Analysis of EST-SSRs in silver birch (Betula pendula Roth.)

Abstract

Simple sequence repeats (SSRs) defined as sequence repeat units between 1 and 6 bp occur abundantly in both coding and non-coding regions in eukaryotic genomes and these repeats can affect gene expression. In this study, ESTs (expressed sequence tags) of Betula pendula (silver birch) were analyzed for in silico mining of EST-SSRs, protein annotation, open reading frames (ORFs), designing primers, and identifying codon repetitions. In B. pendula, the frequency of ESTs containing SSRs was 7.8 % with an average of 1SSR/4. 78 kb of EST sequences. A total of 188 SSRs was identified by using MISA software and di-nucleotide SSR motifs (65.9 %) were found to be the most abundant type of repeat motif followed by tri- (27.1 %), tetra- (4.8 %), and penta- (2.2 %) motifs. Based on ORF analysis, 175 of 178 sequences were predicted as ORFs and the most frequent SSRs were detected in 5′ UTR (58.43 %), followed by in ORF (31.46 %) and in 3′ UTR (8.43 %). 102 of 178 ESTs were annotated as ribosomal protein, transport protein, membrane protein, carrier protein, binding protein, and transferase protein. For a total of 102 SSRs (57.3 %) with significant matches, a set of 102 primers (100 %) with forward and reverse strands was designed by using Primer3 software. Serine (Ser, 19.6 %) was predominant in putative encoded amino acids and most of amino acids showed nonpolar (35.3 %) nature. Our data provide resources for B. pendula and can be useful for in silico comparative analyses of Betulaceae species, including SSR mining.

Keywords

Silver birch (Betula pendula) / Betulaceae / EST-SSR / SSR mining / In silico analysis

References

[1] Acuña CV, Fernandez P, Villalba PV, García MN, Hopp HE, Poltri SNM. Discovery, validation, and in silico functional characterization of EST-SSR markers in Eucalyptus globules. Tree Genet Genomes, 2011

[2] Asp T, Frei UK, Didion T, Nielsen KK, Lübberstedt T. Frequency, type, and distribution of EST-SSRs from three genotypes of Lolium perenne, and their conservation across orthologous sequences of Festuca arundinacea, Brachypodium distachyon, and Oryza sativa. BMC Plant Biol, 2007, 7 36

[3] Bérubé Y, Zhuang J, Rungis D, Ralph S, Bohlmann J, Ritland K. Characterization of EST-SSRs in loblolly pine and spruce. Tree Genet Genomes, 2007, 3: 251-259.

[4] Cardle L, Ramsay L, Milborne D, Macaulay M, Marshall D, Waugh R. Computational and experimental characterization of physically clustered simple sequence repeats in plants. Genetics, 2000, 156: 847-854.

[5] Cordeiro GM, Casu R, McIntyre CL, Manners JM, Henry RJ. Microsatellite markers from sugarcane (Saccharum spp.) ESTs cross transferable to erianthus and sorghum. Plant Sci, 2001, 160: 1115-1123.

[6] De Jong PC. An introduction to Betula: its morphology, evolution, classification and distribution with a survey of recent work. 1993, Susses: The IDS Betula Symposium, International Dendrology Society

[7] Ellegren H. Microsatellite mutations in the germline: implications for evolutionary inference. Trends Genet, 2000, 16: 551-558.

[8] Filiz E, Koc I, Sakinoglu FC. In silico EST-SSRs analysis in unigene of Quercus robur L. Res Plant Biol, 2012, 2: 1-9.

[9] Furlow JJ. The genera of Betulaceae in the southeastern United States. J Arnold Arbor, 1990, 71: 1-67.

[10] Gupta PK, Balyan HS, Sharma PC, Ramesh B. Microsatellites in plants: a new class of molecular markers. Curr Sci, 1996, 70: 45-54.

[11] Gupta PK, Rustgi S, Sharma S, Singh R, Kumar N, Balyan HS. EST-SSRs for transferability, polymorphism and genetic diversity in bread wheat. Mol Genet Genom, 2003, 270: 315-323.

[12] Gupta S, Shukla R, Roy S, Sen N, Sharma A. In silico SSR and FDM analysis through EST sequences in Ocimum basilicum. POJ, 2010, 3: 121-128.

[13] Gupta S, Tripathi KP, Roy S, Sharma A. Analysis of unigene derived microsatellite markers in family Solanaceae. Bioinformation, 2010, 5: 113-121.

[14] Huang X, Madan A. CAP3: a DNA sequence assembly program. Genome Res, 1999, 9: 868-877.

[15] Kalia RK, Rai MK, Kalia S, Singh R, Dhawan AK. Microsatellite markers: an overview of the recent progress in plants. Euphytica, 2011, 177: 309-334.

[16] Kota R, Varshney RK, Thiel T, Dehmer KJ, Graner A. Generation and comparison of EST-derived SSRs and SNPs in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Hereditas, 2001, 135: 145-151.

[17] Lawson MJ, Zhang L. Distinct patterns of SSR distribution in the Arabidopsis thaliana and rice genomes. Genome Biol, 2006, 7 R14

[18] Li YC, Korol AB, Fahima T, Beiles A, Nevo E. Microsatellites: genomic distribution, putative functions and mutational mechanisms: a review. Mol Ecol, 2002, 11: 2453-2465.

[19] Li YC, Korol AB, Fahima T, Nevo E. Microsatellites within genes: structure, function, and evolution. Mol Biol Evol, 2004, 21: 991-1007.

[20] Lü YD, Cai CP, Wang L, Lin SY, Zhao L, Tian LL, Lü JH, Zhang TZ, Guo WZ. Mining, characterization, and exploitation of EST-derived microsatellites in Gossypium barbadense. Chin Sci Bull, 2010, 55: 1889-1893.

[21] Martín C, Parra T, Clemente-Muñoz M, Hernandez-Bermejo E. Genetic diversity and structure of the endangered Betula pendula subsp. fontqueri populations in the south of Spain. Silva Fenn, 2008, 42: 487-498.

[22] Metzgar D, Bytof J, Wills C. Selection against frameshift mutations limits microsatellite expansion in coding DNA. Genome Res, 2000, 10: 72-80.

[23] Morgante M, Hanafey M, Powell W. Microsatellite are preferentially associated with nonrepetitive DNA in plant genomes. Nat Genet, 2002, 30: 194-200.

[24] Palliyarakkal MK, Ramaswamy M, Vadivel A. Microsatellites in palm (Arecaceae) sequences. Bioinformation, 2011, 7: 347-351.

[25] Powell W, Machray GC, Provan J. Polymorphism revealed by simple sequence repeats. Trends Plant Sci, 1996, 1: 215-222.

[26] Qiu L, Yang C, Tian B, Yang JB, Liu A. Exploiting EST databases for the development and characterization of EST-SSR markers in castor bean (Ricinus communis L.). BMC Plant Biol, 2010, 10 278

[27] Rungis D, Bérubé Y, Zhuang J, Ralph S, Ritland CE, Ellis BE, Douglas C, Bohlmann J, Ritland K. Robust simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers for spruce (Picea spp.) from expressed sequence tags (ESTs). Theor Appl Genet, 2004, 109: 1283-1294.

[28] Schenk MF, Thienpont CN, Koopman WJM, Gilissen LJWJ, Smulders MJM. Phylogenetic relationships in Betula (Betulaceae) based on AFLP markers. Tree Genet Genomes, 2008, 4: 911-924.

[29] Scott KD, Eggler P, Seaton G, Rossetto M, Ablett EM, Lee LS, Henry RJ. Analysis of SSRs derived from grape ESTs. Theor Appl Genet, 2000, 100: 723-726.

[30] Shanker A, Bhargava A, Bajpai R, Singh S, Srivastava S, Sharma V. Bioinformatically mined simple sequence repeats in UniGene of Citrus sinensis. Sci Hortic, 2007, 113: 353-361.

[31] Tautz D. Pena SDJ, Chakraborty R, Epplen JT, Jeffreys AJ. Notes on the definition and nomenclature of tandemly repetitive DNA sequences. DNA fingerprinting: state of science. 1993, Basel: Birkhäuser Verlag, 21 28

[32] Tautz D, Renz M. Simple sequence repeats are ubiquitous repetitive components of eukaryotic genomes. Nucleic Acids Res, 1984, 12: 4127-4138.

[33] Toth G, Ga´spa´ri Z Z, Jurka J. Microsatellites in different eukaryotic genomes: survey and analysis. Genome Res, 2000, 10: 967-981.

[34] Varshney RK, Thiel T, Stein N, Langridge P, Graner A. In silico analysis on frequency and distribution of microsatellites in ESTs of some cereal species. Cell Mol Biol Lett, 2002, 7: 537-546.