Decomposition of Mongolian pine litter in the presence of understory species in semi-arid northeast China

Abstract

The effects of understory plant litter on dominant tree litter decomposition are not well documented especially in semi-arid forests. In this study, we used a microcosm experiment to examine the effects of two understory species (Artemisia scoparia and Setaria viridis) litter on the mass loss and N release of Mongolian pine (Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica) litter in Keerqin Sandy Lands, northeast China, and identified the influencing mechanism from the chemical quality of decomposing litter. Four litter combinations were set up: one monoculture of Mongolian pine and three mixtures of Mongolian pine and one or two understory species in equal mass proportions of each species. Total C, total N, lignin, cellulose and polyphenol concentrations, and mass loss of pine litter were analyzed at days 84 and 182 of incubation. The chemistry of pine litter not only changed with the stages of decomposition, but was also strongly influenced by the presence of understory species during decomposition. Both understory species promoted mass loss of pine litter at 84 days, while only the simultaneous presence of two understory species promoted mass loss of pine litter at 182 days. Mass loss of pine litter was negatively correlated with initial ratios of C/N, lignin/N and polyphenol/N of litter combinations during the entire incubation period; at 182 days it was negatively correlated with polyphenol concentration and ratios of C/N and polyphenol/N of litter combinations at 84 days of incubation. Nitrogen release of pine litter was promoted in the presence of understory species. Nitrogen release at 84 days was negatively correlated with initial N concentration; at 182 days it was negatively correlated with initial polyphenol concentration of litter combinations and positively correlated with lignin concentration of litter combinations at 84 days of incubation. Our results suggest that the presence of understory species causes substantial changes in chemical components of pine litter that can exert strong influences on subsequent decomposition of pine litter.

Keywords

Litter chemistry / Litter mixture / Mass loss / Nitrogen release / Understory species

References

[1] Aerts R. Climate, leaf litter chemistry and leaf litter decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems: a triangular relationship. Oikos, 1997, 79(3): 439-449.

[2] Austin AT, Vivanco L. Plant litter decomposition in a semi-arid ecosystem controlled by photodegradation. Nature, 2006, 442(7102): 555-558.

[3] Berg B, McClaugherty C. Plant litter: decomposition, humus formation, carbon sequestration, 2008 2 Berlin: Springer, 286

[4] Brandt LA, King JY, Hobbie SE, Milchunas DG, Sinsabaugh RL. The role of photodegradation in surface litter decomposition across a grassland ecosystem precipitation gradient. Ecosystems, 2010, 13(5): 765-781.

[5] Carreiro MM, Sinsabaugh RL, Repert DA, Parkhurst DF. Microbial enzyme shifts explain litter decay responses to simulated nitrogen deposition. Ecology, 2000, 81(9): 2359-2365.

[6] Chapin FS III, Matson PA, Vitousek PM. Principles of terrestrial ecosystem ecology, 2011 2 New York: Springer, 529

[7] Chapman SK, Koch GW. What type of diversity yields synergy during mixed litter decomposition in a natural forest ecosystem?. Plant Soil, 2007, 299(1–2): 153-162.

[8] Chen FS, Zeng DH, Zhou B, Singh AN, Fan ZP. Seasonal variation in soil nitrogen availability under Mongolian pine plantations at the Keerqin Sand Lands, China. J Arid Environ, 2006, 67(2): 226-239.

[9] Coûteaux M-M, Bottner P, Berg B. Litter decomposition, climate and litter quality. Trends Ecol Evol, 1995, 10(2): 63-66.

[10] Ganjegunte GK, Condron LM, Clinton PW, Davis MR. Effects of mixing radiata pine needles and understory litters on decomposition and nutrients release. Biol Fertil Soils, 2005, 41(5): 310-319.

[11] Gartner TB, Cardon ZG. Decomposition dynamics in mixed-species leaf litter. Oikos, 2004, 104(2): 230-246.

[12] Gessner MO, Swan CM, Dang CK, McKie BG, Bardgett RD, Wall DH, Hättenschwiler S. Diversity meets decomposition. Trends Ecol Evol, 2010, 25(6): 372-380.

[13] Gießelmann UC, Martins KG, Brändle M, Schädler M, Marques R, Brandl R. Diversity and ecosystem functioning: litter decomposition dynamics in the Atlantic rainforest. Appl Soil Ecol, 2010, 46(2): 283-290.

[14] Gnankambary Z, Bayala J, Malmer A, Nyberg G, Hien V. Decomposition and nutrient release from mixed plant litters of contrasting quality in an agroforestry parkland in the south-Sudanese zone of West Africa. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst, 2008, 82(1): 1-13.

[15] Hättenschwiler S, Vitousek PM. The role of polyphenols in terrestrial ecosystem nutrient cycling. Trends Ecol Evol, 2000, 15(6): 238-243.

[16] Hättenschwiler S, Tiunov AV, Scheu S. Biodiversity and litter decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst, 2005, 36: 191-218.

[17] Hättenschwiler S, Coq S, Barantal S, Tanya I. Leaf traits and decomposition in tropical rainforests: revisiting some commonly held views and towards a new hypothesis. New Phytol, 2011, 189: 950-965.

[18] Hillebrand H, Bennett DM, Cadotte MW. Consequences of dominance: a review of evenness effects on local and regional ecosystem processes. Ecology, 2008, 89(6): 1510-1520.

[19] Hobbie SE. Interactions between litter lignin and soil nitrogen availability during leaf litter decomposition in a Hawaiian montane forest. Ecosystems, 2000, 3(5): 484-494.

[20] Hobbie SE. Nitrogen effects on decomposition: a five-year experiment in eight temperate sites. Ecology, 2008, 89(9): 2633-2644.

[21] Holden SR, Gutierrez A, Treseder KK. Changes in soil fungal communities, extracellular enzyme activities, and litter decomposition across a fire chronosequence in Alaskan boreal forest. Ecosystems, 2013, 16(1): 34-46.

[22] Hoorens B, Aerts R, Stroetenga M. Does initial litter chemistry explain litter mixture effects on decomposition?. Oecologia, 2003, 137(4): 578-586.

[23] Iiyama K, Wallis AFA. Determination of lignin in herbaceous plants by an improved acetyl bromide procedure. J Sci Food and Agric, 1990, 51(2): 145-161.

[24] Li W, Pan KW, Wu N, Wang JC, Han CM, Liang XL. Effects of mixing pine and broadleaved tree/shrub litter on decomposition and N dynamics in laboratory microcosms. Ecol Res, 2009, 24(4): 761-769.

[25] Li W, Pan KW, Wu N, Wang JC, Wang YJ, Zhang L. Effect of litter type on soil microbial parameter sand dissolved organic carbon in a laboratory microcosm experiment. Plant, Soil Environ, 2014, 4: 170-176.

[26] Lin GG, Mao R, Zhao L, Zeng DH. Litter decomposition of a pine plantation is affected by species evenness and soil nitrogen availability. Plant Soil, 2013, 373(1–2): 649-657.

[27] Mao R, Zeng DH. Non-additive effects vary with the number of component residues and their mixing proportions during residue mixture decomposition: a microcosm study. Geoderma, 2012, 170: 112-117.

[28] McTiernan KB, Ineson P, Coward PA. Respiration and nutrient release from tree leaf litter mixtures. Oikos, 1997, 78(3): 527-538.

[29] Meier CL, Bowman WD. Links between plant litter chemistry, species diversity, and below-ground ecosystem function. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2008, 105(50): 19780-19785.

[30] Nelson DW, Sommers LE (1996) Total carbon, organic carbon and organic matter. In: Sparks DL, Page AL, Helmke PA, Loeppert RH, Soltanpour PN, Tabatabai MA, Johnston CT, Sumner ME (eds), Methods of soil analysis. Part 3: Chemical Methods. Wisconsin: Soil Science Society of America, pp. 961–1010

[31] Osono T, Azuma JI, Hirose D. Plant species effect on the decomposition and chemical changes of leaf litter in grassland and pine and oak forest soils. Plant Soil, 2014, 376(1–2): 411-421.

[32] Ostertag R, Marín-Spiotta E, Silver WL, Schulten J. Litterfall and decomposition in relation to soil carbon pools along a secondary forest chronosequence in Puerto Rico. Ecosystems, 2008, 11(5): 701-714.

[33] Palm CA, Rowland AP. Cadisch G, Giller KE. A minimum dataset for characterization of plant quality for decomposition. Driven by nature: plant litter quality and decomposition. 1997, Wallingford: CAB International, 379 392

[34] Polyakova O, Billor N. Impact of deciduous tree species on litterfall quality, decomposition rates and nutrient circulation in pine stands. For Ecol Manag, 2007, 253(1–3): 11-18.

[35] Prescott CE, Zabek LM, Staley CL, Kabzems R. Decomposition of broadleaf and needle litter in forests of British Columbia: influences of litter type, forest type, and litter mixtures. Can J For Res, 2000, 30(11): 1742-1750.

[36] Schimel JP, Hättenschwiler S. Nitrogen transfer between decomposing leaves of different N status. Soil Biol Biochem, 2007, 39(7): 1428-1436.

[37] Schlesinger WH, Bernhardt ES. Biogeochemistry: an analysis of global change, 2013 3 New York: Academic Press, 688.

[38] Schwendener CM, Lehmann J, de Camargo PB, Luizão RCC, Fermandes ECM. Nitrogen transfer between high- and low-quality leaves on a nutrient-poor Oxisol determined by ¹⁵N enrichment. Soil Biol Biochem, 2005, 37(4): 787-794.

[39] Swan CM, Gluth MA, Horne CL. Leaf litter species evenness influences nonadditive breakdown in a headwater stream. Ecology, 2009, 90(6): 1650-1658.

[40] Talbot JM, Treseder KK. Interactions among lignin, cellulose, and nitrogen drive litter chemistry-decay relationships. Ecology, 2012, 93(2): 345-354.

[41] Trofymow JA, Moore TR, Titus B, Prescott C, Morrison I, Siltanen M, Smith S, Fyles J, Wein R, Camiré C, Duschene L, Kozak L, Kranabetter M, Visser S. Rates of litter decomposition over 6 years in Canadian forests: influence of litter quality and climate. Can J For Res, 2002, 32(5): 789-804.

[42] Trofymow JA, Addison J, Blackwell BA, He F, Preston CA, Marshall VG. Attributes and indicators of old-growth and successional Douglas-fir forests on Vancouver Island. Environ Rev, 2003, 11(Supplement 1): 187-204.

[43] Updegraff DM. Semimicro determination of cellulose in biological materials. Anal Biochem, 1969, 32(3): 420-424.

[44] Vargas DN, Bertiller MB, Ares JO, Carrera AL, Sain CL. Soil C and N dynamics induced by leaf-litter decomposition of shrubs and perennial grasses of the Patagonian Monte. Soil Biol Biochem, 2006, 38(8): 2401-2410.

[45] Vivanco L, Austin AT. Tree species identity alters forest litter decomposition through long-term plant and soil interactions in Patagonia, Argentina. J Ecol, 2008, 96(4): 727-736.

[46] Wang Q, Wang S, Fan B, Yu X. Litter production, leaf litter decomposition and nutrient return in Cunninghamia lanceolata plantations in south China: effect of planting conifers with broadleaved species. Plant Soil, 2007, 297(1–2): 201-211.

[47] Wardle DA, Bonner KI, Nicholson KS. Biodiversity and plant litter: experimental evidence which does not support the view that enhanced species richness improves ecosystem function. Oikos, 1997, 79(2): 247-258.

[48] Wardle DA, Nilsson MC, Zackrisson O, Gallet C. Determinants of litter mixing effects in a Swedish boreal forest. Soil Biol Biochem, 2003, 35(6): 827-835.

[49] Waring RH, Running SW. Forest ecosystems: analysis at multiple scales, 2007 3 San Francisco: Academic Press, 420.

[50] Waterman PG, Mole S. Analysis of phenolic plant metabolites. The methods in ecology series. 1994, Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications, 238.

[51] Wickings K, Grandy AS, Reed SC, Cleveland CC. The origin of litter chemical complexity during decomposition. Ecol Lett, 2012, 15(10): 1180-1188.

[52] Zeng DH, Hu YL, Chang SX, Fan ZP. Land cover change effects on soil chemical and biological properties after planting Mongolian pine (Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica) in sandy lands in Keerqin, northeastern China. Plant Soil, 2009, 317(1–2): 121-133.

[53] Zhang D, Hui D, Luo Y, Zhou G. Rates of litter decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems: global patterns and controlling factors. J Plant Ecol, 2008, 1(2): 85-93.

[54] Zhang LH, Zhang SJ, Ye GF, Shao HB, Lin GH, Brestic M. Changes of tannin and nutrients during decomposition of branchlets of Casuarina equisetifolia plantation in subtropical coastal areas of China. Plant, Soil Environ, 2013, 59(2): 74-79.

[55] Zhao L, Hu YL, Lin GG, Gao YC, Fang YT, Zeng DH. Mixing effects of understory plant litter on decomposition and nutrient release of tree litter in two plantations in Northeast China. PLoS ONE, 2013, 8 10 e76334