Land cover changes and fragmentation in mountain neotropical ecosystems of Oaxaca, Mexico under community forest management

Abstract

Changes in land cover have a direct impact on forest ecosystem goods and services. In this study, changes in land cover in Sierra de Juarez–Oaxaca ecosystems were estimated using a consistent processing of Landsat images and OBIA methodology. Additionally, landscape analyses using FRAGSTAT were conducted. In 2014, Sierra de Juarez–Oaxaca was covered by approximately 84% of forests, mainly pine-oak and cloud forests. After extensive deforestation until 2001, this trend was reversed and the forest cover surface area in 2014 was slightly higher than in 1979. The comparison of the landscape structure of the forested and agricultural lands suggests an increase in habitat heterogeneity. However, interspersion and juxtaposition indices, showing the patch shape by patch area and perimeter, were similar throughout the study period (1979–2014). Social and economic drivers can explain this situation: namely, community organization, forest enterprises, payment for ecosystem services programs, and changes of agricultural activity. Communities in the Sierra of Oaxaca have reforested degraded lands, created community forest enterprises, and preserved the forest under conservation schemes like those proposed by the Mexican payment for ecosystem services programs. However, their sustainable management faces internal challenges and has become highly dependent on political and institutional decisions beyond their control.

Keywords

Tropical and temperate forests / Social forestry / Land uses segmentation / OBIA / FRAGSTAT

References

Achard F, Eva H, Stibig H, Mayaux P, Gallego J, Richards T, Malingreau J. Determination of deforestation rates of the world’s humid tropical forests. Science, 2002, 297: 999-1002.

Agarwal C, Green G, Grove J, Evans T, Schweik C. A review and assessment of land-use change models: dynamics of space, time, and human choice, 2002, Bloomington: Center for the Study of Institutions Population, and Environmental Change Indiana University.

Aguilar-Vásquez Y, Aliphat Fernández M, Caso Barrera L, del Amo Rodríguez S, Sánchez Gómez M, Martínez-Carrera D. Impact of traditionally managed forest units on the landscape connectivity of Sierra de Los Tuxtlas, Mexico. Rev Biol Trop, 2014, 62(3): 1099-1109.

Benítez-Malvido J, Arroyo-Rodríguez V. Del Claro K, Oliveira O, Rico-Gray V, Ramirez A, Almeida A, Bonet A, Scarano F, Consoli F, Morales F, Naoki J, Costello J, Sampaio M, Quesada M, Morris M, Palacios M, Ramirez N, Marcal O, Ferraz R, Marquis R, Parentoni R, Rodriguez R, Luttge U. Habitat fragmentation, edge effects and biological corridors in tropical ecosystems. Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS). International Commission on Tropical Biology and Natural Resources, 2008, Oxford: UNESCO, Eolss Publishers.

Bennett A, Saunders D. Habitat fragmentation and landscape change. Conserv Biol, 2010, 93: 1544-1550.

Beuchle R, Grecchi R, Shimabukuro Y, Seliger R, Eva H, Sano E, Achard F. Land cover changes in the Brazilian Cerrado and Caatinga biomes from 1990 to 2010 based on a systematic remote sensing sampling approach. Appl Geogr, 2015, 58: 116-127.

Blaschke T. Object based image analysis for remote sensing. ISPRS J Photogramm, 2010, 65(1): 2-16.

Boege E. El patrimonio biocultural de los pueblos indígenas de Mexico: hacia la conservación in situ de la biodiversidad y agrobiodiversidad en los territorios indígenas, 2008, Mexico: INAH.

Boucher D, Elias P, Lininger K, May-Tobin C, Roquemore S, Saxon E. The root of the problem: what’s driving tropical deforestation today?, 2011, Cambridge: Union of Concerned Scientists.

Bray D, Merino-Perez L, Negreros-Castillo P, Segura-Warnholtz G, Torres-Rojo J, Vester H. Mexico’s community-managed forests as a global model for sustainable landscapes. Conserv Biol, 2003, 17: 672-677.

Cairns M, Haggerty P, Alvarez R, de Jong B, Olmsted I. Tropical Mexico’s recent land-use change: a region’s contribution to the global carbon cycle. Ecol Appl, 2000, 10: 1426-1441.

Caselles V, López Garcia M. An alternative simple approach to estimate atmospheric correction in multitemporal studies. Int J Remote Sens, 1989, 10: 1127-1134.

Challenger A, Dirzo R, López JC, Mendoza E, Lira-Noriega A, Cruz I. Factores de cambio y estado de la biodiversidad. Cap Nat México, 2009, 2: 37-73.

Chander G, Markham B, Helder D. Summary of current radiometric calibration coefficients for Landsat MSS, TM, ETM+ , and EO-1 ALI sensors. Remote Sens Environ, 2009, 113(5): 893-903.

Chapela F. Emergencia de las organizaciones sociales de Oaxaca: la lucha por los recursos forestales. Alteridades, 1999, 9(17): 105-112.

Chipman J, Olmanson L, Gitelson A. Remote Sensing Methods for Lake Management: a guide for resource managers and decision-makers, 2009, Madison: North American Lake Management Society-Dartmouth College, University of Minnesota, and University of Nebraska. United States Environmental Protection Agency.

CONABIO (2009) Mexican Biodiversity. http://www.biodiversidad.gob.mx/v_ingles/country/pdf/naturalWealth.pdf. Accessed Feb 2014)

CONAFOR. La Comisión Nacional Forestal en la historia y el futuro de la política forestal de Mexico, 2012, Mexico: Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económicas-Comisión Nacional Forestal.

Dávila P, Torres L, Torres R, Herrera-MacBryde O. Davis S, Heywood V, Herrera-MacBryde O, Villa-Lobos J, Hamilton A. Sierra de Juárez, Oaxaca, Mexico. Centres of plant diversity: a guide and strategy for their conservation. The Americas, 1997, Cambridge: IUCN Publications Unit 135 138

Deikumah J, Mcalpine C, Maron M. Biogeographical and taxonomic biases in tropical forest fragmentation research. Conserv Biol, 2014, 28(6): 1522-1531.

Delgado-Serrano M, Escalante M, Basurto S. Is the community-based management of natural resources inherently linked to resilience? An analysis of the Santiago Comaltepec community (Mexico). J Depop Rur Develop, 2015, 18: 91-114.

Ellis E, Porter-Bolland L. Is community-based forest management more effective than protected areas? A comparison of land use/land cover change in two neighboring study areas of the Central Yucatan Peninsula, Mexico. For Ecol Manag, 2008, 256(11): 1971-1983.

Escalante R, Basurto S, Cruz-Bayer A, Moreno E, Chapela F, Hernández I, Lara Y (2013) Stakeholder vision on problems and drivers related to environmental challenges in Mexico case study. COMET-LA Working Paper. http://www.comet-la.eu/index.php/en/publications.html

ESRI. ArcGIS 9.2. Environmental Systems Research Inst, 2006, Redlands: ESRI.

Evans T, Costa M. Landcover classification of the Lower Nhecolândia subregion of the Brazilian Pantanal Wetlands using ALOS/PALSAR, RADARSAT-2 and ENVISAT/ASAR imagery. Remote Sens Environ, 2013, 128: 118-137.

FAO. State of the World’s Forests. Enhancing the socioeconomic benefits from forests, 2014, Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.

Ferrier S, Drielsma M. Synthesis of pattern and process in biodiversity conservation assessment: a flexible whole—landscape modelling framework. Divers Distrib, 2010, 16(3): 386-402.

Fischer J, Lindenmayer D, Manning A. Biodiversity, ecosystem function, and resilience: ten guiding principles for commodity production landscapes. Front Ecol, 2006, 4(2): 80-86.

Franklin A, Noon B, George T. What is habitat fragmentation?. Stud Avian Biol, 2002, 25: 20-29.

Gómez-Mendoza L, Vega-Peña E, Isabel Ramírez M, Palacio-Prieto J, Galicia L. Projecting land-use change processes in the Sierra Norte of Oaxaca, Mexico. Appl Geogr, 2006, 26: 276-290.

Gómez-Pompa A, Kaus A. From pre-Hispanic to future conservation alternatives: lessons from Mexico. P Natl Acad Sci, 1999, 96(11): 5982-5986.

González Ríos A. Oaxaca 2011: Un Diagnóstico Breve, 2011, Oaxaca: Grupo Mesófilo, A.C..

González-Espinosa M, Meave J, Ramírez-Marcial N, Toledo-Aceves T, Lorea-Hernández F, Ibarra-Manríquez G. Los bosques de niebla de Mexico: conservación y restauración de su componente arbóreo. Ecosistemas, 2012, 21(1–2): 36-52.

Goodwin B, Fahrig L. How does landscape structure influence landscape connectivity?. Oikos, 2002, 99: 552-570.

Green A, Berman M, Switzer P, Craig M. A transformation for ordering multispectral data in terms of image quality with implications for noise removal. IEEE T Geosci Remote, 1988, 26(1): 65-74.

Hansen M, Potapov P, Moore R, Hancher M, Turubanova S, Tyukavina A, Kommareddy A. High-resolution global maps of 21st-century forest cover change. Science, 2013, 342(6160): 850-853.

Hudgens B, Haddad N. Predicting which species will benefit from corridors in fragmented landscapes from population growth models. Am Nat, 2003, 161(5): 808-820.

Jenness J, Wynne J. Kappa analysis extension for ArcView 3.x. (version 2.1), 2006, Flagstaff: Jenness Enterprises.

Jomaa I, Audab Y, Abi Salehc B, Hamze M, Safi S. Landscape spatial dynamics over 38 years under natural and anthropogenic pressures in Mount Lebanon. Landsc Urban Plan, 2008, 87(1): 67-75.

Kissinger G, Herold M, De Sy V. Drivers of deforestation and forest degradation: A synthesis report for REDD+ policymakers, 2012, Vancouver: Lexeme Consulting.

Klepeis P, Vance C. Neoliberal policy and deforestation in southeastern Mexico: an assessment of the PROCAMPO program. Econ Geogr, 2003, 79(3): 221-240.

Klooster D, Masera O. Community forest management in Mexico: carbon mitigation and biodiversity conservation through rural development. Glob Environ Change, 2000, 10: 259-272.

Laliberté E, Legendre P. A distance—based framework for measuring functional diversity from multiple traits. Ecology, 2010, 91(1): 299-305.

Li XX, Shao GF. Object-based urban vegetation mapping with high-resolution aerial photography as a single data source. Int J Remote Sens, 2013, 34(3): 771-789.

Lillesand T, Kiefer R, Chipman J. Remote sensing and image interpretation, 2014, New York: Wiley.

Lu DS, Mausel P, Brondızio E, Moran E. Relationships between forest stand parameters and Landsat TM spectral responses in the Brazilian Amazon Basin. For Ecol Manag, 2004, 198(1): 149-167.

Mas J, Velázquez A, Díaz-Gallegos J, Mayorga-Saucedo R, Alcantara A, Bocco G, Castro R, Fernández T, Pérez-Vega A. Assessing land use/cover changes: a nationalwide multidate spatial database for Mexico. Int J Appl Earth Obs, 2004, 5: 249-261.

Masera O, Ordóñez M, Dirzo R. Carbon emissions from Mexican forests: current situation and long-term scenarios. Clim Change, 1997, 35(3): 265-295.

Matsushita B, Xu M, Fukushima T. Characterizing the changes in landscape structure in the Lake Kasumigaura Basin, Japan using a high-quality GIS dataset. Landsc Urban Plan, 2005, 78(3): 241-250.

Mayfield MM, Bonser SP, Morgan JW, Aubin I, McNamara S, Vesk PA. What does species richness tell us about functional trait diversity? Predictions and evidence for responses of species and functional trait diversity to land-use change. Global Ecol Biogeogr, 2010, 19: 423-431.

McGarigal K, Cushman SA. Comparative evaluation of experimental approaches to the study of habitat fragmentation effects. Ecol Appl, 2002, 12(2): 335-345.

McGarigal K, Marks B (1995) FRAGSTATS: spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report PNW-351. Corvallis, Oregon, U.S.A

Merino L, Martínez A. A vuelo de pájaro: las condiciones de las comunidades con bosques templados en México, 2014, CONABIO: Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad.

Mitri G, Gitas I. Mapping post-fire forest regeneration and vegetation recovery using a combination of very high spatial resolution and hyperspectral satellite imagery. Int J Appl Earth Obs, 2013, 20: 60-66.

Ochoa-Gaona S, González-Espinosa M, Meave JA, Sorani V. Effect of forest fragmentation on the woody flora of the highlands of Chiapas, Mexico. Biodivers Conserv, 2004, 13(5): 867-884.

Olivera G. La reforma al artículo 27 Constitucional y la incorporación de las tierras ejidales al mercado legal de suelo urbano en Mexico. Scr Nova, 2005, 9(194): 1-33.

Olson D, Dinerstein E, Wikramanayake E, Burgess N, Powell G, Underwood E, Loucks C. Terrestrial Ecoregions of the World: a New Map of Life on Earth: a new global map of terrestrial ecoregions provides an innovative tool for conserving biodiversity. Bioscience, 2001, 51(11): 933-938.

Porter-Bolland L, Ellis EA, Guariguata MR, Ruiz-Mallén I, Negrete-Yankelevich S, Reyes-García V. Community managed forests and forest protected areas: an assessment of their conservation effectiveness across the tropics. Forest Ecol Manag, 2012, 268: 6-17.

Raši R, Bodart C, Stibig H, Eva H, Beuchle R, Carboni S, Simonetti D, Achard F. An automated approach for segmenting and classifying a large sample of multi-date Landsat imagery for pan-tropical forest monitoring. Remote Sens Environ, 2011, 115: 3659-3669.

Reyes-García V, Marti N, McDade T, Tanner S, Vadez V. Concepts and methods in studies measuring individual ethnobotanical knowledge. J Ethnobiol, 2007, 27(2): 182-203.

Rudel T, Roper J. The paths to rain forest destruction: crossnational patterns of tropical deforestation, 1975–1990. World Dev, 1997, 25(1): 53-65.

Sarukhán J, Urquiza-Haas T, Koleff P, Carabias J, Dirzo R, Ezcurra E, Cerdeira-Estrada S, Soberón J. Strategic actions to value, conserve, and restore the natural capital of megadiversity countries: the case of Mexico. Bioscience, 2015, 65: 164-173.

Saunders D, Hobbs R, Margules C. Biological consequences of ecosystem fragmentation: a review. Conserv Biol, 1991, 5: 18-32.

Sebbenn A, Carvalho A, Freitas M, Moraes S, Gaino A, Da Silva J, Moraes M. Low levels of realized seed and pollen gene flow and strong spatial genetic structure in a small, isolated and fragmented population of the tropical tree Copaifera langsdorffii Desf. Heredity, 2011, 106(1): 134-145.

Song C, Woodcock C, Seto K, Lenney M, Macomber S. Classification and change detection using Landsat TM data: when and how to correct atmospheric effects?. Remote Sens Environ, 2001, 75(2): 230-244.

Strahler A, Boschetti L, Foody G, Fiedl M, Hansen M, Herold M, Mayaux P, Morisette J, Stehman S, Woodcock C. Global land cover validation: recommendations for evaluation and accuracy assessment of global land cover maps, 2006, Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.

Toure S, Stow D, Shih HC, Coulter L, Weeks J, Engstrom R, Sandborn A. An object-based temporal inversion approach to urban land use change analysis. Remote Sens Lett, 2016, 7(5): 503-512.

Trejo I, Dirzo R. Deforestation of seasonally dry tropical forest: a national and local analysis in Mexico. Biol Conserv, 2000, 94(2): 133-142.

Turner MG, Gardner RH, O’Neill RV. Landscape ecology: theory and practice, 2001, New York: Springer 482

Velázquez A, Durán E, Ramírez I, Mas J, Bocco G, Ramírez G, Palacio J. Land use-cover change processes in highly biodiverse areas: the case of Oaxaca, Mexico. Glob Environ Change, 2003, 13: 175-184.

Vetter D, Hansbauer M, Végvári Z, Storch I. Predictors of forest fragmentation sensitivity in Neotropical vertebrates: a quantitative review. Ecography, 2011, 34(1): 1-8.

Vidal O, López-García J, Rendón-Salinas E. Trends in deforestation and forest degradation after a decade of monitoring in the Monarch Butterfly Biosphere Reserve in Mexico. Conserv Biol, 2014, 28: 177-186.

Villaseñor J (2010) El bosque húmedo de montaña en Mexico y sus plantas vasculares: catálogo florístico-taxonómico. Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad—Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Mexico, Mexico

WRI (2011) Climate Analysis Indicators Tool (CAIT) version 8.0. URL: http://cait.wri.org/. Accessed Feb 2011)

WWF. Ecorregiones prioritarias. Sierra Norte de Oaxaca, 2007, Mexico DF: World Wildlife Fund.

Yang XJ, Lo CP. Using a time series of satellite imagery to detect land use and land cover changes in the Atlanta, Georgia metropolitan area. Int J Remote Sens, 2011, 23(9): 1775-1798.