Changes in soil properties under Eucalyptus relative to Pinus massoniana and natural broadleaved forests in South China

Abstract

The ecological effects of eucalypt plantations (EPs) have garnered increasing attention. To understand their effect on soil quality at a landscape scale, and to determine whether soil quality parameters differ due to different stand types, we evaluated soil characteristics in twenty-one groups of EPs, Pinus massoniana Lamb. plantations (PMPs) and natural broadleaved forests (NBFs) across Guangdong Province, China. Both the physical characteristics of soil hydrology and the properties of soil nutrients in A and B horizons were determined. Results showed that, compared to NBFs, EPs and PMPs produced a shallower litter layer, reduced canopy density, higher soil bulk density, significantly lower total porosity, non-capillary porosity, total water volume, and hygroscopic water in the A horizon (P < 0.05). Moreover, total N, available K, and soil organic carbon (SOC) in EPs and PMPs were significantly lower than in NBFs. EPs and PMPs did not differ significantly in N, P or K content, but PMPs had significantly lower SOC and boron in the A horizon than EPs. Low pH and poor capacity to buffer acidification generally occurred in all cover types. Both EPs and PMPs showed a decline in soil properties relative to NBFs, but EPs and PMPs exhibited no significant difference. These results indicate that actions are needed to ameliorate the potential negative effects on soil quality in forestry plantations.

Keywords

Eucalyptus / Pinus massoniana / Plantations / Soil organic matter / Soil acidification / Moisture retention capacity

References

[1] Alem S, Woldemariam T, Pavlis J. Evaluation of soil nutrients under Eucalyptus grandis plantation and adjacent sub-montane rain forest. J For Res, 2010, 21(4): 457-460.

[2] Bargali SS, Singh RP, Joshi M. Changes in soil characteristics in eucalypt plantations replacing natural broad-leaved forests. J Veg Sci, 1993, 4(1): 25-28.

[3] Carter MR, Gregorich EG. Soil sampling and methods of analysis, 2008, Boca Raton: CRC Press 743 760

[4] Chen F, Zheng H, Zhang K, Ouyang Z, Lan J, Li H, Shi Q. Changes in soil microbial community structure and metabolic activity following conversion from native Pinus massoniana plantations to exotic Eucalyptus plantations. For Ecol Manag, 2013, 291: 65-72.

[5] Cook RL, Binkley D, Stape JL. Eucalyptus plantation effects on soil carbon after 20 years and three rotations in Brazil. For Ecol Manag, 2016, 359(1): 92-98.

[6] Department of Environmental Protection of Guangdong Province (2014) Report on the state of Guangdong provincial environment. http://www.gdep.gov.cn/hjjce/gb/2014hjgb/201506/t20150604_202080.html. Accessed 04 June 2015

[7] Doran JW, Parkin TB. Coleman DC, Bezdicek DF, Stewart BA. Defining and assessing soil quality. Defining soil quality for a sustainable environment, 1994, Madison: Soil Science Society of America 3 22

[8] Guillaume T, Damris M, Kuzyakov Y. Losses of soil carbon by converting tropical forest to plantations: erosion and decomposition estimated by δ13C. Glob Change Biol, 2015, 21(9): 3548-3560.

[9] Guo D, Huang X, Ren S, Lu C, Huang J, Chen J, Xiang DY. Characteristics and evaluation of soil nutrients of Pinus massoniana, Eucalyptus and mixed plantations. Eucalyptus Sci Technol, 2015, 32(03): 14-21. (in Chinese)

[10] Huang J, Zhang W, Mo J, Wang S, Liu J, Chen H. Urbanization in China drives soil acidification of Pinus massoniana forests. Sci Rep, 2015, 5: 13512.

[11] Kerr TF, Ruwanza S. Does Eucalyptus grandis, invasion and removal affect soils and vegetation in the Eastern Cape Province, South Africa?. Aust Ecol, 2016, 41: 328-338.

[12] Khanmirzaei EA, Kowsar SA, Sameni AM. Organic and inorganic forms of phosphorus in a calcareous soil planted with four species of Eucalyptus in Southern Iran. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal, 2009, 40: 3194-3210.

[13] Laclau JP, Ranger J, Deleporte P, Nouvellon Y, Saint-André L, Marlet S, Bouillet JP. Nutrient cycling in a clonal stand of Eucalyptus and an adjacent savanna ecosystem in Congo: 3. Input–output budgets and consequences for the sustainability of the plantations. For Ecol Manag, 2005, 210(1): 375-391.

[14] Lemenih M, Olsson M, Karltun E. Comparison of soil attributes under Cupressus lusitanica and Eucalyptus saligna established on abandoned farmlands with continuously cropped farmlands and natural forest in Ethiopia. For Ecol Manag, 2004, 195(s1–2): 57-67.

[15] Li SY. The soil in Eucalyptus plantations and its fertilization methods, 2007, Guangzhou: Guangdong Technology Press 138 142 (in Chinese)

[16] Liao C, Luo Y, Fang C, Chen J, Li B. The effects of plantation practice on soil properties based on the comparison between natural and planted forests: a meta-analysis. Glob Ecol Biogeogr, 2012, 21(3): 318-327.

[17] Nambiar E, Harwood C. Productivity of acacia and eucalypt plantations in Southeast Asia. 1. Bio-physical determinants of production: opportunities and challenges. Int For Rev, 2014, 16(2): 225-248.

[18] Qiu Q, Wu J, Liang G, Liu J, Chu G, Zhou G, Zhang D. Effects of simulated acid rain on soil and soil solution chemistry in a monsoon evergreen broad-leaved forest in southern China. Environ Monit Assess, 2015, 187(5): 1-13.

[19] State Forestry Administration of the People’s Republic of China (2014) Forest resources in China: the 8th national forest inventory. http://english.forestry.gov.cn/index.php/information-services/forest-resources/2-forest-esources-in-china. Accessed 17 Aug 2016

[20] Tao D, Li Y, Lu D, Luo Y, Yu S, Ye S. The essential oil components of Cinnamomum cassia: an analysis under different thinning models of plantation Pinus massoniana. J For Res, 2016, 27(3): 707-717.

[21] Vogt DJ, Tilley JP, Edmonds RL. Soil and plant analysis for forest ecosystem characterization, 2015, Beijing: Higher Education Press 67 132

[22] Wang S, Wang H. Response of soil respiration to a severe drought in Chinese Eucalyptus plantations. J For Res, 2017, 28(4): 841-847.

[23] Wang H, Liu S, Wang J, Shi Z, Lu L, Zeng J, Ming A, Tang J, Yu H. Effects of tree species mixture on soil organic carbon stocks and greenhouse gas fluxes in subtropical plantations in China. For Ecol Manag, 2013, 300: 4-13.

[24] Yang Y, Li P, He H, Zhao X, Datta A, Ma W, Zhang Y, Liu X, Han W, Wilson MC, Fang J. Long-term changes in soil pH across major forest ecosystems in China. Geophys Res Lett, 2015, 42(3): 933-940.

[25] Yang X, Li D, McGrouther K, Long W, Li Y, Chen Y, Lv X, Niazi NK, Song Z, Wang H. Effect of Eucalyptus forests on understory vegetation and soil quality. J Soils Sediments, 2017, 17(9): 2383-2389.

[26] Zhang K, Zheng H, Chen F, Ouyang Z, Wang Y, Wu Y, Lan J, Fu M, Xia X. Changes in soil quality after converting Pinus to Eucalyptus plantations in southern China. Solid Earth, 2015, 6(1): 115-123.

[27] Zhao X, Yi Q, Ding N, Xia J. Changes in soil properties and quality for a Eucalyptus introduction area: a case study in Lancang country, Yunnan Province. J Residuals Sci Technol, 2014, 11(4): 107-117.