Variation of soil enzyme activity and microbial biomass in poplar plantations of different genotypes and stem spacings

Abstract

To improve the productivity of poplar plantations, a field experiment of split-plot design with four tree spacings and three poplar clones was established, and four soil enzyme activities and microbial biomass were monitored in the trial. Soil enzyme activities, in most cases, were significantly higher in topsoil (0–10 cm) than in lower horizons (10–20 cm). Soil cellulase, catalase and protease activities during the growing season were higher than during the non-growing season, while invertase activity followed the opposite trend. Soil invertase, cellulase and catalase activities varied by poplar clone but soil protease activity did not. Cellulase and protease activities in the plantation at 5 × 5 m spacing were significantly higher than in the other spacings. The highest catalase activity was recorded at 6 × 6 m spacing. At the same planting density, invertase activity was greater in square spacings than in rectangular spacings. Soil microbial biomass was also significantly affected by seedling spacing and poplar clone. The mean soil MBC was significantly lower in topsoil than in the lower horizon, while MBN showed the opposite pattern. Significantly positive correlations were observed among soil cellulase, protease and catalase activities (p < 0.01), whereas soil invertase activity was negatively and significantly correlated with cellulase, protease and catalase activities (p < 0.01). Soil microbial biomass and enzyme activities were not correlated except for a significantly negative correlation between soil MBC and catalase activities. Variations in soil enzyme activity and microbial biomass in different poplar plantations suggest that genotype and planting spacing should be considered when modeling soil nutrient dynamics and managing for long-term site productivity.

Keywords

Microbial activity / Nutrient availability / Planting density / Poplar clone / Seasonal variation

References

[1] Allison SD, Vitousek PM. Responses of extracellular enzymes to simple and complex nutrient inputs. Soil Biol Biochem, 2005, 37(5): 937-944.

[2] Augusto L, Ranger J, Binkley D, Rothe A. Impact of several common tree species of European temperate forests on soil fertility. Ann For Sci, 2002, 59(3): 233-253.

[3] Bobuľská L, Fazekašová D, Angelovičová L. Vertical profiles of soil properties and microbial activities in peatbog soils in Slovakia. Environ Process, 2015, 2(2): 411-418.

[4] Böhme L, Langer U, Böhme F. Microbial biomass, enzyme activities and microbial community structure in two European long-term field experiments. Agr Ecosyst Environ, 2005, 109: 141-152.

[5] Bolat İ. The effect of thinning on microbial biomass C, N and basal respiration in black pine forest soils in Mudurnu, Turkey. Eur J For Res, 2014, 133(1): 131-139.

[6] Burger JA, Kelting DL. Using soil quality indicators to assess forest stand management. For Ecol Manag, 1999, 122(1): 155-166.

[7] Caldwell BA. Enzyme activities as a component of soil biodiversity: a review. Pedobiologia, 2005, 49(6): 637-644.

[8] Chodak M, Niklińska M. Effect of texture and tree species on microbial properties of mine soils. Appl Soil Ecol, 2010, 46(2): 268-275.

[9] Cochran VL, Elliott LF, Lewis CE. Soil microbial biomass and enzyme activity in subarctic agricultural and forest soils. Biol Fertil Soils, 1989, 7(4): 283-288.

[10] Criquet S, Farnet A, Tagger S, Le Petit J. Annual variations of phenoloxidase activities in an evergreen oak litter: influence of certain biotic and abiotic factors. Soil Biol Biochem, 2000, 32(11): 1505-1513.

[11] Devi NB, Yadava PS. Seasonal dynamics in soil microbial biomass C, N and P in a mixed-oak forest ecosystem of Manipur, Northeast India. Appl Soil Ecol, 2006, 31(3): 220-227.

[12] Fang S, Xie B, Zhang H. Nitrogen dynamics and mineralization in degraded agricultural soil mulched with fresh grass. Plant Soil, 2007, 300(1–2): 269-280.

[13] Fang S, Xie B, Liu J. Soil nutrient availability, poplar growth and biomass production on degraded agricultural soil under fresh grass mulch. For Ecol Manag, 2008, 255(5): 1802-1809.

[14] Fang S, Liu J, Liu D, Xie B. Enzymatic activity and nutrient availability in the rhizosphere of poplar plantations treated with fresh grass mulch. Soil Sci Plant Nutr, 2010, 56(3): 483-491.

[15] Fang S, Liu D, Tian Y, Deng S, Shang X. Tree species composition influences enzyme activities and microbial biomass in the rhizosphere: a rhizobox approach. PLoS ONE, 2013 8 4 e61461

[16] Frankeberger WT Jr, Johanson JB. Method of measuring invertase activity in soils. Plant Soil, 1983, 74(3): 301-311.

[17] Freppaz M, Said-Pullicino D, Filippa G, Curtaz F, Celi L, Zanini E. Winter–spring transition induces changes in nutrients and microbial biomass in mid-alpine forest soils. Soil Biol Biochem, 2014, 78: 54-57.

[18] Gavrilenko EG, Susyan EA, Anan’eva ND, Makarov OA. Spatial variability in the carbon of microbial biomass and microbial respiration in soils of the south of Moscow oblast. Eurasian Soil Sci, 2011, 44(10): 1125-1138.

[19] Hinojosa MB, Carreira JA, García-Ruíz R, Dick RP. Soil moisture pre-treatment effects on enzyme activities as indicators of heavy metal-contaminated and reclaimed soils. Soil Biol Biochem, 2004, 36(10): 1559-1568.

[20] Jenkinson DS, Ladd JN. Paul EA, Ladd JN. Microbial biomass in soil: measurement and turnover. Soil biochemistry, 1981, New York, Basel: Marcel Dekker Inc 415 471

[21] Joergensen RG, Brookes PC. Ninhydrin-reactive nitrogen measurements of microbial biomass in 0.5 m K₂SO₄ soil extracts. Soil Biol Biochem, 1990, 22(8): 1023-1027.

[22] Joergensen RG, Anderson TH, Wolters V. Carbon and nitrogen relationships in the microbial biomass of soils in beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) forests. Biol Fertil Soils, 1995, 19(2–3): 141-147.

[23] Koyama A, Wallenstein MD, Simpson RT, Moore JC. Carbon-degrading enzyme activities stimulated by increased nutrient availability in arctic tundra soils. PLoS ONE, 2013 8 10 e77212

[24] Li G, Liu Y, Gan J, Guo B, Xu Y. Seasonal response of soil enzyme activity to thinning intensity of aerial seeded Pinus tabulaeformis stands. Front For Chin, 2008, 3(3): 286-292.

[25] Liu D, Fang S, Tian Y, Dun X. Variation in rhizosphere soil microbial index of tree species on seasonal flooding land: an in situ rhizobox approach. Appl Soil Ecol, 2012, 59: 1-11.

[26] Liu D, Fang S, Tian Y, Dun X. Seasonal and clonal variations of microbial biomass and processes in the rhizosphere of poplar plantations. Appl Soil Ecol, 2014, 78(6): 65-72.

[27] Lü Y, Wang C, Wang F, Zhao G, Pu G, Ma X, Tian X. Effects of nitrogen addition on litter decomposition, soil microbial biomass, and enzyme activities between leguminous and non-leguminous forests. Ecol Res, 2013, 28(5): 793-800.

[28] Puissant J, Cécillon L, Mills RTE Seasonal influence of climate manipulation on microbial community structure and function in mountain soils. Soil Biol Biochem, 2015, 80: 296-305.

[29] Raiesi F, Riahi M. The influence of grazing exclosure on soil C stocks and dynamics, and ecological indicators in upland arid and semi-arid rangelands. Ecol Indic, 2014, 41: 145-154.

[30] Roberge MR. Burns RG. Methodology of enzymes determination and extraction. Soil enzymes, 1978, New York: Academic Press 341 373

[31] Schmidt IK, Jonasson S, Michelsen A. Mineralization and microbial immobilization of N and P in arctic soils in relation to season, temperature and nutrient amendment. Appl Soil Ecol, 1999, 11(2): 147-160.

[32] Senga Y, Hiroki M, Nakamura Y, Watarai Y, Watanabe Y, Nohara S. Vertical profiles of DIN, DOC, and microbial activities in the wetland soil of Kushiro Mire, northeastern Japan. Limnology, 2011, 12(1): 17-23.

[33] Sinsabaugh RL. Phenol oxidase, peroxidase and organic matter dynamics of soil. Soil Biol Biochem, 2010, 42(3): 391-404.

[34] Sinsabaugh RL, Gallo ME, Lauber C, Waldrop MP, Zak DR. Extracellular enzyme activities and soil organic matter dynamics for northern hardwood forests receiving simulated nitrogen deposition. Biogeochemistry, 2005, 75(2): 201-215.

[35] Smith JL, Paul EA. Bollag JM, Stotzky G. The significance of soil microbial biomass estimations. Soil biochemistry, 1990, New York: Marcel Dekker 357 396

[36] Tabatabai MA. Weaver RW, Angle JS, Bottomley PS, Smith S, Tabatabai MA, Wollum A. Soil enzymes. Methods of soil analysis: Part 2. Microbiological and biochemical properties of soils, 1994, Madison: Soil Science Society of America 775 833

[37] Tang YZ, Wei CF, Yan TM, Yang LZ, Ci E. Biological indicator of soil quality: a review. Soils, 2007, 39(2): 157-163.

[38] Tian Y, Cao F, Wang G. Soil microbiological properties and enzyme activity in Ginkgo–tea agroforestry compared with monoculture. Agrofor Syst, 2013, 87(5): 1201-1210.

[39] Tripathi S, Chakraborty A, Chakrabarti K, Bandyopadhyay BK. Enzyme activities and microbial biomass in coastal soils of India. Soil Biol Biochem, 2007, 39(11): 2840-2848.

[40] Venkatesan S, Senthurpandian VK. Comparison of enzyme activity with depth under tea plantations and forested sites in south India. Geoderma, 2006, 137(1): 212-216.

[41] Wallenstein MD, McMahon SK, Schimel JP. Seasonal variation in enzyme activities and temperature sensitivities in Arctic tundra soils. Glob Change Biol, 2009, 15(7): 1631-1639.

[42] Wang Q, Xiao F, He T, Wang S. Responses of labile soil organic carbon and enzyme activity in mineral soils to forest conversion in the subtropics. Ann For Sci, 2013, 70(6): 579-587.

[43] Wang C, Lü Y, Wang L, Liu X, Tian X. Insights into seasonal variation of litter decomposition and related soil degradative enzyme activities in subtropical forest in China. J For Res, 2013, 24(4): 683-689.

[44] Wang Y, Fang S, Chang SX, Tian Y. Non-additive effects of litter-mixing on soil carbon dioxide efflux from poplar-based agroforestry systems in the warm temperate region of China. Agrofor Syst, 2014, 88(2): 193-203.

[45] Wardle DA. Controls of temporal variability of the soil microbial biomass: a global-scale synthesis. Soil Biol Biochem, 1998, 30(13): 1627-1637.

[46] Yan M, Xu T, Song P, Dai J. Effects of different cropping patterns of soybean and maize seedlings on soil enzyme activities and MBC and MBN. J Northeast Agric Univ (Engl Ed), 2012, 19(4): 42-47.

[47] Yan Y, Fang S, Tian Y, Deng S, Tang L, Chuong DN. Influence of tree spacing on soil nitrogen mineralization and availability in hybrid poplar plantations. Forests, 2015, 6(3): 636-649.

[48] Yang R, Tang J, Chen X, Hu S. Effects of coexisting plant species on soil microbes and soil enzymes in metal lead contaminated soils. Appl Soil Ecol, 2007, 37(3): 240-246.

[49] Zhang C, Liu G, Xue S, Song Z. Rhizosphere soil microbial activity under different vegetation types on the Loess Plateau, China. Geoderma, 2011, 161(3–4): 115-125.