Analysis of forest structural complexity using airborne LiDAR data and aerial photography in a mixed conifer–broadleaf forest in northern Japan

Abstract

Determining forest structural complexity, i.e., a measure of the number of different attributes of a forest and the relative abundance of each attribute, is important for forest management and conservation. In this study, we examined the structural complexity of mixed conifer–broadleaf forests by integrating multiple forest structural attributes derived from airborne LiDAR data and aerial photography. We sampled 76 plots from an unmanaged mixed conifer–broadleaf forest reserve in northern Japan. Plot-level metrics were computed for all plots using both field and remote sensing data to assess their ability to capture the vertical and horizontal variations of forest structure. A multivariate set of forest structural attributes that included three LiDAR metrics (95th percentile canopy height, canopy density and surface area ratio) and one image metric (proportion of broadleaf cover), was used to classify forest structure into structural complexity classes. Our results revealed significant correlation between field and remote sensing metrics, indicating that these two sets of measurements captured similar patterns of structure in mixed conifer–broadleaf forests. Further, cluster analysis identified six forest structural complexity classes including two low-complexity classes and four high-complexity classes that were distributed in different elevation ranges. In this study, we could reliably analyze the structural complexity of mixed conifer–broadleaf forests using a simple and easy to calculate set of forest structural attributes derived from airborne LiDAR data and high-resolution aerial photography. This study provides a good example of the use of airborne LiDAR data sets for wider purposes in forest ecology as well as in forest management.

Keywords

Airborne laser scanning / High resolution imagery / Hokkaido / Forest structure / Pan-mixed forests

References

[1] Asner GP, Anderson CB, Martin RE, Knapp DE, Tupayachi R, Sinca F, Malhi Y. Landscape-scale changes in forest structure and functional traits along an Andes-to-Amazon elevation gradient. Biogeosciences, 2014, 11: 843-856.

[2] Avery TE, Burkhart HE. Forest measurements, 2002, Boston: McGraw Hill.

[3] Bradford JB, Kastendick DN. Age-related patterns of forest complexity and carbon storage in pine and aspen-birch ecosystems of northern Minnesota, USA. Can J For Res, 2010, 40: 401-409.

[4] Chasmer L, Hopkinson C, Treitza P. Assessing the three-dimensional frequency distribution of airborne and ground-based LiDAR data for red pine and mixed deciduous forest plots. Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens Spat Inf Sci, 2004, XXXVI-8/W2: 66-70.

[5] Dale MRT, Fortin MJ. Spatial autocorrelation and statistical tests in ecology. EcoSc, 2002 9 2 167

[6] Dalponte M, Bruzzone L, Gianelle D. Fusion of hyperspectral and LIDAR remote sensing data for classification of complex forest areas. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens, 2008, 46(5): 1416-1427.

[7] De la Cueva AV. Structural attributes of three forest types in central Spain and Landsat ETM plus information evaluated with redundancy analysis. Int J Remote Sens, 2008, 29(19): 5657-5676.

[8] Dewalt SJ, Maliakal SK, Denslow JS. Changes in vegetation structure and composition along a tropical forest chronosequence: implications for wildlife. For Ecol Manag, 2003, 182: 139-151.

[9] Dickinson Y, Zenner EK, Miller D. Examining the effect of diverse management strategies on landscape scale patterns of forest structure in Pennsylvania using novel remote sensing techniques. Can J For Res, 2014, 44(4): 301-312.

[10] Egoh BN, Reyers B, Rouget M, Richardson DM, Le Maitre DC, Van Jaarsveld A. Mapping ecosystem services for planning and management. Ecosyst Environ, 2008, 127: 135-140.

[11] Everitt B, Hothorn T. Everitt B, Hotohorn T. Cluster analysis. An introduction to applied multivariate analysis with R, 2011, New York: Springer 163 200

[12] Franklin JF, Van Pelt R. Spatial aspects of structural complexity in old-growth forests. J For, 2004, 102(3): 22-28.

[13] Hame T, Salli A, Andersson K, Lohi A. A new methodology for the estimation of biomass of conifer dominated boreal forest using NOAA AVHRR data. Int J Remote Sens, 1997, 18: 3211-3243.

[14] Harper KA, Bergeron Y, Gauthier S, Drapeau P. Post-fire development of canopy structure and composition in black spruce forests of Abitibi, Quebec: a landscape scale study. Silva Fenn, 2002, 36(1): 249-263.

[15] Horie K, Miyamoto Y, Kimura N, Oikawa N. List of vascular plant of the University of Tokyo Hokkaido Forest. Univ For (Tokyo Univ), 2013, 54: 59-106.

[16] Hyyppä J, Yu XW, Hyyppä H, Vastaranta M, Holopainen M, Kukko A, Kaartinen H, Jaakkola A, Vaaja M, Koskinen J, Alho P. Advances in forest inventory using airborne laser scanning. Remote Sens, 2012, 4: 1190-1207.

[17] Igarashi T, Cheng D. Fungal damage caused by Racodium therryanum to regeneration of Japanese larch by natural seeding. Bull Coll Exp Hokkaido Univ, 1988, 45(1): 213-219.

[18] Ishida TA, Nara K, Hogetsu T. Host effects on ectomycorrhizal fungal communities: insight from eight host species in mixed conifer–broadleaf forests. New Phytol, 2007, 174(2): 430-440.

[19] Kane VR, Bakker JD, McGaughey RJ, Lutz JA, Gersonde RF, Franklin JF. Examining conifer canopy structural complexity across forest ages and elevations with LiDAR data. Can J For Res, 2010, 40(4): 774-787.

[20] Kane VR, McGaughey RJ, Bakker JD, Gersonde RF, Lutz JA, Franklin JF. Comparisons between field- and LiDAR-based measures of stand structural complexity. Can J For Res, 2010, 40: 761-773.

[21] Koch GW, Sillett SC, Jennings GM, Davis SD. The limits to tree height. Nature, 2004, 428: 851-854.

[22] Kodani E, Awaya Y (2005) Estimating forest stand parameters of Cryptomeria japonica and Chamaecyparis obtusa using LiDAR. In: 116th conference proceedings of Japan Forestry Society, pp 62–63

[23] Kodani E, Awaya Y (2006) Estimating height and volume in broadleaved forest stand using LiDAR. In: Proceedings of Silvilaser 2006, pp 173–176

[24] Koy K, McShea WJ, Leimgruber P, Haack BN, Aung A. Percentage canopy cover—using Landsat imagery to delineate habitat for Myanmar’s endangered Eld’s deer (Cervus eldi). Anim Conserv, 2005, 8: 289-296.

[25] Langely SK, Cheshire HM, Humes KS. A comparison of single date and multitemporal satellite image classifications in a semi-arid grassland. J Arid Environ, 2001, 49: 401-411.

[26] Larson AJ, Lutz JA, Gersonde RF, Franklin JF, Hietpas FF. Potential site productivity influences the rate of forest structural development. Ecol Appl, 2008, 18(4): 899-910.

[27] Lefsky MA, Harding D, Cohen WB, Parker G, Shugart HH. Surface LiDAR remote sensing of basal area and biomass in deciduous forests of eastern Maryland, USA. Remote Sens Environ, 1999, 67: 83-98.

[28] Lefsky MA, Cohen WB, Spies TA. An evaluation of alternate remote sensing products for forest inventory, monitoring, and mapping of Douglas-fir forests in western Oregon. Can J For Res, 2001, 31: 78-87.

[29] Lefsky MA, Cohen WB, Parker GG, Harding DJ. LiDAR remote sensing for ecosystem studies. Bioscience, 2002, 52(1): 19-30.

[30] Lefsky MA, Hudak AT, Cohen WB, Acker SA. Patterns of covariance between forest stand and canopy structure. Remote Sens Environ, 2005, 95(4): 517-531.

[31] Lovell JL, Jupp DL, Culvenor DS, Coops NC. Using airborne and ground-based ranging lidar to measure canopy structure in Australian forests. Can J Remote Sens, 2003, 29(5): 607-622.

[32] Ma ZK, Hart MM, Redmond RL. Mapping vegetation across large geographic areas: integration of remote sensing and GIS to classify multisource data. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens, 2001, 67(3): 295-307.

[33] Maltamo M, Mustonen K, Hyyppä J, Pitkänen J, Yu X. Identifying and quantifying structural characteristics of heterogeneous boreal forests using laser scanner data. For Ecol Manag, 2005, 216(1–3): 41-50.

[34] Matsuda K, Shibuya M, Koike T. Maintenance and rehabilitation of the mixed conifer–broadleaf forests in Hokkaido, Northern Japan. Eur J For Res, 2002, 5(2): 119-130.

[35] McCune B, Grace JB. Analysis of ecological communities, 2002, Gleneden Beach: MjM Software Design.

[36] McElhinny C, Gibbons P, Brack C, Bauhus J. Forest and woodland stand structural complexity: its definition and measurement. For Ecol Manag, 2005, 218(1–3): 1-24.

[37] Messier C, Puettmann KJ. Forests as complex adaptive systems: implications for forest management and modelling. Ital J For Mt Environ, 2011, 66(3): 249-258.

[38] Messier C, Parent S, Bergeron Y. Effects of overstory and understory vegetation on the understory light environment in mixed boreal forests. J Veg Sci, 1998, 9(4): 511-520.

[39] Næsset E. Predicting forest stand characteristics with airborne scanning laser using a practical two-stage procedure and field data. Remote Sens Environ, 2002, 80: 88-99.

[40] Næsset E, Gobakken T, Holmgren J, Hyyppä H, Hyyppä J, Maltamo M, Nilssonb M, Olssonb H, Perssonf Å, Söderman U. Laser scanning of forest resources: the Nordic experience. Scand J For Res, 2004, 19(6): 482-499.

[41] Nakata M, Tanaka H, Yagi H. Altitudinal changes in vegetation and soils on Mt. Dairoku, central Hokkaido, Japan. Jpn J Ecol, 1994, 44: 33-47.

[42] Noguchi M, Yoshida T. Factors influencing the distribution of two co-occurring dwarf bamboo species (Sasa kurilensis and S. senanensis) in a conifer-broadleaved mixed stand in northern Hokkaido. Ecol Res, 2005, 20: 25-30.

[43] Olthof I, King DJ. Development of a forest health index using multispectral airborne digital camera imager. Can J Remote Sens, 2000, 26: 166-176.

[44] Owari T. Relationship between the abundance of Abies sachalinensis juveniles and site condition in selection forests of central Hokkaido, Japan. FORMATH, 2013, 12: 1-20.

[45] Owari T, Matsui M, Inukai H, Kaji M. Stand structure and Geographic conditions of natural selection forests in central Hokkaido, Nothern Japan. J For Plan, 2011, 16: 207-214.

[46] Parker GG, Harmon ME, Lefsky MA, Chen J, Van Pelt R, Weis SB, Thomas SC, Winner WE, Shaw DC, Franklin JF. Three-dimensional structure of an oldgrowth Pseudotsuga tsuga canopy and its implications for radiation balance, microclimate, and gas exchange. Ecosystems, 2004, 7: 440-453.

[47] Pasher J, King DJ. Multivariate forest structure modelling and mapping using high resolution airborne imagery and topographic information. Remote Sens Environ, 2010, 114: 1718-1732.

[48] Pastur GJ, Cellini JM, Lencinas MV, Peri PL. Stand growth model using volume increment/basal area ratios. J For Sci, 2008, 54(3): 102-108.

[49] Prescott CE, Zabek LM, Staley LM, Kabzems R. Decomposition of broadleaf and needle litter in forests of British Columbia: influences of litter type, forest type, and litter mixtures. Can J For Res, 2000, 30(11): 1742-1750.

[50] R Development Core Team (2014) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. www.R-project.org

[51] Reitberger J, Krzystek P, Stilla U. Analysis of full waveform LiDAR data for the classification of deciduous and coniferous trees. Int J Remote Sens, 2008, 29(5): 1407-1431.

[52] Spies TA. Forest structure: a key to the ecosystem. Northwest Sci, 1998, 72: 34-39.

[53] Staudhammer CL, LeMay VM. Introduction and evaluation of possible indices of stand structural diversity. Can J For Res, 2001, 31(7): 1105-1115.

[54] Tatewaki M. Forest ecology of the islands of the North Pacific Ocean. J Fac Agric Hokkaido Univ, 1958, 50(4): 371-486.

[55] The University of Tokyo Hokkaido Forest (2015) http://www.uf.a.u-tokyo.ac.jp/files/gaiyo_hokkaido.pdf. Accessed 03 June 2016

[56] Van Pelt R, Franklin JF. Influence of canopy canopy structure on the understorey environment in tall, old-growth, conifer forests. Can J Remote Sens, 2000, 30(8): 1231-1245.

[57] Van Pelt R, Nadkarni NM. Development of canopy structure in Pseudotsuga menziesii forests in Southern Washington cascades. For Sci, 2003, 50(3): 326-341.

[58] Vazquez JA, Givnish TJ. Altitudinal gradients in tropical forest composition, structure and diversity in the Sierra de Manan. J Ecol, 1998, 86: 999-1020.

[59] Vepakomma U, Kneeshaw D, St-Onge B. Interactions of multiple disturbances in shaping boreal forest dynamics: a spatially explicit analysis using multi-temporal LiDAR data and high resolution imagery. J Ecol, 2010, 98(3): 526-539.

[60] Whittaker RJ, Araújo MB, Jepson P, Ladle RJ, Watson JE, Willis KJ. Conservation biogeography: assessment and prospect. Divers Distrib, 2005, 11: 3-23.

[61] Whittney GG, Foster DR. Overstorey composition and age as determinants of the understorey flora of woods of central New England. J Ecol, 1988, 76: 867-876.

[62] Wulder M. Optical remote sensing techniques for the assessment of forest inventory and biophysical parameters. Prog Phys Geogr, 1998, 22(4): 449-476.

[63] Wulder WA, Coops NC, Hudak AT, Morsdorf F, Nelson R, Newnham G, Vastaranta M. Status and prospects for LiDAR remote sensing of forested ecosystems. Can J Remote Sens, 2013, 39(Supplement 1): S1-S5.

[64] Wunderle AL, Franklin SE, Guo XG. Regenerating boreal forest structure estimation using SPOT-5 pan-sharpened imagery. Int J Remote Sens, 2007, 28(19): 4351-4364.

[65] Xie YC, Sha ZY, Yu M. Remote sensing imagery in vegetation mapping: a review. J. Plant Ecol, 2008, 1(1): 9-23.

[66] Yan MJ (2005) Methods of determining the number of clusters in a data set and a new clustering criterion. Doctoral Thesis, Blacksburg: Virginia. https://theses.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-12062005-153906/unrestricted/Proposal-Face.pdf. Accessed 03 June 2016

[67] Zenner EK. Do residual trees increase structural complexity in Pacific Northwest coniferous forests?. Ecol Appl, 2000, 10(3): 800-810.

[68] Zenner EK. Does old-growth condition imply high live-tree structural complexity?. For Ecol Manag, 2004, 195(1–2): 243-258.

[69] Zimble DA, Evans DL, Carlson GC, Parker RC, Grado SC, Gerard PD. Characterizing vertical forest structure using small-footprint airborne LiDAR. Remote Sens Environ, 2003, 87: 171-182.