Effects of soil drought stress on photosynthetic gas exchange traits and chlorophyll fluorescence in Forsythia suspensa

Abstract

To clarify the changes in plant photosynthesis and mechanisms underlying those responses to gradually increasing soil drought stress and reveal quantitative relationships between photosynthesis and soil moisture, soil water conditions were controlled in greenhouse pot experiments using 2-year-old seedlings of Forsythia suspensa (Thunb.) Vahl. Photosynthetic gas exchange and chlorophyll fluorescence variables were measured and analyzed under 13 gradients of soil water content. Net photosynthetic rate (P _N), stomatal conductance (g _s), and water-use efficiency (W _UE) in the seedlings exhibited a clear threshold response to the relative soil water content (R _SWC). The highest P _N and W _UE occurred at R _SWC of 51.84 and 64.10%, respectively. Both P _N and W _UE were higher than the average levels at 39.79% ≤ R _SWC ≤ 73.04%. When R _SWC decreased from 51.84 to 37.52%, P _N, g _s, and the intercellular CO₂ concentration (C _i) markedly decreased with increasing drought stress; the corresponding stomatal limitation (L _s) substantially increased, and nonphotochemical quenching (N _PQ) also tended to increase, indicating that within this range of soil water content, excessive excitation energy was dispersed from photosystem II (PSII) in the form of heat, and the reduction in P _N was primarily due to stomatal limitation. While R _SWC decreased below 37.52%, there were significant decreases in the maximal quantum yield of PSII photochemistry (F _v/F _m) and the effective quantum yield of PSII photochemistry (ΦPSII), photochemical quenching (q _P), and N _PQ; in contrast, minimal fluorescence yield of the dark-adapted state (F ₀) increased markedly. Thus, the major limiting factor for the P _N reduction changed to a nonstomatal limitation due to PSII damage. Therefore, an R _SWC of 37.52% is the maximum allowable water deficit for the normal growth of seedlings of F. suspensa, and a water content lower than this level should be avoided in field soil water management. Water contents should be maintained in the range of 39.79% ≤ R _SWC ≤ 73.04% to ensure normal function of the photosynthetic apparatus and high levels of photosynthesis and efficiency in F. suspensa.

Keywords

Chlorophyll fluorescence / Gas exchange / Photosynthetic rate / Soil water deficit / Stomatal mechanism / Water-use efficiency

References

[1] Anselmi S, Chiesi M, Giannini M, Manes F, Maselli F. Estimation of mediterranean forest transpiration and photosynthesis through the use of an ecosystem simulation model driven by remotely sensed data. Global Ecol Biogeogr, 2004, 13(4): 371-380.

[2] Bray EA. Molecular responses to water deficit. Plant Physiol, 1993, 103(4): 1035-1040.

[3] Demmig B, Björkman O. Comparison of the effect of excessive light on chlorophyll fluorescence and photon yield of O₂ evolution in leaves of higher plants. Planta, 1987, 171(2): 171-184.

[4] Demmig B, Winter K, Krüger A, Czygan C. Photoinhibition and zeaxanthin formation in intact leaves a possible role of the xanthophyll cycle in the dissipation of excess light energy. Plant Physiol, 1987, 84(2): 218-224.

[5] Farquhar GD, Sharkey TD. Stomatal conductance and photosynthesis. Annu Rev Plant Physiol, 1982, 33(1): 317-345.

[6] Farquhar GD, Wong SC, Evans JR, Hubick KT. Jones HG, Flowers TJ, Jones MB. Photosynthesis and gas exchange. Plants under stress, 1989, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 47 69

[7] Gilmore AM, Yamamoto HY. Zeaxanthin formation and energy dependent fluorescence quenching in pea chloroplasts under artificially mediated linear and cyclic electron transport. Plant Physiol, 1991, 96(2): 635-643.

[8] Guo CF, Sun Y, Tang YH, Zhang MQ. Effect of water stress on chlorophyll fluorescence in leaves of tea plant (Camellia sinensis). Chin J Eco-Agric, 2009, 17(3): 560-564.

[9] Hao Y, Li DF, Piao XL. Forsythia suspensa extract alleviates hypersensitivity induced by soybean β-conglycinin in weaned piglets. J Ethnopharmacol, 2010, 128(2): 412-418.

[10] Kebbas S, Lutts S, Aid F. Effect of drought stress on the photosynthesis of Acacia tortilis subsp. raddiana at the young seedling stage. Photosynthetica, 2015, 53(2): 288-298.

[11] Krause GH. Photoinhibition of photosynthesis: an evaluation of damaging and protective mechanisms. Physiol Plant, 1988, 74: 566-574.

[12] Krause GH, Weis E. Chlorophyll fluorescence and photosynthesis: the basics. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol, 1991, 42: 313-349.

[13] Lang Y, Wang M. Effects of soil water on photosynthesis of Forsythia suspensa (Thunb.) Vahl. in spring and summer. Acta Ecol Sin, 2015, 35(9): 3043-3051.

[14] Lang Y, Wang M. Threshold effect of photosynthesis in Forsythia suspense to soil water and its photosynthetic productivity grading in spring and summer. Sci Silva Sin, 2016, 52(2): 38-46.

[15] Lang Y, Wang M, Zhang GC, Zhao QK. Experimental and simulated light responses of photosynthesis in leaves of three tree species under different soil water conditions. Photosynthetica, 2013, 51(3): 370-378.

[16] Lawson T, Oxborough K, Morison JL, Baker NR. The responses of guard and mesophyll cell photosynthesis to CO₂, O₂, light, and water stress in a range of species are similar. J Exp Bot, 2003, 54(388): 1743-1752.

[17] Lazar D. Chlorophyll a fluorescence induction. Biochim Biophys Acta, 1999, 1412(3): 1-28.

[18] Li WR, Zhang SQ, Shan L. Responsibility of nonstomatal limitations for the reduction of photosynthesis—response of photosynthesis and antioxidant enzyme characteristics in alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) seedlings to water stress and rehydration. Front Agric China, 2007, 1(3): 255-264.

[19] Li ZQ, Niu F, Fan JW, Liu YG, Rosenfeld D, Ding YN. Long-term impacts of aerosols on the vertical development of clouds and precipitation. Nat Geosci, 2011, 4(12): 888-894.

[20] Masrahi YS, Al-Turki TA, Sayed OH. Photosynthetic adaptation and survival strategy of Duvalia velutina in an extremely arid environment. Photosynthetica, 2015, 53(4): 555-561.

[21] Ohashi Y, Nakayama N, Saneoka H, Fujita K. Effects of drought stress on photosynthetic gas exchange, chlorophyll fluorescence and stem diameter of soybean plants. Biol Plant, 2006, 50(1): 138-141.

[22] Peterson RB, Sivak MN, Walker DA. Relationship between steady-state fluorescence yield and photosynthetic efficiency in spinach leaf tissue. Plant Physiol, 1998, 88: 158-163.

[23] Piao XL, Jang MH, Cui J, Piao XS. Lignans from the fruits of Forsythia suspensa. Bioorg Med Chem Lett, 2008, 18(6): 1980-1984.

[24] Roháček K. Chlorophyll fluorescence parameters: the definitions, photosynthetic meaning and mutual relationships. Photosynthetica, 2002, 40(1): 13-29.

[25] Smith DM, Cusack S, Colman AW, Folland CK, Harris GR, Murphy JM. Improved surface temperature prediction for the coming decade from a global climate model. Science, 2007, 317(5839): 796-799.

[26] Sung YY, Lee AY, Kim HK. Forsythia suspensa fruit extracts and the constituent matairesinol confer anti-allergic effects in an allergic dermatitis mouse model. J Ethnopharmacol, 2016, 187: 49-56.

[27] Van KO, Snel JFH. The use of chlorophyll nomenclature in plant stress physiology. Photosynth Res, 1990, 25: 147-150.

[28] Wang ZX, Chen L, Ai J, Qin HY, Liu YX, Xu PL, Jiao ZQ, Zhao Y, Zhang QT. Photosynthesis and activity of photosystem II in response to drought stress in Amur Grape (Vitis amurensis Rupr.). Photosynthetica, 2012, 50(2): 189-196.

[29] Ware MA, Belgio E, Ruban AV. Photoprotective capacity of nonphotochemical quenching in plants acclimated to different light intensities. Photosynth Res, 2015, 126(2): 261-274.

[30] Wu CA, Meng QW, Zou Q, Zhao SJ, Wang W. Comparative study on the photooxidative response in different wheat cultivar leaves. Acta Agron Sin, 2003, 29(3): 339-344.

[31] Xia EQ, Ai XX, Zang SY, Guan TT, Xu XR, Li HB. Ultrasound-assisted extraction of phillyrin from Forsythia suspensa. Ultrason Sonochem, 2011, 18(2): 549-552.

[32] Xia JB, Zhang SY, Zhao ZG, Zhao YY, Gao Y, Gu GY, Sun JK. Critical effect of photosynthetic efficiency in Salix matsudana to soil moisture and its threshold grade in shell ridge island. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2013, 37(9): 851-860.

[33] Xia JB, Zhang GC, Wang RR, Zhang SY. Effect of soil water availability on photosynthesis in Ziziphus jujuba var. spinosus in a sand habitat formed from seashells: Comparison of four models. Photosythetica, 2014, 52(2): 253-261.

[34] Xu DQ. Photosynthetic Efficiency, 2002, Beijing: Shanghai Scientific & Technological Press 4 6

[35] Yan N, Zhang YL, Xue HM, Zhang XH, Wang ZD, Shi LY, Guo DP. Changes in plant growth and photosynthetic performance of Zizania latifolia exposed to different phosphorus concentrations under hydroponic condition. Photosynthetica, 2015, 53(4): 630-635.

[36] Ye ZP. A new model for relationship between irradiance and the rate of photosynthesis in Oryza sativa. Photosynthetica, 2007, 45(4): 637-640.

[37] Zhang SY, Zhang GC, Gu SY, Xia JB, Zhao JK. Critical responses of photosynthetic efficiency of goldspur apple tree to soil water variation in semiarid loess hilly area. Photosynthetica, 2010, 48(4): 589-595.

[38] Zhang GC, Xia JB, Shao HB, Zhang SY. Grading woodland soil water productivity and soil bioavailability in the semi-arid loess plateau of China. CLEAN–Soil Air Water, 2012, 40(2): 148-153.