Genetic variation of wood tracheid traits and their relationships with growth and wood density in clones of Pinus tabuliformis

Abstract

To improve wood quality for pulpwood industries, it is important to examine not only wood density but also its components, especially tracheid characteristics. We studied genetic variations in the following tracheid traits by earlywood (EW) and latewood (LW): tracheid length (TL), double wall thickness (WT), radial lumen diameter (R_D1), tangential lumen diameter (T_D1), radial central diameter (R_D2), and tangential central diameter (T_D2). We also studied the relationship with the following growth traits: diameter at breast height (DBH), height (H), crown breadth south-north axis (NSC), crown breadth east–west axis (EWC), ring width (RW), latewood percentage (LWP), and wood density (WD). All sample materials were collected from a 33-year old clonal seed orchard of Pinus tabuliformis Carr. Genetic variation among clones was moderate for all tracheid traits, 9.49–26.03%. Clones significantly affected WT, R_D1, R_D2, T_D1, T_D2, and the two ratios WT/R_D1 and TL/T_D2 in EW but had no effects in LW. Clones significantly affected TL in LW but had no effects in EW. $ H\frac{2}{C} $ was higher in LW (0.50) than in EW (0.20) for TL, while $ H\frac{2}{C} $ was higher in EW (0.27–0.46) for other tracheid traits and the two ratios (TL/T_D2 and WT/R_D1) than in EW (0.06–0.22). WD and TL were significantly positively correlated, but WT and TL were negatively correlated both at individual and clone levels; all tracheid diameters and the four ratio values (EW_WT/R_D1, LW_WT/R_D1, EW_TL/T_D2 and LW_TL/T_D2), were strongly positively correlated with DBH, H, NSC, WEC and RW, and strongly negatively correlated with WD both at individual and clone levels. The most important variables for predicting WD were LW_TL, EW_WT and R_D1 in both EW and LW (r² = 0.22). Selecting the top 10% of the clones by DBH would improve DBH growth by 12.19% (wood density was reduced by 0.14%) and produced similar responses between EW and LW for all tracheid traits: a reduction of 0.94 and 3.69% in tracheid length and increases in tracheid diameters (from 0.36 to 5.24%) and double wall thickness (0.07 and 0.87%). The two ratios WT/R_D1 and TL/T_D2 across tissues (EW and LW) declined 0.59 and 4.56%, respectively. The decreased tracheid length and the ratio between tracheid length and diameter is disadvantageous for pulp production. The unfavorable relationship of tracheid traits with wood density indicate that multiple trait selection using optimal economic weights and optimal breeding strategies are recommended for the current long-term breeding program for P. tabuliformis.

Keywords

Pinus tabuliformis / Clone / Tracheid traits / Wood density / Genetic variation / Correlation coefficient

References

[1] Beaulieu J. Genetic variation in tracheid length and relationships with growth and wood traits in eastern white spruce (Picea glauca). Wood Fiberence, 2003, 35(4): 609-616.

[2] Brändström J. Micro-and ultrastructural aspects of Norway spruce tracheids: a review. Iawa J, 2001, 22(4): 333-353.

[3] Chen JZ, Li Y, Li GF, Li J, Du QP, Wang XR. Study on the genetic variations of half-sib progeny testing and advanced selections of Pinus taburaeformis. J Henan Agr Univ, 2006, 40: 146-160.

[4] Cown D, Ball R, Riddell M. Wood density and microfibril angle in 10 Pinus radiata clones: distribution and influence on product performance. NZ J For Sci, 2004, 34(3): 293-315.

[5] Denne MP, Rao RV, Aebischer DP. Latewood density in relation to wood fibre diameter, wall thickness, and fibre and vessel percentages in Quercus Robur L. Iawa J, 1997, 18(2): 127-138.

[6] Fan JF, Yang PH, Guo SJ, Liu YH. Research progess of genetics and improvement on Pinus tabulaeformis carriere of Shanxi province. J Northwest Sci-Tech Univ Agr For (NatSci), 2006, 34: 45-50.

[7] Fries A. Genetic parameters, genetic gain and correlated responses in growth, fibre dimensions and wood density in a Scots pine breeding population. Ann For Sci, 2012, 69(7): 783-794.

[8] Gagen M, Mccarroll D, Edouard JL. Latewood width, maximum density, and stable carbon isotope ratios of Pine as climate indicators in a dry subalpine environment, French Alps. Arct Antarct Alp Res, 2004, 36(2): 166-171.

[9] Hacke UG, Sperry JS, Pockman WT, Davis SD, Mcculloh KA. Trends in wood density and structure are linked to prevention of xylem implosion by negative pressure. Oecologia, 2001, 126(4): 457-461.

[10] Hannrup B, Danell Ö. Relationships between wood density and tracheid dimensions in Pinus sylvestris L. Wood Fiberence, 2001, 33(2): 173-181.

[11] Hannrup B, Ekberg I, Persson A. Genetic correlations among wood, growth capacity and stem traits in Pinus sylvestris. Scand J For Res, 2000, 5(2): 161-170.

[12] Hannrup B, Cahalan C, Chantre G, Grabner M, Karlsson B, Le Bayon I, Jones GL, Mülle U, Pereira H, Rodrigues JC, Rosner S, Rozenberg P, Wilhelmsson L, Wimmer R. Genetic parameters of growth and wood quality traits in Picea abies. Scand J For Res, 2004, 8(1): 14-29.

[13] Havimo M, Rikala J, Sirviö J, Sipi M. Tracheid cross-sectional dimensions in Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris)–distributions and comparison with Norway spruce (Picea abies). Silva Fenn, 2009, 43(4): 681-688.

[14] Heimsch C, Tschabold EE. Xylem Studies in the Linaceae. Bot Gaz, 1972, 133(3): 242-253.

[15] Hodge GR, White TL. Fins L, Friedman ST, Brotschol JV. Concepts of selection and gain prediction. Handbook of quantitative forest genetics, 1992, Netherlands: Springer.

[16] Irbe I, Sable I, Noldt G, Grinfelds U, Jansons A, Treimanis A, Koch G. Wood and tracheid properties of Norway spruce (Picea abies [L] Karst.) clones grown on former agricultural land in Latvia. Balt For, 2015, 21(1): 114-123.

[17] Ivkovich M, Namkoong G, Koshy M. Genetic variation in wood properties of interior spruce. II. Tracheid characteristics. Can J Forest Res, 2002, 32(12): 2128-2139.

[18] Kirkpatrick LA, Feeney BC. A simple guide to IBM SPSS: For Version 22.0, 2014, Wadsworth: Belmont.

[19] Lenz P, Cloutier A, MacKay J, Beaulieu J. Genetic control of wood properties in Picea glauca-an analysis of trends with cambial age. Can J For Res, 2010, 40(4): 703-715.

[20] Li J, Li Y, Li GF, Zhang HF, Hou ZZ, Wang HY. Progeny test of plus trees and advanced selection of Pinus tabulaeformis. J Beijing For Univ, 1998, 20: 19-24.

[21] Li W, Wang XR, Li Y. Stability in and correlation between factors influencing genetic quality of seed lots in seed orchard of Pinus tabuliformis Carr. over a 12-year span. PLoS ONE, 2011 6 8 492

[22] Li W, Wang XR, Li Y. Variation in floral phenological synchronization in a clonal seed orchard of Pinus tabuliformis in Northeast of China. Silvae Genet, 2012, 61(4): 133-142.

[23] Liu YH. Genetic variation and comprehensive selection of superior families of Pinus tabuleaformis Carr. J Central South Univ For Technol, 2007, 27: 21-25.

[24] Loustarinen K. Tracheid wall thickness and lumen diameter in different axial and radial locations in cultivated Larix sibirica trunks. Silva Fenn, 2012, 46(46): 707-716.

[25] Macdonald E, Hubert J. A review of the effects of silviculture on timber quality of Sitka spruce. Forestry, 2002, 75(2): 107-138.

[26] Makinen H, Saranpaa P, Linder S. Wood-density variation of Norway spruce in relation to nutrient optimization and fibre dimensions. Can J For Res, 2002, 32(2): 185-194.

[27] McDonough TJ, Courchene CE, White DE, Schimleck L, Peter G. Effects of loblolly pine tree age and wood properties on linerboard-grade pulp yield and sheet properties: Part 2. Tappi J, 2012, 11: 41-50.

[28] Meko DM, Baisan CH. Pilot study of latewood-width of conifers as an indicator of variability of summer rainfall in the North American monsoon region. Int J Climatol, 2001, 21(6): 697-708.

[29] Niu SH, Li ZX, Yuan HW, Chen XY, Li Y, Li W. Transcriptome characterisation of Pinus tabuliformis and evolution of genes in the Pinus phylogeny. BMC Genom, 2013, 14: 263-274.

[30] Qin CF, Li Y, Niu ZT, Li GF, Du QP, Wang HY. Genetic variations of clonal traits and estimation of gamete pool composition in a clonal seed orchard of Pinus tabulaeformis. J Beijing For Univ, 2000, 22: 20-24.

[31] Roderick ML, Berry SL. Linking wood density with tree growth and environment: a theoretical analysis based on the motion of water. New Phytol, 2001, 149(3): 473-485.

[32] Sas Institute, Inc. SAS/STAT User’s Guide, Version 6, 2010, Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.

[33] Wang SW, Shen XH, Wang SM. Study on variation of wood properties in Pinus tabulaeformis. J Beijing For Univ, 1992, 14: 87-92.

[34] Wimmer R, Grabner M. A comparison of tree-ring features in Picea abies as correlated with climate. Iawa J, 2000, 21(4): 403-416.

[35] Wimmer R, Downes G, Evans R, Rasmussen G, French J. Direct effects of wood characteristics on pulp and handsheet properties of Eucalyptus globulus. Holzforschung, 2002, 56(3): 244-252.

[36] Xu YM. Specific gravity variation in Pinus tabulaeformis. J Huazhong Agr Univ, 1991, 10: 281-285.

[37] Yuan HW (2016) Key technologies and strategies for advanced-cycle genetic improvement of Pinus tabuliformis Carr. Ph.D. dissertation, Beijing Forestry University, 139

[38] Yuan HW, Li ZX, Fang P, Li W, Li Y. Variation and stability in female strobili production of a first-generation clonal seed orchard of Chinese Pine (Pinus tabuliformis). Silvae Genet, 2014, 63(1–2): 41-47.

[39] Yuan HW, Niu SH, Zhon XQ, Du QP, Li Y, Li W. Evaluation of seed production in a first-generation seed orchard of Chinese pine (Pinus tabuliformis). J Forestry Res, 2016, 27(5): 1-6.

[40] Zhao RJ, Guo JR, Yang PH, Xie B. A study on morphological and comparison of the wood tracheid of the half-sib progency and parent of Pinus tabulaeformis Carr. J Northwest For Univ, 1999, 14: 6-9.

[41] Zhou H, Fries A, Wu HX. High negative genetic correlations between growth traits and wood properties suggest incorporating multiple traits selection including economic weights for the future Scots pine breeding programs. Ann For Sci, 2014, 71(4): 463-472.

[42] Zimmerman MH, Brown CL. Trees: structure and function, 1971, New York: Springer 61 67