A comparison of decomposition dynamics among green tree leaves, partially decomposed tree leaf litter and their mixture in a warm temperate forest ecosystem

Abstract

Decomposition dynamics were compared among green tree leaves, partially decomposed tree leaf litter (i.e., decayed tree leaf litter on forest floor) and a mixture of the two in a warm temperate forest ecosystem in central China to test the influence of litter chemical quality on the degree of decomposition. The study was conducted in situ at two contrasting forest sites, an oak forest dominated by Quercus aliena var. acuteserrata Maxim., and a mixed pine and oak forest dominated by Pinus armandii Franch. and Q. aliena var. acuteserrata. We found marked differences in the rate of decomposition among litter types at both forest sites; the litter decomposition constant, k, was about 39 % greater at the oak forest site and more than 70 % greater at the pine-oak forest site, for green leaves than for partially decomposed leaf litter. The decomposition dynamics and temporal changes in litter chemistry of the three litter types also greatly differed between the two forest sites. At both forest sites, the higher rate of decomposition for the green leaves was associated with a higher nitrogen (N) content and lower carbon to N ratio (C/N) and acid-unhydrolyzable residue to N ratio (AUR/N). We did not find any non-additive effects when mixing green leaves and partially decomposed leaf litter. Our findings support the contention that litter chemical quality is one of the most important determinants of litter decomposition in forest ecosystems at the local or regional scale, but the effect of litter chemical quality on decomposition differs between the contrasting forest types and may vary with the stage of decomposition.

Keywords

Carbon cycling / Litter chemistry / Litter decay / Litter quality / Recalcitrance

References

[1] Aerts R. Climate, leaf litter chemistry and leaf litter decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems: a triangular relationship. Oikos, 1997, 79: 439-449.

[2] Berg B. Litter decomposition and organic matter turnover in northern forest soils. For Ecol Manag, 2000, 133: 13-22.

[3] Chapman SK, Koch GW. What type of diversity yields synergy during mixed litter decomposition in a natural forest ecosystem?. Plant Soil, 2007, 299: 153-162.

[4] Fonte SJ, Schowalter TD. Decomposition of greenfall vs. senescent foliage in a tropical forest ecosystem in Puerto Rico. Biotropica, 2004, 36: 474-482.

[5] Freschet GT, Aerts R, Cornelissen JHC. Multiple mechanisms for trait effects on litter decomposition: moving beyond home-field advantage with a new hypothesis. J Ecol, 2012, 100: 619-630.

[6] Gallaher RN, Weldon CO, Boswell FC. A semiautomated procedure for total nitrogen in plant and soil samples. Soil Sci Soc Am J, 1976, 40: 887-889.

[7] Giese M, Gao Y, Zhao Y, Pan Q, Lin S, Peth S, Brueck H. Effects of grazing and rainfall variability on root and shoot decomposition in a semi-arid grassland. Appl Soil Ecol, 2009, 41: 8-18.

[8] Hector A, Beale AJ, Minns A, Otway SJ, Lawton JH. Consequences of the reduction of plant diversity for litter decomposition effects through litter quality and microenvironment. Oikos, 2000, 90: 357-371.

[9] Herbert DA, Fownes JH, Vitousek PM. Hurricane damage to a Hawaiian forest: nutrient supply rate affects resistance and resilience. Ecology, 1999, 80: 908-920.

[10] Hoorens B, Aerts R, Stroetenga M. Does initial litter chemistry explain litter mixture effects on decomposition?. Oecologia, 2003, 137: 578-586.

[11] IUSS Working Group WRB (2014) World Reference Base for Soil Resources 2014. International soil classification system for naming soils and creating legends for soil maps. World Soil Resources Reports No. 106. FAO, Rome

[12] Loranger G, Ponge JF, Imbert D, Lavelle P. Leaf decomposition in two semi-evergreen tropical forest: influence of litter quality. Biol Fertil Soils, 2002, 35: 247-252.

[13] Meentemeyer V. Macroclimate and lignin control of litter decomposition rates. Ecology, 1978, 59: 465-472.

[14] Melillo JM, Aber JD, Muratore JF. Nitrogen and lignin control of hardwood leaf litter decomposition dynamics. Ecology, 1982, 63: 621-626.

[15] Moore JC, Berlow EL, Coleman DC, de Ruiter PC, Dong Q, Hastings A, Johnson NC, McCann KS, Melville K, Morin PJ, Nadelhoffer K, Rosemond AD, Post DM, Sabo JL, Scow KM, Vanni MJ, Wall DH. Detritus, trophic dynamics and biodiversity. Ecol Lett, 2004, 7: 584-600.

[16] Nelson DW, Sommers LE. Page AL, Miller RH, Keeney DR. Total carbon, organic carbon, and organic matter. Methods of soil analysis. 1982, Madison: American Society of Agronomy and Soil Science Society of American, 101 129

[17] Olson JS. Energy storage and the balance of producers and decomposers in ecological systems. Ecology, 1963, 44: 322-331.

[18] Ostrofsky ML. A comment on the use of exponential decay models to test nonadditive processing hypotheses in multispecies mixtures of litter. J North Am Benthol Soc, 2007, 26: 23-27.

[19] Pandey RR, Sharma G, Tripathi SK, Singh AK. Litterfall, litter decomposition and nutrient dynamics in a subtropical natural oak forest and managed plantation in northeastern India. For Ecol Manag, 2007, 240: 96-104.

[20] Parton W, Silver WL, Burke IC, Grassens L, Harmon ME, Currie WS, King JY, Adair EC, Brandt LA, Fasth B. Global-scale similarities in nitrogen release patterns during long-term decomposition. Science, 2007, 315: 361-364.

[21] Pérez-Suárez M, Arredondo-Moreno JT, Huber-Sannwald E. Early stage of single and mixed leaf-litter decomposition in semiarid forest pine-oak: the role of rainfall and microsite. Biogeochemistry, 2012, 108: 245-258.

[22] Polyakova O, Billor N. Impact of deciduous tree species on litterfall quality, decomposition rates and nutrient circulation in pine stands. For Ecol Manag, 2007, 253: 11-18.

[23] Prescott CE. Litter decomposition: what controls it and how can we alter it to sequester more carbon in forest soils?. Biogeochemistry, 2010, 101: 133-149.

[24] Prescott CE, Zabek LM, Staley CL, Kabzems R. Decomposition of broadleaf and needle litter in forests of British Columbia: influences of litter type, and litter mixtures. Can J For Res, 2000, 30: 1742-1750.

[25] Purahong W, Schloter M, Pecyna MJ, Kapturska D, Däumlich V, Mital S, Buscot F, Hofrichter M, Gutknecht JLM, Krüger D. Uncoupling of microbial community structure and function in decomposing litter across beech forest ecosystems in Central Europe. Sci Rep, 2014, 4 7014

[26] Smith VC, Bradford MA. Do non-additive effects on decomposition in litter-mix experiments result from differences in resource quality between litters?. Oikos, 2003, 102: 235-243.

[27] Sun OJ, Campbell J, Law BE, Wolf V. Dynamics of carbon stocks in soils and detritus across chronosequences of different forest types in the Pacific Northwest, USA. Glob Change Biol, 2004, 10: 1470-1481.

[28] Swift MJ, Heal OW, Anderson JM. Decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems. 1979, Oxford: Blackwell

[29] Talbot JM, Yelle DJ, Nowick J, Treseder KK. Litter decay rates are determined by lignin chemistry. Biogeochemistry, 2012, 108: 279-295.

[30] Tripathi SK, Sumida A, Shibata H, Ono K, Uemura S, Kodama Y, Hara T. Leaf litterfall and decomposition of different above- and belowground parts of birch (Betula ermanii) trees and dwarf bamboo (Sasa kurilensis) shrubs in a young secondary forest in Northern Japan. Biol Fertil Soils, 2006, 43: 237-246.

[31] Vivanco L, Austin AT. Nitrogen addition stimulates forest litter decomposition and disrupts species interactions in Patagonia, Argentina. Glob Change Biol, 2011, 17: 1963-1974.

[32] Wang Q, Wang S, Huang Y. Leaf litter decomposition in the pure and mixed plantations of Cunninghamia lanceolata and Michelia macclurei in subtropical China. Biol Fertil Soils, 2009, 45: 371-377.

[33] Wang J, You Y, Tang Z, Liu S, Sun OJ. Variations in leaf litter decomposition across contrasting forest stands and controlling factors at local scale. J Plant Ecol, 2015, 8: 261-272.

[34] You Y, Wang J, Huang X, Tang Z, Liu S, Sun OJ. Relating microbial community structure to functioning in forest soil organic carbon transformation and turnover. Ecol Evol, 2014, 4: 633-647.

[35] Zhang D, Hui D, Luo Y, Zhou G. Rates of litter decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems: global patterns and controlling factors. J Plant Ecol, 2008, 1: 1-9.