Early evaluation of growth traits of Larix kaempferi clones

Abstract

Early selection is an important method to shorten the breeding cycle for tree species, which may differ in the time for early selection. To evaluate the early selected time for Larix kaempferi, tree height and diameter at breast height of 57 L. kaempferi clones were measured over many different growth years. The results indicated that, except for age × clone interaction for diameter at breast height (P = 0.741), there were significant differences among all variation sources (P < 0.01). The coefficient of phenotypic variation ranged from 14.89 to 35.65% for height and from 19.17 to 23.86% for diameter at breast height in different growth years. The repeatability of height and of diameter at breast height among clones was high, ranging from 0.6181 to 0.8531 (height) and from 0.8443 to 0.8497 (diameter at breast height), in different growth years. There were significant positive correlations between all pairs of growth traits except between height in the 2nd growth year and height in the 30th growth year; and between height in the 2nd growth year × diameter at breast height in the 30th growth year. With a comprehensive evaluation method and a selection ratio of 10%, L65, L1, L62, L9, L15, and L78 were selected as excellent clones in the 30th growth year. Their average values of height and diameter at breast height were 9.81 and 16.57% higher than the overall average, representing genetic gains of 6.46 and 13.99%, respectively. This study provides a theoretical foundation for the genetic improvement of L. kaempferi.

Keywords

Larix kaempferi / Genetic / Variation / Comprehensive evaluation

References

[1] Achere V. Chloroplast and mitochondrial molecular tests identify European × Japanese larch hybrids. Theor Appl Genet, 2004, 108: 1643-1649.

[2] Apiolaza LA. Very early selection for solid wood quality: screening for early winners. Ann For Sci, 2009

[3] Arcade A, Anselin F, Faivre RP. Application of AFLP, RAPD and ISSR markers to genetic mapping of European and Japanese larch. Theor Appl Genet, 2000, 100: 299-307.

[4] Balocchi C, Bridgwater F, Zobel B, Jahromi S. Age trends in genetic parameters for tree height in a nonselected population of loblolly pine. For Sci, 1993, 39(2): 231-251.

[5] Bi CX, Guo JZ, Wang HW, Shu QY. The correlation and path analysis on the quantity characters of Chinese pine. J Northwest For Univ, 2000, 15(2): 7-12.

[6] Burczyk J, Nikkanen T, Lewandowski A. Evidence of an unbalanced mating pattern in a seed orchard composed of two larch species. Silvae Genet, 1997, 46: 176-181.

[7] Chen XY, Hawkins B, Xie CY. Age trends in genetic parameters and early selection of lodgepole pine provenances with particular reference to the lambeth model. For Genet, 2003, 10(3): 249-258.

[8] Collet C, Chenost C. Using competition and light estimates to predict diameter and height growth of naturally regenerated beech seedlings growing under changing canopy conditions. Forestry, 2006, 79(5): 489-502.

[9] Crane J, Dickmann D, Flore J. Photosynthesis and transpiration by young Larix kaempferi trees: C3 responses to light and temperature. Physiol Plant, 1983, 59(4): 635-640.

[10] Diao S, Hou YM, Xie YH, Sun XM. Age trends of genetic parameters, early selection and family by site interactions for growth traits in Larix kaempferi open-pollinated families. BMC Genet, 2016, 17: 104-115.

[11] Du CQ, Xu YZ, Sun XH, Liu YH, Xie PS. Variation of growth traits and early selection of Larix Kaempferi clones in sub-alpine area of western Hubei Province. J Huazhong Agric Univ, 2015, 34(3): 19-23.

[12] Francisco F, Messias G, Helaine C, Pedro C, Telma N, Ana P, Alexandre P, Geraldo A. Selection and estimation of the genetic gain in segregating generations of papaya (Carica papaya L.). Crop Breed Appl Biotechnol, 2008, 8: 1-8.

[13] Fujimoto T, Kita K, Uchiyama K. Age trends in the genetic parameters of wood density and the relationship with growth rates in hybrid larch (Larix gmelinii var. japonica × L. kaemferi) F1. Jpn For Soc Springer Verlag Tokyo, 2006, 11: 157-163.

[14] Fukatsu E, Fukuda Y, Takahashi M, Nakada R. Clonal variation of carbon content in wood of Larix kaempferi (Japanese larch). J Wood Sci, 2008, 54: 247-251.

[15] Fukatsu E, Tsubomura M, Fujisawa Y, Nakada R. Genetic improvement of wood density and radial growth in Larix kaempferi: results from a diallel mating test. Ann For Sci, 2013, 70: 451-459.

[16] Goncalves P, Bortoletto N, Cardinal A, Gouvea L, Costa R, Moraes M. Age–age correlation for early selection of rubber tree genotypes in Sao Paulo State, Brazil. Genet Mol Biol, 2005, 28: 758-764.

[17] Gwaze DP, Bridgwater FE. Determining optimum selection age for diameter and height in loblolly pine (Pinus taeda). For Genet, 2002, 9: 159-165.

[18] Haapanen M. Time trends in genetic parameter estimates and selection efficiency for Scots pine in relation to field testing method. For Genet, 2001, 8: 129-144.

[19] Hai PH, Jansson G, Harwood C, Hannrup B, Thinh HH. Genetic variation in growth, stem straightness and branch thickness in clonal trials of Acacia auriculiformis at three contrasting sites in Vietnam. For Ecol Manag, 2008, 255: 156-167.

[20] Hansen J, Roulund H. Genetic parameters for spiral grain, stem form, pilodyn and growth in 13 years old clones of Sitka Spruce (Picea sitchensis (Bong.) Carr.). Silvae Genet, 1997, 46: 107-113.

[21] Hou YM, Quan YS, Cao J, Guan LH. Study on superior family selection of Larix kaempferi. J Cent South Univ For Technol, 2012, 3(9): 6-10.

[22] Isik F, Li BL, Frampton J. Estimates of additive, dominance and epistatic genetic variances from a clonally replicated test of loblolly pine. For Sci, 2003, 49(1): 77-88.

[23] Isik K, Kleinschmit J, Steiner W. Age–age correlations and early selection for height in a clonal genetic test of Norway spruce. For Sci, 2010, 56(2): 212-221.

[24] Jansson G, Li BL, Hannrup B. Time trends in genetic parameters for height and optimum age for parental selection in Scots pine. For Sci, 2003, 49: 696-705.

[25] Jiao YD, Zhao K, Qin YF, Hu ZY, Liu HF. Study on superior clones and early selection of Larix kaempferi. J Henan For Sci Technol, 2005, 25(2): 9-11.

[26] Karacic A, Weih M. Variation in growth and resource utilization among eitht poplar clones grown under different irrigation and fertilization regimes in Sweden. Biomass Bioenerg, 2006, 30: 115-124.

[27] King JN, Burdon RD. Time trends in inheritance and projected efficiencies of early selection in a large 17-year-old progeny test of Pinus radiata. Can J For Res, 1991, 21(8): 1200-1207.

[28] Kroon J, Ericsson T, Jansson G, Andersson B. Patterns of genetic parameters for height in field genetic tests of Picea abies and Pinus sylvestris in Sweden. Tree Genet Genomes, 2011, 7(6): 1099-1111.

[29] Kumar D, Singh NB. Age–age correlation for early selection of clones of Populus in India. Silvae Genet, 2001, 50: 103-108.

[30] Kurinobu S. Forest tree breeding for Japanese larch. Eurasian J For Res, 2005, 8: 127-134.

[31] Lai M, Sun XM, Chen DS, Xie YH, Zhang SG. Age-related trends in genetic parameters for Larix kaempferi and their implications for early selection. BMC Genet, 2014 15 Suppl 1 S10

[32] Leksono B, Kurinobu S, Ide Y. Optimum age for selection base on a time trend of genetic parameters related to diameter growth in seedling seed orchards of Eucalyptus pellita in Indonesia. J For Res, 2006, 11: 359-363.

[33] Liu LX, Bai YR, Wu ZY, Zhao A, Ma ZG. Experiment on choosing excellent clones of Larix kaempferi Carr. J Inner Mong For Technol, 2009, 35(2): 10-13.

[34] Ma SX (2006) Studies on genetic variation and early selection of Japanese larch clone. Master Thesis of Henan Agricultural University

[35] Maniee MD, Kahrizi MD, Mohammadi R. Genetic variability of some morphophysiological traits in durum wheat (Triticum turgidum var. durum). J Appl Sci, 2009, 9: 1383-1387.

[36] Marron N, Ceulemans R. Genetic variation of leaf traits related to productivity in a Populus deltoides × Populus nigra family. Can J For Res, 2006, 36: 390-400.

[37] Matheson A, Spencer DJ, Magnussen D. Optimum age for selection in pinus radiata using basal area under bark for age–age correlations. Silvae Genet, 1994, 43: 352-357.

[38] Montes CS, Hernandez RE, Beaulieu J, Weber JC. Genetic variation in wood color and its correlations with tree growth and wood density of Calycophyllum spruceanum at an early age in the Peruvian Amazon. New For, 2008, 35: 57-73.

[39] Moriguchi Y, Kita K, Uchiyama K, Kuromaru M, Tsumura Y. Enhanced hybridization rates in a Larix gmelinii var. japonica × L. kaempferi interspecific seed orchard with a single maternal clone revealed by cytoplasmic DNA markers. Tree Genet Genomes, 2008, 4: 637-645.

[40] Mwase WF, Savill PS, Hemery G. Genetic parameter estimates for growth and form traits in common ash (Fraxinus excelsior, L.) in a breeding seedling orchard at Little Wittenham in England. New For, 2008, 36: 225-238.

[41] Nagasaka K, Yoshimura K, Akashi T, Arai K, Yamamoto C. Assessment of characteristics and grouping of Larix kaempferi provenances in provenance test sites in Nagano prefecture in Japan. J Jap For Soc, 2011, 93: 179-186.

[42] Nakada R, Fujisawa Y, Taniguchi T. Variations of wood properties between plus-tree clones in Larix kaempferi (Lamb.) Carrière. Bull For Tree Breed Cent, 2005, 21: 85-105.

[43] Neale DB. Genomics to tree breeding and forest health. Curr Opin Genet Dev, 2007, 17: 539-544.

[44] Oshima T. The age trends in the combining ability and heritability in the wood density in Japanese larch. Trans Meet Hokkaido Branch Jpn For Soc, 1998, 46: 157-159.

[45] Pâques LE. Roles of European and Japanese larch in the genetic control of growth, architecture and wood quality traits in interspecific hybrids (Larix × eurolepis Henry). Ann For Sci, 2004, 61: 25-33.

[46] Pâques LE, Millier F, Rozenberg P. Selection perspectives for genetic improvement of wood stiffness in hybrid larch (Larix × eurolepis Henry). Tree Genet Genomes, 2010, 6: 83-92.

[47] Pliura A, Zhang SY, Mackay J, Bousquet J. Genotypic variation in wood density and growth traits of poplar hybrids at four clonal trials. For Ecol Manag, 2007, 238: 92-106.

[48] Safavi SA, Pourdad SA, Mohmmad T, Mahmoud K. Assessment of genetic variation among safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) accessions using agro-morphological traits and molecular markers. J Food Agric Environ, 2010, 8(1): 616-625.

[49] San J, Uchida K, Tomaru N. Mitochondrial DNA variation in natural populations of Japanese larch (Larix kaempferi). Silvae Genet, 2009, 58: 5-6.

[50] Shi LW. Statistical analysis from entry to the master of SPSS 19.0, 2012, Beijing: Tsinghua University Press.

[51] Shigematsu Y. The wood quality of planting trees for Japanese larch relating with growth. II. The grade of wood for planting trees of Japanese larch. Mokuzai Kogyo, 1991, 46: 9-16.

[52] Sixto H, Salvia J, Barrio M, Ciria MP, Canellas I. Genetic variation and genotype-environment interactions in short rotation Populus plantations in southern Europe. New For, 2011, 42: 163-177.

[53] Sumida A, Miyaura T, Torii H. Relationships of tree height and diameter at breast height revisited: analyses of stem growth using 20-year data of an even-aged Chamaecyparis obtusa stand. Tree Physiol, 2013, 33: 106-118.

[54] Sun XM (2003) Selection of superior Larix kaempferi families for pulpwood purpose and family based growth simulation. Ph.D. Thesis of Chinese Academy of Forestry

[55] Sun XM, Zhang SG, Hou YM, Li SY. Age trends of genetic parameters for growth traits in short rotation Larix kaempferi families. Sci Silvae Sin, 2004, 40(6): 68-74.

[56] Takata K, Koizumi A, Ueda K. Variations of radial growth and wood quality among provenances in Japanese larch. Mokuzai Gakkaishi, 1992, 38: 1082-1088.

[57] Teruyoshi N, Kazutoshi N, Hiroshi Y, Yoshihiko T. Provenance tests for survival and growth of 50-year-old Japanese larch (Larix kaempferi) trees related to climatic conditions in central Japan. Tree Genet Genomes, 2014, 10: 87-99.

[58] Toda R, Mikami S. The provenance trials of Japanese larch established in Japan and the tentative achievements. Silvae Genet, 1976, 25: 209-216.

[59] Vasquez J, Dvorak WS. Trend in variance and heritabilities with stand development of tropical pines. Can J For Res, 1996, 26: 1473-1480.

[60] Weng YH, Tosh KJ, Park YS, Fullarton MS. Age-related trends in genetic parameters for Jack Pine and their implications for early selection. Silvae Genet, 2007, 56(5): 242-251.

[61] Xia H, Zhao GH, Zhang LS, Sun XY, Yin SP, Liang DY, Li Y, Zheng M, Zhao XY. Genetic and variation analyses of growth traits of half-sib Larix olgensis families in northeastern China. Euphytica, 2016

[62] Xu JR. Quantitative genetics of forest, 2006, Beijing: China Forestry Publishing.

[63] Xu SD, Sun XM, Chen JL, Li DX, Wang GF, Huang XF, Qi WY. Primary research on fine family and clone of Larix kaempferi. Hubei For Sci Technol, 2014, 43(3): 12-16.

[64] Zas R, Merlo E, Fernández-López J. Genetic parameter estimates for Maritime pine in the Atlantic coast of North-west Spain. For Genet, 2004, 11(1): 45-53.

[65] Zhang ZG, Ma JW, Jin XC, Wang HC, Ding PJ, Hu MH, Pan CL, Lei SG. Analysis and selection of progeny test forest of the open pollinated family of Japanese larch. J Northwest For Univ, 2013, 28(4): 74-79.

[66] Zhao XY, Hou W, Zheng HQ, Zhang ZY. Analyses of genotypic variation in white poplar at four sites in China. Silvae Genet, 2013, 62(4–5): 187-195.

[67] Zhao XY, Bian XY, Liu MR, Li ZX, Li Y, Zheng M, Teng WH, Jiang J, Liu GF. Analysis of genetic effects on complete diallel cross test of Betula platyphylla. Euphytica, 2014, 200: 221-229.

[68] Zhao XY, Xia H, Wang XW, Wang C, Liang DY, Li KL, Liu GF. Variance and stability analyses of growth characters in halfsib Betula platyphylla families at three different sites in China. Euphtyica, 2016, 208: 173-186.

[69] Zhou GX, Hu X, Zhu Q, Ning SH. Research on the relationship between stand productivity and site condition of Larix kaempferi. Ecol Econ, 2008, 4: 216-226.

[70] Zhou H, Fries A, Wu HX. High negative genetic correlations between growth traits and wood properties suggest incorporating multiple traits selection including economic weights for the future Scots pine breeding programs. Ann For Sci, 2014, 71: 463-472.