Response of saproxylic insect communities to logging history, tree species, stage of decay, and wood posture in the central Nearctic boreal forest

Abstract

Saproxylic insect assemblages are essential functional components of forest ecosystems that can be affected by forest management. We used a split-plot ANOVA design to analyze differences in selected saproxylic insects (all arthropod orders and dipteran and parasitic hymenopteran families) emerging from dead wood of sites with different logging histories (horse-logged, mechanically-logged and unlogged), tree species (Populus and Picea), stage of decay (early- and late-decay stages) and posture (standing and downed logs) in the boreal forest of central Canada. No clear effects of logging history were seen for the studied taxa; however, interaction between logging history and other dead wood features was apparent. Cecidomyiidae consistently emerged more from Populus than from Picea dead wood. Most of the studied saproxylic families were more abundant in late-decay than in early-decay wood. Dipterans of the Cecidomyiidae, Ceratopogonidae, Empididae, Mycetophilidae and Sciaridae families, and hymenopterans of the Diapriidae and Ichneumonidae families were significantly more abundant in downed than in standing dead wood. In contrast, Mymaridae was most abundant in standing dead wood. Our study provides evidence that some insects at high taxonomic levels respond differently to dead wood quality, and this could inform future management strategies in the boreal forest for the conservation of saproxylic fauna and their ecological functions.

Keywords

Boreal forest / Dead wood quality / Forest harvesting / High-level taxa / Saproxylic insects

References

[1] Ǻs S. Are habitat islands islands? Woodliving beetles (Coleoptera) in deciduous forest fragments in boreal forest. Ecography, 1993, 16: 219-228.

[2] Boucher J, Azaria ET, Ibarzabal J, Hébert C. Saproxylic beetles in disturbed boreal forest: temporal dynamics, habitat associations, and community structure. Ecoscience, 2012, 19: 328-343.

[3] Carleton TJ, MacLellan P. Woody vegetation responses to fire versus clear-cutting: a comparative survey in the central Canadian boreal forest. Ecoscience, 1994, 1: 141-152.

[4] Carpenter SE, Harmon ME, Ingham ER, Kelsey RG, Lattin JD, Schowalter TD. Early patterns of heterotroph activity in conifer logs. Proc R Soc Edinb Sect B Biol Sci, 1988, 94: 33-43.

[5] Chambers JQ, Higuchi N, Schimel JP, Ferreira LV, Melack JM. Decomposition and carbon cycling of dead trees in tropical forests of the central Amazon. Oecologia, 2000, 122: 380-388.

[6] Dajoz R. Insects and forests: the role and diversity of insects in the forest environment, 2000, Paris: Intercept Ltd. 620

[7] Deans AM, Malcolm JR, Smith SM, Bellocq MI. Edge effects and the responses of aerial insect assemblages to structural-retention harvesting in Canadian boreal peatland forests. For Ecol Manag, 2005, 204: 249-266.

[8] Debeljak M. Coarse woody debris in virgin and managed forest. Ecol Indicators, 2006, 6: 733-742.

[9] Edman M, Jonsson M, Jonsson BG. Fungi and wind strongly influence the temporal availability of logs in an old-growth spruce forest. Ecol Appl, 2007, 17: 482-490.

[10] Ehnström B. Leaving dead wood for insects in boreal forests—suggestions for the future. Scand J For Res Suppl, 2001, 3: 91-98.

[11] Finnamore AT. Alberta forest biodiversity monitoring program: arthropod pilot study report. Draft report, 2000, Edmonton: Provincial Museum of Alberta 11

[12] Fischer AL, Moncalco JM, Klironomos JN, Malcolm JR. Fruiting body and molecular rDNA sampling of fungi in woody debris from logged and unlogged boreal forests in northeastern Ontario. Ecoscience, 2012, 19: 374-390.

[13] Freedman B, Zelazny V, Beaudette D, Fleming T, Flemming S, Forbes G, Gerrow JS, Johnson G, Woodley S. Biodiversity implications of changes in the quantity of dead organic matter in managed forests. Environ Rev, 1996, 4: 238-265.

[14] Gibb H, Hjalten J, Ball JP, Atlegrim O, Pettersson RB, Hilszczanski J, Johansson T, Danell K. Effects of landscape composition and substrate availability on saproxylic beetles in boreal forests: a study using experimental logs for monitoring assemblages. Ecography, 2006, 29: 191-204.

[15] Goulet H, Huber JT. Hymenoptera of the world: an identification guide to families, 1993, Ottawa: Research Branch, Agriculture Canada 668

[16] Grove SJ. The influence of forest management history on the integrity of the saproxylic beetle fauna in an Australian lowland tropical rainforest. Biol Conserv, 2002, 104: 149-171.

[17] Hammond HEJ. Arthropod biodiversity from Populus coarse woody material in north-central Alberta: a review of taxa and collection methods. Can Entomol, 1997, 129: 1009-1033.

[18] Hammond HEJ, Langor DW, Spence JRS. Early colonization of Populus wood by saproxylic beetles. Can J For Res, 2001, 31: 1175-1183.

[19] Hammond HEJ, Langor DW, Spence JR. Saproxylic beetles (Coleoptera) using Populus in boreal aspen stands of western Canada: spatiotemporal variation and conservation of assemblages. Can J For Res, 2004, 34: 1-19.

[20] Harmon ME, Franklin JF, Swanson FJ, Sollins P, Gregory SV, Lattin JD, Anderson NH, Cline SP, Aumen NG, Sedell JR, Lienkaemper GW, Cromack K, Cummins KW. Ecology of coarse woody debris in temperate ecosystems. Adv Ecol Res, 1986, 15: 133-302.

[21] Heliövaara K, Väisänen R. Effects of modern forestry on northwestern European forest invertebrates: a synthesis. Acta For Fenn, 1984, 189: 5-30.

[22] Higgins R. Coarse woody debris as refugia for ants in the cool, moist sub-boreal forests of British Columbia. Arthropods Can For, 2006, 2: 18-19.

[23] Hilszczański J, Gibb H, Hjältén J, Atlegrim O, Johansson T, Pettersson RB, Ball JP, Danell K. Parasitoids (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonoidea) of Saproxylic beetles are affected by forest successional stage and dead wood characteristics in boreal spruce forest. Biol Conserv, 2005, 126: 456-464.

[24] Irmler U, Heller K, Warning J. Age and tree species as factors influencing the populations of insects living in dead wood (Coleoptera, Diptera: Sciaridae, Mycetophilidae). Pedobiologia, 1996, 40: 134-148.

[25] Jackson SM, Pinto F, Malcolm JR, Wilson ER. A comparison of pre-European settlement (1857) and current (1981–1995) forest composition in central Ontario. Can J For Res, 2000, 30: 605-661.

[26] Jacobs JM, Spence JR, Langor DW. Influence of boreal forest succession and dead wood qualities on saproxylic beetles. Agric For Entomol, 2007, 9: 3-16.

[27] Janssen P, Hébert C, Fortin D. Biodiversity conservation in old-growth boreal forest: black spruce and balsam fire snags harbour distinct assemblages of saproxylic beetles. Biodiver Conserv, 2011, 13: 2917-2932.

[28] Jonsell M, Weslien J. Felled or standing retained wood—it makes a difference for saproxylic beetles. For Ecol Manag, 2003, 175: 425-435.

[29] Jonsell M, Weslien J, Ehnström B. Substrate requirements of red-listed saproxylic invertebrates in Sweden. Biodiver Conserv, 1998, 7: 749-764.

[30] Jonsson BG, Kruys N. Ecology of coarse woody debris in boreal forests: future research directions. Ecol Bull, 2001, 49: 279-281.

[31] Kraut A, Liira J, Lõhmus A. Beyond a minimum substrate supply: sustaining saproxylic beetles in semi-natural forest management. For Ecol Manag, 2016, 360: 9-19.

[32] Krugner R, Johnson MW, Groves RL, Morse JG. Host specificity of Anagrus epos: a potential biological control agent of Homalodis cavitripennis. Biocontrol, 2008, 53: 439-449.

[33] Langor DW, Spence JR, Hammond HEJ, Jacobs J, Cobb TP (2006) Maintaining saproxylic insects in Canada’s extensively managed boreal forests: a review. In: Grove SJ, Hanula JL (eds) Insect biodiversity and dead wood: proc sym 22nd international congress of entomology, August 2004, Brisbane, Australia. USDA Forest Service, Southern Research Station, Asheville, North Carolina, USA, General Technical.Report SRS-93, pp 83–97

[34] La Salle J, Gauld JD. Parasitic Hymenoptera and the biodiversity crisis. Redia, 1991, 74: 315-334.

[35] Lassauce A, Paillet Y, Jactel H, Bouget C. Deadwood as a surrogate for forest diversity: meta-analysis of correlations between deadwood volume and species richness of saproxylic organisms. Ecol Indicators, 2011, 11: 1027-1039.

[36] Maleque MA, Ishii HT, Maeto K, Taniguchi S. Line thinning fosters the abundance and diversity of understory Hymenoptera (Insecta) in Japanese cedar (Cryptomeria japonica D. Don) plantations. J For Res, 2007, 12: 14-23.

[37] Margules CR, Pressey RL. Systematic conservation planning. Nature, 2000, 405: 243-253.

[38] Martikainen P, Siitonen J, Kaila L, Punttila P, Rauh J. Bark beetles (Coleoptera, Scolytidae) and associated beetle species in mature managed and old-growth boreal forests in southern Finland. For Ecol Manag, 1999, 116: 233-245.

[39] Martikainen P, Siitonen J, Punttila P, Kaila L, Rauh J. Species richness of coleoptera in mature managed and old-growth boreal forests in southern Finland. Biol Conserv, 2000, 94: 199-209.

[40] Mason F, Zapponi L. The forest diversity artery: towards forest management for saproxylic conservation. Biogeosci For, 2015, 9: 1-12.

[41] McAlpine JF, Peterson BV, Shewell GE, Teskey HJ, Vockeroth JR, Wood DM (eds) (1987) Manual of Nearctic diptera.Vol 1 and 2. Research Branch, Agriculture Canada, Monographs 27 and 28

[42] Muller MM, Varama M, Heinonen J, Hallaksela AM. Influence of insects on the diversity of fungi in decaying spruce wood in managed and natural forests. For Ecol Manag, 2002, 166: 165-181.

[43] Nieto A, Alexander KNA. European red list of saproxylic beetles, 2010, Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union 45

[44] Økland B. Unlogged forests: important sites for preserving the diversity of mycetophilids (Diptera: Sciaroidea). Biol Conserv, 1996, 76: 297-310.

[45] Ols C, Victorsson J, Jonsell M. Saproxylic insect fauna in stumps on wet and dry soil: implications for stump harvest. For Ecol Manag, 2013, 290: 15-21.

[46] Pawlowsky J. Lamellicorns cariophags in forest biocenosis in Poland. Ekologia Polskasér. A, 1961, 9: 355-437.

[47] Radforth I. Bushworkers and bosses: logging in Northern Ontario, 1900-1980, 1987, Toronto: University of Toronto Press 336

[48] Rowe JS (1972) Forest Regions of Canada. Revised edition. Department of the Environment, Canadian Forestry Service. Publication No. 1300.Information Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, pp 172

[49] Saint-Germain M, Drapeau P, Buddle CM. Host-use patterns of saproxylic phloeophagous and xylophagous Coleoptera adults and larvae along the decay gradient in standing dead black spruce and aspen. Ecography, 2007, 30: 737-748.

[50] Seibold S, Brandl R, Buse J, Hothorn T, Schmidl J, Thorn S, Müller J. Association of extinction risk of saproxylic beetles with ecological degradation of forest in Europe. Conserv Biol, 2015, 29: 382-390.

[51] Selby RD. Diversity of Cecidomyiidae (Diptera) living in deadwood in a Quebec hardwood forest. Arthropods Can For, 2006, 2: 21-22.

[52] Shaw MR, Hochberg ME. The neglect of parasitic hymenoptera in insect conservation strategies: the British fauna as a prime example. J Insect Conserv, 2001, 5: 253-263.

[53] Siitonen J (2001) Forest management, coarse woody debris and saproxylic organisms: fennoscandian boreal forests as an example. In Jonsson BG, Kruys N (eds), Ecology of Woody Debris in Boreal Forests. Ecological Bull 49:11–41

[54] Simandl J. The spatial pattern, diversity and niche partitioning in xylophagous beetles (Coleoptera) associated with Frangula alnus Mill. Acta Oecol, 1993, 14: 161-171.

[55] Sippola AL, Siitonen J, Kallio R. Amount and quality of coarse woody debris in natural and managed coniferous forests near the timberline in Finnish Lapland. Scand J For Res, 1998, 13: 204-214.

[56] Smith SM, Islam N, Bellocq MI. Effects of single-tree selection harvesting on Hymenopteran and saproxylic insect assemblages in the canopy and understory of northern temperate forests. J For Res, 2012, 23: 275-284.

[57] Spence JR, Langor DW, Neimelä J, Carcamo H, Currie CR. Northern forestry and carabids: the case for concern about old-growth species. Ann Zool Fenn, 1996, 33: 173-184.

[58] Stenbacka F, Hjältén J, Hilszczański J, Ball JP, Gibb H, Johansson T, Pettersson RB, Danell K. Saproxylic parasitoid (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonoidea) communities in managed boreal forest landscapes. Insect Conserv Diver, 2010, 3: 114-123.

[59] Stokland JN, Siitonen J, Jonsson BG. Biodiversity in dead wood, 2012, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 524

[60] Sturtevant BR, Bissonette JA, Long JN, Roberts DW. Coarse woody debris as a function of age, stand structure, and disturbance in boreal Newfoundland. Ecol Appl, 1997, 7: 702-712.

[61] Timms LL, Bowden JJ, Summerville KS, Buddle CM. Does species-level resolution matter? Taxonomic sufficiency in terrestrial arthropod biodiversity studies. Insect ConservDiver, 2013, 6: 453-462.

[62] Ulyshen MD, Pucci TM, Hanula JL. The importance of forest type, tree species and wood posture to saproxylic wasp (Hymenoptera) communities in the southeastern United States. J Insect Conserv, 2011, 15: 539-546.

[63] Väisänen R, Biström O, Heliövaara K. Sub-cortical Coleoptera in dead pines and spruces: is primeval species composition maintained in managed forests?. Biodiv Conserv, 1993, 2: 95-113.

[64] Vanderwel MC, Malcolm JR, Smith SM, Islam N. Insect community composition and trophic guild structure in decaying logs from eastern Canadian pine-dominated forests. For Ecol Manag, 2006, 225: 190-199.

[65] Vanderwel MC, Malcolm JR, Smith SM. An integrated model for snag and downed woody debris decay class transitions. For Ecol Manag, 2006, 234: 48-59.

[66] Vanlaerhoven SL, Stephen FM. Height distribution of adult parasitoids of the Southern Pine Beetle Complex. Environ Entomol, 2002, 31: 982-987.

[67] Yatskov M, Harmon ME, Krankina ON. A chronosequence of wood decomposition in the boreal forests of Russia. Can J For Res, 2003, 33: 1211-1226.