Genetic diversity in two threatened species in Vietnam: Taxus chinensis and Taxus wallichiana

Abstract

Taxus chinensis and T. wallichiana in have been threatened in their distribution areas in recent decades because of their over-exploitation and reduction and destruction of native habitats. Determining the genetic diversity in populations of the two species will provide guidelines for their protection and preservation. Two hundred and fifteen trees from six populations of T. chinensis and 150 sampled trees of T. wallichiana were sampled. Six microsatellite primer pairs selected from 16 primer pairs were used to investigate genetic variation at the population and species levels. Five yielded polymorphic alleles, and among the 13 putative alleles amplified, 11 were polymorphic (accounting for 76.33 %).Shannon’s information index (I) and percentage of polymorphic bands (PPB) (I = 0.202 and PPB = 67.22 % for T. chinensis; I = 0.217 and PPB = 65.03 % for T. wallichiana). Both species had low levels of genetic diversity (mean H _o = 0.107, H _e = 0.121 for T. chinensis; H _o = 0.095, H _e = 0.109 for T. wallichiana). Genetic differentiation among populations was higher (F _ST = 0.189) for T. chinensis and lower (0.156) for T. wallichiana, indicating limited gene flow (Nm) among populations for T. chinensis (0.68) and T. wallichiana (0.65). Variation among individuals of T. chinensis was 63.59 and 73.12 % for T. wallichiana. Thus, the threatened status of the two conifers is related to a lack of genetic diversity. All populations are isolated in small forest remnants. An ex situ conservation site should be established with a new population for these species that comprises all the genetic groups for the best chance to improve their fitness under environmental stresses.

Keywords

Genetic diversity / Species conservation / SSR markers / Taxus wallichiana / Taxus chinensis

References

[1] Aquirre Planter E, Furnier GR, Eguiarte LE. Low levels genetic variation within and high levels of genetic differentiation among populations of species of Abies from southern Mexico and Guatemala. Am J Bot, 2000, 87: 362-371.

[2] Barrett SCH, Kohn JR. Falk DA, Holsinger KE. Genetic and evolutionary consequences of small population size in plants: implications for conservation. Genetics and conservation of rare plants, 1991, Oxford: Oxford University Press 3 30

[3] Boy J, Cherry M, Dayanandan S. Microsatellite analysis reveals genetically distinct populations of red pine (Pinus resinosa, Pinaceae). Am J Bot, 2005, 92: 833-841.

[4] Cipriano J, Carvalho A, Fernandes C, Gaspar MJ. Evaluation of genetic diversity of Portuguese Pinus sylvestris L. populations based on molecular data and inferences about the future use of this germplasm. J Genet, 2013, 92: e41-e48.

[5] Doyle JJ, Doyle JJ. Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tissue. Pocus, 1990, 12: 13-15.

[6] Dubreuil M, Sebastiani F, Mayol M, Gonza´lez-Martı´nez SC, Riba M, Vendramin GG. Isolation and characterization of polymorphic nuclear microsatellite loci in Taxus baccata L. Conserv Genet, 2008, 9: 1665-1668.

[7] Earl DA, von-Holdt BM. Structure Harvester: a website and program for visualizing structure output and implementing the Evanno method. Conserv Genet Resour, 2012, 4: 359-361.

[8] Echt CS, May Marquardt P, Hseih M, Zahorchak R. Characterization of microsatellite markers in eastern white pine. Genome, 1996, 39: 1102-1108.

[9] Ellstrand NC, Elam RD. Population genetic consequences of small population size: implication for plant conservation. Ann Rev Ecol Syst, 1993, 24: 217-242.

[10] Evanno G, Regnaut S, Goudet J. Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software structure: a simulaton study. Mol Ecol, 2005, 14: 2611-2620.

[11] Excoffier L, Laval G, Schneider S. Arlequin v. 3.1. an integrated software package for population genetics data analysis. Evol Bioinform, 2005, 1: 47-50.

[12] Farjon A, Page CN. Conifers status survey and conservation action plans, 1999, Cambridge: IUCNISSC. Conifer Specialist Group IUCN.

[13] Hiep NT, Loc PK, Luu NDT, Thomas T, Farjon A, Averyanov I, Regalado J. Vietnam conifers. Conservation status review 2004, 2004, Hanoi: Fauna and Flora international, Vietnam Program 128

[14] Ho¨hn M, A´bra´n P, Vendramin. Genetic analysis of Swiss stone pine populations (Pinus cembra L. subsp. cembra) from the Carpathians using chloroplast microsatellites. Acta Silvatica et Ligniensia Hungarica, 2005, 1: 39-47.

[15] Huang CC, Chiang TY, Hsu TW. Isolation and characterization of microsatellite loci in Taxus sumatrana (Taxaceae) using PCR-based isolation of microsatellite arrays (PIMA). Conserv Genet, 2008, 9: 471-473.

[16] Karp A. Molecular tools in plant genetic resources conservation: a guide to the technologies, 1997, Rome: Bioversity International.

[17] Larionova AY, Ekart AK, Kravchenko AN. Genetic diversity and population structure of Siberian fir (Abies sibirica LEDER.) in Middle Siberia, Russia. Eurasian J For Res, 2007, 10: 185-192.

[18] Luu NDT, Thomas P. Conifers of Vietnam, 2004, Hanoi: Agricultural Publishing.

[19] Miao YC, Su JR, Zhang ZJ, Li H, Luo J, Zhang YP. Isolation and characterization of microsatellite markers for the endangered Taxus yunnanensis. Conserv Genet, 2008, 9: 1683-1685.

[20] Miller MP (1997) Tools for population genetic analysis (TFPGA) 1.3: a windows program for the analysis of allozyme and molecular population genetic data

[21] MOST VAST. Vietnam red data book, part II. plants, 2007, Hanoi: Natural Sciences and Technology.

[22] Nei M. Genetic distance between populations. Am J Bot, 1972, 72: 1590-1597.

[23] Peakall R, Smouse PE. GENALEX 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Mol Ecol Notes, 2006, 6: 288-295.

[24] Phong DT, Lieu TT, Hien VTT, Hiep NT. Genetic diversity of the endemic flat needle pine Pinus krempfii (Pinaceae) from Vietnam revealed by SSR markers. Genet Mol Res, 2015, 14(3): 7727-7739.

[25] Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics, 2000, 155: 945-959.

[26] Rubio Moraga A, CandelPerez D, LucasBorja ME, Tiscar PA. Genetic diversity of Pinus nigra Arn. populations in southern Spain and northern Morocco revealed by inter-simple sequence repeat profiles. Int J Mol Sci, 2012, 13: 5645-5658.

[27] Slatkin M. Gene flow in natural populations. Ann Rev Ecol Syst, 1985, 16: 393-430.

[28] Smith DN, Devey ME. Occurrence and inheritance of microsatellites in Pinus radiata. Genome, 1994, 37: 977-983.

[29] Nguyen MT, Vu DD, Bui TTX, Nguyen MD. Genetic variation and population structure in Chinese water pine (Glyptostrobus pensilis): a threatened species. Indian J Biotechnol, 2013, 12(4): 499-503.

[30] Terrab A, Paun O, Talavera S, Tremetsberger K, Arista M, Stuessy TF. Genetic diversity and population structure in natural populations of Moroccan Atlas cedar (Cedrus atlantica, Pinaceae) determined with cpSSR markers. Am J Bot, 2006, 93: 1274-1280.

[31] Thomas P, Nguyen TH, Phan KL, Nguyen QH (2013) The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2015.2. www.iucnredlist.org. Accessed 6 July 2015

[32] Turner IM. The ecology of trees in the tropical rain forest, 2001, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

[33] Van NK, Hien NT, Loc PK, Hiep NT. Bioclimatic diagrams of Vietnam, 2000, Hanoi: National University Publishing House 124

[34] Vendramin GG, Lelli L, Rossi P, Morgante M. A set of primers for the amplification of 20 chloplast microsatellites in Pinaceae. Mol Ecol, 1996, 5: 595-598.

[35] Vendramin GG, Anzidei M, Madaghiele A, Bucci C. Distribution of genetic diversity in Pinus pinaster Ait. as revealed by chloroplast microsatellites. Theor Appl Genet, 1998, 97: 456-463.

[36] Xue H, Lu CH, Wu XB. Development and characterization of microsatellite markers for the endangered Chinese yew Taxus chinensis var. mairei (Taxaceae). Genet Mol Res, 2012, 11(2): 1296-1299.

[37] Yang JB, Li HT, Li DZ, Liu J, Gao L-M. Isolation and characterization of microsatellite markers in the endangered species Taxus wallichiana using the FIASCO method. HortScience, 2009, 44(7): 2043-2045.