Predicting intensity of white-tailed deer herbivory in the Central Appalachian Mountains

Abstract

In eastern North America, white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) can have profound influences on forest biodiversity and forest successional processes. Moderate to high deer populations in the central Appalachians have resulted in lower forest biodiversity. Legacy effects in some areas persist even following deer population reductions or declines. This has prompted managers to consider deer population management goals in light of policies designed to support conservation of biodiversity and forest regeneration while continuing to support ample recreational hunting opportunities. However, despite known relationships between herbivory intensity and biodiversity impact, little information exists on the predictability of herbivory intensity across the varied and spatially diverse habitat conditions of the central Appalachians. We examined the predictability of browsing rates across central Appalachian landscapes at four environmental scales: vegetative community characteristics, physical environment, habitat configuration, and local human and deer population demographics. In an information-theoretic approach, we found that a model fitting the number of stems browsed relative to local vegetation characteristics received most (62%) of the overall support of all tested models assessing herbivory impact. Our data suggest that deer herbivory responded most predictably to differences in vegetation quantity and type. No other spatial factors or demographic factors consistently affected browsing intensity. Because herbivory, vegetation communities, and productivity vary spatially, we suggest that effective broad-scale herbivory impact assessment should include spatially-balanced vegetation monitoring that accounts for regional differences in deer forage preference. Effective monitoring is necessary to avoid biodiversity impacts and deleterious changes in vegetation community composition that are difficult to reverse and/or may not be detected using traditional deer-density based management goals.

Keywords

Biodiversity / Central Appalachian Mountains / Herbivory / Odocoileus virginianus / Predicting browsing intensity / White-tailed deer

References

[1] Alverson WS, Waller DM, Solheim SL. Forests too deer: edge effects in northern Wisconsin. Conserv Biol, 1988, 2: 348-358.

[2] Augustine DJ, Jordan PA. Predictors of white-tailed deer grazing intensity in fragmented deciduous forests. J Wildl Manag, 1998, 62: 1076-1085.

[3] Braun EL. Deciduous forests of eastern North America, 1974, New York: Hafner Press 596

[4] Burnham KP, Anderson DR. Model selection and multimodel inference a practical information-theoretic approach, 2002, New York: Springer 488

[5] Campbell TA, Laseter BR, Ford WM, Miller KV. Movements of female white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) in relation to timber harvests in the central Appalachians. For Ecol Manag, 2004, 199: 371-378.

[6] Campbell TA, Laseter BR, Ford WM, Odom RH, Miller KV. Abiotic factors influencing deer browsing in West Virginia. North J Appl For, 2006, 23: 20-26.

[7] Castleberry SB, Ford WM, Miller KV, Smith WP. White-tailed deer browse preferences in a southern bottomland hardwood forest. South J Appl For, 1999, 23: 78-82.

[8] Chai T, Draxler RR. Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)? Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature. Geosci Model Dev, 2014, 7: 1247-1250.

[9] Côté SD, Rooney TP, Tremblay JP, Dussault C, Waller DM. Ecological impacts of deer overabundance. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst, 2004, 35: 113-147.

[10] Crimmins SM, Edwards JW, Ford WM, Keyser PD, Crum JM. Browsing patterns of white-tailed deer following increased timber harvest and a decline in population density. Int J For Res, 2010, 2010: 1-7.

[11] De Reu J, Bourgeois J, Bats M, Zwertvaegher A, Gelorini V, De Smedt P, Chu W, Antrop M, De Maeyer P, Finke P, Van Meirvenne M, Verniers J, Crombé P. Application of the topographic position index to heterogeneous landscapes. Geomorphology, 2013, 186: 39-49.

[12] DeGraaf RM, Yamasaki M, Leak WB, Lanier JW (1992) New England wildlife: management forested habitats. In: General technical report NE-144. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station, Radnor, Pennsylvania, p 271

[13] DiTommaso A, Morris SH, Parker J, Cone CL, Agrawal AA. Deer browsing delays succession by altering aboveground vegetation and belowground seed banks. PLoS ONE, 2014, 9: e91155.

[14] Dostaler S, Ouellet JP, Therrien JF, Côté SD. Are feeding preferences of white-tailed deer related to plant constituents?. J Wildl Manag, 2011, 75: 913-918.

[15] Fenneman NM. Physiography of eastern United States, 1938, New York: McGraw-Hill 714

[16] Ford WM, Johnson AS, Hale PE, Wentworth JM. Availability and use of spring and summer woody browse by deer in clearcut and uncut forests of the southern Appalachians. South J Appl For, 1993, 17: 116-119.

[17] Ford WM, Johnson AS, Hale PE, Wentworth JM. Influences of forest type, stand age, and weather on deer weights and antler size in the southern Appalachians. South J Appl For, 1997, 21: 11-18.

[18] Ford WM, Odom RH, Hale PE, Chapman BR. Stand-age, stand characteristics, and landform effects on understory herbaceous communities in southern Appalachian cove-hardwoods. Biol Conserv, 2000, 93: 237-246.

[19] Frerker K, Sonnier G, Waller DM. Browsing rates and ratios provide reliable indices of ungulate impacts on forest plant communities. For Ecol Manag, 2013, 291: 55-64.

[20] Fry JA, Xian G, Jin SM, Dewitz J, Homer CG, Yang LM, Barnes CA, Herold ND, Wickham J. Completion of the 2006 national land cover database for the conterminous United States. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens, 2011, 77: 858-864.

[21] Gawler SC (2008) Northeastern terrestrial wildlife habitat classification. Report to the Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries on behalf of the Northeast Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies and the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation, Boston, Massachusetts, p 102

[22] Goetsch C, Wigg J, Royo AA, Ristau T, Carson WP. Chronic over browsing and biodiversity collapse in a forest understory in Pennsylvania: results from a 60 year-old deer exclusion plot. J Torrey Bot Soc, 2011, 138: 220-224.

[23] Halls LK. White-tailed deer: ecology and management, 1984, Harrisburg: Stackpole Books 864

[24] Hobbs NT. Modification of ecosystems by ungulates. J Wildl Manag, 1996, 60: 695-713.

[25] Homer C, Dewitz JA, Yang L, Jin S, Danielson P, Xian G, Coulston J, Herold ND, Wickham JD, Megown K. Completion of the 2011 national land cover database for the conterminous United States—representing a decade of land cover change information. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens, 2015, 81: 345-354.

[26] Horsley SB, Stout SL, DeCalesta DS. White-tailed deer impact on the vegetation dynamics of a northern hardwood forest. Ecol Appl, 2003, 13: 98-118.

[27] Kilpatrick HJ, Spohr SM. Spatial and temporal use of a suburban landscape by female white-tailed deer. Wildl Soc Bull, 2000, 28: 1023-1029.

[28] Kniowski AB, Ford WM (2017) Spatial patterns of white-tailed deer herbivory in the central appalachian mountains. For Ecol Manage (in review)

[29] Koh S, Bazely DR, Tanentzap AJ, Voigt DR, Da Silva E. Trillium grandiflorum height is an indicator of white-tailed deer density at local and regional scales. For Ecol Manag, 2010, 259: 1472-1479.

[30] Kronmal RA. Spurious correlation and the fallacy of the ratio standard revisited. J R Stat Soc Ser A, 1993, 156: 379-392.

[31] Latifi H, Heurich M, Hartig F, Müller J, Krzystek P, Jehl H, Dech S. Estimating over- and understorey canopy density of temperate mixed stands by airborne LiDAR data. Forestry, 2016, 89: 69-81.

[32] McGarigal K, Cushman SA, Ene E (2012) FRAGSTATS v4: spatial pattern analysis program for categorical and continuous maps. University of Massachusetts, Amherst. http://www.umass.edu/landeco/research/fragstats/fragstats.html

[33] McNab H. Terrain shape index: quantifying effect of minor landforms on tree height. For Sci, 1989, 35: 91-104.

[34] McNab WH. A topographic index to quantify the effect of mesoscale landform on site productivity. Can J For Res, 1993, 23: 1100-1107.

[35] McShea WJ. Ray JC, Redford KH, Steneck RS, Berger J. When ungulates rule the world. Large carnivores and the conservation of biodiversity, 2005, Washington: Island Press 138 153

[36] McShea WJ. Ecology and management of white-tailed deer in a changing world. Ann N Y Acad Sci, 2012, 1249: 45-56.

[37] Morellet N, Champely S, Gaillard JM, Ballon P, Boscardin Y. The browsing index: new tool uses browsing pressure to monitor deer populations. Wildl Soc Bull, 2001, 29: 1243-1252.

[38] Morellet N, Gaillard JM, Hewison AJM, Ballon P, Boscardin Y, Duncan P, Klein F, Maillard D. Indicators of ecological change: new tools for managing populations of large herbivores. J Appl Ecol, 2007, 44: 634-643.

[39] Nakagawa S, Schielzeth H. A general and simple method for obtaining R² from generalized linear mixed-effects models. Methods Ecol Evol, 2013, 4: 133-142.

[40] Nixon CM, McClain MW, Russell KR. Deer food habits and range characteristics in Ohio. J Wildl Manag, 1970, 34: 870-886.

[41] Rooney TP. Deer impacts on forest ecosystems: a North American perspective. Forestry, 2001, 74: 201-208.

[42] Rooney TP, Waller DM. Direct and indirect effects of white-tailed deer in forest ecosystems. For Ecol Manag, 2003, 181: 165-176.

[43] Royo AA, Stout SL, deCalesta DS, Pierson TG. Restoring forest herb communities through landscape-level deer herd reductions: is recovery limited by legacy effects?. Biol Conserv, 2010, 143: 2425-2434.

[44] Russell FL, Zippin DB, Fowler NL. Effects of white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) on plants, plant populations and communities: a review. Am Midl Nat, 2001, 146: 1-26.

[45] Schielzeth H. Simple means to improve the interpretability of regression coefficients. Methods Ecol Evol, 2010, 1: 103-113.

[46] Schumacher HB, Carson WP. Biotic homogenization of the sapling layer in 19 late-successional and old-growth forest stands in Pennsylvania. J Torrey Bot Soc, 2013, 140: 313-328.

[47] Simon SA (2011) Ecological zones on the George Washington National Forest: first approximation mapping. Final Report to The Nature Conservancy, Virginia Field Office, Charlottesville, VA, p 23

[48] Simon SA (2013) Ecological zones on the Jefferson National Forest Study Area: first approximation. Final Report to The Nature Conservancy, Virginia Field Office, Charlottesville, VA, p 28

[49] Snijders TAB. Lovric M. Multilevel analysis. International encyclopedia of statistical science, 2011, Berlin: Springer 879 882

[50] Stevens DLJ, Olsen AR. Spatially balanced sampling of natural resources. J Am Stat Assoc, 2004, 99: 262-278.

[51] Tanentzap AJ, Kirby KJ, Goldberg E. Slow responses of ecosystems to reductions in deer (Cervidae) populations and strategies for achieving recovery. For Ecol Manag, 2012, 264: 159-166.

[52] Tierson WC, Mattfeld GF, Sage RW, Behrend DF. Seasonal movements and home ranges of white-tailed deer in the Adirondacks. J Wildl Manag, 1985, 49: 760-769.

[53] Vangilder LD, Torgerson O, Porath WR. Factors influencing diet selection by white-tailed deer. J Wildl Manag, 1982, 46: 711-718.

[54] Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries. Virginia deer management plan 2015–2024, 2015, Virginia: Richmond 137

[55] Wilson JP, Gallant JC. Terrain analysis: principles and applications, 2000, New York: Wiley 520

[56] Young JA, Hedrick DW, Keniston RF. Forest cover and logging–herbage and browse production in the mixed coniferous forest of northeastern Oregon. J For, 1967, 65: 807-813.

[57] Zar JH. Biostatistical analysis, 1984, Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall Inc 718