Spatial correlation of pit and mound topography with canopy gaps in a virgin mixed beech forest, northern Iran

Abstract

In a reserved forest parcel in a virgin eastern Hyrcanian mixed beech forest, 80 ha was surveyed to determine the pit and mound topography, canopy gaps and dead trees. The aim was to investigate the spatial patterns and correlation of pit and mound features with canopy gaps. Seventy-five canopy gaps and 61 pit and mound features were identified. The univariate first order nearest neighbor (R_CE) and bivariate second order test (Ripley’s K) statistic were applied. R_CE statistics highlighted a general aggregation pattern for canopy gaps and pits and mounds, while pits and mounds alone were more clumped. Distances between canopy gaps were 130 m average, whereas distances between pit and mound features and dead trees were 60 and 78 m, respectively. Spatial positive correlation of canopy gaps with pits and mounds were observed with all distances. The result of spatial correlations between canopy gaps with pits and mounds confirmed that windthrows cause micro successions in fallen tree ecosystem-scale correlated with gap phase dynamics in the forest community-scale.

Keywords

Pit and mound / Canopy gap / Mixed beech / Spatial pattern / Spatial correlation

References

[1] Akhavan R, Sagheb-Talebi Kh, Zenner EK, Safavimanesh F. Spatial patterns in different forest development stages of an intact old-growth oriental beech forest in the Caspian region of Iran. Eur J For Res, 2012, 125(1): 225-237.

[2] Clark PJ, Evans FC. Distance to nearest neighbor as a measure of spatial relationships in populations. Ecology, 1954, 35: 445-453.

[3] Clinton BD, Baker C. Catastrophic windthrow in the Southern Appalachians: characteristics of pits and mounds and initial vegetation responses. For Ecol Manag, 2000, 126: 51-60.

[4] Dounavi A, Koutsias N, Ziehe H, Hattemer H. Spatial patterns and genetic structures within beech populations (Fagus sylvatica L.) of forked and non-forked individuals. Eur J For Res, 2010, 129: 1191-1202.

[5] Duncan RP, Stewart GH. The temporal and spatial analysis of tree age distributions. Can J For Res, 1991, 21: 1703-1710.

[6] Habashi H, Hosseini SM, Mohammadi J, Rahmani R. Stand structure and spatial pattern of trees in mixed Hyrcanian beech forests of Iran. Iran J For Poplar Res, 2007, 15: 55-64.

[7] Heiri C, Wolf A, Rohrer L, Bugmann H. Forty years of natural dynamics in Swiss beech forests: structure, composition, and the influence of former management. Ecol Appl, 2009, 19(7): 1920-1934.

[8] Jonsson BG (1993) Treefall disturbance, succession, and diversity in boreal forest floor vegetation. Doctoral Dissertation. University of Umea Sweden

[9] Kan B, Wang Q, Wu W. The influence of selective cutting of mixed Korean pine (Pinus koraiensis Sieb. et Zucc.) and broad-leaf forest on rare species distribution patterns and spatial correlation in Northeast China. J For Res, 2015, 26(4): 833-840.

[10] Kooch Y, Hosseini SH, Mohammadi J, Hojjati SM. Effects of pit and mound landscape on soil ecosystem engineers at local scales-a case Study in Hyrcanian forest. Mol Soil Biol, 2013, 4(1): 7-15.

[11] Krebs CJ. Ecology: the experimental analysis of distribution and abundance, 1994 4 New York: Harper Collins.

[12] Kunstler J, Curt T, Lepart J. Spatial pattern of beech (Fagus csylvatica L.) and Oak (Quercus pubescens Mill) seedling in natural pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) wood lands. Eur J For Res, 2004, 123: 331-337.

[13] Liebhold AM, Gurevitch J. Integrating the statistical analysis of spatial data in ecology. Ecography, 2002, 25: 553-557.

[14] Liechty HO, Jurgensen MF, Mroz GD, Gale MR. Pit and mound topography and its influence on storage of carbon, nitrogen, and organic matter within an old-growth forest. Can J For Res, 1997, 27(12): 1992-1997.

[15] Maimon O, Rokach L. Data mining and knowledge discovery handbook, 2010 2 New York: Springer 851 852

[16] Martinez I, Wiegand T, Gonzalez-Taboada F, Obesco JR. Spatial associations among tree species in a temperate forest community in North-western Spain. For Ecol Manag, 2010, 260: 456-465.

[17] Marvie Mohadjer MR. Silviculture, 2007, Tehran: Tehran University Publications.

[18] Mcsweeney K, Meyers NL. Influence of windthrow on soil properties in northern Wisconsin. Soil Sci Soc Am J, 1995, 59: 871-876.

[19] Moeur M. Characterizing spatial patterns of trees using stem mapped data. For Sci, 1993, 39: 756-775.

[20] Nagel TA, Svoboda M, Diaci J. Regeneration patterns after intermediate wind disturbance in an old-growth Fagus-Abies forest in southeastern Slovenia. For Ecol Manag, 2006, 226: 268-278.

[21] Oheimb G, Westphal C, Tempel H, Hardtle W. Structural pattern of a near-natural beech forest (Fagus sylvatica)(Serrahn, North-east Germany). For Ecol Manag, 2005, 212: 253-263.

[22] Paluch J. The spatial pattern of a natural European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.)-silver fir (Abies alba Mill.) forest: a patch-mosaic perspective. For Ecol Manag, 2007, 253: 161-170.

[23] Parhizkar P, Sagheb-Talebi Kh, Mataji A, Namiranian M. Influence of gap size and development stages on the silvicultural characteristics of oriental beech (Fagus orientalis Lipsky) regeneration. Hyrcanian J Environ Sci, 2011, 9(1): 55-65.

[24] Perry GLW. SpPack: spatial point pattern analysis in Excel using visual basic for applications (VBA). Environ Model Softw, 2004, 19: 559-569.

[25] Peterson CJ. Consistent influence of tree diameter and species on damage in nine eastern North America tornado blow downs. For Ecol Manag, 2007, 250: 96-106.

[26] Phillips JD. Soil system modelling and generation of field hypotheses. Geoderma, 2008, 145: 419-425.

[27] Pielou EC. Segregation and symmetry in two-species populations as studied in nearest-neighbour relationships. J Ecol, 1961, 49: 255-269.

[28] Pourbabaei H, Ahani H, Bonyad AE. Spatial pattern of Maple trees (Acer platanoides L.) in Guilan province. J Environ, 2005, 1: 24-30.

[29] Raphael P, Francois G. A practical approach to the study of spatial structure in simple cases of heterogeneous vegetation. J Veg Sci, 2001, 12(2): 99-108.

[30] Ripley BD. Spatial statistics, 1981, New York: Wiley

[31] Runkle JR. Patterns of disturbance in some old growth mesic forests of North America. Ecology, 1982, 63: 1533-1556.

[32] Sagheb-Talebi Kh, Sajedi T, Yazdian F (2004) Forests of Iran. Research Institute of Forests and Rangelands Press, Technical publication No. 339

[33] Schaetzl RJ, Johnson DL, Burns SF, Small TW. Tree uprooting: review of impact on forest ecology. Vegetation, 1989, 79: 165-176.

[34] Shambroch and Bokheim (2007) p 12

[35] Sinclair DF. On tests of spatial randomness using mean nearest neighbor distance. Ecology, 1985, 66: 1084-1085.

[36] Stone EL. Winds throw influences on spatial heterogeneity in a forest soil. Mitt Eid Anst Forstl Versuchsw, 1975, 51: 77-87.

[37] Ulanova NG. The effects of windthrow on forests at different spatial scales: a review. For Ecol Manag, 2000, 135: 155-167.

[38] Waez-Mousavi SM, Habashi H. Evaluating humus forms variation in an unmanaged mixed beech forest using two different classification methods. iForest - Biogeosci For, 2012, 5: 272-275.

[39] Zeibig A, Diaci J, Wagner S. Gap disturbance patterns of a Fagus sylvatica virgin forest remnant in the mountain vegetation belt of Slovenia. For. Snow Landsc Res, 2005, 79: 69-80.

[40] Zenner EK, Peck JE. Characterizing structural conditions in mature managed red pine: spatial dependency of metrics and adequacy of plot size. For Ecol Manag, 2009, 257: 311-320.

[41] Zhang Q, Zhang Y, Peng S, Yirdaw E, Wu N. Spatial structure of Alpine trees in mountain Baima Xueshan on the southeast Tibetan plateau. Silva Fennica, 2009, 43: 197-208.