Exploratory analysis of structural diversity indicators at stand level in three Italian beech sites and implications for sustainable forest management

Abstract

The present study introduces an exploratory data analysis based on structural indicators with the aim to assess the effect of silvicultural practices on tree stand structure. The study was carried out in three Italian beech forests of different ages with stand structures that originated from dissimilar regeneration and cultivation techniques (Cansiglio, northern Italy, Chiarano, central Italy, and Mongiana, southern Italy). Ten structural indicators were considered when investigating the latent multivariate relationship between stand structure attributes before and after thinning operations by using a multiway factor analysis (MFA). The MFA results identified the older stand at Cansiglio as more homogeneous for cultivation regimes, and more stable to practices when compared with the younger sites (Chiarano and Mongiana). Heterogeneous stands were sensitive to silvicultural practice thus suggesting their possible impact on forest attributes. The proposed approach proved to be an operational tool to evaluate comprehensively the response of forest structure to planned interventions.

Keywords

Forest diversity / Multiway factor analysis / Silviculture / Structural diversity indicators / Tree stand structure

References

[1] ANPA. Indicatori di gestione sostenibile in Italia, 2000, Roma: Agenzia Nazionale per la Protezione dell’Ambiente.

[2] Assmann E. The principles of forest yield study, 1970, Oxford: Pergamon Press 506

[3] Becagli C, Puletti N, Chiavetta U, Cantiani P, Salvati L, Fabbio G. Early impact of alternative thinning approaches on structure diversity and complexity at stand level in two beech forests in Italy. Ann Silv Res, 2014, 37(1): 55-63.

[4] Bertini G, Fabbio G, Pichi M (2006) MAIN TreeS: a software designed for forest biodiversity assessment. In: Final forest biota meeting, Athens, May 9–10

[5] Biasi R, Colantoni A, Ferrara C, Ranalli F, Salvati L. In-between sprawl and fires: long-term forest expansion and settlement dynamics at the Wildland–Urban Interface in Rome, Italy. Int J Sustain Dev World Ecol, 2015, 22(6): 467-475.

[6] Briceño-Elizondo E, Jäger D, Lexer MJ, Garcia-Gonzalo J, Peltola H, Kellomäki S. Multi-criteria evaluation of multi-purpose stand treatment programmes for Finnish boreal forests under changing climate. Ecol Ind, 2008, 8(1): 26-45.

[7] Coppi R, Bolasco S. Multiway data analysis, 1989, Amsterdam: North Holland.

[8] Corona P, D’Orazio P, Lamonaca A, Portoghesi L. L’indice Winkelmass per l’inventariazione a fini assestamentali della diversità strutturale di soprassuoli forestali. Forest, 2005, 2(2): 225-232.

[9] Dale VH, Beyeler SC. Challenges in the development and use of ecological indicators. Ecol Ind, 2001, 1(1): 3-10.

[10] Edwards D, Søndergaard Jensen F, Marzano M, Mason B, Pizzirani S, Schelhaas M. A theoretical framework to assess the impacts of forest management on the recreational value of European forests. Ecol Ind, 2011, 11(1): 81-89.

[11] Fabbio G, Manetti MC, Bertini G. Aspects of biological diversity in the CONECOFOR plots. I Structural and species diversity of the tree community. Ann CRA-SEL, 2006, 30: 17-28.

[12] Failing L, Gregory R. The common mistakes in designing biodiversity indicators for forest policy. J Environ Manag, 2003, 68(2): 121-132.

[13] Ferrara A, Salvati L, Sateriano A, Carlucci M, Gitas I, Biasi R. Unraveling the ‘stable’ landscape: a multi-factor analysis of unchanged agricultural and forest land (1987–2007) in a rapidly-expanding urban region. Urban Ecosyst, 2015, 19(2): 835-848.

[14] Ferretti M, Bussotti F, Fabbio G, Petriccione B. Status and changes of key ecosystems attributes monitored at the CONECOFOR plots, 1995–2005—achievements, problems, perspectives. Ann CRA-SEL, 2006, 34: 115-120.

[15] Ferretti M, Calderisi M, Bussotti F. Were there significant changes in the overall condition of the CONECOFOR plots over the 1995–2005 period?. Ann CRA-SEL, 2006, 34: 101-114.

[16] Fischer R, Pommerening A (2003) Methodology for stand structure assessments in the biodiversity test phase 2003–2005 of EU/ICP forests. Working group on biodiversity assessment in forests, ICP on assessment and monitoring of air pollution effects on forests

[17] Gough AD, Innes JL, Allen SD. Development of common indicators of sustainable forest management. Ecol Ind, 2008, 8(5): 425-430.

[18] Hickey GM. Evaluating sustainable forest management. Ecol Ind, 2008, 8(2): 109-114.

[19] INFC. Inventario Nazionale delle Foreste e dei Serbatoi Forestali di Carbonio, 2005, Milan: Metodi e Risultati, Edagricole 653

[20] Kotwal PC, Omprakash MC, Gairola S, Dugaya D. Ecological indicators: imperative to sustainable forest management. Ecol Ind, 2008, 8(1): 104-107.

[21] Lavit C, Escoufier Y, Sabatier R, Triassac P. The ACT (STATIS) method. Comput Stat Data Ann, 1994, 18: 97-119.

[22] Lindenmayer DB, Margules CR, Botkin DB. Indicators of biodiversity for ecologically sustainable forest management. Conserv Biol, 2000, 14(4): 941-950.

[23] Maes WH, Fontaine M, Rongé K, Hermy M, Muys B. A quantitative indicator framework for stand level evaluation and monitoring of environmentally sustainable forest management. Ecol Ind, 2011, 11(2): 468-479.

[24] McElhinny C, Gibbons P, Brack C, Bauhus J. Forest and woodland stand structural complexity: its definition and measurement. Forest Ecol Manag, 2005, 218: 1-24.

[25] MCPFE (2011). State of Europe’s forests 2011. Status and trend in sustainable forest management in Europe. Helsinki, Finland

[26] Mendoza GA, Prabhu R. Qualitative multi-criteria approaches to assessing indicators of sustainable forest resource management. For Ecol Manag, 2003, 174: 329-343.

[27] Moldan B, Janouŝková S, Hák T. How to understand and measure environmental sustainability: indicators and targets. Ecol Ind, 2012, 17: 4-13.

[28] Neumann M, Starlinger F. The significance of different indices for stand structure and diversity in forests. For Ecol Manag, 2001, 145: 91-106.

[29] Pili S, Grigoriadis E, Carlucci M, Clemente M, Salvati L. Towards sustainable growth? A multi-criteria assessment of (changing) urban forms. Ecol Ind, 2017, 76: 71-80.

[30] Pommerening A. Evaluating structural indices by reversing forest structural analysis. For Ecol Manag, 2006, 224: 266-277.

[31] Pretzsch H. Forest dynamics growth and yield: from measurement to model, 2009, Berlin: Springer

[32] Rolstad J, Gjerde I, Gundersen VS, Sætersdal M. Use of indicator species to assess forest continuity: a critique. Conserv Biol, 2002, 16(1): 253-257.

[33] Salvati L, Zitti M. Assessing the impact of ecological and economic factors on land degradation vulnerability through multiway analysis. Ecol Ind, 2008, 9: 357-363.

[34] Salvati L, Zitti M. Substitutability and equal weighting of environmental indicators: a proposal to estimate the importance of the different components of a composite index. Ecol Econ, 2009, 68(4): 1093-1099.

[35] Singh RK, Murty HR, Gupta SK, Dikshit AK. An overview of sustainability assessment methodologies. Ecol Ind, 2009, 9: 189-212.

[36] Staudhammer CL, LeMay VM. Introduction and evaluation of possible indices of stand structural diversity. Can J For Res, 2001, 3: 1105-1115.

[37] Wolfslehner B, Vacik H. Mapping indicator models: from intuitive problem structuring to quantified decision-making in sustainable forest management. Ecol Ind, 2011, 11(2): 274-283.