‘Relationships between relationships’ in forest stands: intercepts and exponents analyses

Abstract

Relationships between diameter at breast height (dbh) versus stand density, and tree height versus dbh (height curve) were explored with the aim to find if there were functional links between correspondent parameters of the relationships, exponents and intercepts of their power functions. A geometric model of a forest stand using a conic approximation suggested that there should be interrelations between correspondent exponents and intercepts of the relationships. It is equivalent to a type of ‘relationship between relationships’ that might exist in a forest stand undergoing self-thinning, and means that parameters of one relationship may be predicted from parameters of another. The predictions of the model were tested with data on forest stand structure from published databases that involved a number of trees species and site quality levels. It was found that the correspondent exponents and intercepts may be directly recalculated from one another for the simplest case when the total stem surface area was independent of stand density. For cases where total stem surface area changes with the drop of density, it is possible to develop a generalization of the model in which the interrelationships between correspondent parameters (exponents and intercepts) may be still established.

Keywords

Total stem surface area / Self-thinning / Conic approximation / Power function / Exponent / Intercept / Scots pine

References

[1] Chapman HH. Forest mensuration, 1921, New York: Wiley 553

[2] Gavrikov VL. A simple theory to link bole surface area, stem density and average tree dimensions in a forest stand. Eur J For Res, 2014, 133(6): 1087-1094.

[3] Gavrikov VL. An application of bole surface growth model: a transitional status of ‘−3/2’ rule. Eur J For Res, 2015, 134(4): 715-724.

[4] Inoue A. Relationships of stem surface area to other stem dimensions for Japanese cedar (Cryptomeria japonica D. Don) and Japanese cypress (Chamaecyparis obtusa Endl.) trees. J For Res, 2004, 9(1): 45-50.

[5] Inoue A. Allometric model of the maximum size–density relationship between stem surface area and stand density. J For Res, 2009, 14(5): 268-275.

[6] Inoue A, Nishizono T. Conservation rule of stem surface area: a hypothesis. Eur J For Res, 2015, 134(4): 599-608.

[7] Larjavaara M. Maintenance cost, toppling risk and size of trees in a self-thinning stand. J Theor Biol, 2010, 265(1): 63-67.

[8] Niklas KJ, Spatz HC. Growth and hydraulic (not mechanical) constraints govern the scaling of tree height and mass. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2004, 101(44): 15661-15663.

[9] Pretzsch H. Species-specific allometric scaling under self-thinning: evidence from long-term plots in forest stands. Oecologia, 2006, 146(4): 572-583.

[10] Pretzsch H, Biber P. A re-evaluation of Reineke’s rule and stand density index. For Sci, 2005, 51(4): 304-320.

[11] Reineke LH. Perfecting a stand-density index for even-aged forests. J Agric Res, 1933, 46(7): 627-638.

[12] Sterba H. Estimating potential density from thinning experiments and inventory data. For Sci, 1987, 33(4): 1022-1034.

[13] Usoltsev VA. Eurasian forest biomass and primary production data, 2010, Yekaterinburg: Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences 570 (in Russian)

[14] van Laar A, Akça A. Gadow KV, Pukkala T, Tomé M. Forest mensuration. Managing forest ecosystems, 2007, Dordrecht: Springer 384

[15] Vanclay JK, Sands PJ. Calibrating the self-thinning frontier. For Ecol Manag, 2009, 259(1): 81-85.

[16] Yoda K, Kira T, Ogawa H, Hozumi K. Intraspecific competition among higher plants. XI. Self-thinning in over-crowded pure stands under cultivated and natural conditions. J Biol Osaka City Univ, 1963, 14: 107-129.

[17] Zhang Z, Zhong Q, Niklas KJ, Cai L, Yang Y, Cheng D. A predictive nondestructive model for the covariation of tree height, diameter, and stem volume scaling relationships. Sci Rep, 2016, 6: 31008.