Effect of increasing densities of Urochloa brizantha cv. Marandu on Eucalyptus urograndis initial development in silvopastoral system

Abstract

In silvopasture system, the coexistence of eucalyptus seedlings with other species may result in growth reduction, especially during eucalyptus early development. Therefore, studies elucidating how forage species affect the eucalyptus growth can provide important information for their rational management aiming to obtain the maximum gain of the system. The aim of this work was to evaluate the effect of increasing densities of Urochloa brizantha cv. Marandu in the early development of Eucalyptus urograndis. An experiment was conducted in 20 L pots, in an open and semi-controlled area, during 90 days after planting of eucalyptus. A completely randomized design with four replications was used, in a 6 × 7 factorial system, meaning six evaluation periods and seven densities of U. brizantha: 0 (control), 22, 33, 44, 67, 89 and 111 plants m⁻². Fortnightly, eucalyptus height, stem diameter and chlorophyll fluorescence (F _v/F _m) were evaluated. At the end of experimental period, the net assimilation rate, stomatal conductance and transpiration rate of eucalyptus plants were determined, in addition to the dry matter of eucalyptus (leaves and stem) and U. brizantha (leaves). In coexistence with 111 plants m⁻², eucalyptus had reduction of 63.9% on total dry matter and 72.7% on leaf area, compared to the control. From the density of 22 plants m⁻², U. brizantha negatively interfere significantly the growth of E. urograndis. Up to 8 plants m⁻² there are no reductions greater than 5% in eucalyptus height and stem diameter.

Keywords

Eucalyptus / Palisade grass / Competition / Interference

References

[1] Abraf (2013) Associação brasileira dos produtores de florestas plantadas. Anuário estatístico da abraf, ano base 2012. http://www.ipef.br/estatisticas/relatorios/anuario-ABRAF13-BR.pdf. Accessed 25 Feb 2017

[2] Adams PR, Beadle CL, Mendham NJ, Smethurst PJ. The impact of timing and duration of grass control on the growth of a young Eucalyptus globulus Labill. plantation. New For, 2003, 26(2): 147-165.

[3] Bacha AL, Pereira FCM, Pires RN, Nepomuceno MP, Alves PLCA. Interference of seeding and regrowth of signalgrass weed (Urochloa decumbens) during the initial development of Eucalyptus urograndis (E. grandis × E. urophylla). Aust J Crop Sci, 2016, 10(3): 322-330.

[4] Bleasdale JKA. Harper JL. Studies on plant competition. The biology of weeds, 1960, Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications 133 142

[5] Brendolan RA, Pellegrini MT, Alves PLCA. Efeitos da nutrição mineral na competição inter e intraespecífica de Eucalyptus grandis e Brachiaria decumbens: 1-crescimento. Sci For, 2000, 58: 49-57.

[6] Caldwell JM, Sucoff EI, Dixon RK. Grass interference limits resource availability and reduces growth of juvenile red pine in the field. New For, 1995, 10(1): 1-15.

[7] Coll L, Balandier P, Picon-Cochard C. Morphological and physiological responses of beech (Fagus sylvatica) seedlings to grass-induced belowground competition. Tree Physiol, 2004, 24(1): 45-54.

[8] Costa NL, Townsend CR, Magalhães JA, Pereira RGA. Desempenho agronômico de gramíneas forrageiras sob sombreamento de eucalipto (Eucalyptus spp.). Embrapa Cpaf Rondônia, 2000, 184: 1-4.

[9] Cruz MB, Alves PLCA, Karam D, Ferraudo AS. Capim-colonião e seus efeitos sobre o crescimento inicial de clones de Eucalyptus x urograndis. Cienc Florest, 2010, 20(3): 391-401.

[10] Dinardo W, Toledo REB, Alves PLCA, Pitelli RA. Efeito da densidade de plantas de Panicum maximum Jacq. sobre o crescimento inicial de Eucalyptus grandis W. Hill ex Maiden. Sci For, 2003, 64: 59-68.

[11] Ellis RC, Webb DP, Graley AM, Rout AF. The effect of weed competition and nitrogen nutrition on the growth of seedlings of Eucalyptus delegatensis in a highland area of Tasmania. Aust For Res, 1985, 15(4): 395-408.

[12] Florentine S, Fox J. Competition between Eucalyptus victrix seedlings and grass species. Ecol Res, 2003, 18(1): 25-39.

[13] Garau AM, Lemcoff JH, Ghersa CM, Beadle CL. Water stress tolerance in Eucalyptus globulus Labill. subsp. maidenii (F. Muell.) saplings induced by water restrictions imposed by weeds. For Ecol Manag, 2008, 255(7): 2811-2819.

[14] Garau AM, Lemcoff JH, Ghersa CM, Barañao JJ. Weeds in Eucalyptus globulus subsp. maidenii (F. Muell) establishment: effects of competition on sapling growth and survivorship. New For, 2009, 37(3): 251-264.

[15] Graat Y, Rosa JO, Nepomuceno MP, Carvalho LB, Alves PLCA. Grass weeds interfering with eucalypt: effects of the distance of coexistence on the initial plant growth. Planta Daninha, 2015, 33(2): 203-211.

[16] Grossnickle S, Folk R. Stock quality assessment: forecasting survival and performance on a reforestation niche. Tree Plant Notes, 1993, 44(3): 113-121.

[17] Iba (2016) Indústria brasileira de árvores. Relatório IBÁ 2016. http://iba.org/images/shared/Biblioteca/IBA_RelatorioAnual2016_.pdf. Accessed 23 Feb 2017

[18] Köppen W. Climatologia: con un estudio de los climas de la tierra, 1948, Mexico City: Fondo de Cultura Econômica 478

[19] Krause GH, Weis E. Chlorophyll fluorescence and photosynthesis: the basics. Annu Rev Plant Phys, 1991, 42(2): 313-349.

[20] Lamhamedi M, Bernier P, Hebert C, Jobidon R. Physiological and growth responses of three sizes of containerized Picea mariana seedlings outplanted with and without vegetation control. For Ecol Manag, 1998, 110(1–3): 13-23.

[21] Macedo MCM. Integração lavoura pecuária: o estado da arte e inovação tecnológicas. Rev Bras Zootech, 2009, 38(1): 133-146.

[22] Macedo RIG, Venturim N, Gomes JE, Lima EMG. Princípios de agrossilvicultura como subsídios do manejo sustentável. Informe Agropecuário, 2001, 29(1): 15-26.

[23] Margolis HA, Brand DG. An ecophysiological basis for understanding plantation establishment. Can J For Res, 1990, 20(4): 375-390.

[24] Marques DB, Martins PFRB, Parreira MC, Alves PLCA. Companion crops upon Eucalyptus urograndis initial development. Bosque, 2015, 36(2): 163-170.

[25] Maxwell K, Johnson GN. Chlorophyll fluorescence: a practical guide. J Exp Bot, 2000, 51: 659-668.

[26] Menezes RSC, Salcedo IH, Elliott ET. Microclimate and nutrient dynamic in a silvopastoral system of semiarid northeastern Brazil. Agrofor Syst, 2002, 56(1): 27-38.

[27] Nambiar EKS, Sands R. Competition for water and nutrients in forests. Can J For Res, 1993, 23(10): 1955-1968.

[28] Pereira FCM, Yamauti MS, Alves PLCA. Interaction between weed management and covering fertilization in the initial growth of Eucalyptus grandis × E. urophylla. Rev Árvore, 2012, 36(5): 941-949.

[29] Pereira FCM, Alves PLCA, Martins JVF. Interference of grasses on the growth of eucalyptus clones. J Agric Sci, 2013, 5(11): 173-180.

[30] Pitelli RA. Interferência das plantas daninhas em culturas agrícolas. Informe Agropecuário, 1985, 11(129): 16-27.

[31] Pitelli RA, Marchi SR. Interferência das plantas invasoras nas áreas de reflorestamento. Seminário Técnico Sobre Plantas Daninhas e o Uso de Herbicidas em Reflorestamento, 1991, 3: 1-11.

[32] R Development Core Team (2017) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org

[33] Ribaski J, Rakocevic M (2002) Disponibilidade e qualidade da forragem de braquiária (Brachiaria brizantha) em um sistema silvipastoril com eucalipto (Eucalyptus citriodora) no noroeste do Estado do Paraná. Congresso brasileiro de sistemas agroflorestais, Ilhéus. https://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/bitstream/doc/307621/1/6026disponibilidade.pdf. Accessed 08 Feb 2017

[34] Sands R, Nambiar EKS. Water relations of Pinus radiata in competition with weeds. Can J For Res, 1984, 14(2): 233-237.

[35] Santos MV, Ferreira EA, Tuffi Santos LD, Fonseca DM, Aspiazu I, Silva DV, Porto JMP, Braga RR. Physiological aspects of acacia and eucalyptus in competition with Brachiaria. Aust J Crop Sci, 2015, 9(3): 210-214.

[36] Schaller M, Schroth G, Beer J, Jiménez F. Root interactions between young Eucalyptus deglupta trees and competitive grass species in contour strips. For Ecol Manag, 2003, 179(1–3): 429-440.

[37] Sharkey TD, Raschke K. Effect of light quality on stomatal opening in leaves of Xanthium strumarium L.. Plant Physiol, 1981, 68(5): 1170-1174.

[38] Stape J, Binkley D, Ryan MG, Gomes AN. Water use, water limitation, and water use efficiency in a eucalyptus plantation. Bosque, 2004, 25(2): 35-41.

[39] Tarouco CP, Agostinetto D, Panozzo LE, Santos LS, Vignolo GK, Ramos LOO. Períodos de interferência de plantas daninhas na fase inicial de crescimento do eucalipto. Pesqui Agropecu Bras, 2009, 44(9): 1131-1137.

[40] Toledo REB, Victoria Filho R, Pitelli RA, Alves PLCA, Lopes MAF. Efeitos de períodos de controle de plantas daninhas sobre o desenvolvimento inicial de plantas de eucalipto. Planta Daninha, 2000, 18(3): 395-404.

[41] Toledo REB, Dinardo W, Bezutte AJ, Alves PLCA, Pitelli RA. Efeito da densidade de plantas de Brachiaria decumbens Stapf sobre o crescimento inicial de mudas de Eucalyptus grandis W. Hill ex Maiden. Sci For, 2001, 60: 109-117.

[42] Torres LG, Faria AT, Felipe RS, Benevenute SS, Medeiros WN, Ferreira FA. Interferência de plantas daninhas sobre o crescimento inicial de mudas de clones de eucalipto. Congresso Brasileiro da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas, 2010, 28: 105-109.

[43] Watt MS, Whitehead D, Mason EG, Richardson B, Kimberley MO. The influence of weed competition for light and water on growth and dry matter partitioning of young Pinus radiata, at a dryland site. For Ecol Manag, 2003, 183(1–3): 363-376.