Aboveground biomass and carbon stock in the largest sacred grove of Manipur, Northeast India

Abstract

Aboveground biomass and carbon stock in the largest sacred grove of Manipur was estimated for trees with diameter >10 cm at 1.37 m height. The aboveground biomass, carbon stock, tree density and basal area of the sacred grove ranged from 962.94 to 1130.79 Mg ha⁻¹, 481.47 to 565.40 Mg ha⁻¹ C, 1240 to 1320 stem ha⁻¹ and 79.43 to 90.64 m² ha⁻¹, respectively. Trees in diameter class of 30–40 cm contributed the highest proportion of aboveground biomass (22.50–33.73%). The aboveground biomass and carbon stock in research area were higher than reported for many tropical and temperate forests, suggesting a role of spiritual forest conservation for carbon sink management.

Keywords

Allometric models / Carbon stock / Sacred forest / Basal area / Tree density

References

[1] Baishya R, Barik SK, Upadhaya K. Distribution pattern of aboveground biomass in natural and plantation forests of humid tropics in northeast India. Trop Ecol, 2009, 50: 295-304.

[2] Binkley CS, Apps MJ, Dixon RK, Kauppi PE, Nilsson LO. Sequestering carbon in natural forests. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol, 1997, 27(Special): S23-S45.

[3] Borah N, Nath AJ, Das AK. Aboveground biomass and carbon stocks of tree species in tropical forests of Cachar district, Assam North East India. Int J Ecol Environ Sci, 2013, 39(2): 97-106.

[4] Borah M, Das D, Kalita J, Prasanna H, Borua D, Phukan B, Neog B. Tree species composition, biomass and carbon stocks in two tropical forest of Assam. Biomass Bioenergy, 2015, 78: 25-35.

[5] Brown S (1997) Estimating biomass and biomass change of tropical forests: a primer. FAO forestry paper—134. A Forest Resource Assessment Publication, Rome

[6] Brown S, Gillespie AJR, Lugo AE. Biomass estimation methods for tropical forests with application to forest inventory data. For Sci, 1989, 35: 881-902.

[7] Brown JH, Gillooly JH, Allen AP, Savage VM, West GB. Toward a metabolic theory of ecology. Ecology, 2004, 85: 1771-1789.

[8] Chambers JQ, Santos JD, Ribeiro RJ, Higuchi N. Tree damage, allometric relationships, and above-ground net primary production in central Amazon forest. For Ecol Manag, 2001, 152: 73-84.

[9] Chave J, Reira B, Dubois MA. Estimation of biomass in a neo-tropical forest of French Guiana: spatial and temporal variability. J Trop Ecol, 2001, 17: 79-96.

[10] Edwards PJ, Grub PJ. Studies of mineral cycling in a montane rainforest in New Guinea. 1. The distribution of organic matter in the vegetation and soil. J Ecol, 1977, 65: 943-969.

[11] Gibbs KG, Brown S, Niles JO, Foley JA. Monitoring and estimating tropical forest carbon stocks: making REDD a reality. Environ Res Lett, 2007, 2(4): 1-13.

[12] He B, Miao L, Cui X, Wu Z. Carbon sequestration from China’s afforestation projects. Environ Earth Sci, 2015, 74(7): 5491-5499.

[13] Kandari LS, Bisht VK, Bhardwaj M, Thakur AK. Conservation and management of sacred groves, myths and beliefs of tribal communities: a case study from north-India. Environ Syst Res, 2014, 3: 16.

[14] Khumbongmayum AD, Khan ML, Tripathi RS. Sacred groves of Manipur: ideal centres for biodiversity conservation. Curr Sci, 2004, 87(4): 430-433.

[15] Klinge H, Herrera R. Biomass studies in Amazon Caatinga forest in Southern Venezuela. 1. Standing crop of composite root mass in related stand. Trop Ecol, 1978, 19: 93-110.

[16] Lebbie AR, Freudenberger MS. Sacred groves in Africa: forest patches in transition. Forest patches in tropical landscapes, 1996, Washington, DC: Island Press 300 324

[17] Malhotra KC, Gokhale Y, Chatterjee S, Srivastava S. Sacred groves in India, 2007, New Delhi: Aryan Books International.

[18] Midgley GF, Bond WJ, Kapos VK, Ravilious C, Scharlemann JPW, Woodward FI. Terrestrial carbon stocks and biodiversity: key knowledge gaps and some policy implications. Curr Opin Environ Sustain, 2010, 2: 264-270.

[19] Montagnini F, Nair P. Carbon sequestration: an underexploited environmental benefit of agroforestry systems. Agrofor Syst, 2004, 61: 281-295.

[20] Nath AJ, Lal R, Das AK. Grains for ecosystem carbon management in North East India. Curr Sci, 2015, 109: 1187-1189.

[21] Ogawa H, Yoda K, Ogino K, Kira T. Comparative ecological studies on three main types of forest vegetation in Thailand. II. Plant biomas. Nat Life Southeast Asia, 1965, 4: 49-80.

[22] Ormsby AA. The impacts of global and national policy on the management and conservation of sacred groves of India. Hum Ecol, 2011, 39: 783-793.

[23] Ormsby AA. Pungetti G, Oviedo G, Hooke D. Cultural and conservation values of sacred forest in Ghana. Sacred species and sites: advances in biocultural conservation, 2012, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

[24] Pala NA, Negi AK, Gokhale Y, Aziem S, Vikrant KK, Todaria NP. Carbon stock estimation for tree species of SemMukhem sacred forest in Garhwal Himalaya, India. J For Res, 2013, 24(3): 457-460.

[25] Pan YD, Birdsey RA, Fang JY A large and persistent carbon sink in the world’s forests. Science, 2011, 333(6045): 988-993.

[26] Parratt SN. Religion of Manipur, 1980, Calcutta: Firma Klmpvt.

[27] Ravindranath NH, Somashekhar BS, Gadgil M. Carbon flow in Indian forests. Clim Change, 1997, 35: 297-320.

[28] Segura M, Kanninen M. Allometric models for tree volume and total aboveground biomass in a tropical humid forest in Costa Rica. Biotropica, 2005, 37(1): 2-8.

[29] Singh JS, Singh SP. Forest of Himalaya: structure, functioning and impact of man, 1992, Nainital: GyanodayaPrakashan.

[30] UNFCCC (1997) Kyoto protocol to the United Nations framework convention on climate change. http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/convkp/kpeng

[31] Van der Werf GR, Morton DC, Defries RS, Oliver JG, Kasibhatta PS, Jackson RB, Collatz GJ, Randerson J. CO₂ emissions from forest loss. Nat Geosci, 2009, 2: 737-738.

[32] Yadava PS. Qasim SZ, Goel M. Soil and vegetation carbon pool and sequestration in the forest ecosystems of Manipur, NE India. CO₂ sequestration technologies for clean energy, 2010, New Delhi: Daya publication house 163 170