Assessing vulnerability of forests to climate change in South Korea

Abstract

This study demonstrated a framework to assess vulnerability of forests to climate change. We focused on how alterations of temperature and precipitation might affect forest type distributions and carbon-related functions. In particular, our framework considered three sectors of forest type distribution, net primary production, and soil carbon storage. Future projections were derived from mechanistic models for South Korean forests under the A1B scenarios of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Forest type distributions were simulated by the Hydrological and thermal analogy group model, while the MAPSS and CENTURY1 models estimated forest carbon flux/storage. We quantified normalized vulnerability indices for each sector. Our results indicate that the overall vulnerability of forest type distribution is greater in the west central regions and southeastern inlands. The vulnerabilities of carbon flux/storage show that net primary production of South Korean forests is relatively less susceptible to climate change, but a highly vulnerable area of soil carbon storage mainly spreads from the west central to the south east region. The spatio-temporal vulnerability map with a synoptic overview from this study might be useful for policy makers in preparing adaptive measures and identifying management priorities.

Keywords

Vulnerability / Forest / Climate change / Forest assessment

References

[1] Arvai J, Bridge G, Dolsak N, Franzese R, Koontz T, Luginbuhl A, Robbins P, Richards K, Korfmacher KS, Sohngen B, Tansey J, Thompson A. Adaptive management of the global climate problem: bridging the gap between climate research and climate policy. Clim Change, 2006, 78(1): 217-225.

[2] Bachelet D, Lenihan JM, Daly C, Neilson RP, Ojima DS, Parton WJ (2001) MC1: a dynamic vegetation model for estimating the distribution of vegetation and associated carbon, nutrients, and water. Technical documentation version 1.0. Oregon State University, Colorado State University. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, pp 6–25

[3] Byun J, Lee WK, Choi S, Oh SH, Yoo S, Kwon TS, Sung JH, Woo JW. Vulnerability assessment for forest ecosystem to climate change based on spatio-temporal information. Korean J Remote Sens, 2012, 28(1): 159-171.

[4] Cha DH, Lee DK. Reduction of systematic errors in regional climate simulations of the summer monsoon over East Asia and the western North Pacific by applying the spectral nudging technique. J Geophys Res-Atmos, 2009, 114 D14108

[5] Choi S, Lee WK, Son Y, Yoo S, Lim JH. Changes in the distribution of South Korean forest vegetation simulated using thermal gradient indices. Sci China Ser C-Life Sci, 2010, 53(7): 784-797.

[6] Choi S, Lee WK, Kwak DA, Lee S, Son Y, Choi H, Lim JH, Saborowski J. Predicting forest type changes in future climate using hydrological and thermal indices in South Korea. Clim Res, 2011, 49(3): 229-245.

[7] Choi S, Lee WK, Kwak H, Kim SR, Yoo S, Choi HA, Park SM, Lim JH. Vulnerability assessment of forest ecosystem to climate change in Korea using MC1 model. J For Plan Jpn, 2011, 16: 149-161.

[8] Eriksson E, Gillespie AR, Gustavsson L, Langvall O, Olsson M, Sathre R, Stendahl J. Integrated carbon analysis of forest management practices and wood substitution. Can J For Res, 2007, 37(3): 671-681.

[9] Evrendilek F, Berberoglu S, Gulbeyaz O, Ertekin C. Modeling potential distribution and carbon dynamics of natural terrestrial ecosystems: a case study of Turkey. Sensors, 2007, 7(10): 2273-2296.

[10] Friedlingstein P, Cox P, Betts R, Bopp L, BlohW Von, Brovkin V, Cadule P, Doney S, Eby M, Fung I, Bala G, John J, Jones C, Joos F, Kato T, Kawamiya M, Knorr W, Lindsay K, Matthews HD, Raddatz T, Rayner P, Reick C, Roeckner E, Schnitzler KG, Schnur R, Strassmann K, Weaver AJ, Yoshikawa C, Zeng N. Climate-carbon cycle feedback analysis: results from the C4MIP model intercomparison. J Clim, 2006, 19(14): 3337-3353.

[11] Füssel HM, Klein RJ. Climate change vulnerability assessments: an evolution of conceptual thinking. Clim Change, 2006, 75(3): 301-329.

[12] Houghton RA. Balancing the global carbon budget. Annu Rev Earth Planet Sci, 2007, 35: 313-347.

[13] Jackson RB, Schenk HJ, Jobbagy EG, Canadell J, ColelloGD Colello GD, Dickinson RE, Field CB, Friedlingstein P, Heimann M, Hibbard K, Kicklighter DW, Kleidon A, Neilson RP, Parton WJ, Sala OE, Sykes MT. Belowground consequences of vegetation change and their treatment in models. Ecol Appl, 2000, 10(2): 470-483.

[14] Joshi PK, Rawat A, Narula S, Sinha V. Assessing impact of climate change on forest cover type shifts in Western Himalayan Eco-region. J For Res, 2012, 23(1): 75-80.

[15] Kim JW, Lee D-K. A study on the vulnerability assessment of forest vegetation using regional climate model. Korea Soc For Environ Restor Reveg Technol, 2006, 9: 32-40.

[16] Kim SN, Lee WK, Son Y, Cho Y, Lee MS. Applicability of climate change impact assessment models to Korean forest. J Korean For Soc (in Korean), 2009, 98(1): 33-48.

[17] Kira T. On the altitudinal arrangement of climatic zones in Japan. Kanti-Nogaku, 1948, 2: 143-173.

[18] Kirschbaum MU. The temperature dependence of soil organic matter decomposition, and the effect of global warming on soil organic C storage. Soil Biol Biochem, 1995, 27(6): 753-760.

[19] Kong WS. Selection of vulnerable criterion plants by global warming. Korean J Atmos Sci (in Korean), 2005, 41(2–1): 263-273.

[20] Korea Forest Service Statistical yearbook of forestry. 2011, Seoul: Korea Forest Service, 1 484

[21] Lal R. Soil carbon sequestration to mitigate climate change. Geoderma, 2004, 123(1): 1-22.

[22] Lee MA, Lee WK, Song CC, Lee JH, Choi HA, Kim TM. Spatio-temporal change prediction and variability of temperature and precipitation. J GIS Assoc Korea (in Korean), 2007, 15(3): 267-278.

[23] Lee MA, Lee WK, Son Y, Cho Y, Song CC, Kim TM, Yu L, Tao B (2007b). Sensitivity and adaptability of vegetation and soil carbon storage to climate change with CEVSA model in Korea, proceeding of A3 foresight program, p 24

[24] Lee WK, Yoo S, Byun JG, Lee SC, Raesun J (2010) Impact assessment on ecosystem of the Korean Peninsula: vulnerability assessment to climate change scenarios (in Korean). South Korea: Korea Environment Institute pp 15–124

[25] Lee S, Choi S, Lee W-K, Park T, Oh S, Kim SN. Vulnerability assessment of forest distribution by the climate change scenarios. J Korean For Soc, 2011, 100(2): 256-265.

[26] Lenihan JM, Bachelet D, Neilson RP, Drapek R. Response of vegetation distribution, ecosystem productivity, and fire to climate change scenarios for California. Clim Change, 2008, 87(1): 215-230.

[27] Lindner M, Maroschek M, Netherer S, Kremer A, Barbati A, Gonzalo JG, Seidl R, Delzon S, Corona P, Kolström M, Lexer MJ, Marchetti M. Climate change impacts, adaptive capacity, and vulnerability of European forest ecosystems. For Ecol Manag, 2010, 259(4): 698-709.

[28] McCarthy JJ. Climate change 2001: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability: contribution of working group II to the third assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. 2001, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 235 342

[29] Min SK, Legutke S, Hense A, Cubasch U, Kwon WT, Oh JH, Schlese U. East Asian climate change in the 21st century as simulated by the coupled climate model ECHO-G under IPCC SRES scenarios. J Meteorol Soc Jpn, 2006, 84(1): 1-26.

[30] Moorcroft P, Hurtt G, Pacala SW. A method for scaling vegetation dynamics: the ecosystem demography model (ED). Ecol Monogr, 2001, 71(4): 557-586.

[31] Myneni RB, Keeling C, Tucker C, Asrar G, Nemani R. Increased plant growth in the northern high latitudes from 1981 to 1991. Nature, 1997, 386: 698-702.

[32] Nakicenovic N, Alcamo J, Davis G, de Vries B, Fenhann J, Gaffin S, Gregory K, Griibler A, Jung TY, Kram T, Lebre E, Rovere L, Michaelis L, Mori S, Morita T, Smith S, Swart R, Rooijen SV, Victor N, Dadi Z. Emission scenarios. A special report of working group III of the Intergovernmental panel on climate change. 2000, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1 595

[33] Neilson RP. A model for predicting continental-scale vegetation distribution and water balance. Ecol Appl, 1995, 5(2): 362-385.

[34] Norby RJ, Hanson PJ, O’Neill EG, Tschaplinski TJ, Weltzin JF, Hansen RA, Cheng WX, Wullschleger SD, Gullschleger CA, Edwards NT, Johnson DW. Net primary productivity of a CO2-enriched deciduous forest and the implications for carbon storage. Ecol Appl, 2002, 12(5): 1261-1266.

[35] Parton W. The century model. Evaluation of soil organic matter models. 1996, New York: Springer, 283 291

[36] Pearson RG. Climate change and the migration capacity of species. Trends Ecol Evol, 2006, 21(3): 111-113.

[37] Pearson RG, Dawson TP. Predicting the impacts of climate change on the distribution of species: are bioclimate envelope models useful. Glob Ecol Biogeogr, 2003, 12(5): 361-371.

[38] Prentice IC, Cramer W, Harrison SP, Leemans R, Monserud RA, Solomon AM. Special paper: a global biome model based on plant physiology and dominance, soil properties and climate. J Biogeogr, 1992, 19: 117-134.

[39] SAS Institute Inc. (2009) SAS 9.2 help and documentation. SAS Institute, Cary

[40] Schlesinger WH, Lichter J. Limited carbon storage in soil and litter of experimental forest plots under increased atmospheric CO₂. Nature, 2001, 411(6836): 466-469.

[41] Schulze E-D, Wirth C, Heimann M. Managing forests after Kyoto. Science (Washington), 2000, 289(5487): 2058-2059.

[42] Scott D, Lemieux C. Climate change and protected area policy and planning in Canada. For Chronicle, 2005, 81(5): 696-703.

[43] Shugart HH, Saatchi S, Hall FG. Importance of structure and its measurement in quantifying function of forest ecosystems. J Geophys Res-Biogeosci, 2010

[44] Smith CD. The relationship between monthly precipitation and elevation in the Alberta foothills during the foothills orographic precipitation experiment. Cold region atmospheric and hydrologic studies the mackenzie GEWEX experience. 2008, New York: Springer, 167 185

[45] Thornthwaite CW. An approach toward a rational classification of climate. Geogr Rev, 1948, 38(1): 55-94.

[46] Van Vuuren DP, Edmonds J, Kainuma M, Riahi K, Thomson A, Hibbard K, Hurtt GC, Kram T, Krey V, Lamarque JF, Masui T, Meinshausen M, Nakicenovic N, Smith SJ, Rose SK. The representative concentration pathways: an overview. Clim Change, 2011, 109: 5-31.

[47] Wang M, Li QR, Xiao DM, Dong BL. Effects of soil temperature and soil water content on soil respiration in three forest types in Changbai Mountain. J For Res, 2004, 15(2): 113-118.

[48] Wang HM, Saigusa N, Zu YG, Wang WJ, Yamamoto S, Kondo H. Carbon fluxes and their response to environmental variables in a Dahurian larch forest ecosystem in northeast China. J For Res, 2008, 19(1): 1-10.

[49] Watson RT, Albritton DL. Climate change 2001: synthesis report: third assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. 2001, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1 284

[50] Yoo SJ, Kwak DA, Cui GS, Lee WK, Kwak HB, Ito A, Son YH, Jeon SW. Estimation of ecosystem carbon budget in South Korea between 1999 and 2008. Ecol Res, 2013, 28(6): 1045-1059.

[51] Yu L, Cao M, Li K. An overview of assessment of ecosystem vulnerability to climate change. Prog Geogr, 2005, 24(1): 61-67.

[52] Yu L, Cao M, Li K. Climate-induced changes in the vegetation pattern of China in the 21st century. Ecol Res, 2006, 21(6): 912-919.

[53] Yu L, Cao MK, Tao B, Li KR, Dong WJ, Liu HB, Liu CY. Quantitative assessment of the vulnerability of terrestrial ecosystems of china to climate change based on potential vegetation. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2008, 32(3): 521-530.

[54] Yun JI, Choi JY, Ahn JH. Seasonal trend of elevation effect on daily air temperature in Korea. Korea J Agric Meteorol, 2001, 3(2): 96-104.

[55] Zhang HL, Liu GH, Feng XF. A process model for simulating net primary productivity (NPP) based on the interaction of water-heat process and nitrogen: a case study in Lantsang valley. J For Res, 2011, 22(1): 93-97.

[56] Zhu WQ, Pan YZ, Liu X, Wang AL. Spatio-temporal distribution of net primary productivity along the Northeast China Transect and its response to climatic change. J For Res, 2006, 17(2): 93-98.