Developing individual tree-based models for estimating aboveground biomass of five key coniferous species in China

Weisheng Zeng , Liyong Fu , Ming Xu , Xuejun Wang , Zhenxiong Chen , Shunbin Yao

Journal of Forestry Research ›› 2017, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (5) : 1251 -1261.

PDF
Journal of Forestry Research ›› 2017, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (5) : 1251 -1261. DOI: 10.1007/s11676-017-0538-9
Original Paper

Developing individual tree-based models for estimating aboveground biomass of five key coniferous species in China

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Estimating individual tree biomass is critical to forest carbon accounting and ecosystem service modeling. In this study, we developed one- (tree diameter only) and two-variable (tree diameter and height) biomass equations, biomass conversion factor (BCF) models, and an integrated simultaneous equation system (ISES) to estimate the aboveground biomass for five conifer species in China, i.e., Cunninghamia lanceolata (Lamb.) Hook., Pinus massoniana Lamb., P. yunnanensis Faranch, P. tabulaeformis Carr. and P. elliottii Engelm., based on the field measurement data of aboveground biomass and stem volumes from 1055 destructive sample trees across the country. We found that all three methods, including the one- and two-variable equations, could adequately estimate aboveground biomass with a mean prediction error less than 5%, except for Pinus yunnanensis which yielded an error of about 6%. The BCF method was slightly poorer than the biomass equation and the ISES methods. The average coefficients of determination (R 2) were 0.944, 0.938 and 0.943 and the mean prediction errors were 4.26, 4.49 and 4.29% for the biomass equation method, the BCF method and the ISES method, respectively. The ISES method was the best approach for estimating aboveground biomass, which not only had high accuracy but also could estimate stocking volumes simultaneously that was compatible with aboveground biomass. In addition, we found that it is possible to develop a species-invariant one-variable allometric model for estimating aboveground biomass of all the five coniferous species. The model had an exponent parameter of 7/3 and the intercept parameter a 0 could be estimated indirectly from stem basic density (a 0 = 0.294 ρ).

Keywords

Biomass models / Allometric equations / Biomass conversion factor / Error-in-variable simultaneous equations

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Weisheng Zeng, Liyong Fu, Ming Xu, Xuejun Wang, Zhenxiong Chen, Shunbin Yao. Developing individual tree-based models for estimating aboveground biomass of five key coniferous species in China. Journal of Forestry Research, 2017, 29(5): 1251-1261 DOI:10.1007/s11676-017-0538-9

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Bentley LP, Stegen JC, Savage VM An empirical assessment of tree branching networks and implications for plant allometric scaling models. Ecol Lett, 2013

[2]

Bi H, Birk E, Turner J, Lambert M, Jurskis V. Converting stem volume to biomass with additivity, bias corrections and confidence bands for two Australian tree species. NZ J For Sci, 2001, 31: 298-319.

[3]

Bi H, Murphy S, Volkova L, Li Y, Weston C, Fairman T, Li Y, Law R, Norris J, Lei X, Caccamo G. Additive biomass equations based on complete weighing of sample trees for open eucalypt forest species in southeast Australia. For Ecol Manag, 2015, 349: 106-121.

[4]

Blujdea VNB, Pilli R, Dutca I Allometric biomass equations for young broadleaved trees in plantations in Romania. For Ecol Manag, 2012, 264: 172-184.

[5]

Borders BE. Systems of equations in forest stand modeling. For Sci, 1989, 35(2): 548-556.

[6]

Brown S, Lugo EA. Biomass of tropical forests: a new estimate based on forest volumes. Science, 1984, 223: 1290-1293.

[7]

Chen CG, Zhu JF. A handbook of tree biomass for main tree species in northeastern China, 1989, Beijing: Chinese Forestry Press 296

[8]

Fang JY. Forest productivity in China and its response to global climate change. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica, 2000, 24(5): 513-517.

[9]

Fang JY, Chen AP, Peng CH Changes in forest biomass carbon storage in China between 1949 and 1998. Science, 2001, 292: 2320-2322.

[10]

Fayolle A, Doucet JL, Gillet JF Tree allometry in Central Africa: testing the validity of pantropical multi-species allometric equations for estimating biomass and carbon stocks. For Ecol Manag, 2013, 305: 29-37.

[11]

Feng ZW, Wang XK, Wu G. Biomass and productivity of forest ecosystems in China, 1999, Beijing: Chinese Science Press 241

[12]

Fu LY, Zeng WS, Tang SZ Using linear mixed model and dummy variable model approaches to construct compatible single-tree biomass equations at different scales: a case study for Masson pine in southern China. J For Sci, 2012, 58(3): 101-115.

[13]

Fu LY, Zhang HR, Li CM Analysis of nonlinear mixed effects model parameter estimation methods. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2013, 49(1): 114-119.

[14]

Fu L, Sun H, Sharma RP, Lei Y, Zhang H, Tang S. Nonlinear mixed-effects crown width models for individual trees of Chinese fir (Cunninghamia lanceolata) in south-central China. For Ecol Manag, 2013, 302: 210-220.

[15]

Fu L, Lei Y, Wang G, Bi H, Tang S, Song X. Comparison of seemingly unrelated regressions with multivariate errors-in-variables models for developing a system of nonlinear additive biomass equations. Trees, 2016, 30: 839-857.

[16]

Henry M, Bombelli A, Trotta C, et al. 2013. GlobAllomeTree: international platform for tree allometric equations to support volume, biomass and carbon assessment. iForest (early view): e1-e5. Available at: <http://www.sisef.it/iforest/contents/?id=ifor0901-006> [Accessed 10-02-2016]

[17]

IPCC. 2003. Good practice guidance for land use, land use change and forestry. Japan: The Institute for Global Environmental Strategies for the IPCC, 632 pp. Available at: <http://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp> [accessed 24-04-2016]

[18]

Jenkins JC, Chojnacky DC, Heath LS, Birdsey RA. National-scale biomass estimators for United States tree species. For Sci, 2003, 49(1): 12-35.

[19]

Li YC, Tang SZ. Parameter estimate of the whole stand model with measurement error. J Beijing For Univ, 2006, 28(1): 23-27.

[20]

Li CM, Zhang HR. Modeling dominant height for Chinese fir plantation using a nonlinear mixed-effects modeling approach. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2010, 46(3): 89-95.

[21]

Liu GH, Fu BJ, Fang JY. Carbon dynamics of Chinese forests and its contribution to global carbon balance. Acta Ecol Sin, 2000, 20(5): 733-740.

[22]

Longford NT. Simulation-based diagnostics in random-coefficient models. J R Stat Soc Ser A, 2001, 164: 259-273.

[23]

Ma QY. A study on the biomass of Chinese pine forests. J Beijing For Univ, 1989, 11(4): 1-10.

[24]

Ma QY, Xie ZM. Basic estimation of carbon storage for Chinese pine forest in China. J Beijing For Univ, 1996, 18(3): 23-27.

[25]

Muukkonen P. Generalized allometric volume and biomass equations for some tree species in Europe. Eur J For Res, 2007, 126: 157-166.

[26]

Návar J. Allometric equations for tree species and carbon stocks for forests of northwestern Mexico. For Ecol Manag, 2009, 257: 427-434.

[27]

Parresol BR. Assessing tree and stand biomass: a review with examples and critical comparisons. For Sci, 1999, 45(4): 573-593.

[28]

Sileshi GW. A critical review of forest biomass estimation models, common mistakes and corrective measures. For Ecol Manag, 2014, 329: 237-254.

[29]

Snorrason A, Einarsson SF. Single-tree biomass and stem volume functions for eleven tree species ssed in Icelandic Forestry. Icel Agric Sci, 2006, 19: 15-24.

[30]

Somogyi Z, Cienciala E, Mäkipää R Indirect methods of large-scale forest biomass estimation. Eur J For Res, 2007, 126: 197-207.

[31]

State Forestry Administration. Guidelines on carbon accounting and monitoring for afforestation project, 2014, Beijing: Chinese Standard Press 64

[32]

State Forestry Administration. Technical regulation on sample collections for tree biomass modeling, 2015, Beijing: Chinese Standard Press 11

[33]

Tang SZ, Li Y, Wang YH. Simultaneous equations, error-in-variable models, and model integration in systems ecology. Ecol Model, 2001, 142: 285-294.

[34]

Tang SZ, Li Y, Fu LY. Statistical foundation for biomathematical models, 2015 2 Beijing: Higher Education Press of China 435

[35]

Ter-Mikaelian MT, Korzukhin MD. Biomass equations for sixty-five north American tree species. For Ecol Manag, 1997, 97: 1-24.

[36]

Wang M, Borders BE, Zhao D. An empirical comparison of two subject-specific approaches to dominant heights modeling the dummy variable method and the mixed model method. For Ecol Manag, 2008, 255: 2659-2669.

[37]

West GB, Brown JH, Enquist BJ. A general model for the origin of allometric scaling laws in biology. Science, 1997, 276(5309): 122-126.

[38]

West GB, Brown JH, Enquist BJ. A general model for the structure and allometry of plant vascular systems. Nature, 1999, 400: 664-667.

[39]

Woodbury PB, Smith JE, Heath LS. Carbon sequestration in the US forest sector from 1990 to 2010. For Ecol Manag, 2007, 241: 14-27.

[40]

Zeng WS. Methodology on modeling single-tree biomass equations for national biomass estimation in China, 2011, Beijing: Chinese Academy of Forestry, Doctoral dissertation.

[41]

Zeng WS. Development of monitoring and assessment of forest biomass and carbon storage in China. For Ecosyst, 2014, 1: 20.

[42]

Zeng WS. Using nonlinear mixed model and dummy variable model approaches to construct origin-based single tree biomass equations. Trees, 2015, 29(1): 275-283.

[43]

Zeng WS. Integrated individual tree biomass simultaneous equations for two larch species in northeastern and northern China. Scand J For Res, 2015, 30(7): 594-604.

[44]

Zeng WS, Tang SZ. Establishment of below-ground biomass equations for larch in northeastern and Masson pine in southern China. J Beijing For Univ, 2011, 33(2): 1-6.

[45]

Zeng WS, Tang SZ. 2011b. A new general biomass allometric model. Nature Precedings. Available at <http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/npre.2011.6704.2> [accessed 24-04-2016]

[46]

Zeng WS, Tang SZ. 2011c. Bias correction in logarithmic regression and comparison with weighted regression for nonlinear models. Nature Precedings. Available at <http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/npre.2011.6708.1> [accessed 24-04-2016]

[47]

Zeng WS, Tang SZ. Goodness evaluation and precision analysis of tree biomass equations. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2011, 47(11): 106-113.

[48]

Zeng WS, Tang SZ. Modeling compatible single-tree biomass equations of Masson pine (Pinus massoniana) in southern China. J For Res, 2012, 23(4): 593-598.

[49]

Zeng WS, Tang SZ, Huang GS Population classification and sample structure on modeling of single-tree biomass equations for national biomass estimation in China. For Resour Manag, 2010, 7(3): 16-23.

[50]

Zeng WS, Zhang HR, Tang SZ. Using the dummy variable model approach to construct compatible single-tree biomass equations at different scales—a case study for Masson pine (Pinus massoniana) in southern China. Can J For Res, 2011, 41(7): 1547-1554.

[51]

Zianis D, Muukkonen P, Mäkipää R, Mencuccini M. 2005. Biomass and stem volume equations for tree species in Europe. Silva Fennica, (Monographs 4)

[52]

Zou WT, Zeng WS, Zhang LJ, Zeng M. Modeling crown biomass for four pine species in China. Forests, 2015, 6(2): 433-449.

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

168

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/