Impacts of soil fauna on nitrogen and phosphorus release during litter decomposition were differently controlled by plant species and ecosystem type

Abstract

The dynamics of litter nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) release could be affected by soil fauna and environmental conditions. The objective of the present study was to investigate the effects of soil fauna on the dynamics of N and P during foliar litter decomposition in three types of ecosystems (i.e., montane forest, ecotone, and dry valley) along an elevation gradient. A field experiment using litterbags with two different mesh sizes (0.04 and 3 mm) was conducted from November 2013 to October 2014. Nitrogen and P release rates in decomposing foliar litter from fir (Abies faxoniana) and birch (Betula albosinensis) in montane forest, oak (Quercus baronii) and cypress (Cupressus chengiana) in ecotone, and cypress and clovershrub (Campylotropis macrocarpa) in dry valley were investigated in the upper reaches of the Yangtze River. Soil fauna strongly affected N and P release across different decomposition periods and ecosystem types. The average release rate of N mediated by soil fauna across the entire year was higher in the dry valley (15.6–37.3%) than in the montane forest (0.5–6.4%) and the ecotone (− 3.7–4.9%). The effects of soil fauna on P release rate were manifest in both the montane forest and the dry valley. Moreover, the impacts of soil fauna can vary substantially among different decomposition periods. Our results indicated that soil fauna can significantly affect N and P release during litter decomposition. The N release rate mediated by fauna was likely to be more sensitive to the effects of plant species (i.e., initial litter chemical traits), while the P release rate mediated by soil fauna might be subject to the effects of local-scale environmental factors (e.g., temperature) to a greater extent.

Keywords

Dry valley / Ecotone / Environmental factors / Litterbag / Montane forest / Release rate

References

[1] Aerts R. The freezer defrosting: global warming and litter decomposition rates in cold biomes. J Ecol, 2006, 94: 713-724.

[2] Bailey R. Identifying Ecoregion Boundaries. Environ Manag, 2004, 34: S14-S26.

[3] Bargali K, Manral V, Bargali S. Weight loss pattern in decomposing litter of Coriaria nepalensis, an actinorhizal shrub from degraded land. Indian J Agric Sci, 2015, 85: 270-273.

[4] Bargali S, Shukla K, Singh L, Ghosh L, Lakhera M. Leaf litter decomposition and nutrient dynamics in four tree species of dry deciduous forest. Trop Ecol, 2015, 56: 191-200.

[5] Bradford MA, Warren RJ II, Baldrian P, Crowther TW, Maynard DS, Oldfield EE, Wieder WR, Wood SA, King JR. Climate fails to predict wood decomposition at regional scales. Nat Clim Chan, 2014, 4: 625-630.

[6] Bradford MA, Berg B, Maynard DS, Wieder WR, Wood SA. Understanding the dominant controls on litter decomposition. J Ecol, 2016, 104: 229-238.

[7] Cleveland CC, Neff JC, Townsend AR, Hood E. Composition, dynamics, and fate of leached dissolved organic matter in terrestrial ecosystems: results from a decomposition experiment. Ecosystems, 2004, 7: 175-285.

[8] García-Palacios P, Maestre FT, Kattge J, Wall DH. Climate and litter quality differently modulate the effects of soil fauna on litter decomposition across biomes. Ecol Lett, 2013, 16: 1045-1053.

[9] García-Palacios P, Shaw EA, Wall DH, Hättenschwiler S. Temporal dynamics of biotic and abiotic drivers of litter decomposition. Ecol Lett, 2016, 19: 554-563.

[10] Gessner MO, Swan CM, Dang CK, Mckie BG, Bardgett RD, Wall DH, Hättenschwiler S. Diversity meets decomposition. Trends Ecol Evol, 2010, 25: 372-380.

[11] Güsewell S, Gessner MO. N:P ratios influence litter decomposition and colonization by fungi and bacteria in microcosms. Funct Ecol, 2009, 23: 211-219.

[12] Hättenschwiler S, Tiunov VA, Scheu S. Biodiversity and litter decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst, 2005, 36: 191-218.

[13] He W, Wu F, Zhang D, Yang W, Tan B, Zhao Y, Wu Q. The effects of forest gaps on cellulose degradation in the foliar litter of two shrub species in an alpine fir forest. Plant Soil, 2015, 393: 109-122.

[14] He W, Wu F, Yang W, Tan B, Zhao Y, Wu Q, He M. Lignin degradation in foliar litter of two shrub species from the gap center to the closed canopy in an alpine fir forest. Ecosystems, 2016, 19: 115-128.

[15] He Z, Yu Z, Huang Z, Davis M, Yang Y. Litter decomposition, residue chemistry and microbial community structure under two subtropical forest plantations: a reciprocal litter transplant study. Appl Soil Ecol, 2016, 101: 84-92.

[16] Heděnec P, Radochová P, Nováková A, Kaneda S, Frouz J. Grazing preference and utilization of soil fungi by Folsomia candida (Isotomidae: Collembola). Eur J Soil Biol, 2013, 55: 66-70.

[17] Hobbie S, Stuart Chapin F III. Winter regulation of tundra litter carbon and nitrogen dynamics. Biogeochemistry, 1996, 35: 327-338.

[18] Hobbie SE, Vitousek PM. Nutrient limitation of decomposition in Hawaiian forests. Ecology, 2000, 81: 1867-1877.

[19] Li X, Wu F, Yang W, Xia L, Tan B. Contribution of meso-and macro-fauna to nitrogen release in needle litter decomposition of Abies faxoniana during the freeze-thaw period. Acta Ecol Sin, 2014, 34: 290-293.

[20] Liski J, Nissinen A, Erhard M, Taskinen O. Climatic effects on litter decomposition from arctic tundra to tropical rainforest. Glob Change Biol, 2003, 9: 575-584.

[21] Lu RK (1999) Soil and agro-chemical analytical method. China Agricultural Science and Technology Press, Beijing, p 107, 147, 168 (in Chinese)

[22] Manzoni S, Trofymow JA, Jackson RB, Porporato A. Stoichiometric controls on carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus dynamics in decomposing litter. Ecol Monogr, 2010, 80: 89-106.

[23] Moore T, Trofymow J, Prescott C, Fyles J, Titus B. Patterns of carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus dynamics in decomposing foliar litter in Canadian forests. Ecosystems, 2006, 9: 46-62.

[24] Moore TR, Trofymow J, Prescott CE, Titus B, Group CW. Nature and nurture in the dynamics of C, N and P during litter decomposition in Canadian forests. Plant Soil, 2011, 339: 163-175.

[25] Mueller KE, Eisenhauer N, Reich PB Light, earthworms, and soil resources as predictors of diversity of 10 soil invertebrate groups across monocultures of 14 tree species. Soil Biol Biochem, 2016, 92: 184-198.

[26] Peng Y, Yang W, Li J, Wang B, Zhang C, Yue K, Wu F. Contribution of soil fauna to foliar litter-mass loss in winter in an ecotone between dry valley and montane forest in the upper reaches of the Minjiang River. PLoS ONE, 2015 10 4 e0124605

[27] Simmons B, Wall D, Adams B, Ayres E, Barrett J, Virginia R. Long-term experimental warming reduces soil nematode populations in the McMurdo Dry Valleys, Antarctica. Soil Biol Biochem, 2009, 41: 2052-2060.

[28] Swift MJ, Heal OW, Anderson JM. Decomposition in terrestrial ecosystem, 1979, Berkley: University of California Press 71 73

[29] Sylvain ZA, Wall DH, Cherwin KL, Peters DP, Reichmann LG, Sala OE. Soil animal responses to moisture availability are largely scale, not ecosystem dependent: insight from a cross-site study. Glob Change Biol, 2014, 20: 2631-2643.

[30] Tan B, Wu FZ, Yang WQ, Liu L, Yu S. Characteristics of soil animal community in the subalpine/alpine forests of western Sichuan during onset of freezing. Acta Ecol Sin, 2010, 30: 93-99.

[31] Wang Q, Wang X, Luo J. Ecotone and biodiversity. Chin Biodivers, 1997, 5: 126-131.

[32] Wang S, Ruan H, Han Y. Effects of microclimate, litter type, and mesh size on leaf litter decomposition along an elevation gradient in the Wuyi Mountains, China. Ecol Res, 2010, 25: 1113-1120.

[33] Wardle D, Lavelle P. Cadish G, Giller KE. Linkages between soil biota, plant litter quality and decomposition. Driven by nature: plant litter quality and decomposition, 1997, Wallingford: CAB International 107 124

[34] Wardle DA, Bardgett RD, Klironomos JN, Setälä H, Van Der Putten WH, Wall DH. Ecological linkages between aboveground and belowground biota. Science, 2004, 304: 1629-1633.

[35] Whittaker RH. Evolution and measurement of species diversity. Taxon, 1972, 21: 213-251.

[36] Wu F, Yang W, Zhang J, Deng R. Litter decomposition in two subalpine forests during the freeze–thaw season. Acta Oecol, 2010, 36: 135-140.

[37] Wu F, Peng C, Zhang J, Zhang J, Tan B, Yang W. Impacts of freezing and thawing dynamics on foliar litter carbon release in alpine/subalpine forests along an altitudinal gradient in the eastern Tibetan Plateau. Biogeosciences, 2014, 11: 6471-6481.

[38] Xin W, Yin X, Song B. Contribution of soil fauna to litter decomposition in Songnen sandy lands in northeastern China. J Arid Environm, 2012, 77: 90-95.

[39] Xu X, Hirata E. Decomposition patterns of leaf litter of seven common canopy species in a subtropical forest: N and P dynamics. Plant Soil, 2005, 273: 279-289.

[40] Yang X, Chen J. Plant litter quality influences the contribution of soil fauna to litter decomposition in humid tropical forests, southwestern China. Soil Biol Biochem, 2009, 41: 910-918.

[41] Yin W, Hu S, Shen W. Handbook of Soil Fauna in China, 1998, Beijing: Science Press.

[42] Yu Z, Huang Z, Wang M Nitrogen addition enhances home-field advantage during litter decomposition in subtropical forest plantations. Soil Biol Biochem, 2015, 90: 188-196.

[43] Yue K, Yang WQ, Peng CH, Peng Y, Zhang C, Huang CP, Tan Y, Wu FZ. Foliar litter decomposition in an alpine forest meta-ecosystem on the eastern Tibetan Plateau. Sci Total Environ, 2016, 566–567: 279-287.

[44] Yue K, Yang W, Peng Y, Zhang C, Huang C, Wu F. Chromium, cadmium, and lead dynamics during winter foliar litter decomposition in an alpine forest river. Arct Antarct Alp Res, 2016, 48(1): 79-91.