Characteristics of canopy interception and its simulation with a revised Gash model for a larch plantation in the Liupan Mountains, China

Abstract

Canopy interception is a significant proportion of incident rainfall and evapotranspiration of forest ecosystems. Hence, identifying its magnitude is vital for studies of eco-hydrological processes and hydrological impact evaluation. In this study, throughfall, stemflow and interception were measured in a pure Larix principis-rupprechtii Mayr. (larch) plantation in the Liupan Mountains of northwestern China during the growing season (May–October) of 2015, and simulated using a revised Gash model. During the study period, the total precipitation was 499.0 mm; corresponding total throughfall, stemflow and canopy interception were 410.3, 2.0 and 86.7 mm, accounting for 82.2, 0.4 and 17.4% of the total precipitation, respectively. With increasing rainfall, the canopy interception ratio of individual rainfall events decreased initially and then tended to stabilize. Within the study period, the simulated total canopy interception, throughfall and stemflow were 2.2 mm lower, 2.5 mm higher and 0.3 mm lower than their measured values, with a relative error of 2.5, 0.6 and 15.0%, respectively. As quantified by the model, canopy interception loss (79%) mainly consisted of interception caused by canopy adsorption, while the proportions of additional interception and trunk interception were small. The revised Gash model was highly sensitive to the parameter of canopy storage capacity, followed by the parameters of canopy density and mean rainfall intensity, but less sensitive to the parameters of mean evaporation rate, trunk storage capacity, and stemflow ratio. The revised Gash model satisfactorily simulated the total canopy interception of the larch plantation within the growing season but was less accurate for some individual rainfall events, indicating that some flaws exist in the model structure. Further measures to improve the model’s ability in simulating the interception of individual rainfall events were suggested.

Keywords

Canopy interception / Larch plantation / Revised Gash model / Stemflow / Throughfall

References

[1] Ahmadi MT, Attarod P, Mohadjer MRM, Rahmani R, Fathi J. Partitioning rainfall into throughfall, stemflow, and interception loss in an oriental beech (Fagus orientalis Lipsky) forest during the growing season. T J Agric For, 2009, 33(6): 557-568.

[2] Bouten W, Swart PJF, De Water E. Microwave transmission, a new tool in forest hydrological research. J Hydrol, 1991, 124(1–2): 119-130.

[3] Bryant ML, Bhat S, Jacobs JM. Measurements and modeling of throughfall variability for five forest communities in the Southeastern US. J Hydrol, 2005, 312(1–4): 95-108.

[4] Calder IR. A stochastic model of rainfall interception. J Hydrol, 1986, 89(1–2): 65-71.

[5] Calder IR, Wright IR. Gamma ray attenuation studies of interception from Sitka spruce: some evidence for an additional transport mechanism. Water Resour Res, 1986, 22(3): 409-417.

[6] Carlyle-Moses DE. Throughfall, stemflow, and canopy interception loss fluxes in a semi-arid Sierra Madre Oriental matorral community. J Arid Environ, 2004, 58(2): 181-202.

[7] Chai RS, Cai TJ, Man XL, Wang H, Guan JQ. Simulation of rainfall interception process of primary korean pine forest in Xiaoxing’an Mountains by using the modified Gash model. Acta Ecol Sin, 2013, 33(4): 1276-1284. in Chinese with English abstract)

[8] Chang SC, Matzner E. The effect of beech stemflow on spatial patterns of soil solution chemistry and seepage fluxes in a mixed beech/oak stand. Hydrol Process, 2000, 14(1): 135-144.

[9] Chang ZY, Bao WK, He BH, Yang YC, He QH. Interception and distribution effects of mixed artificial. J Soil Water Conserv, 2006, 20(6): 37-40. (in Chinese with English abstract)

[10] Chen SJ, Chen CG, Zou CB, Stebler E, Zhang SX, Hou L, Wang DX. Application of Gash analytical model and parameterized Fan model to estimate canopy interception of a Chinese red pine forest. J For Res, 2013, 18(4): 335-344.

[11] Chuyong GB, Newbery DM, Songwe NC. Rainfall input, throughfall and stemflow of nutrients in a central African rain forest dominated by ectomycorrhizal trees. Biogeochemistry, 2004, 67(1): 73-91.

[12] Crockford RH, Richardson DP. Partitioning of rainfall into throughfall, stemflow and interception: effect of forest type, ground cover and climate. Hydrol Process, 2000, 14(16–17): 2903-2920.

[13] Deguchi A, Hattori S, Park HT. The influence of seasonal changes in canopy structure on interception loss: application of the revised Gash model. J Hydrol, 2006, 318(1–4): 80-102.

[14] Fang SM, Zhao CY, Jian SQ, Yu K. Canopy interception of Pinus tabulaeformis plantation on Longzhong Loess Plateau, Northwest China: characteristics and simulation. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2013, 24(6): 1509-1516. (in Chinese with English abstract)

[15] Fleischbein K, Wilcke W, Goller R, Boy J, Valarezo C, Zech W, Knoblich K. Rainfall interception in a lower montane forest in Ecuador: effects of canopy properties. Hydrol Process, 2005, 19(7): 1355-1371.

[16] Gao CC, Peng HH, Zhao CY, Liu XM. Simulation of rainfall interception of Qinghai spruce (Picea crassifolia) forest in the eastern part of Qilian Mountains by Gash model. Chin J Ecol, 2015, 34(1): 288-294. (in Chinese with English abstract)

[17] Gash JHC, Lloyd CR, Lachaud G. Estimating sparse forest rainfall interception with an analytical model. J Hydrol, 1995, 170(1–4): 78-86.

[18] Germer S, Werther L, Elsenbeer H. Have we underestimated stemflow? Lessons from an open tropical rainforest. J Hydrol, 2010, 395(3–4): 169-179.

[19] Germer S, Zimmermann A, Neill C, Krusche AV, Elsenbeer H. Disproportionate single-species contribution to canopy-soil nutrient flux in an Amazonian rainforest. For Ecol Manage, 2012, 267: 40-49.

[20] Gómez JA, Vanderlinden K, Giráldez JV, Fereres E. Rainfall concentration under olive trees. Agric Water Manag, 2002, 55(1): 53-70.

[21] He CQ, Xue JH, Wu YB, Zhang LY. Application of a revised Gash analytical model to simulate subalpine Quercus aquifolioides forest canopy interception in the upper reaches of Minjiang River. Acta Ecol Sin, 2010, 30(5): 1125-1132. (in Chinese with English abstract)

[22] Holwerda F, Scatena FN, Bruijnzeel LA. Throughfall in a Puerto Rican lower montane rain forest: a comparison of sampling strategies. J Hydrol, 2006, 327(3): 592-602.

[23] Hörmann G, Branding A, Clemen T, Herbst M, Hinrichs A, Thamm F. Calculation and simulation of wind controlled canopy interception of a beech forest in Northern Germany. Agric For Meteorol, 1996, 79(3): 131-148.

[24] Iida SI, Tanaka T, Sugita M. Change of interception process due to the succession from Japanese red pine to evergreen oak. J Hydrol, 2005, 315(1–4): 154-166.

[25] Levia DF, Frost EE. A review and evaluation of stemflow literature in the hydrologic and biogeochemical cycles of forested and agricultural ecosystems. J Hydrol, 2003, 274(1–4): 1-29.

[26] Levia DF, Herwitz SR. Interspecific variation of bark water storage capacity of three deciduous tree species in relation to stemflow yield and solute flux to forest soils. CATENA, 2005, 64(1): 117-137.

[27] Leyton L, Reynolds ERC, Thompson FB. Sopper WE, Lull HW. Rainfall interception in forest and moorland. Forest hydrology, 1967, Oxford: Pergamon 163 178

[28] Li XY, Yang ZP, Li YT, Lin H. Connecting ecohydrology and hydropedology in desert shrubs: stemflow as a source of preferential flow in soils. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci, 2009, 13(7): 1133-1144.

[29] Liang WJ, Ding GD. Simulation of rainfall interception in a Pinus tabulaeformis plantation in North China. J Food Agric Environ, 2013, 11(1): 976-981.

[30] Limousin JM, Rambal S, Ourcival JM, Joffre R. Modelling rainfall interception in a Mediterranean Quercus ilex ecosystem: lesson from a throughfall exclusion experiment. J Hydrol, 2008, 357(1–2): 57-66.

[31] Link TE, Unsworth M, Marks D. The dynamics of rainfall interception by a seasonal temperate rainforest. Agric For Meteorol, 2004, 124(3–4): 171-191.

[32] Liu JG. A theoretical model of the process of rainfall interception in forest canopy. Ecol Model, 1988, 42(2): 111-123.

[33] Liu SG. Estimation of rainfall storage capacity in the canopies of cypress wetlands and slash pine uplands in North-Central Florida. J Hydrol, 1998, 207(1–2): 32-41.

[34] Liu CY, Li L, Zhao XH, Zhuo HB, Huhe MR. Redistribution effects of tree canopy of Larix principis-rupprechtii plantation on precipitation in the upper stream of Saihanba area. J Northwest For Univ, 2011, 26(3): 1-5. (in Chinese with English abstract)

[35] Liu ST, Gao P, Li X, Niu X, Wang B. Canopy rainfall interception characteristics of Chinese Fir forest and its revised Gash model simulation in Dagangshan Mountain of Jiangxi Province. J Soil Water Conserv, 2015, 29(2): 172-176. (in Chinese with English abstract)

[36] Livesley SJ, Baudinette B, Glover D. Rainfall interception and stem flow by eucalypt street trees-The impacts of canopy density and bark type. Urban For Urban Green, 2014, 13(1): 192-197.

[37] Llorens P, Gallart F. A simplified method for forest water storage capacity measurement. J Hydrol, 2000, 240(1): 131-144.

[38] Lu XJ, He KN, Wang H, Chen C, Wang SL, Wang WY, Chang XP, Zhao LJ, Wang XD, An GC. Simulation of canopy rainfall interception of Larix principis-rupprechtii artificial forest with the Gash model in high-cold areas of Qinghai Province. J Soil Water Conserv, 2014, 28(4): 44-48. (in Chinese with English abstract)

[39] Marin CT, Bouten W, Sevink J. Gross rainfall and its partitioning into throughfall, stemflow and evaporation of intercepted water in four forest ecosystems in western Amazonia. J Hydrol, 2000, 237(1–2): 40-57.

[40] Monteith JL, Unsworth MH. Principles of environmental physics, 1990, London: Edward Arnold.

[41] Motahari M, Attarod P, Pypker TG, Etemad V, Shirvany A. Rainfall interception in a Pinus eldarica plantation in a semi-arid climate zone: an application of the Gash model. J Agric Sci Technol, 2013, 15(5): 981-994.

[42] Muzylo A, Llorens P, Valente F, Keizer JJ, Domingo F, Gash JHC. A review of rainfall interception modelling. J Hydrol, 2009, 370(1–4): 191-206.

[43] Mużyło A, Valente F, Domingo F, Llorens P. Modelling rainfall portioning with sparse Gash and Rutter models in a downy oak stand in leafed and leafless periods. Hydrol Process, 2012, 26(21): 3161-3173.

[44] Nassar NMA. Three Brazilian Manihot species with tolerance to stress conditions. Can J Plant Sci, 1979, 59(2): 553-555.

[45] Návar J. The performance of the reformulated Gash’s interception loss model in Mexico’s northeastern temperate forests. Hydrol Process, 2013, 27(11): 1626-1633.

[46] Návar J, Bryan R. Interception loss and rainfall redistribution by three semi-arid growing shrubs in northeastern Mexico. J Hydrol, 1990, 115(1–4): 51-63.

[47] Pereira FL, Gash JHC, David JS, Monteiro PR, Valente F. Modelling interception loss from evergreen oak Mediterranean savannas: application of a tree-based modelling approach. Agric For Meteorol, 2009, 149(3): 680-688.

[48] Rutter AJ, Kershaw KA, Robins PC, Morton AJ. A predictive model of rainfall interception in forests, 1. Derivation of the model from observations in a plantation of Corsican pine. Agric Meteorol, 1971, 9: 367-374.

[49] Shi ZJ, Wang YH, Xu LH, Xiong W, Yu PT, Gao JX, Zhang LB. Fraction of incident rainfall within the canopy of a pure stand of Pinus armandii with revised Gash model in the Liupan Mountains of China. J Hydrol, 2010, 385(1–4): 44-50.

[50] Su L, Zhao CM, Xu WT, Xie ZQ. Modelling interception loss using the revised Gash model: a case study in a mixed evergreen and deciduous broadleaved forest in China. Ecohydrology, 2016, 9(8): 1580-1589.

[51] Tian FX, Zhao CY, Feng ZD, Peng SZ, Peng HF. Eco-hydrological effects of Qinghai spruce (Picea crassifolia) canopy and its influence factors in the Qilian Mountains. Acta Ecol Sin, 2012, 32(4): 1066-1076. in Chinese with English abstract)

[52] Valente F, David JS, Gash JHC. Modeling interception loss for two sparse eucalypt and pine forests in central Portugal using reformulated Rutter and Gash analytical models. J Hydrol, 1997, 190(1–2): 141-162.

[53] Van Stan JT, Lewis ES, Hildebrandt A, Rebmann C, Friesen J. Impact of interacting bark structure and rainfall conditions on stemflow variability in a temperate beech-oak forest, central Germany. Hydrol Sci J, 2016, 61(11): 2071-2083.

[54] Vernimmen RRE, Bruijnzeel LA, Romdoni A, Proctor J. Rainfall interception in three contrasting lowland rain forest types in Central Kalimantan, Indonesia. J Hydrol, 2007, 340(3–4): 217-232.

[55] Wallace J, McJannet D. On interception modelling of a lowland coastal rainforest in northern Queensland, Australia. J Hydrol, 2006, 329(3–4): 477-488.

[56] Wallace J, McJannet D. Modelling interception in coastal and montane rainforests in northern Queensland, Australia. J Hydrol, 2008, 348(3–4): 480-495.

[57] Wang XP, Zhang YF, Hu R, Pan YX, Berndtsson R. Canopy storage capacity of xerophytic shrubs in Northwestern China. J Hydrol, 2012, 454–455: 152-159.

[58] Wei XH, Liu SR, Zhou GY, Wang C. Hydrological processes in major types of Chinese forest. Hydrol Process, 2005, 19(1): 63-75.

[59] Zhang G, Zeng GM, Jiang YM, Huang GH, Li JB, Yao JM, Tan W, Xiang R, Zhang XL. Modelling and measurement of two-layer-canopy interception losses in a subtropical evergreen forest of central-south China. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci Dis, 2006, 10(1): 65-77.

[60] Zhao YY, Wang YJ, Wang YQ, Liu N, Liu M, Wu Y, Chen L. Simulation of canopy rainfall interception of the Phyllostachys edulis forest with the revised Gash model in the Jinyun Mountains of Chongqing. Sci Silv Sin, 2011, 47(9): 15-20. (in Chinese with English abstract)