Impact of patch size on woody tree species richness and abundance in a tropical montane evergreen forest patches of south India

Dharmalingam Mohandass , Mason J. Campbell , Priya Davidar

Journal of Forestry Research ›› 2018, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (6) : 1675 -1687.

PDF
Journal of Forestry Research ›› 2018, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (6) : 1675 -1687. DOI: 10.1007/s11676-018-0592-y
Original Paper

Impact of patch size on woody tree species richness and abundance in a tropical montane evergreen forest patches of south India

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

We examined the effects of forest patch size on woody tree species richness and abundance in tropical montane evergreen forest patches of the Nilgiri region, south India. We sampled woody trees (≥ 1 cm dbh) from 21 forest patches in the upper Nilgiri hills (> 2000 m elevation) and recorded a total of 35,146 individuals of 61 species, 45 genera and 30 families. Species richness and abundance of sapling/shrubs (≥ 1 to < 10 cm dbh) increased significantly with increasing patch size, but the species richness and abundance of small, medium and larger trees (≥ 10 to < 30, ≥ 30 to < 60 and ≥ 60 cm dbh, respectively) did not. Overall, forest interior species richness and abundance increased significantly with increasing patch size but edge species richness did not. Species richness and abundance of shade-tolerant and shade-demanding tree species also increased with increasing patch size. The abundance of zoochory dispersed tree species was significantly related to increasing patch size, but those dispersed by autochory did not display any clear relationship between patch size and species richness or abundance. Our findings suggest that with increasing forest patch area, tree compositional patterns may be driven by species specific shade-tolerance adaptations and dispersal patterns. Differential responses in these traits by the plant community within the individual habitat zones of forest edge and interiors likely plays a major role in determining the inherent plant community and thus the subsequent ecological processes of forest patches, including their responses to increasing patch area.

Keywords

Dispersal mode / Forest fragments / Shade-tolerance / Species–area relationships / Western Ghats

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Dharmalingam Mohandass, Mason J. Campbell, Priya Davidar. Impact of patch size on woody tree species richness and abundance in a tropical montane evergreen forest patches of south India. Journal of Forestry Research, 2018, 29(6): 1675-1687 DOI:10.1007/s11676-018-0592-y

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Baez S, Balslev H. Edge effects on palm diversity in rain forest fragments in western Ecuador. Biodivers Conserv, 2007, 16: 2201.

[2]

Baker FS. A revised tolerance table. J For, 1949, 47: 179-181.

[3]

Berhanu A, Demissew S, Woldu Z, Didita M. Woody species composition and structure of Kuandisha afromontane forest fragment in northwestern Ethiopia. J For Res, 2017, 28: 343-355.

[4]

Bin Y, Ye WH, Muller-Landau HC, Wu LF, Lian JY, Cao HL. Unimodal tree size distributions possibly result from relatively strong conservatism in intermediate size classes. PLoS ONE, 2012, 7: e52596.

[5]

Cayuela L, Golicher DJ, Benayas JMR, Gonzalez-Espinosa M, Ramirez-Marcial N. Fragmentation, disturbance and tree diversity conservation in tropical montane forests. J Appl Ecol, 2006, 43: 1172-1181.

[6]

Chazdon RL. Tropical forest recovery: legacies of human impact and natural disturbances. Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst, 2003, 6: 51-71.

[7]

Cochrane MA, Schulze MD. Fire as a recurrent event in tropical forests of the eastern Amazon: effects on forest structure, biomass, and species composition. Biotropica, 1999, 31: 2-16.

[8]

Collinge SK. Ecological consequences of habitat fragmentation: implications for landscape architecture and planning. Landsc Urban Plan, 1996, 36: 59-77.

[9]

Dalling JW, Hubbell SP. Seed size, growth rate and gap microsite conditions as determinants of recruitment success for pioneer species. J Ecol, 2002, 90: 557-568.

[10]

De Angelis DL, Waterhouse JC. Equilibrium and non-equilibrium concepts in ecological models. Ecol Monogr, 1987, 57: 1-21.

[11]

Echeverria C, Newton AC, Lara A, Benavas JR, Coomes DA. Impacts of forest fragmentation on species composition and forest structure in the temperate landscape of southern Chile. Glob Ecol Biogeogr, 2007, 16: 426-439.

[12]

Ewers RM, Didham RK. Confounding factors in the detection of species responses to habitat fragmentation. Biol Rev, 2006, 81: 117-142.

[13]

Ewers RM, Thorpe S, Didham RK. Synergistic interactions between edge and area effects in a heavily fragmented landscape. Ecology, 2007, 88: 96-106.

[14]

Fahrig L. Rethinking patch size and isolation effects: the habitat amount hypothesis. J Biogeogr, 2013, 40: 1649-1663.

[15]

Fletcher R. Multiple edge effects and their implications in fragmented landscapes. J Anim Ecol, 2005, 74: 342-352.

[16]

Forman RTT, Godron M. Landscape ecology, 1986, New York: Wiley.

[17]

Fyson PF. The flora of the south Indian hills, volumes 1–2, 1932, Chennai: Government Press.

[18]

Gamble JS, Fischer CEC (1915–1935) Flora of the presidency of Madras, volumes 1–3. Adlard and Son, London

[19]

Godefroid S, Koedam N. Distribution pattern of the flora in a peri-urban forest: an effect of the city-forest ecotone. Landsc Urban Plan, 2003, 65: 169-185.

[20]

Gonzalez M, Ladet S, Deconchat M, Cabanettes A, Alard D, Balent G. Relative contribution of edge and interior zones to patch size effect on species richness: an example for woody plants. For Ecol Manag, 2010, 259: 266-274.

[21]

Grashof-Bokdam C. Forest species in an agricultural landscape in the Netherlands: effects of habitat fragmentation. J Veg Sci, 1997, 8: 21-28.

[22]

Hanski I, Zurita GA, Bellocq MI, Rybicki J. Species–fragmented area relationship. PNAS, 2013, 110: 12715-12720.

[23]

Harper KA, Macdonald ES, Burton PJ, Chen J, Brosofske KD, Saunders SC, Euskirchen ES, Roberts D, Jaiteh MS, Esseen PA. Edge influence on forest structure and composition in fragmented landscapes. Conserv Biol, 2005, 19: 768-782.

[24]

Hill J, Curran PJ. Area, shape and isolation of tropical forest fragments: effects on tree species diversity and implications for conservation. J Biogeogr, 2003, 30: 1391-1403.

[25]

Hosseinzadeh R, Soosani J, Alijani V, Khosravi S, Karimikia H. Diversity of woody plant species and their relationship to physiographic factors in central Zagros forests (Case study: Perc forest, Khorramabad, Iran). J For Res, 2016, 27: 1137-1141.

[26]

Kolb A, Diekmann M. Effects of life-history traits on responses of plant species to forest fragmentation. Conserv Biol, 2005, 19: 929-938.

[27]

Kumar S (1993) Survey and mapping of Shola forests and grasslands in the upper Nilgiri plateau and assessment of human utilization of the vegetation. Report submitted to World Wild Fund for Nature, India

[28]

Laurance WF. Theory meets reality: how habitat fragmentation research has transcended island biogeographic theory. Biol Conserv, 2008, 141: 1731-1744.

[29]

Laurance WF, Vasconcelos HL, Lovejoy TE. Forest loss and fragmentation in the Amazon: implications for wildlife conservation. Oryx, 2000, 34: 39-45.

[30]

Laurance WF, Camargo JLC, Fearnside PM, Lovejoy TE, Williamson GB, Mesquita RCG, Meyer CFJ, Bobrowiec PED, Laurance SGW. An Amazonian rainforest and its fragments as a laboratory of global change. Biol Rev, 2017

[31]

Levenson JB. Burgess RL, Sharpe DM. Woodlots as biogeographic islands in Southeastern Wisconsin. Forest Island dynamics in man-dominated landscapes, 1981, New York: Springer 13 66

[32]

Li HB, Franklin JF, Swanson FL, Spies TA. Developing alternative forestcutting patterns: a simulation approach. Landsc Ecol, 1993, 8: 63-75.

[33]

MacArthur RH, Wilson EO. An equilibrium theory of insular zoogeography. Evolution, 1963, 17: 373-387.

[34]

MacArthur RH, Wilson EO. The theory of island biogeography, 1967, Princeton: Princeton University Press 203

[35]

Magrach A, Rodríguez-Perez J, Campbell M, Laurance WF. Edge effects shape the spatial distribution of lianas and epiphytic ferns. Appl Veg Sci, 2014, 17: 754-764.

[36]

Majumdar K, Choudhary BK, Datta BK. Changes of woody species diversity, horizontal and vertical distribution of stems across interior to outside within a primate rich habitat of Northeast India. J For Res, 2016, 27: 787-798.

[37]

Martin PH, Sherman RE, Fahey TJ. Tropical montane forest ecotones: climate gradients, natural disturbance, and vegetation zonation in the Cordillera Central, Dominican Republic. J Biogeogr, 2007, 34: 1792-1806.

[38]

Matthew KM. The flora of the Palni hills, south India (3 volumes), 1999, Thiruchirapalli: The Rapinat Herbarium.

[39]

Meher-Homji VM. Udhagamandalam (Ootacamund): a biogeographic prespective. J Ind Geogr, 1984, 59: 205-213.

[40]

Meher-Homji VM. Ecological diversity in the Nilgiri district. J Palynol, 1987, 23–24: 159-166.

[41]

Mohandass D (2007) Plant diversity and forest dynamics in montane evergreen forest (shola) of the Nilgiri mountains, southern India. Ph.D. thesis. Pondicherry University, India

[42]

Mohandass D, Davidar P. Floristic structure and diversity of a tropical montane evergreen forest (shola) of the Nilgiri Mountains, southern India. Trop Ecol, 2009, 50: 219-229.

[43]

Mohandass D, Davidar P. The relationship between area, and vegetation structure and diversity in montane forest (shola) patches in southern India. Plant Ecol Divers, 2010, 3: 67-76.

[44]

Mohandass D, Hughes AC, Campbell M, Davidar P. Effects of patch size on liana diversity and distributions in the tropical montane evergreen forests of the Nilgiri Mountains, southern India. J Trop Ecol, 2014, 30: 579-590.

[45]

Mohandass D, Davidar P, Somasundaram S, Vijayan L, Beng KC. Influence of disturbance regime on liana species composition, density and basal area in the tropical montane evergreen forests (sholas) of the Western Ghats, India. Trop Ecol, 2015, 56: 169-182.

[46]

Mohandass D, Chhabra T, Pannu RS, Beng KC. Recruitment of saplings in active tea plantations of the Nilgiri Mountains: implications for restoration ecology. Trop Ecol, 2016, 57: 101-118.

[47]

Pausas JG, Austin MP. Patterns of plant species richness in relation to different environments: an appraisal. J Veg Sci, 2001, 12: 153-165.

[48]

Puyravaud JP, Davidar P. The Nilgiris Biosphere Reserve: an unrealized vision for conservation. Trop Conserv Sci, 2013, 6: 468-476.

[49]

Puyravaud JP, Dufour G, Aravajy S. Rain forest expansion mediated by successional processes in vegetation thickets in the Western Ghats of India. J Biogeogr, 2003, 30: 1067-1080.

[50]

Ries L, Fletcher RJ, Battin J, Sisk TD. Ecological responses to habitat edges: mechanisms, models and variability explained. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst, 2004, 35: 491-522.

[51]

Saunders DA, Hobbs RJ, Margules CR. Biological consequences of ecosystem fragmentation: a review. Conserv Biol, 1991, 5: 18-32.

[52]

Selwyn MA, Ganesan R. Evaluating the potential role of Eucalyptus plantations in the regeneration of native trees in southern Western Ghats, India. Trop Ecol, 2006, 50: 173-189.

[53]

Swaine MD, Whitemore TC. On the definition of ecological species groups in tropical rain forest. Vegetatio, 1988, 75: 81-86.

[54]

Temple SA. Verner J, Morrison ML, Ralph CJ. Predicting impacts of habitat fragmentation on forest birds: a comparison of two models. Wildlife zoology: modelling habitat relationships of terrestrial vertebrates, 1986, Madison: University of Wisconsin Press 301 304

[55]

Zon R, Graves H. Light in relation to tree growth, 1911, Washington: U.S. Department of Agriculture, USA Forest Service

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

128

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/