Effects of clump spacing on nutrient distribution and root activity of Dendrocalamus strictus in the humid region of Kerala, peninsular India

Abstract

The humid agroclimatic conditions of Kerala, India permit the cultivation of an array of bamboo species of which Dendrocalamus strictus Roxb. (Nees.) is an important one on account of its high growth rate and multiple uses. Stand density, a potential tool in controlling the productivity of woody ecosystems, its effect on growth and root distribution patterns may provide a better understanding of productivity optimization especially when bamboo-based intercropping options are considered. Growth attributes of 7-year-old bamboo (D. strictus) stands managed at variable spacing (4 × 4 m, 6 × 6 m, 8 × 8 m, 10 × 10 m, 12 × 12 m) were studied. Functional root activity among bamboo clumps were also studied using a radio tracer soil injection method in which the radio isotope ³²P was applied to soil at varying depths and lateral distances from the clump. Results indicate that spacing exerts a profound influence on growth of bamboo. Widely spaced bamboo exhibited higher clump diameters and crown widths while clump heights were better under closer spacing. Clump height was 30% lower and DBH 52% higher at the widest spacing (12 × 12 m) compared to the closest spacing (4 × 4 m). With increasing soil depth and lateral distance, root activity decreased significantly. Root activity near the clump base was highest (809 counts per minute, cpm; 50 cm depth and 50 cm lateral distance) at 4 × 4 m. Tracer study further showed wider distribution of root activity with increase in clump spacing. It may be concluded that the intensive foraging zone of bamboo is within a 50-cm radius around the clump irrespective of spacing. N, P and K content in the upper 20 cm was 2197, 21, and 203 kg/ha respectively for the closely spaced bamboo (4 × 4 m) which were significantly higher than corresponding nutrient content at wider spacings. About 50% of N, P and K were present within the 0–20 cm soil layer, which decreased drastically beyond the 20 cm depth. The results suggest that stand management practices through planting density regulation can modify the resource acquisition patterns of D. strictus which in turn can change growth and productivity considerably. Such information on root activities, spatial and temporal strategies of resource sharing will be helpful in deciding the effective nutrition zone for D. strictus. Further, the study throws light on the spatial distribution of non-competitive zones for productivity optimization yields, especially when intercropping practices are considered.

Keywords

Bamboo / Clump spacing / Functional root activity / Radio tracer / ³²P / Soil nutrients

References

[1] Atger C, Edelin C. Strategies of below ground occupation by the root systems of trees. Revolut Ecol, 1994, 49: 343-356.

[2] Binkley D. Bioassays of the influence of Eucalyptus saligna and Albizia falcataria on soil nutrient supply and limitation. For Ecol Manag, 1997, 91(2–3): 229-234.

[3] Bohm W. Methods of studying root systems. J Agric Syst, 1979, 6(3): 247-248.

[4] Caldwell MM, Richards JH. Givnish T. Competing root systems: morphology and models of absorption. On the economy of plant form and function, 1986, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 251 273

[5] Chander K, Goyal S, Nandal DP, Kapoor KK. Soil organic matter, microbial biomass and enzyme activities in a tropical agroforestry system. Biol Fertil Soils, 1998, 27: 168-172.

[6] Christanty L, Kimmins JP, Mailly D. ‘‘Without bamboo, the land dies’’: a conceptual model of the biogeochemical role of bamboo in an Indonesian agroforestry system. For Ecol Manag, 1997, 91: 83-91.

[7] Coker EG. Root development of apple trees in grass and clean cultivation. J Hortic Sci, 1959, 34: 111-121.

[8] Dhyani SK, Narain P, Singh KP. Studies on root distribution of five multipurpose tree species in Doon valley, India. Agrofor Syst, 1990, 12: 149-161.

[9] Dickens ED, Barnett JP, Hubbard WG, Jokela EJ (2004) Slash pine: still growing and growing!. In: Proceedings of the slash pine symposium. Gen. Tech. Rep. SRS-76. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest service, Southern Research Station, Asheville, p 148

[10] Divakara BN, Kumar BM, Balachandran PV, Kamalam NV. Bamboo hedgerow systems in Kerala, India: root distribution and competition with trees for phosphorus. Agrofor Syst, 2001, 51: 189-200.

[11] George SJ, Kumar BM, Wahid PA, Kamalam NV. Root competition for phosphorus between the tree and herbaceous components of silvopastoral systems in Kerala. Plant Soil, 1996, 179(2): 189-196.

[12] George S, Suresh PR, Wahid PA, Nair RB, Punnoose KI. Active root distribution pattern of Hevea brasiliensis determined by radioassay of latex serum. Agrofor Syst, 2009, 76(2): 275-281.

[13] Giardina CP, Ryan MG. Total belowground carbon allocation in a fast growing eucalyptus plantation estimated using a carbon balance approach. Ecosystem, 2002, 5: 487-499.

[14] Harris F (2007) The effect of competition on stand, tree, and wood growth and structure in subtropical Eucalyptus grandis plantations. Ph.D thesis submitted to Southern Cross University, pp 108–109

[15] IAEA (Indian Atomic Energy Agency) (1975) Rooting activity patterns of some tree crops. Technical Report Series No.170, Vienna, p 14

[16] Isaac ME, Anglaaere LC. An in situ approach to detect tree root ecology: linking ground-penetrating radar imaging to isotope-derived water acquisition zones. Ecol Evol, 2013, 3(5): 1330-1339.

[17] Jackson ML. Soil chemical analysis, 1958, New Delhi: Asia Publishing House 498

[18] Jamaludheen V, Kumar BM, Wahid PA, Kamalam NV. Root distribution pattern of the wild jack tree (Artocarpus hirsutus Lamk.) as studied by ³²P soil injection method. Agrofor Syst, 1997, 35: 329-336.

[19] Jonsson K, Fidjeland L, Maghembe A, Hogbert P. The vertical distribution of fine roots of five tree species and maize, Morogoro, Tanzania. Agrofor Syst, 1988, 6: 63-69.

[20] Kittur BH, Sudhakara K, Mohan Kumar B, Kunhamu TK, Sureshkumar P. Bamboo based agroforestry systems in Kerala, India: performance of turmeric (Curcuma longa L.) in the subcanopy of differentially spaced seven year-old bamboo stand. Agrofor Syst, 2015, 90(2): 237-250.

[21] Kolesnikov VA. The root system of fruit plants, 1971, Moscow: Mir Publishers 269

[22] Kumar BM. Batish DR, Kohli RK, Jose S, Singh HP. Litter dynamics in plantation and agroforestry systems of the tropics- a review of observations and methods. Ecological basis of agroforestry, 2008, Boca Raton: CRC Press 181 216

[23] Kunhamu TK, Kumar BM, Viswanath S, Sureshkumar P. Root activity of young Acacia mangium Willd trees: influence of stand density and pruning as studied by ³²P soil injection technique. Agrofor Syst, 2010, 78: 27-38.

[24] Lehmann J, Muraoka T, Zech W. Root activity patterns in an Amazonian agroforest with fruit trees determined by ³²P, ³³P and ¹⁵N applications. Agrofor Syst, 2001, 52: 185-197.

[25] Mao P, Han G, Wang G, Yu J, Shao H. Effects of age and stand density of mother trees on early Pinus thunbergii seedling establishment in the Coastal Zone, China. Sci World J, 2014, 2014: 9-13.

[26] Schenk H. Root competition: beyond resource depletion. J Ecol, 2006, 94: 725-739.

[27] Schroth G. A review of belowground interactions in agroforestry, focusing on mechanisms and management options. Agrofor Syst, 1999, 43: 5-34.

[28] Schroth G, Zech W. Root length dynamics in agroforestry with Gliricidia sepium as compared to sole cropping in the semi-deciduous rainforest zone of West Africa. Plant Soil, 1995, 170: 297-306.

[29] Smith J. Agroforestry: reconciling production with protection of the environment, 2010, Newbury: Organic Research Centre, Elm Farm 24

[30] Thakur S, Kumar BM, Kunhamu TK. Coarse root biomass, carbon, and nutrient stock dynamics of different stem and crown classes of silver oak (Grevillea robusta A. Cunn. ex. R. Br.) plantation in Central Kerala, India. Agrofor Syst, 2015, 89: 869-883.

[31] Thomas J, Kumar BM, Wahid PA, Kamalam NV, Fisher R. Root competition for phosphorus between ginger and Ailanthus triphysa in Kerala, India. Agrofor Syst, 1998, 41(3): 293-305.

[32] Tomlinson H, Traore A, Teklenaimanot Z. An investigation of the root distribution of Parkia biglobosa in Burkina Faso, West Africa, using a logarithmic spiral trench. For Ecol Manage, 1998, 107: 173-182.

[33] Tripathi SK, Singh KP (1996) Fine root dynamics in a dry tropical bamboo savanna in India. In: Rangelands in a sustainable biosphere. Proceedings of the fifth international rangeland congress, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA, July 23–28. Volume 1 Contributed presentations. Society for range management, Denver, Colorado. pp 572–573

[34] Vanclay JK, Lamb D, Erskine PD, Cameron DM. Spatially-explicit competition in a mixed planting of Araucaria cunninghamii and Flindersia brayleyana. Ann For Sci, 2013, 70: 611-619.

[35] Wahid PA. Radioisotope studies of root activity and root-level interactions in tree-based production systems: a review. Appl Radiat Isot, 2001, 54(5): 75-82.

[36] Wahid PA, Kamalam NV, Sankar SJ. A device for soil injection of ³²P solution in root activity studies of tree crops. J Plant Crops, 1988, 16: 62-64.

[37] Wahid PA, Kamalam NV, Ashokan PK, Vidyadharan KK. Root activity pattern of cashew (Anacardium occidentale) in laterite soil. J Plant Crops, 1989, 17(2): 85-89.

[38] Warren KL, Ashton MS. Change in soil and forest floor carbon after shelterwood harvests in a New England Oak-Hardwood Forest, USA. Int J Improv Res, 2014, 2014: 9-14.

[39] Watanabe FS, Olsen SR. Test of an ascorbic acid method for determining phosphorus in water and NaHCO₃ extracts from soil. Soil Sci Soc Am Proc, 1965, 29: 677-678.

[40] White DG, Childers NF. Bamboo for controlling soil erosion. J Am Soc Agron, 1945, 34(10): 839-847.