Photosynthetic response of poplar leaves at different developmental phases to environmental factors

Abstract

With economic incentives and interests in fast-growing poplar trees for short-rotation production of fiber and veneer, many new poplar hybrids have been bred and planted in China, but how to match the new poplar clones to suitable sites and maintain their higher growth rates is still not very clear. In this study, the photosynthetic response of poplar leaves at various developmental stages during two seasons (summer and autumn) was explored and mechanistic models for the photosynthesis of poplar leaves at different developmental phases in response photosynthetic active radiation (PAR), temperature, and relatively humidity were established using the optimization software package 1st Opt. Mature poplar leaves in autumn had significantly higher photosynthetic capacity than leaves at other stages and seasons. Based on the models established for poplar leaves at different phases, the main limiting factors for photosynthesis at the research site were high PAR and temperature in the summer and low PAR in the autumn. Our results highlight the importance of selecting suitable sites, pruning and stand density control during the plantation development to maintain higher photosynthetic rates of poplar trees and to establish optimum cultivation patterns for various utilization of poplar plantations.

Keywords

Leaf development / Model / Photosynthesis / Poplar plantation

References

[1] Baldocchi DD, Harley PC. Scaling carbon dioxide and water vapour exchange from leaf to canopy in a deciduous forest. II. Model testing and application. Plant Cell Environ, 1995, 18(10): 1157-1173.

[2] Catský J, Šesták Z. Photosynthesis during leaf development. Handbook of photosynthesis, 1997, New York: Marcel Dekker 633 660

[3] Constable GA, Rawson HM. Effect of leaf position, expansion and age on photosynthesis, transpiration and water use efficiency of cotton. Funct Plant Biol, 1980, 7(1): 89-100.

[4] Dale JE. How do leaves grow?. Bioscience, 1992, 42(6): 423-432.

[5] Deckmyn G, Laureysens I, Garcia J, Muys B, Ceulemans R. Poplar growth and yield in short rotation coppice: model simulations using the process model SECRETS. Biomass Bioenerg, 2004, 26(3): 221-227.

[6] Dillenburg LR, Sullivan JH, Teramura AH. Leaf expansion and development of photosynthetic capacity and pigments in Liquidambar styraciflua (Hamamelidaceae) -effects of UV-B radiation. Am J Bot, 1995, 82: 878-885.

[7] Dreyer E, Le Roux X, Montpied P, Daudet FA, Masson F. Temperature response of leaf photosynthetic capacity in seedlings from seven temperate tree species. Tree Physiol, 2001, 21(4): 223-232.

[8] Fang S, Xu X, Lu S, Tang L. Growth dynamics and biomass production in short-rotation poplar plantations: 6-year results for three clones at four spacings. Biomass Bioenerg, 1999, 17(5): 415-425.

[9] Fang S, Xie B, Liu D, Liu J. Effects of mulching materials on nitrogen mineralization, nitrogen availability and poplar growth on degraded agricultural soil. New For, 2011, 41(2): 147-162.

[10] Fang S, Zhai X, Wan J, Tang L. Clonal variation in growth, chemistry and calorific value of new poplar hybrids at nursery stage. Biomass Bioenerg, 2013, 54: 303-311.

[11] Flexas J, Gulías J, Jonasson S, Medrano H, Mus M. Seasonal patterns and control of gas exchange in local populations of the Mediterranean evergreen shrub Pistacia lentiscus L. Acta Oecol, 2001, 22(1): 33-43.

[12] Fung LE, Wang SS, Altman A, Hütterman A. Effect of NaCl on growth, photosynthesis, ion and water relations of four poplar genotypes. For Ecol Manag, 1998, 107(1): 135-146.

[13] Greer DH, Halligan EA. Photosynthetic and fluorescence light responses for kiwifruit (Actinidia deliciosa) leaves at different stages of development on vines grown at two different photon flux densities. Funct Plant Biol, 2001, 28(5): 373-382.

[14] Guo XY, Zhang XS. Performance of 14 hybrid poplar clones grown in Beijing, China. Biomass Bioenerg, 2010, 34(6): 906-911.

[15] Hansen EA. Poplar woody biomass yields: a look to the future. Biomass Bioenerg, 1991, 1(1): 1-7.

[16] Harley PC, Tenhunen JD. Boote KJ, Loomis RS. Modeling the photosynthetic response of C3 leaves to environmental factors. Modeling crop photosynthesis—from biochemistry to canopy, 1991, Madison: CSSA 17 39

[17] Jiang CD, Li PM, Gao HY, Zou Q, Jiang GM, Li LH. Enhanced photoprotection at the early stages of leaf expansion in field-grown soybean plants. Plant Sci, 2005, 168(4): 911-919.

[18] Lauenroth WK, Dodd JL, Sims PL. The effects of water-and nitrogen-induced stresses on plant community structure in a semiarid grassland. Oecologia, 1978, 36(2): 211-222.

[19] Lautner S, Grams T, Matyssek R, Fromm J. Characteristics of electrical signals in poplar and responses in photosynthesis. Plant Physiol, 2005, 138(4): 2200-2209.

[20] Le Roux X, Gran S, Dreyer E, Daudet FA (1999) Parameterization and testing of a biochemically based photosynthesis model for walnut (Juglans regia) trees and seedlings. Tree Physiol 19:481–492

[21] Medlyn BE, Loustau D, Delzon S. Temperature response of parameters of a biochemically based model of photosynthesis. I. Seasonal changes in mature maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Ait.). Plant Cell Environ, 2002, 25(9): 1155-1165.

[22] Meir P, Kruijt B, Broadmeadow M, Barbosa E, Kull O, Carswell F, Nobre A, Jarvis PG (2002) Acclimation of photosynthetic capacity to irradiance in tree canopies in relation to leaf nitrogen concentration and leaf mass per unit area. Plant Cell Environ 25:343–357

[23] Niinemets Ü, Tenhunen JD. A model separating leaf structural and physiological effects on carbon gain along light gradients for the shade-tolerant species Acer saccharum. Plant, Cell Environ, 1997, 20(7): 845-866.

[24] Ogaya R, Peñuel ASJ. Comparative seasonal gas exchange and chlorophyll fluorescence of two dominant woody species in a Holm Oak Forest. Flora, 2003, 198(2): 132-141.

[25] Pokovai K, Kovacs GJ. Development of crop models: a critical review. Novenytermeles, 2003, 52: 573-582.

[26] Powles SB. Photoinhibition of photosynthesis induced by visible light. Annu Rev Plant Physiol, 1984, 35(1): 15-44.

[27] Pury DD, Farquhar GD. Simple scaling of photosynthesis from leaves to canopies without the errors of big-leaf models. Plant Cell Environ, 1997, 20(5): 537-557.

[28] Reddy AR, Chaitanya KV, Vivekanandan M. Drought-induced responses of photosynthesis and antioxidant metabolism in higher plants. J Plant Physiol, 2004, 161(11): 1189-1202.

[29] Roden J, Van Volkenburgh E, Hinckley TM. Cellular basis for limitation of poplar leaf growth by water deficit. Tree Physiol, 1990, 6(2): 211-219.

[30] Roper TR, Kennedy RA. Photosynthetic characteristics during leaf development in bing sweet cherry. J Am Soc Hortic Sci, 1986, 111(6): 938-941.

[31] Wang X, He W, Qu F, Feng X, Li C. Effect of different cultivation patterns of blueberry on soil quality. Acta Agri Jiangxi, 2013, 25(8): 17-21. (in chinese)

[32] Yan Y, Fang S, Tian Y, Deng S, Tang L, Chuong DN. Influence of tree spacing on soil nitrogen mineralization and availability in hybrid poplar plantations. Forests, 2015, 6(3): 636-649.