A new approach to retrieve leaf normal distribution using terrestrial laser scanners

Shengye Jin , Masayuki Tamura , Junichi Susaki

Journal of Forestry Research ›› 2015, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (3) : 631 -638.

PDF
Journal of Forestry Research ›› 2015, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (3) : 631 -638. DOI: 10.1007/s11676-015-0204-z
Original Paper

A new approach to retrieve leaf normal distribution using terrestrial laser scanners

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Leaf normal distribution is an important structural characteristic of the forest canopy. Although terrestrial laser scanners (TLS) have potential for estimating canopy structural parameters, distinguishing between leaves and nonphotosynthetic structures to retrieve the leaf normal has been challenging. We used here an approach to accurately retrieve the leaf normals of camphorwood (Cinnamomum camphora) using TLS point cloud data. First, nonphotosynthetic structures were filtered by using the curvature threshold of each point. Then, the point cloud data were segmented by a voxel method and clustered by a Gaussian mixture model in each voxel. Finally, the normal vector of each cluster was computed by principal component analysis to obtain the leaf normal distribution. We collected leaf inclination angles and estimated the distribution, which we compared with the retrieved leaf normal distribution. The correlation coefficient between measurements and obtained results was 0.96, indicating a good coincidence.

Keywords

Leaf normal distribution / Leaf inclination angle / Terrestrial laser scanner / Point cloud data / Curvature / Clustering

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Shengye Jin, Masayuki Tamura, Junichi Susaki. A new approach to retrieve leaf normal distribution using terrestrial laser scanners. Journal of Forestry Research, 2015, 27(3): 631-638 DOI:10.1007/s11676-015-0204-z

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Alliez P, Pion S, Gupta A (2013) CGAL 4.3 - Principal Component Analysis. Available online at: http://doc.cgal.org/latest/Principal_component_analysis/index.html Accessed 25 Jan 2014

[2]

Belton D, Moncrieff S, Chapman J. Processing tree point clouds using Gaussian mixture models. ISPRS Ann Photogramm Remote Sens Spat Inf Sci, 2013, 1(2): 43-48.

[3]

Buckley SJ, Howell JA, Enge HD, Kurz TH. Terrestrial laser scanning in geology: data acquisition, processing and accuracy considerations. J Geol Soc, 2008, 165(3): 625-638.

[4]

Campbell GS. Extinction coefficients for radiation in plant canopies calculated using an ellipsoidal inclination angle distribution. Agric For Meteorol, 1985, 36: 317-321.

[5]

Chen JM, Blanken PD, Black TA. Radiation regime and canopy architecture in a boreal aspen forest. Agric For Meteorol, 1997, 86: 107-125.

[6]

Côté J, Fournier RA, Egli R. An architectural model of trees to estimate forest structural attributes using terrestrial LiDAR. Environ Model Softw, 2011, 26: 761-777.

[7]

Dasgupta A, Raftery AE. Detecting features in spatial point processes with clutter via model-based clustering. J Am Stat Assoc, 1998, 93: 294-302.

[8]

de Wit CT. Photosynthesis of leaf canopies. 1965, Wageningen: Centre for Agricultural Publications and Documentation

[9]

Estivill-Castro V. Why so many clustering algorithms: a position paper. ACM SIGKDD Explor Newsl, 2002, 4: 65-75.

[10]

Fraley C, Raftery AE. How many clusters? Which clustering method? Answers via model-based cluster analysis. Comput J, 1998, 41: 578-588.

[11]

Fraley C, Raftery AE. Model-based clustering, discriminant analysis, and density estimation. J Am Stat Assoc, 2002, 97: 611-631.

[12]

Fraley C, Raftery AE, Murphy TB, Scrucca L. (2012) MCLUST version 4 for R: normal mixture modeling for model-based clustering, classification, and density estimation. Available online at: http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/mclust/vignettes/mclust.pdf. Accessed on 23 Jan 2014

[13]

Fröhlich C, Mettenleiter M. Terrestrial laser scanning-new perspectives in 3D surveying. Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens Spat Inf Sci, 2004, 36 Part 8 W2.

[14]

Goel NS, Strebel DE. Simple beta distribution representation of leaf orientation in vegetation canopies. Agron J, 1984, 75(5): 800-802.

[15]

Goudriann J. The bare bones of leaf-angle distribution in radiation models for canopy photosynthesis and energy exchange. Agric For Meteorol, 1988, 43: 155-169.

[16]

Govaerts YM, Verstraete MM. Raytran: a Monte Carlo ray-tracing model to compute light scattering in three-dimensional heterogeneous media. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens, 1998, 36(2): 493-505.

[17]

Hikosaka K, Hirose T. Leaf angle as a strategy for light competition: optimal and evolutionarily stable light-extinction coefficient within a leaf canopy. Ecoscience, 1997, 4(4): 501-507.

[18]

Hoppe H, DeRose T, Duchamp T, McDonald J, Stuetzle W. Surface reconstruction from unorganized points. SIGGRAPH Comput Graph, 1992, 26(2): 71-78.

[19]

Hosoi F, Omasa K. Voxel-based 3-D modeling of individual trees for estimating leaf area density using high-resolution portable scanning lidar. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens, 2006, 44: 3610-3618.

[20]

Jin S, Tamura M, Susaki J. Effective leaf area index retrieving from terrestrial point cloud data: coupling computational geometry application and Gaussian mixture model clustering. ISPRS Ann Photogramm Remote Sens Spat Inf Sci, 2014, II-7(1): 23-30.

[21]

Kobayashi H, Iwabuchi H. A coubled 1-D atmosphere and 3-D canopy radiative transfer model for canopy reflectance, light environment, and photosynthesis simulation in a heterogeneous landscape. Remote Sens Environ, 2008, 112(1): 173-185.

[22]

Monsi M, Uchijima Z, Oikawa T. Structure of foliage canopies and photosynthesis. Annu Rev Ecol Syst, 1973, 4: 301-327.

[23]

Myneni RB, Asrar G. Radiative transfer in three-dimensional atmosphere-vegetation media. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transf, 1993, 49(6): 585-598.

[24]

Myneni RB, Ross J, Asrar G. A review on the theory of photon transport in leaf canopies. Agric For Meteorol, 1989, 45: 1-153.

[25]

Nilson T, Kuusk A. A reflectance model for the homogeneous plant canopy and its inversion. Remote Sens Environ, 1989, 27: 157-167.

[26]

Nilson T, Peterson U. A forest canopy reflectance model and a test case. Remote Sens Environ, 1991, 37: 131-142.

[27]

Nilson T, Ross J. Gholz HL, Nakane K, Shimoda H. Modeling radiative transfer through forest canopies: Implications for canopy photosynthesis and remote sensing. The use of remote sensing in the modeling of forest productivity. 1997, Dordrecht: Kluwer, 23 60

[28]

Nilson T, Kuusk A, Lang M, Lükk T. Forest reflectance modeling: theoretical aspects and applications. AMBIO, 2003, 32(8): 535-541.

[29]

North P. Three-dimensional forest light interaction model using a Monte Carlo method. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens, 1996, 34(4): 946-956.

[30]

Pfeifer N, Briese C. Geometrical aspects of airborne laser scanning and terrestrial laser scanning. Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens Spat Inf Sci, 2007, 36(3/W52): 311-319.

[31]

Pisek J, Ryu Y, Alikas K. Estimating leaf inclination and G-function from leveled digital camera photography in broadleaf canopies. Trees, 2011, 25: 919-924.

[32]

Ross J. The radiation regime and architecture of plant stands. 1981, New York: Springer

[33]

Rusu RB (2009) Semantic 3D object maps for everyday manipulation in human living environments. PhD thesis, Technischen Universität München, Germany

[34]

Schnabel R, Klein R (2006) Octree-based point-cloud compression. In: Eurographics symposium on point-based graphics, 111–120

[35]

Seversky LM, Berger MS, Yin L. Harmonic point cloud orientation. Comput Gr, 2011, 35: 492-499.

[36]

Sinoquet H, Andrieu B. (1993) The geometrical structure of plant canopies: characterization and direct measurement methods. Crop structure and light microclimate: characterization and applications, 131–158

[37]

Thomas SC, Winner WE. A rotated ellipsoidal angle density function improves estimation of foliage inclination distributions in forest canopies. Agric For Meteorol, 2000, 100: 19-24.

[38]

Wang WM, Li ZL, Su HB. Comparison of leaf angle distribution functions: effects on extinction coefficient and fraction of sunlit foliage. Agric For Meteorol, 2007, 143: 106-122.

[39]

Wilson JW. Analysis of the spatial distribution of foliage by two-dimensional point quadrats. New Phytol, 1959, 58(1): 92-99.

[40]

Wilson JW. Inclined point quadrats. New Phytol, 1960, 59: 1-7.

[41]

Zheng G, Moskal LM. Computational-geometry-based retrieval of effective leaf area index using terrestrial laser scanning. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens, 2012, 50: 3958-3969.

[42]

Zheng G, Moskal LM. Leaf orientation retrieval from terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) data. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens, 2012, 50: 3970-3979.

[43]

Zou X, Mõttus M, Tammeorg P, Torres CL, Takala T, Pisek J, Mäkelä PSA, Stoddard FL, Pellikka PKE. Photographic measurement of leaf angles in field crops. Agric For Meteorol, 2014, 184(2): 137-146.

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

136

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/