Exotic and invasive species compromise the seed bank and seed rain dynamics in forests undergoing restoration at urban regions

Abstract

The control of exotic and invasive species in areas undergoing recovery is a challenge for ecological restoration and this problem may be even greater in urbanized areas. This study evaluated the seed bank and seed rain of a 5-year-old riparian forest located at the metropolitan region of Belo Horizonte in southeast Brazil, and verified changes over time in the abundance and species richness and whether planted species already were providing propagules to the site. At the forest, fifteen parcels of 100 m² were distributed randomly and soil samples were collected thrice (October 2011, March 2012 and July 2012) to evaluate the seed bank. Seed traps were installed in nine parcels to collect propagules over 1 year. Propagules were segregated and germinate at greenhouse. Species richness and abundance were estimated, and variance and similarity were quantified. In total, 86 species were recorded in the seed banks, 41.9% natives and 33.7% exotics, with the predominance of herbs (87.2%) and only 7% of trees. Species classified as weeds amounted to 52.3%. In the seed rain 642 seedlings germinated but they belonged to only 10 species, half of them were exotics. Regarding life forms, half of the species were arboreal and dominated the samples, highlighting the exotic species Melia azedarach. The species richness of the seed bank did not differ by season, unlike the seed rain which varied significantly by month. Seed bank and seed rain species had a very low floristic similarity with the list of planted species, suggesting that few planted trees had dispersed or were stocking propagules. Many non-planted species were recorded, mostly exotics and/or invasive that were probably derived from the surrounding urban matrix. These might interrupt the successional dynamics of the restoration forest and compromise the restoration process in the medium and long-terms. Our results highlight: (1) the importance of monitoring areas undergoing restoration; (2) that restoration methods and management actions directed to control exotic and invasive species are particularly important for sites in urban regions; and (3) the relevance of conserving forest fragments as sources of propagules for nearby areas.

Keywords

Exotic plants / Monitoring indicators / Restoration ecology / Urban forests

References

[1] Antunes NB, Ribeiro JF. Aspectos fenológicos de seis espécies vegetais em matas de galeria do Distrito Federal. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, 1999, 34: 1517-1527.

[2] Apg III. An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG III. Bot J Linn Soc, 2009, 161: 105-121.

[3] Assembleia Legislativa de Minas Gerais (ALMG) (2013) Municípios mineiros: Sabará. http://www.almg.gov.br/consulte/info_sobre_minas/index.html?aba=js_tabMunicipios&sltMuni=567. Accessed 12 March 2013

[4] Bertoncini AP, Rodrigues RR. Forest restoration in an indigenous land considering a forest remnant influence (Avaí, São Paulo State, Brazil). For Ecol Manag, 2008, 255: 513-521.

[5] Blackham GV, Thomas A, Webb EL, Corlett RT. Seed rain into a degraded tropical peatland in Central Kalimantan, Indonesia. Biol Conserv, 2013, 167: 215-223.

[6] Borgmann KL, Rodewald AD. Forest restoration in urbanizing landscapes: interactions between land uses and exotic shrubs. Restor Ecol, 2005, 13: 334-340.

[7] Bowers K, Boutin C. Evaluating the relationship between floristic quality and measures of plant biodiversity along stream bank habitats. Ecol Ind, 2008, 8: 466-475.

[8] D’Antonio C, Meyerson LA. Exotic plant species as problems and solutions in ecological restoration: a synthesis. Restor Ecol, 2002, 10: 703-713.

[9] Funk JL, Cleland EE, Suding KN, Zavaleta ES. Restoration through reassembly: plant traits and invasion resistance. Trends Ecol Evol, 2008, 23: 695-703.

[10] Ho M, Richardson CJ. A five-year study of floristic succession in a restored urban wetland. Ecol Eng, 2013, 61: 511-518.

[11] Holl KD, Aide TM. When and where to actively restore ecosystems?. For Ecol Manag, 2011, 261: 1558-1563.

[12] Instituto Hórus de desenvolvimento e conservação ambiental (2013) Base de dados nacional de espécies exóticas invasoras, I3 N Brasil. http://i3n.institutohorus.org.br/www/accessed. 15 March 2013

[13] Jesus FM, Pivello VR, Meirelles ST, Franco GADC, Metzger JP. The importance of landscape structure for seed dispersal in rain forest fragments. J Veg Sci, 2012, 23: 1126-1136.

[14] Lamb D, Gilmour D. Rehabilitation and restoration of degraded forests, 2003, Switzerland: IUCN and WWF Publication 31 68

[15] List of Species of the Brazilian Flora (2016) Rio de Janeiro Botanical Garden. http://floradobrasil.jbrj.gov.br. Accessed 28 January 2016

[16] Lorenzi H. Plantas daninhas do Brasil: terrestres, aquáticas, parasitas e tóxicas (4rd edition), 2008, Nova Odessa: Instituto Plantarum 10 670

[17] Lorenzi H, Souza HM, Torres MAV, Bacher LB. Árvores exóticas no Brasil: madeireiras, ornamentais e aromáticas, 2003, Instituto Plantarum: Nova Odessa 8 380

[18] Mack MC, D’Antonio CM. Impacts of biological invasions on disturbance regimes. Trends Ecol Evol, 1998, 13: 195-198.

[19] Martínez-Ramos M, Soto-Castro A. Seed rain and advanced regeneration in a tropical forest. Vegetatio, 1993, 107(108): 299-318.

[20] Martins SV. Recuperação de matas ciliares, 2011, Aprenda Fácil: Viçosa 100 240

[21] Martins CC, Silva WR. Estudos de bancos de sementes do solo. Inf Abrates, 1994, 4: 49-56.

[22] Martins SV, Almeida DP, Fernandes LV, Ribeiro TM. Seed bank as indicator of restoration of a kaolin mining-degraded area in Brás Pires. Minas Gerais Rev Árvore, 2008, 32: 1081-1088.

[23] McEuen AB, Curran LM. Seed dispersal and recruitment limitation across spatial scales in Temperate forest fragments. Ecology, 2004, 85: 507-518.

[24] McKinney ML. Urbanization, biodiversity, and conservation. Bioscience, 2002, 52: 883-890.

[25] Metzger JP. Tree functional group richness and landscape structure in a Brazilian Tropical fragment landscape. Ecol Appl, 2000, 10: 1147-1161.

[26] Müller F, Lenz R. Ecological indicators: theoretical fundamentals of consistent applications in environmental management. Ecol Indic, 2006, 6: 1-5.

[27] Pakeman RJ, Small JL. The role of the seed bank, seed rain and the timing of disturbance in gap regeneration. J Veg Sci, 2005, 16: 121-130.

[28] Pivello VR, Petenon D, Jesus FM. Seed rain in Atlantic forest fragments (São Paulo State, SP, Brazil) with different connectivity, forest structure and distance to edge. Acta Bot Brasilica, 2006, 20: 845-859.

[29] Podadera DS, Engel VL, Parrota JA, Machado DL, Sato LM, Durigan G. Influence of removal of a non-native tree species Mimosa caesalpiniifolia Benth. On the regenerating plant communities in a tropical semideciduos forest under restoration in Brazil. Environ Manag, 2015, 55: 1148-1158.

[30] R Core Team (2015) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.r-project.org/

[31] Reis A, Bechara FC, Tres DR. Nucleation in tropical ecological restoration. Scientia Agricola, 2010, 67: 244-250.

[32] Ribbens E, Silander JA Jr, Pacala SW. Seedling recruitment in forests: calibrating models to predict patterns of tree seedling dispersion. Ecology, 1994, 75: 1794-1806.

[33] Rodrigues RR, Lima RAF, Gandolfi S, Nave AG. On the restoration of high diversity forests: 30 years of experience in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Biol Conserv, 2009, 142: 1242-1251.

[34] Schultz RC, Isenhart TM, Simpkins WW, Colleti JP. Riparian forest buffers in agroecoystems—lessons learned from the Bear Creek Watershed, central Iowa, USA. Agrofor Syst, 2004, 61: 35-50.

[35] Society for Ecological Restoration (SER) (2004) The SER primer on ecological restoration, Version 2. Society for Ecological Restoration Science and Policy Working Group. http://www.ser.org/resources. Accessed 12 March 2013

[36] Tererai F, Gaertner M, Jacobs SM, Richardson DM. Resilience of invaded riparian landscapes: the potential role of soil-stored seed banks. Environ Manag, 2015, 55: 86-99.

[37] Tres DR, Sant’anna CS, Basso S, Langa R, Júnior UR, Reis A. Banco e chuva de sementes como indicadores para a restauração ecológica de matas ciliares. Revista Brasileira de Biociências, 2007, 5: 309-311.

[38] Wang J, Ren H, Yang L, Li D, Guo Q. Soil seed banks in four 22-year-old plantations in South China: implications for restoration. For Ecol Manag, 2009, 258: 2000-2006.