Assessing current stocks and future sequestration potential of forest biomass carbon in Daqing Mountain Nature Reserve of Inner Mongolia, China

Abstract

Assessment of regional forest carbon stocks and underlying controls is critical for guiding forest management in the context of carbon sequestration. We investigated the variations in tree biomass carbon stocks relating to forest types, and estimated the total tree biomass carbon stocks and projected gains through natural stand development by 2020 and 2050 in the Daqing Mountain Nature Reserve based on Category II data of the Forest Inventory of Inner Mongolia for the period ending 2008. Over a total area of 388,577 ha, this nature reserve currently stores an estimated 2221 GgC in tree aboveground biomass alone, with potential to grow by more than 30 % to reach 2938 GgC by 2020 and nearly double to 4092 GgC by 2050 through natural development of the existing forest stands. The tree biomass carbon density and potential gain in tree biomass carbon stocks vary markedly among forest types and with stand development. The variations in the potential change of tree biomass carbon density for the periods 2008–2020 and 2008–2050 among forest types partly reflect the varying relationships of tree biomass carbon density with stand age for different tree species, and partly are attributable to variations in the stand age structure among different forest types. Of the major forest types, the ranking of projected changes in tree biomass carbon density are not consistent with variations in the relationship between tree biomass carbon density and stand age, neither are they explainable by variations in stand age structures, implying the interactive effect between forest type and stand dynamics on temporal changes in tree biomass carbon density. Birch rank highest for future biomass carbon sequestration because of its dominance in cover area and better age structure for potential gain in tree biomass carbon stocks. Poplar and larch were out-performers compared to other forest types given their greater contribution to total tree biomass carbon stocks relative to their distributional areas. Findings in this study illustrate that protection and proper management of under-aged forests can deliver marked gains in biomass carbon sequestration. This is of great importance to policy-makers as well as to scientific communities in seeking effective solutions for adaptive forest management and mitigation of anthropogenic greenhouse gases emissions using forest ecosystems.

Keywords

Carbon sequestration / Climate adaptation / Forest ecosystem / Global change / Nature reserve

References

[1] Buongiorno J, Zhou M. Adaptive economic and ecological forest management under risk. For Ecosyst, 2015, 2 4

[2] Chen G, Yang Z, Gao R, Xie J, Guo J, Huang Z, Yang Y. Carbon storage in a chronosequence of Chinese fir plantations in southern China. For Ecol Manag, 2013, 300: 68-76.

[3] Chen QQ, Xu WQ, Li SG, Fu SL, Yan JH. Aboveground biomass and corresponding carbon sequestration ability of four major forest types in south China. Chin Sci Bull, 2013, 58: 1551-1557.

[4] Dai L, Jia J, Yu D, Lewis BJ, Zhou L, Zhou W, Zhao W, Jiang L. Effects of climate change on biomass carbon sequestration in old-growth forest ecosystems on Changbai Mountain in Northeast China. For Ecol Manag, 2013, 300: 106-116.

[5] Fang J, Chen A, Peng C, Zhao S, Ci L. Changes in forest biomass carbon storage in China between 1949 and 1998. Science, 2001, 292: 2320-2322.

[6] Houghton RA. Aboveground forest biomass and the global carbon balance. Glob Chang Biol, 2005, 11: 945-958.

[7] Houghton RA, Hackler JL. Sources and sinks of carbon from land-use change in China. Glob Biogeochem Cycles, 2003, 17 1034

[8] IPCC 2014 Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Core Writing Team, Pachauri RK and Meyer LA (eds.)]. IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland

[9] Law BE, Sun OJ, Campbell J, Van Tuyl S, Thornton P. Changes in carbon storage and fluxes in a chronosequence of ponderosa pine. Glob Chang Biol, 2003, 9: 510-524.

[10] Law BE, Turner D, Campbell J, Sun OJ, Van Tuyl S, Ritts WD, Cohen WB. Disturbance and climate effects on carbon stocks and fluxes across Western Oregon USA. Glob Chang Biol, 2004, 10: 1429-1444.

[11] Li HK, Lei YC. Estimation and Evaluation of Forest Biomass Carbon Storage in China. 2010, Beijing: Forestry Publishing House of China

[12] Liu P, Yin R. Sequestering carbon in China’s forest ecosystems: potential and challenges. Forests, 2012, 3: 417-430.

[13] NDRC-PRC (2012) China’s Policies and Actions for addressing Climate Change (White Paper). The National Development and Reform Commission, the People’s Republic of China. (http://www.ccchina.gov.cn/WebSite/CCChina/UpFile/File1324.pdf; last Accessed 20 Mar 2015)

[14] Piao S, Fang J, Ciais P, Peylin P, Huang Y, Sitch S, Wang T. The carbon balance of terrestrial ecosystems in China. Nature, 2009, 458: 1009-1013.

[15] SFA-PRC (2010) China’s Forest Resources Report—the 7th National Inventory Analysis. State Forestry Administration, the People’s Republic of China.

[16] Turner DP, Guzy M, Lefsky MA, Van Tuyl S, Sun O, Daly C, Law BE. Effects of land use and fine-scale environmental heterogeneity on net ecosystem production over a temperate coniferous forest landscape. Tellus, 2003, 55B: 657-668.

[17] Wofsy SC. Where have all the carbon gone?. Science, 2001, 292: 2261-2263.

[18] Xu B, Guo ZD, Piao SL, Fang JY. Biomass carbon stocks in China’s forests between 2000 and 2050: a prediction based on forest biomass-age relationships. Sci China Life Sci, 2010, 53: 776-783.

[19] Zeng WS. Development of monitoring and assessment of forest biomass and carbon storage in China. For Ecosyst, 2014, 1 20

[20] Zeng WS, Tomppo E, Healey S, Gadow K. The national forest inventory in China: history—results—international context. For Ecosyst, 2015, 2 23

[21] Zhang Y, Gu F, Liu S, Liu Y, Li C. Variations of carbon stock with forest types in subalpine region of southwest China. For Ecol Manag, 2013, 300: 88-95.