Effects of flooding stress on the photosynthetic apparatus of leaves of two Physocarpus cultivars

Huihui Zhang , Peng Feng , Wei Yang , Xin Sui , Xin Li , Wei Li , Rongtao Zhang , Siyu Gu , Nan Xu

Journal of Forestry Research ›› 2017, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (4) : 1049 -1059.

PDF
Journal of Forestry Research ›› 2017, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (4) : 1049 -1059. DOI: 10.1007/s11676-017-0496-2
Original Paper

Effects of flooding stress on the photosynthetic apparatus of leaves of two Physocarpus cultivars

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

We applied under pot-culture conditions and the double-casing pot method to study the characteristics of photosynthetic gas exchange and chlorophyll fluorescence in the leaves of Physocarpus amurensis Maxim (PA) and Physocarpus opulifolius under flooding stress. Our results indicate a significantly higher flooding tolerance of P. opulifolius compared to P. amurensis. Especially in P. amurensis, the limitation of non-stomatal factors played a major role in the advanced stages of flooding stress, observed as a rapid increase of the intercellular CO2 concentration (C i) and a decrease of the stomatal limitation value (L s). The maximal PSII photochemical efficiencies (F v/F m) and actual photochemical efficiency (Ф PSII) in the leaves of P. opulifolius were significantly higher, and the extent of decrease during the flooding process was smaller than in P. amurensis. In addition, the non-chemical quenching (NPQ) in the leaves of P. opulifolius significantly increased from the 10th day under flooding stress, while the variation of NPQ in the leaves of P. amurensis was much smaller. This indicates that the leaves of P. opulifolius had not only higher PSII photochemical activity, but also improved tolerance to flooding stress, which may be caused by its ability to dissipate excess excitation energy by starting NPQ. At the 16th day under flooding stress, the P IABS significantly decreased with greater extent of decrease than F v/F m in the leaves of both Physocarpus, but the decreasing extent of P IABS in P. opulifolius was significantly smaller than in P. amurensis. In the 16th day under flooding stress, the fluorescence at J and I point (V J and V I) in P. amurensis were significantly higher, and the extent of increase in V J was greater than V I. However, the variations of V J and V I in the leaves of P. opulifolius were smaller, suggesting that the damage sites of flooding stress to PSII in the leaves of P. amurensis were mainly located in the electron transport process from QA at the PSII receptor side to QB. Flooding stress reduced the proportion (φE o) of luminous energy absorbed by the PSII reaction center for the electron transport following QA , while the maximum quantum yield (φD o) of non-photochemical quenching increased. However, the TRo/RC and ETo/RC in the leaves of P. amurensis decreased accompanied by a dramatic increase of energy (DIo/RC) from the dissipation in the reaction center. This further indicated that the function of the PSII reaction center in the leaves of P. amurensis was significantly lower than in P. opulifolius.

Keywords

Physocarpus amurensis Maxim / Physocarpus opulifolius / Photosynthesis capacity / Chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Huihui Zhang, Peng Feng, Wei Yang, Xin Sui, Xin Li, Wei Li, Rongtao Zhang, Siyu Gu, Nan Xu. Effects of flooding stress on the photosynthetic apparatus of leaves of two Physocarpus cultivars. Journal of Forestry Research, 2017, 29(4): 1049-1059 DOI:10.1007/s11676-017-0496-2

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Abiko T, Kotuia L, Shiono K, Malik A, Colmer TD, Nakazono M. Enhanced formation of aerenchyma and induction of a barrier to radial oxygen loss in adventitious roots of Zea nicaraguensis contribute to its waterlogging tolerance as compared with maize. Plant, Cell Environ, 2012, 35(9): 1618-1630.

[2]

Ahmed S, Nawata E, Hosokawa M, Domae Y, Sakuratani T. Alterations in photosynthesis and some antioxidant enzymatic activities of mungbean subjected to waterlogging. Plant Sci, 2002, 163(1): 117-123.

[3]

Arbona V, Hossain Z, Clemente RP, Cadenas AG. Antioxidant enzymatic activity is linked to waterlogging stress tolerance in citrus. Physiol Plant, 2008, 132(4): 452-466.

[4]

Ashraf M, Arfan M. Gas exchange characteristics and water relations in two cultivars of Hibiscus esculentus under Waterlogging. Biol Plant, 2005, 49(3): 459-462.

[5]

Cao G, Wang XG, Liu Y, Luo W. Effect of water logging stress on cotton leaf area index and yield. Proc Eng, 2012, 28(12): 202-209.

[6]

Chartzoulakis K, Klapaki G. Response of two greenhouse pepper hybrids to NaCl salinity during different growth stages. Sci Horti, 2000, 86(3): 247-260.

[7]

Chaves MM, Flexas J, Pinheiro C. Photosynthesis under drought and salt stress: regulation mechanisms from whole plant to cell. Ann Bot, 2009, 103(4): 551-560.

[8]

Cheng DD, Liu MJ, Sun XB, Zhao M, Chow WS, Sun GY. Light suppresses bacterial population through the accumulation of hydrogen peroxide in tobacco leaves infected with pseudomonas syringaepv.tabaci. Front. Plant Sci, 2016, 7(512): 1-11.

[9]

Cheng DD, Zhang ZS, Sun XB, Zhao M, Sun GY. Photoinhibition and photoinhibition-like damage to the photosynthetic apparatus in tobacco leaves induced bypseudomonas syringaepv.Tabaciunder light and dark conditions. BMC Plant Biol, 2016, 16(1): 1-11.

[10]

Du KB, Xu L, Tu BK, Shen BX. Influences of soil flooding on ultrastructure and photosynthetic capacity of leaves of one-year old seedlings of two poplar clones. Sci Silv Sin, 2010, 46(6): 58-64.

[11]

Fan XL, Zhang ZS, Gao HY, Yang C, Liu MJ, Li PM. Photoinhibition-like damage to the photosynthetic apparatus in plant leaves induced by submergence treatment in the dark. PLoS ONE, 2014, 9(2): 1633-1641.

[12]

Farquhar GD, Sharkey TD. Stomatal conductance and photosynthesis. Ann Rev Plant Physiol, 1982, 33: 317-345.

[13]

Fernandez MD. Changes in photosynthesis and fluorescence in response to flooding in emerged and submerged leaves of Pouteria orinocoensis. Photosynthetica, 2006, 44(1): 32-38.

[14]

Fukao T, Bailey-Serres J. Plant responses to hypoxia: issurvival a balancing act. Trends Plant Sci, 2004, 9(9): 449-456.

[15]

Fukao T, Bailey-Serres J. Ethylene-A key regulator of submergence responses in rice. Plant Sci, 2008, 175(S1–2): 43-51.

[16]

Geigenberger P. Response of plant metabolism to too little oxygen. Cur Opin Plant Biol, 2003, 6(3): 247-256.

[17]

Hank W, William A, Timothyd C. Conditions leading to high CO2 (> 5 kPa) in waterlogged flooded soils and possible effects on root growth and metabolism. Ann Bot, 2006, 98(1): 9-32.

[18]

Havaux M, Davaud A. Photoinhibition of photosynthesis in chilled potato leaves is not correlated with a loss of photosystem-II activity-preferential inactivation of photosystem I. Photosynth Res, 1994, 40: 75-92.

[19]

Hu YB, Sun GY, Wang XC. Induction characteristics and response of photosynthetic quantum conversion to changes in irradiance in mulberry plants. J Plant Physiol, 2007, 164(8): 959-968.

[20]

Huang SB, Colmer TD, Millar AH. Does anoxia tolerance involve altering the energy currency towards PPi?. Trends Plant Sci, 2008, 13(5): 221-227.

[21]

Islam MA, Macdonald SE. Ecophysiological adaptations of black spruce (Picea mariana) and tamarack (Larix laricina) seedlings to flooding. Trees, 2004, 18(18): 35-42.

[22]

Jackson MB, Armstrong W. Formation of aerenchyma and the processes of plant ventilation in relation to soil flooding and submergence. Plant Biol, 1999, 1(3): 274-287.

[23]

Kaelke CM, Dawson JO. Seasonal flooding regimes influence survival, nitrogen fixation and the partitioning of nitrogen and biomass in Alnus incana ssp. Rugosa. J Plant Soil, 2003, 254(1): 167-177.

[24]

Kreslavski VD, Carpentier R, Klimov VV, Murata N, Allakhverdiev SI. Molecular mechanisms of stress resistance of the photosynthetic apparatus. Biochem Suppl Ser A Membr Cell Biol, 2007, 1(3): 185-205.

[25]

Li PM, Cheng LL, Gao HY, Peng T. Heterogeneous behavior of PSII in soybean (Glycine max) leaves with identical PSII photochemistry effi ciency under different high temperature treatments. J Plant Physiol, 2000, 166(15): 1607-1615.

[26]

Li XP, Bjorkman O, Shi C, Grossman AR, Rosenquist M, Jansson S, Niyogi KK. A pigment-binding protein essential for regulation of photosynthetic light harvesting. Nature, 2000, 403(6768): 391-395.

[27]

Li HB, Chen WF, Li QY. Responses of rice leaf photosynthetic parameters to light intensity under NaCl stress. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2006, 17(9): 1588-1592.

[28]

Li G, Gao HY, Zhao B, Dong ST, Zhang JW, Yang JS, Wang JF, Liu P. Effects of drought stress on activity of photosystems in leaves of maize at grain filling stage. Acta Agron Sin, 2009, 35(10): 1916-1922.

[29]

Li PM, Cheng LL, Gao HY, Jiang C, Peng T. Heterogeneous behavior of PSII in soybean (Glycine max) leaves with identical PSII photochemistry efficiency under different high temperature treatments. J Plant Physiol, 2009, 166(15): 1607-1615.

[30]

Li Y, Du YP, Fu YD, Heng D. Physiological responses of waterlogging on different rootstock combinations of cabernet sauvignon grape. Acta Hortic Sin, 2013, 40(11): 2105-2114.

[31]

Lindroth RL, Reich PB, Tjoelker MG, Volin JC, Oleksyn J. Light environment alters response to ozone stress in seedlings of Acer saccharum Marsh, and hybrid Populus L. New Phytol, 1993, 124(4): 637-646.

[32]

Liu MJ, Zhang ZS, Gao HY, Cheng Y, Fan XL, Cheng DD. Effect of leaf dehydration duration and dehydration degree on psII photochemical activity of papaya leaves. Plant Physiol Biochem, 2014, 82(3): 85-88.

[33]

Lu CM, Qiu NW, Wang BS, Zhang J. Salinity treatment shows no effects on photosystem II photochemistry, but increases the resistance of photosystem II to heat stress in halophyte Suaeda salsa. J Exp Bot, 2003, 54(383): 851-860.

[34]

Mathur S, Agrawal D, Jajoo A. Photosynthesis: response to high temperature stress. J Photochem Photobiol Biol, 2014, 137(8): 116-126.

[35]

Meyer S, Kouchkovsky Y. Electron transport, photosystem-reaction centers and chlorophyll protein complexes of thylakoids of drought resistant and sensitive lupin plants. Photosynth Res, 1993, 37(1): 49-60.

[36]

Nadia AA, Dewez D, Didur O, Popovic R. Inhibition of photosystem II photochemistry by Cr is caused by the alteration of both D1 protein and oxygen evolving complex. Photosynth Res, 2006, 89(89): 81-87.

[37]

Nishiuchi S, Yamauchi T, Takahashi H, Kotual L, Nakazono M. Mechanisms for coping with submergence and waterlogging in rice. Rice, 2012, 5(2): 1-14.

[38]

Olgun M, Kumlay AM, Adiguzel MC, Abdullah C. The effect of waterlogging in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Acta Agric Scand Sect B Soil Plant Sci, 2008, 58(3): 193-198.

[39]

Parolin P, Armbrüster N, Junk WJ. Two Amazonian floodplain trees react differently to periodical flooding. Trop Ecol, 2006, 47(2): 243-250.

[40]

Prasad TK, Anderson MD, Martin BA, Stewart CR. Evidence for chilling-induced oxidative stress in maize seedlings and a regulatory role for hydrogen peroxide. Plant Cell, 1994, 6(1): 65-74.

[41]

Qi L, Ma N, Wu WW, An YY, Xu JC, Qin XH, Wang LJ. Physiological responses and tolerance evaluation of fig cultivars to waterlogging. Acta Hortic Sin, 2015, 42(7): 1273-1284.

[42]

Qu NW, Zhou F, Gu ZJ, Jia SQ, Wang XA. Photosynthetic functions and chlorophyll fast fluorescence characteristics of five Pinus species. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2012, 23(5): 1181-1187.

[43]

Salmela MJ, Cavers S, Cottrell JE, Lason GR, Ennos RA. Seasonal patterns of photochemical capacity and spring phenology reveal genetic differentiation among native Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) populations in Scotland. For Ecol Manag, 2011, 262(6): 1020-1029.

[44]

Satoh K, Smith CM, Fork DC. Effect of salinity on primary processes of photosynthesis in the red alga porphyraperforata. Plant Physiol, 1983, 73(3): 643-647.

[45]

Seemann JR, Sharkey TD. Salinity and nitrogen effects on photosynthesis, ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase and metabolite pool sizes in Phaseolus vulgaris L. Plant Physiol, 1986, 82(2): 555-560.

[46]

Strasser RJ, Srivastava A, Govindjee. Polyphasic chlorophyll a fluorescence transients. Photosynth Res, 1997, 52(2): 147-155.

[47]

Strauss AJ, Kruger GHJ, Strasser RJ, Heerden PDRV. Ranking of dark chilling tolerance in soybean genotypes probed by the chlorophyll a fluorescence transient O–J–I–P. Environ Exp Bot, 2006, 56(2): 147-157.

[48]

Ushimaru T, Ogawa K, Ishida N, Tsuji H. Changes in organelle superoxide dismutase isoenzymes during air adaptation of submerged rice seedlings: Differential behavior of isoenzymes in plastids and mitochondoria. Planta, 1995, 196(3): 606-613.

[49]

Yan K, Chen P, Shao H, Zhao S, Zhang L, Zhang L, Xu G, Sun J. Responses of photosynthesis and photosystem IIto higher temperature and salt stress in sorghum. J Agron Crop Sci, 2012, 198(3): 218-226.

[50]

Yavas I, Unaya A, Aydin M. The waterlogging tolerance of wheat varieties in western of Turkey. Sci World J, 2012, 4: 1-7.

[51]

Yu YY, Zhang HY, Pan J, Tan Z, Ma L. Cross-breedingof Physocarpus plant. J Northeast For Uni, 2010, 38(7): 16-18.

[52]

Yuan L, Zhang LQ, Gu ZQ. Responses of chlorophyll fluoresescence of aninsive plant Spartina alterniflorato continuous waterlogging. Acta Sci Circ, 2012, 30(4): 882-889.

[53]

Zhang XK, Zhou QH, Cao JH, Yu BJ. Differential Cl/Salt tolerance and NaCl-induced alternations of tissue and cellular ion fluxes in Glycine max, Glycine soja and their Hybrid Seedlings. J Agron Crop Sci, 2011, 197(5): 1-11.

[54]

Zhang HH, Zhang XL, Li X, Ding JN, Zhu WX, Qi F, Zhang T, Tian Y, Sun GY. Effects of NaCl and Na2CO3 stresses on the growth and photosynthesis characteristics of Morus alba seedlings. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2012, 23(3): 625-631.

[55]

Zhang ZS, Li G, Gao HY, Zhang LT, Yang C, Liu P, Meng QW. Characterization of photosynthetic performance during senescence in stay-green and quick-leaf-senescence Zea mays L. Inbred Lines. PLoS ONE, 2012 7 8 e42936

[56]

Zhang BB, Xu JL, Cai ZX, Ma RJ. Relationship between photosynthetic characteristics and environmental factors in leaves of two plum rootstock varieties under waterlogging stress. J Nanjing Agric Univ, 2013, 36(5): 39-44.

[57]

Zhang HH, Zhong HX, Sui X, Xu N. Adaptive changes in chlorophyll content and photosynthetic features to low light in physocarpus amurensis maxim and physocarpus opulifolius “diabolo”. Peer J, 2016 4 3 e2125

[58]

Zhou YZ. Studies on the propagation in vitro of Physocorpus opulifolius “Lutein”. Acta Hortic Sin, 2000, 27(2): 148-150.

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

120

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/