM. Water relations of caatinga trees in the dry season. South Afr J Bot, 2011, 77(2): 430-434.

[18] Giambelluca TW, Schols FG, Bucci SJ, Meinzer FC, Goldstein G, Hoffmann WA, Franco AC, Buchert MP. Evapotranspiration and energy balance of Brazilian savannas with contrasting tree density. Agric For Meteorol, 2009, 149(2): 1365-1376.

[19] Guevara-Escobar A, González-Sosa E, Véliz-Cháves C, Ventura-Ramos E, Ramos-Salinas E. Rainfall interception and distribution patterns of gross precipitation around an isolated Ficus benjamina tree in an urban area. J Hydrol, 2007, 333(2–4): 532-541.

[20] Gurevitch J, Schneider SM, Fox GA. The ecology of plants, 2006 2 Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates Inc..

[21] Hawke MF, Wedderburn ME. Microclimate changes under Pinus radiata agroforestry regimes in New Zealand. Agric For Meteorol, 1994, 71(1–2): 133-145.

[22] Huang J, Cai W, Zhong Q, Wang S. Influence of temperature on micro-environment, plant eco-physiology and nitrogen removal effect in subsurface flow constructed wetland. Ecol Eng, 2013, 60: 242-248.

[23] IPECE. [Instituto de Pesquisa e Estratégia Econômica do Ceará] Perfil Básico Municipal, Sobral, 2005, Fortaleza: Secretaria do Planejamento e Coordenação (SEPLAN).

[24] Köppen W. Das geographische system der climate. Handbuch der Klimatologie, 1936, Berlin: Borntraeger.

[25] Lemenih M, Gidyelew T, Teketay D. Effects of canopy cover and understory environment of tree plantations on richness, density and size of colonizing woody species in southern Ethiopia. For Ecol Manag, 2004, 194(1–3): 1-10.

[26] Li X, Xiao Q, Niu J, Dymond S, van Doorn NS, Yu X, Xie B, Lv X, Zhang K, Li J. Process-based rainfall interception by small trees in Northern China: the effect of rainfall traits and crown structure characteristics. Agric For Meteorol, 2016, 218–219: 65-73.

[27] Lin BB. Agroforestry management as an adaptive strategy against potential microclimate extremes in coffee agriculture. Agric For Meteorol, 2007, 144(1–2): 85-94.

[28] Looney CE, D’Amato AW, Fraver S, Palik BJ, Reinikainen MR. Examining the influences of tree-to-tree competition and climate on size-growth relationships in hydric, multi-aged Fraxinus nigra stands. For Ecol Manag, 2016, 375: 238-248.

[29] Lozano-Parra J, Schnabel S, Ceballos-Barbancho A. The role of vegetation covers on soil wetting processes at rainfall event scale in scattered tree woodland of Mediterranean climate. J Hydrol, 2015, 529(3): 951-961.

[30] Ma JX. Sap flow characteristics of four typical species in desert shelter forest and their responses to environmental factors. Environ Earth Sci, 2012, 67(1): 151-160.

[31] Ma P, Bai TH, Ma FW. Effects of progressive drought on photosynthesis and partitioning of absorbed light in apple trees. J Integr Agric, 2015, 14(4): 681-690.

[32] Maia SM, Xavier FA, Oliveira TS, Mendonça ES, Araújo-Filho JA. Impactos de sistemas agroflorestais e convencional sobre a qualidade do solo no semi-árido cearense. Rev Árvore, 2006, 30(5): 837-848.

[33] Matsumoto K, Ohta T, Tanaka T. Dependence of stomatal conductance on leaf chlorophyll concentration and meteorological variables. Agric For Meteorol, 2005, 132(1–2): 44-57.

[34] Mendes MMS, Lacerda CF, Fernandes FEP, Cavalcante ACR, Oliveira TS. Ecophysiology of deciduous plant grown at different densities in the semi-arid region of Brazil. Theor Exp Plant Physiol, 2013, 25(2): 1-12.

[35] Microcal Software INC. (1997) Data analysis and technical graphics software. Origin Professional version 6.0. Northampton

[36] Moro MF, Lughadha EN, Araújo FS, Martins FR. A phytogeographical metaanalysis of the semiarid caatinga domain in Brazil. Bot Rev, 2016, 82(2): 91-148.

[37] Muthuri CW, Ong CK, Craigon J, Mati BM, Ngumi VW, Black CR. Gas exchange and water use efficiency of trees and maize in agroforestry systems in semi-arid Kenya. Agric Ecosyst Environ, 2009, 129(4): 497-507.

[38] Ohashi Y, Kawakami H, Shigeta Y, Ykeda H, Yamamoto N. The phenology of cherry blossom (Prunus yedoensis “Somei-yoshino”) and the geographic features contributing to its flowering. Int J Biometeorol, 2012, 56(5): 903-914.

[39] Patterson MC, Samuelson L, Somers G, Mays A. Environmental control of stomatal conductance in forest trees of the Great Smoky Mountains National Park. Environ Pollut, 2000, 110(2): 225-233.

[40] Pérez-Marin AM, Menezes RS, Salcedo IH. Produtividade do milho solteiro ou em aleias de gliricidia adubado com duas fontes orgânicas. Pesqui Agropecu Bras, 2007, 42(5): 669-677.

[41] Poppenborg P, Hölscher D. The influence of emergent trees on rainfall distribution in a cacao agroforest (Sulawesi, Indonesia). Flora Morphol Distrib Funct Ecol Plants, 2009, 204(10): 730-736.

[42] Rasul G, Thapa GB. Financial and economic suitability of agroforestry as an alternative to shifting cultivation: the case of the Chittagong Hill Tracts, Bangladesh. Agric Syst, 2006, 91(1–2): 29-50.

[43] Reifsnyder WE. Reyfsnyder WE, Darnhofer TOYEAR. Control of solar radiation in agroforestry practice. Meteorology and agroforestry, 1989, ICRAF: Nairobi 141 157

[44] Robakowski P, Wyka T, Samardakiewicz S, Kierzkowski D. Growth, photosynthesis, and needle structure of silver fir (Abies alba Mill.) seedlings under different canopies. For Ecol Manag, 2004, 201(2–3): 211-227.

[45] Russel G (2017) Canopy architecture. In: Encyclopedia of applied plant sciences, 2nd edn. vol 3, pp 13–17. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780123948076000307

[46] Sadras VO, Montoro A, Moran MA, Aphalo PJ. Elevated temperature altered the reaction norms of stomatal conductance in field-grown grapevine. Agric For Meteorol, 2012, 165: 35-42.

[47] Santos CM, Veríssimo V, Wanderley-Filho HCL, Ferreira VM, Cavalcante PGS, Rolim EV, Endres L. Seasonal variations of photosynthesis, gas exchange, quantum efficiency of photosystem II and biochemical responses of Jatropha curcas L. grown in semi-humid and semi-arid areas subject to water stress. Ind Crops Prod, 2013, 41: 203-213.

[48] Santos-Silva CM, Lúcio PS. Distribuição espacial da precipitação sobre o Rio Grande do Norte: estimativas via satélites e medidas por pluviômetros. Rev Bras Meteorol, 2012, 27(3): 337-346.

[49] Schwärzel K, Menzer A, Clausnitzer F, Spank U, Häntzschel J, Grünwald T, Köstner B, Bernhofer C, Feger KH. Soil water content measurements deliver reliable estimates of water fluxes: a comparative study in a beech and a spruce stand in the Tharandt forest (Saxony, Germany). Agric For Meteorol, 2009, 149(11): 1994-2006.

[50] Schweitzer CJ, Dey DC. Forest structure, composition, and tree diversity response to a gradient of regeneration harvests in the mid-Cumberland Plateau escarpment region, USA. For Ecol Manag, 2011, 262(9): 1729-1741.

[51] Shachnovich Y, Berliner PR, Bar P. Rainfall interception and spatial distribution of throughfall in a pine forest planted in an arid zone. J Hydrol, 2008, 349(1–2): 168-177.

[52] Siles P, Vaast P, Dreyer E, Harmand JM. Rainfall partitioning into throughfall, stemflow and interception loss in a coffee (Coffea arabica L.) monoculture compared to an agroforestry system with Inga densiflora. J Hydrol, 2010, 395(1–2): 39-48.

[53] Silva GL, Lima HV, Campanha MM, Gilkes RJ, Oliveira TS. Soil physical quality of Luvisols under agroforestry, natural vegetation and conventional crop management systems in Brazilian semi-arid region. Geoderma, 2011, 167–168: 61-70.

[54] Silveira AP, Martins FR, Araújo FS. Are tree ontogenetic structure and allometric relationship independent of vegetation formation type? A case study with Cordia oncocalyx in the Brazilian caatinga. Acta Oecol, 2012, 43: 126-133.

[55] Silveira AP, Martins FR, Araújo FS. Do vegetative and reproductive phenophases of deciduous tropical species respond similarly to rainfall pulses?. J For Res, 2013, 24: 1-9.

[56] Vierling LA, Wessman CA. Photosynthetically active radiation heterogeneity within a monodominant Congolese rain forest canopy. Agric For Meteorol, 2000, 103(3): 265-278.

[57] Von Arx G, Dobbertin M, Rebetez M. Spatio-temporal effects of forest canopy on understory microclimate in a long-term experiment in Switzerland. Agric For Meteorol, 2012, 166–167: 144-155.

[58] Walcroft AS, Whitehead D, Kelliher FM, Arneth A, Silvester WB. The effects of long-term, partial shading on growth and photosynthesis in Pinus radiata D. Don trees. For Ecol Manag, 2002, 163(1–3): 151-163.

[59] Wick B, Tiessen H, Menezes RSC. Land quality changes following the conversion of the natural vegetation into silvo-pastoral systems in semi-arid NE Brazil. Plant Soil, 2000, 222(1–2): 59-70.

[60] Will RE, Barron GA, Burkes EC, Shiver B, Teskey RO. Relationship between intercepted radiation, net photosynthesis, respiration, and rate of stem volume growth of Pinus taeda and Pinus elliottii stands of different densities. For Ecol Manag, 2001, 154(1–2): 155-163.

[61] Wittmann C, Aschan G, Pfanz H. Leaf and twig photosynthesis of young beech (Fagus sylvatica) and aspen (Populus tremula) trees grown under different light regime. Basic Appl Ecol, 2001, 2(2): 145-154.

[62] Woodward FI, Lomas MR, Kelly CK. Global climate and the distribution of plant biomes. Philos Trans R Soc Ser B, 2004, 359(1450): 1465-1476.

[63] Wu H, Franklin SB, Liu J, Lu Z. Relative importance of density dependence and topography on tree mortality in a subtropical mountain forest. For Ecol Manage, 2017, 384: 169-179.

[64] Yao H, Zhang Y, Yi X, Zhang X, Zhang W. Cotton responds to different plant population densities by adjusting specific leaf area to optimize canopy photosynthetic use efficiency of light and nitrogen. Field Crops Res, 2016, 188: 10-16.

[65] Yirdaw E, Luukkanen O. Photosynthetically active radiation transmittance of forest plantation canopies in the Ethiopian highlands. For Ecol Manag, 2004, 188(1–3): 17-24.