Phenotypic variation in Phoebe bournei populations preserved in the primary distribution area

Yingang Li , Xinhong Liu , Junwei Ma , Xiaomian Zhang , Li-an Xu

Journal of Forestry Research ›› 2017, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (1) : 35 -44.

PDF
Journal of Forestry Research ›› 2017, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (1) : 35 -44. DOI: 10.1007/s11676-017-0409-4
Original Paper

Phenotypic variation in Phoebe bournei populations preserved in the primary distribution area

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Phoebe bournei (Hemsl.) Yang is a rare and protected plant in China. This study was conducted to determine the phenotypic variation in this species and to document phenotypic variation within and among populations of P. bournei. Nested analysis of variance, coefficient of variation, multiple comparisons, principal component analysis (PCA) and correlation analysis were used to analyze ten phenotypic traits in ten natural populations of P. bournei from both the northeastern and the primary region of the range of this species. Significant differences among and within populations were observed in leaf and seed phenotypic traits. Variation among populations (34.92%) was greater than that within populations (26.19%). The mean phenotypic differentiation coefficient was 53.77% among populations, indicating that variation among populations comprised the majority of the phenotypic variation of P. bournei. The coefficient of variance (CV) of ten traits varied from 6.44 to 18.45%, with an average of 12.03%. The CV of leaf traits among populations (15.64%) was higher than that of seed traits (8.60%), indicating that seed traits were more stable. The results from CV and PCA indicated that leaf area, leaf length and thousand seed weight were the main factors accounting for the observed phenotypic variations. Significant or highly significant correlations were observed among most leaf and/or in seed phenotypic traits, whereas no significant correlations were observed between phenotypic traits and geographic factors. Based on cluster analysis, the ten populations can be divided into three clusters. These clusters were not a result of geographic distances.

Keywords

Phenotypic variation / Phoebe bournei / Population / Principal component analysis / Protection and utilization

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Yingang Li, Xinhong Liu, Junwei Ma, Xiaomian Zhang, Li-an Xu. Phenotypic variation in Phoebe bournei populations preserved in the primary distribution area. Journal of Forestry Research, 2017, 29(1): 35-44 DOI:10.1007/s11676-017-0409-4

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Abdeullan AJ, Jana LR. Phenotypic divergence and population variation in Cuphea. J Agron, 2008, 7(1): 25-32.

[2]

Aida A, Hussein M, Mohamad AS, Hani S, Sameer M. Assessment of phenotypic diversity among Jordanian barely landraces (Hortkum vulgare L.). Biotechnology, 2007, 6(2): 232-238.

[3]

Ariane R, Barbos A, Cecilia F, Fiorini Viviane SP, Renato MS, Eduardo LB. Geographical genetic structure and phenotypic variation in the Vellozia hirsute (Velloziaceae) ochlospecies complex. Am J Bot, 2012, 99(9): 1477-1488.

[4]

Blue MP, Jensen RJ. Positional and seasonal variation in oak (Quercus: Fagaceae) leaf morphology. Am J Bot, 1988, 75: 939-947.

[5]

Boulli A, Baaziz M, Mhirit O. Polymorphism of natural populations of Pinus halepensis Mill. in Morocco as revealed by morphological characters. Euphytica, 2001, 119(3): 309-316.

[6]

Chisha-kasumu E, Woodward S, Price A. Phenotypic variation among five provenances of Pterocarpus angolensis in Zimbabwe and Zambia. South For, 2009, 71(1): 41-47.

[7]

Dangasuk OG, Panetsos KP. Altitudinal and longitudinal variations in Pinus brutia (Ten.) of Ctete Island, Greece: some needle, cone and seed traits under natural habitats. New For, 2004, 27(3): 269-284.

[8]

Editorial Committee of Flora of China, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Flora of China, 1982, Beijing: Science Press 112

[9]

Garcia JQ, Ivancic A, Lebot V. Morphological variation and reproductive characteristics of wild giant taro (Alocasia macrorrhizos, Araceae) populations in Vanuatu. N Z J Bot, 2008, 46(2): 189-203.

[10]

Garcia R, Siepielski AM, Benkman CW. Cone and seed trait variation in white bark pine (Pinus albicaulis; Pinaceae) and the potential for phenotypic selection. Am J Bot, 2009, 96(5): 1050-1054.

[11]

Ge S, Wang MX, Chen YW. An analysis of population genetic structure of Masson pine by isozyme technique. Sci Silvae Sin, 1988, 24(4): 399-409. (In Chinese)

[12]

Gil L, Climent J, Nanos N, Mutke S, Ortiz I, Schiller G. Cone morphology variation in Pinus canariensis Sm. Plant Syst Evol, 2002, 235: 35-51.

[13]

Gu YJ, Luo JX, Wu YW, Cao XJ. Phenotypic diversity in natural populations of Picea balfouriana in Sichuan, China. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2009, 33(2): 291-301. (In Chinese)

[14]

Hamrick JL, Godt NJW. Brown AHD, Clegg MT, Kahler AL, Weir BS. Allozyme Diversity in Plant Species. Plant population genetics, breeding, and genetic resources, 1990, Sunderland: Sinauer Association 43 63

[15]

Hamrick JL, Blanton HM, Hamrick KJ. Genetic structure of geographically marginal populations of ponderosa pine. Am J Bot, 1989, 76(11): 1559-1568.

[16]

IUCN (2015) In–situ The IUCN red list of threatened species. http://www.iucnredlist.org

[17]

Ji ZF, Gao YH, Li L, Mao SX, Zhao L, Geng QY, Wang YL. Phenotypic diversity of populations of Acer mono in Huoshan Mountain of Shanxi at different altitude. Acta Hortic Sin, 2012, 39(11): 2217-2228. (In Chinese)

[18]

Lee SW, Choi WY, Norbu L, Pradham R. Genetic diversity and structure of blue pine (Pinus wallichiana Jackson) in Bhutan. For Ecol Manag, 1998, 105(1): 45-53.

[19]

Li WY, Gu WC. Study on phenotypic diversity of natural population in Quercus mongolica. Sci Silvae Sin, 2005, 41(1): 49-56. (In Chinese)

[20]

Maley ML, Parker WH. Phenotypic variation in cone and needle characters of Pinus banksiana (jack pine) in northwestern Ontario. Can J Bot, 1993, 71(1): 43-51.

[21]

Mao JF, Li Y, Liu YJ, Liu H, Wang XR. Cone and seed characteristics of pinus densata and their adaptive fitness implications. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2007, 31(2): 291-299. In Chinese)

[22]

Marshall B, Harrison RE, Graham J, Mcnico JW, Wright G, Squire GR. Spatial trends of phenotypic diversity between colonies of wild raspberry Rubus idaeus. New Phytol, 2001, 151(3): 671-682.

[23]

Matziris D. Genetic variation in cone and seed characteristics in a clonal seed orchard of Aleppo pine grown in Greece. Silvae Genet, 1998, 47: 37-41.

[24]

Ministry of Civil Affairs of the People’s Republic of China, Ministry of Development of the People’s Republic of China (1993) Encyclopedia of Chinese Counties, vol East China. China Social Press, Beijing, pp 583, 953, 957, 974, 982, 1052, 1064, 1095, 1125, 1274

[25]

Mohamed MS, Mohammed EH, Nadia W, Aziz O, Abdelali B, Abdelmajid H. Fruit and seed diversity of domesticated carob (Ceratonia siliqua L.) in Morocco. Sci Hortic, 2009, 123(1): 110-116.

[26]

Nadya W, González-Martínez Santiago C, Ismaïl EH, Abdelali B. Variation of morphological traits in natural populations of maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Ait.) in Morocco. Ann For Sci, 2006, 63(1): 83-92.

[27]

Noraini T, Cutler DF. Leaf anatomical and micromorphological characters of some Malaysian Parashorea (Dipterocarpaceae). J Trop For Sci, 2009, 21(2): 156-167.

[28]

Panetsos KP, Aravanopoulos FA, Scaltsoyiannes A. Genetic variation of Pinus brutia from Islands of the northeastern Aegean Sea. Silvae Genet, 1998, 47(2): 115-119.

[29]

Peterson BJ, Graves WR, Sharma J. Phenotypic and genotypic diversity of eastern leatherwood in five populations that span its geographic distribution. Am Midl Nat, 2011, 165(1): 1-21.

[30]

Rabara RC, Ferrer MC, Diaz CL, Newingham MCV, Romero GO. Phenotypic diversity of farmers’ traditional rice varieties in the Philippines. Agronomy, 2014, 4(2): 217-241.

[31]

Schaal BA, Leverich WJ, Rogstad SH. Falk DA, Holsinger KE. A comparison of methods for assessing genetic variation in plant conservation biology. Genetics and conservation of rare plants, 1991, New York: Oxford University Press 123 124

[32]

She CQ, Yang WX, Fang SZ, Shang XL. Phenotypic diversity of natural Cyclocarya paliurus populations seed traits. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2009, 20(10): 2351-2356. (In Chinese)

[33]

Singh O, Thapliyal M. Variation in cone and seed characters in blue pine (Pinus wallichiana) across natural distribution in western himalayas. J For Res, 2012, 23(2): 235-239.

[34]

Singh O, Bordoloi S, Mahanta N. Variability in cone, seed and seedling characteristics of Pinus kesiya Royle ex Gordon. J For Res, 2015, 26(2): 331-337.

[35]

Sreekanth PM, Balasundaran M, Nazeem PA. Genetic and morphological variation in natural teak (Tectona grandis) populations of the Western Ghats in Southern India. J For Res, 2014, 25(4): 805-812.

[36]

Verbeeck H, Betehndoh E, Maes WH, Hubau W, Kearsley E, Buggenhout L, Hufkens K, Huygens D, Acker JV, Beeckman H, MweruJPM Boeckx P, Steppe K. Functional leaf trait diversity of 10 tree species in Congolese secondary tropical forest. J Trop For Sci, 2014, 26(3): 409-419.

[37]

Xu YL, Woeste K, Cai NH, Kang XY, Li GQ, Chen S, Duan A. Variation in needle and cone traits in natural populations of Pinus yunnanensis. J For Res, 2016, 27(1): 41-49.

[38]

Zheng JY, Yin YH, Li BY. A new scheme for climate regionalization in China. Acta Geogr Sin, 2010, 65(1): 3-13. (In Chinese)

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

183

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/