Natural regeneration of oriental beech (Fagus orientalis Lipsky) trees in canopy gaps and under closed canopy in a forest in northern Iran

Abstract

For developing nature-based silvicultural practices in a beech forest to promote, abundance, height, vitality, and preferred growth form, regenerated trees growing in gaps were compared with those under closed canopies. A systematic 50 × 50 m grid was plotted in a beech stand in the Kheyrud Experimental Forest for selecting trees to measure variables in gaps and under closed canopies. Abundance and mean height of regenerated beech trees were significantly higher in closed canopies than in canopy gaps. Beech seedlings with excurrent growth were significantly taller within regeneration patches under closed canopy. Moreover, regenerated trees with high vitality were more abundant in closed canopy areas than in gaps. Thus, beech regeneration should improve under closed canopies; hence, gaps in a near natural forest should be created only after adequate regeneration and appropriate growth under the parent tree in a closed canopy area is ensured. The results of this research have profound implications for the sustainable management of the forest and for ensuring sustainable beech regeneration. The presence of a closed canopy cover likely will reduce potential stresses on oriental beech regeneration.

Keywords

Closed canopy / Canopy gap / Growth form / Vitality / Beech

References

[1] Agestam E, Ekö P-M, Nilsson U, Welander NT. The effects of shelterwood density and site preparation on natural regeneration of Fagus Sylvatica in southern Sweden. For Ecol Manag, 2003, 176(1): 61-73.

[2] Albanesi E, Ol Gulgliotta, Mercurio I, Mercurion R. Effects of gap size and within-gap position on seedlings establishment in silver fir stands. Forest, 2008, 1(1): 55-59.

[3] Caquet B, Montpied P, Dreyer E, Epron D, Collet C. Response to canopy opening does not act as a filter to Fagus sylvatica and Acer sp. advance regeneration in a mixed temperate forest. Ann For Sci, 2010 67 1 105

[4] Collet C, Chenost C. Using competition and light estimates to predict diameter and height growth of naturally regenerated beech seedlings growing under changing canopy conditions. Forestry, 2006, 79(5): 489-502.

[5] Dobrowolska D. Vitality of European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) at the limit of its natural range in Poland. Pol J Ecol, 2015, 63: 260-272.

[6] Emborg J. Understorey light conditions and regeneration with respect to the structural dynamics of a near-natural temperate deciduous forest in Denmark. For Ecol Manag, 1998, 106(2): 83-95.

[7] Forest management plan (2010) School of natural resources, forestry and forest economics Dept., University of Tehran, 450 p

[8] Fredricksen TS, Pariona W. Effects of skidder disturbance on commercial tree regeneration in logging gaps in a Bolivian tropical forest. For Ecol Manag, 2002, 171(3): 223-230.

[9] Gharehaghaji M, Shabani AA, Feghhi J, Danehkar A, Kaboli M, Ashrafi S. Effects of landscape context on bird species abundance of tree fall gaps in a temperate deciduous forest of Northern Iran. For Ecol Manag, 2012, 267: 182-189.

[10] Holland EP, Pech RP, Ruscoe WA, Parkes JP, Nugent G, Duncan RP. Thresholds in plant–herbivore interactions: predicting plant mortality due to herbivore browse damage. Oecologia, 2013, 172(3): 751-766.

[11] Ichihara Y, Yamaji K. Effect of light conditions on the resistance of current-year Fagus Crenata seedlings against fungal pathogens causing damping-off in a natural beech forest: fungus isolation and histological and chemical resistance. J Chem Ecol, 2009, 35(9): 1077-1085.

[12] Javanmiri MP, Marvie Mohadjer MR, Etemad V, Zobeiri M. Effects of grazing on natural regeneration of tree and herb species of Kheyroud forest in northern Iran. J For Res, 2012, 23(2): 299-304.

[13] Kamler J, Homolka M, Baranceková M, Krojerová-Prokesová J. Reduction of herbivore density as a tool for reduction of herbivore browsing on palatable tree species. Eur J For Res, 2010, 129(2): 155-162.

[14] Kreyling J, Thiel D, Nagy L, Jentsch A, Huber G, Konnert M, Beierkuhnlein C. Late frost sensitivity of juvenile Fagus sylvatica L. differs between southern Germany and Bulgaria and depends on preceding air temperature. Eur J For Res, 2012, 131(3): 717-725.

[15] Kucbel S, Jaloviar P, Saniga M, Vencurik J, Klimaš V. Canopy gaps in an old- growth fir-beech forest remnant of Western Carpathians. Eur J For Res, 2009, 129(3): 249-259.

[16] Lendzion J, Leuschner C. Growth of European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) saplings is limited by elevated atmospheric vapour pressure deficits. For Ecol Manag, 2008, 256(4): 648-655.

[17] Ligot G, Balandier P, Fayolle A, Lejeune P, Claessens H. Height competition between Quercus petraea and Fagus sylvatica natural regeneration in mixed and uneven-aged stands. For Ecol Manag, 2013, 304: 391-398.

[18] Lin N, Bartsch N, Vor T. Long-term effects of gap creation and liming on understory vegetation with a focus on tree regeneration in a European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) forest. Ann For Res, 2014, 57(2): 233-246.

[19] Lin N, Bartsch N, Heinrichs S, Vor T. Long-term effects of canopy opening and liming on leaf litter production, and on leaf litter and fine-root decomposition in a European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) forest. For Ecol Manag, 2015, 338: 183-190.

[20] Madsen P. Effects of soil water content, fertilization, light, weed competition and seedbed type on natural regeneration of beech (Fagus sylvatica). For Ecol Manag, 1995, 72(2): 251-264.

[21] Madsen P, Larsen JB. Natural regeneration of beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) with respect to canopy density, soil moisture and soil carbon content. For Ecol Manag, 1997, 97(2): 95-105.

[22] Modrý M, Hubený D, Rejšek K. Differential response of naturally regenerated European shade tolerant tree species to soil type and light availability. For Ecol Manag, 2004, 188(1): 185-195.

[23] Mohammadi L, Marvie Mohadjer MR, Etemad V, Sefidi K. Quantitative charachteristics of regeneration in natural and tree fall canopy gaps in the mixed beech stands, Northern Iran. Iran J For, 2014, 6(4): 457-470.

[24] Naaf T, Wulf M. Effects of gap size, light and herbivory on the herb layer vegetation in European beech forest gaps. For Ecol Manag, 2007, 244(1): 141-149.

[25] Nagel TA, Svoboda M, Rugani T, Diaci J. Gap regeneration and replacement patterns in an old-growth Fagus-Abies forest of Bosnia-Herzegovina. Plant Ecol, 2010, 208(2): 307-318.

[26] Nakaige T, Kamitani T, Nakashizuka T. The effect of shelterwood logging on the diversity of plant species in a beech (Fagus crenata) forest in Japan. For Ecol Manag, 1999, 118(1): 161-171.

[27] Nicolini E, Chanson B, Bonne F. Stem growth and epicormic branch formation in understorey beech trees (Fagus sylvatica L.). Ann Bot, 2001, 87(6): 737-750.

[28] Parhizkar P, Sagheb-Talebi K, Mataji A, Nyland R, Namiranian M. Silvicultural characteristics of Oriental beech (Fagus orientalis Lipsky) regeneration under different RLI and positions within gaps. Forestry, 2011, 84(2): 177-185.

[29] Parpan VI, Sannikov SN, Parpan TV. The hypothesis of the pulsed dynamics of virgin beech forests. Russ J Ecol, 2009, 40(7): 466-470.

[30] Pedersen BS, Howard JC. The influence of canopy gaps on overstory tree and forest growth rates in a mature mixed-age, mixed-species forest. For Ecol Manag, 2004, 196(2): 351-366.

[31] Peltier A, Touzet MC, Armengaud C, Ponge JF. Establishment of Fagus sylvatica and Fraxinus excelsior in an old-growth beech forest. J Veg Sci, 1997, 8(1): 13-20.

[32] Petritan AM, Von Lüpke B, Petritan IC. Effects of shade on growth and mortality of maple (Acer pseudoplatanus), ash (Fraxinus excelsior) and beech (Fagus sylvatica) saplings. Forestry, 2007, 80(4): 397-412.

[33] Pourmajidian MR, Jalilvand H, Fallah A, Hosseini SA, Parsakhoo A, Vosoughian A, Rahmani A. Effect of shelterwood cutting method on forest regeneration and stand structure in a Hyrcanian forest ecosystem. J For Res, 2010, 21(3): 265-272.

[34] Richards JD, Harts JL. Canopy gap dynamics and development patterns in secondary Quercus stands on the Cumberland Plateau, Alabama, USA. For Ecol Manag, 2011, 262(12): 2229-2239.

[35] Ritter E, Dalsgaard L, Einhorn KS. Light, temperature and soil moisture regimes following gap formation in a semi-natural beech-dominated forest in Denmark. For Ecol Manag, 2005, 206(1): 15-33.

[36] Rozenbergar D, Diaci J. Architecture of Fagus sylvatica regeneration improves over time in mixed old-growth and managed forests. For Ecol Manag, 2014, 318: 334-340.

[37] Sagheb-Talebi K, Schütz JP. The structure of natural oriental beech (Fagus orientalis) forests in the Caspian region of Iran and potential for the application of the group selection system. Forestry, 2002, 75(4): 465-472.

[38] Sagheb-Talebi K, Schütz JP. Some criteria of re-generation density in young beech populations Caspian. J of Environ Sci, 2012, 10(1): 61-66.

[39] Sefidi K, Marvie Mohadjer MR, Mosandl R, Copenheaver CA. Canopy gaps and regeneration in old-growth Oriental beech (Fagus orientalis Lipsky) stands, northern Iran. For Ecol Manag, 2011, 262(6): 1094-1099.

[40] Shakeri Z, Marvie Mohadjer MR, Simberloff D, Etemad V, Asadi M, Donath TW, Otte A, Eckstein RL. Plant community composition and disturbance in Caspian Fagus orientalis forests: which are the main driving factors?. Phytocoenologia, 2012, 41(4): 247-263.

[41] Silva DE, Mazzella RP, Legay M, Corcket E, Dupouey JL. Does natural regeneration determine the limit of European beech distribution under climatic stress?. For Ecol Manag, 2012, 266: 263-272.

[42] Szwagrzyk J, Szewczyk J, Bodziarczyk J. Dynamics of seedling banks in beech forest: results of a 10 year study on germination, growth and survival. For Ecol Manag, 2001, 141(3): 237-250.

[43] Tabari M, Fayaz P, Espahbodi K, Staelens J, Nachtergale L. Response of oriental beech (Fagus orientalis Lipsky) seedlings to canopy gap size. Forestry, 2005, 78(4): 443-450.

[44] Topoliantz S, Ponge JF. Influence of site conditions on the survival of Fagus sylvatica seedlings in an old-growth beech forest. J Veg Sci, 2000, 11(3): 369-374.

[45] Vilhar U, Simončič P. Water status and drought stress in experimental gaps in managed and semi-natural silver fir-beech forests. Eur J For Res, 2012, 131(5): 1381-1397.

[46] Wagner S, Collet C, Madsen P, Nakashizuka T, Nyland RD, Sagheb-Talebi Kh. Beech regeneration research: From ecological to silvicultural aspects. For Ecol Manag, 2010, 259(11): 2172-2182.

[47] Wang G, Liu F. The influence of gap creation on the regeneration of Pinus tabuliformis planted forest and its role in the near-natural cultivation strategy for planted forest management. For Ecol Manag, 2011, 262(3): 413-423.

[48] Zeibig A, Diaci J, Wagner S. Gap disturbance patterns of a Fagus sylvatica virgin forest remnant in the mountain vegetation belt of Slovenia. For Snow Landsc Res, 2005, 79(1): 69-80.

[49] Zhu J, Lu D, Zhang W. Effects of gaps on regeneration of woody plants: a meta-analysis. J For Res, 2014, 25(3): 501-510.