Increase of forest carbon biomass due to community forestry management in Nepal

Anup K C , Roshani Manandhar , Rajeshor Paudel , Sujan Ghimire

Journal of Forestry Research ›› 2017, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (2) : 429 -438.

PDF
Journal of Forestry Research ›› 2017, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (2) : 429 -438. DOI: 10.1007/s11676-017-0438-z
Original Paper

Increase of forest carbon biomass due to community forestry management in Nepal

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Community forest management helps in mitigating deforestation and forest degradation by addressing the negative aspects of rural livelihoods such as poverty and social exclusion. It is important in regulating global climate by encouraging sequestration of carbon in shoots, roots and soils. We studied the status of community forest management, forest resource harvest and carbon stocks in two community forests of the mid hill region of central and western Nepal. The study was based on primary and secondary data collected through carbon stock measurement from field visits and allometric equations, household surveys, focus group discussions, key informant interviews, and review of past studies. Socioeconomic variables such as gender, age group, livestock and landholding status were related to resource utilization, conservation, and management of community forest. Forest resources such as timber, firewood, fodder and leaf litter were harvested in sustainable ways. People were involved in forest thinning, co-management meetings, guarding and planting trees for forest conservation and management. Density and carbon stock of trees increased gradually in comparison to a previous study. We recommend further research on other community forests for more accurate and better results.

Keywords

Community forest management / Resource use / Carbon stock / Nepal

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Anup K C, Roshani Manandhar, Rajeshor Paudel, Sujan Ghimire. Increase of forest carbon biomass due to community forestry management in Nepal. Journal of Forestry Research, 2017, 29(2): 429-438 DOI:10.1007/s11676-017-0438-z

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Adhikari B (2003) Property rights and natural resources: socio-economic heterogeneity and distributional implications of common property resource management. Kathmandu, Nepal

[2]

Adhikari B, Lovett JC. Transaction costs and community-based natural resource management in Nepal. J Environ Manag, 2006, 78: 5-15.

[3]

Adhikari B, Williams F, Lovett JC. Local benefits from community forests in the middle hills of Nepal. For Policy Econ, 2007, 9: 464-478.

[4]

Aryal C. Status of carbon stock at Toudol Chhap community forest, Sipadol, Bhaktapur, 2010, Kirtipur: Tribhuvan University.

[5]

Aryal S, Bhattarai DR, Devkota RP. Comparison of carbon stocks between mixed and pine-dominated forest stands within the Gwalinidaha community forest in Lalitpur District, Nepal. Small Scale For, 2013, 12: 659-666.

[6]

Banskota K, Karky BS, Skutch M. Reducing carbon emissions through community-managed forests in the Himalayas, 2007, Kathmandu: ICIMOD.

[7]

Bayat AT, Gils HV, Weir M. Carbon stock of European beech forest; a case at M. Pizzalto, Italy. APCBEE Proc, 2012, 1: 159-168.

[8]

Bhatta P. Carbon stock capacity of mixed broad leaved forests of Phulchowki watershed, Lalitpur, 2004, Kirtipur, Kathmandu: Tribhuvan University.

[9]

Bottazzi P, Cattaneo A, Rocha DC, Rist S. Assessing sustainable forest management under REDD+: a community-based labour perspective. Ecol Econ, 2013, 93: 94-103.

[10]

Brendler T, Carey H. Community forestry, defined. J For, 1998, 96: 21-23.

[11]

Brown D, Malla YB, Schreckrnberg K, Springate-Baginski O. From supervising subjects to supporting citizens: recent developments in community forestry in Asia and Africa, 2002, London: Overseas Development Institute.

[12]

CBS. Population monograph of Nepal, 2011, Kathmandu: Central Burea of Statistics.

[13]

CBS. national population and housing census 2011, 2012, Kathmandu: Central Bureau of Statistics.

[14]

CFOP. Community forest operational plan of Kafle community forest, 2008, Lalitpur: Kafle Community Forest User Group.

[15]

Chave J, Andalo C, Brown C. Tree allometry and improved estimation of carbon stocks and balance in tropical forests. Oecologia, 2005, 145: 87-99.

[16]

Chhetri BBK, Lund JF, Nielsen ØJ. The public finance potential of community forestry in Nepal. Ecol Econ, 2012, 73(1727): 113-121.

[17]

Chhetri BBK, Johnsen FH, Konoshima M. Community forestry in the hills of Nepal: determinants of user participation in forest management. For Policy Econ, 2013, 30: 6-13.

[18]

Dahal P. Carbon sequestration status at Sunaulo Ghampa Danda community forest, Kathmandu, 2007, Kirtipur, Kathmandu: Tribhuvan University.

[19]

Dhakal K. Carbon stock estimation of Pashupati community forest, 2010, Kathmandu: Tribhuvan University.

[20]

DoF. CFUG database record available in MIS, 2015, Kathmandu: Community Forestry Division, Department of Forest.

[21]

Ekoungoulou R, Niu S, Loumeto JJ, Ifo SA, Bocko YE, Mikieleko FEK, Guiekisse EDM, Senou H, Liu X. Evaluating the carbon stock in above-and below-ground biomass in a moist central African forest. Appl Ecol Environ Sci, 2015, 3: 51-59.

[22]

Gelman V, Hulkkonen V, Kantola R, Nousiainen M, Nousiainen V, Poku-Marboah M (2013) Impacts of forest management practices on forest carbon. HENVI Workshop 2013: interdisciplinary approach to forests and climate change. Helsinki University Centre for Environment, HENVI, University of Helsinki

[23]

Ghazoul J, Butler RA, Vega JM, Koh LP. REDD: a reckoning of environment and development implications. Trends Ecol Evol, 2010, 25: 396-402.

[24]

Gilmour DA, Fisher RJ. Evolution in community forestry: contesting forest resources, 1998, Bangkok: RECOFTC.

[25]

GSBCFOP. Community forest operational plan of Ghwangkhola Sapaude Babiyabhir community forest, 2006, Syangja: District Forest Office.

[26]

Gurung M (2009) Assessment of forest carbon potential of riverine forests at the Khata Corridor and Lamahi-mahadevpuri complex. Presented in national sharing workshop in everest hotel on 25th August 2009. Organized by WWF-Nepal/WINROCK International and Terai Arc Landscape kathmandu, Nepal

[27]

Hayes T, Persha L. Nesting local forestry initiatives: revisiting community forest management in a REDD+ world. For Policy Econ, 2010, 12: 545-553.

[28]

Hobley M, Malla Y. Hobley M. From forests to forestry. The three ages of forestry in Nepal privatisation, nationalisation and populism. Participatory forestry the process of change in India and Nepal, rural development forestry study guide 3, 1996, London: Rural Development Forestry Network Overseas Development Institute.

[29]

Ianni E, Mattenet M, Geneletti D, Malizia LR. Community-based forest management in the Yungas biosphere reserve, Northern Argentina. Environ Dev Sustain, 2010, 12: 631-646.

[30]

ICIMOD, ANSAB, FECOFUN (2010) Baseline report of forest carbon stocks in Ludhikhola, kayarkhola and Charnawati watersheds of Nepal, forest carbon stock in REDD+ pilot project sites: year one measurement and analysis. In: International centre for integrated mountain development, Asia network for sustainable agriculture and bioresources. Federation of Community Forest Users’ Nepal, Kathmandu

[31]

IPCC. Guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories, volume 4 agricultural, forestry and other land use, 2006, Cambridge: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

[32]

Karky BS. Who will grow the forest, bring benefit, and save the earth?, 2005, Kathmandu: Resources Himalaya Foundation.

[33]

Karky BS (2008) The economics of reducing emissions from community managed forests in Nepal Himalaya. Dissertation to obtain the degree of Doctorate, Centre for Clean Technology and Environmental Policy, University of Twente, Enschede

[34]

Karky BS, Skutsch MM. The cost of carbon abatement through community forest management in Nepal Himalaya. Ecol Econ, 2010, 69: 666-672.

[35]

KC Anup, Bhandari G, Joshi Ganesh Raj, Aryal S. Climate change mitigation potential from carbon sequestration of community forest in mid hill region of Nepal. Int J Environ Prot, 2013, 3(7): 33-40.

[36]

KC Anup, Joshi GR, Aryal S. Opportunity cost, willingness to pay and cost benefit analysis of a community forest of Nepal. Int J Environ, 2014, 3(2): 108-124.

[37]

KC Anup, Koirala I, Adhikari N. Cost-benefit analysis of a community forest in Nepal. J Sustain For, 2015, 34(3): 199-213.

[38]

Khanal A (2007) Estimating the potential of community forestry: a case from Champadevi forest. Master thesis submitted to Central Department of Environmental Science, Tribhuvan University, Kirtipur, Kathmandu

[39]

MacDicken K. A guide to monitoring carbon storage in forestry and agroforestry projects, 1997, Arlington: Forest Carbon Monitoring Programme, Winrock International Institute for Agricultural Development.

[40]

Meshack CK, Adhikari B, Doggart N, Lovett JC. Transaction costs of community-based forest management: empirical evidence from Tanzania. Afr J Ecol, 2006, 44: 468-477.

[41]

MoFSC. Forest carbon measurement guidelines, 2011, Kathmandu: Climate Change and REDD Cell.

[42]

Moss C (2012) Nepalese community forestry expert: ‘With green forests comes a green economy’. FORESTS NEWS. Centre for International Forestry Research, Indonesia

[43]

Nabuurs GJ, Masera O, Andrasko K, Benitez-Ponce P, Boer R, Dutschke M, Elsiddig E, Ford-Robertson J, Frumhoff P, Karjalainen T, Krankina O, Kurz WA, Matsumoto M, Oyhantcabal W, Ravindranath NH, Sanz Sanchez MJ, Zhang X. Metz B, Davidson OR, Bosch PR, Dave R, Meyer LA. Forestry. Climate change 2007: mitigation. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2007, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 543 584

[44]

Ojha H, Persha L, Chhatre A. Community forestry in Nepal, A policy innovation for local livelihoods, 2009, Washington: International Food Policy Research Institute.

[45]

Patel T, Dhiaulhaq A, Gritten D, Yasmi Y, Bruyn TD, Paudel NS, Luintel H, Khatri DB, Silori C, Suzuki R. Predicting future conflict under REDD+ implementation. Forests, 2013, 4: 343-363.

[46]

Pearson TR, Brown SL, Birdsey RA (2007) Measurement guidelines for the sequestration of forest carbon. Northern Research Station, Department of Agriculture

[47]

Pokharal BK. Livelihoods, economic opportunities and equity: community forestry and people’s livelihoods. J For Livelihood, 2001, 1: 16-18.

[48]

Pokharel RK. Factors influencing the management regime of Nepal’s community forestry. For Policy Econ, 2012, 17: 13-17.

[49]

Purdon M. The clean development mechanism and community forests in Sub-Saharan Africa: reconsidering Kyoto’s ‘‘moral position’’ on biocarbon sinks in the carbon market. Environ Dev Sustain, 2010, 12: 1025-1050.

[50]

Rijal A, Smith-Hall C, Helles F. Non-timber forest product dependency in the Central Himalayan foot hills. Environ Dev Sustain, 2011, 13: 121-140.

[51]

Satyal Pravat P, Humphreys D. Using a multilevel approach to analyse the case of forest conflicts in the Terai Nepal. For Policy Econ, 2013, 33: 47-55.

[52]

Sreedharan CK, Matta JR. Poverty alleviation as a pathway to sustainable forest management. Environ Dev Sustain, 2010, 12: 877-888.

[53]

Thagunna LK. Estimation of carbon stock of Bailbanda Buffer Zone community forest, Chadani VDC-7, Kanchanpur, 2009, Kirtipur: Tribhuvan University.

[54]

Upadhyay TP, Sankhayan PL, Solberg B. A review of carbon sequestration dynamics in the Himalayan region as a function of land-use change and forest/soil degradation with special reference to Nepal. Agr Ecosyst Environ, 2005, 105: 449-465.

[55]

Walkley A, Black IA. An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining organic carbon in soils: effect of variations in digestion conditions and of inorganic soil constituents. Soil Sci, 1934, 63: 251-263.

[56]

Zenteno M, Zuidema PA, De Jong W, Boot RGA. Livelihood strategies and forest dependence: new insights from Bolivian forest communities. For Policy Econ, 2013, 26: 12-21.

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

143

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/