Socio-economic factors influencing mopane worm (Imbrasia belina) harvesting in Limpopo Province, South Africa

Abstract

In South Africa, non-timber forest products, especially mopane worms (Imbrasia belina) have become an important source of food and cash income for rural people living in or near the mopane woodlands. However, the continued harvesting has implications for long term management of the mopane woodlands in the northern parts of South Africa. In order to keep a balance between mopane worm harvesting and biodiversity, an understanding of socio-economic factors influencing the harvest at household level is vital to reducing depletion and overexploitation of the mopane woodland resources. This study evaluated the socio-economic factors influencing mopane worm harvesting decisions in rural households in Limpopo Province, South Africa using a binary logistic regression model based on a household survey of 120 respondents. Age, gender, education, income from mopane worm sales, social capital (group affiliation), household size, lack of institution/law to regulate use, distance to the nearest harvesting site, and regional locations were statistically significant factors influencing household mopane worm harvest decisions. Implications for policy are discussed.

Keywords

NTFPs / Mopane worm / Harvesting / Livelihood / Conservation / South Africa

References

[1] Adesina AA, Chianu J. Determinants of farmers’ adoption and adaptation of alley farming technology in Nigeria. Agrofor Syst, 2002, 55: 99-112.

[2] Akpalu W, Muchapondiwa E, Zikhali P (2007) Can the restrictive harvest period policy conserve Mopane Worms in Southern Africa? a Bio-economic approach. University of Pretoria/University of Cape Town/Gotenborg University, 65:1–12

[3] Amemiya T. Qualitative response models: a survey. J Econ Lit, 1981, 19: 1483-1536.

[4] Arnold JEM (2001) Forests and people: 25 years of community forestry. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, p 145

[5] Baiyegunhi LJS, Fraser GCG. Vulnerability and poverty dynamics in rural areas of Eastern Cape Province, South Africa. Ghana J Dev Stud, 2011, 8(2): 84-100.

[6] Bless C, Higson-Smith C. Fundamentals of social research methods: an African perspective, 2000 3 Cape Town: Juta & Co., Ltd., 1 186

[7] Cavendish W. Empirical regularities in the poverty–environment relationship of rural households: evidence from Zimbabwe. World Dev, 2000, 28: 1979-2003.

[8] Clarke J, Grundy IM. Lawes MJ, Eeley HAC, Shackleton CM, Geach BGS. Socio-economics of forest and woodland resource use. Indigenous forests and woodlands in South Africa: policy, people and practice. 2004, Pietermaritzburg: University of KwaZulu-Natal Press, 167 193

[9] Cocks M, Dold A, Grundy I. Challenges facing a community structure to implement CBNRM in the Eastern Cape, South Africa. Afr Stud Q, 2002, 5: 36-51.

[10] Cocks ML, Dold AP, Grundy IM. Lawes MJ, Eeley HAC, Shackleton CM, Geach BGS. The trade in medicinal plants from forests in the Eastern Cape Province. Indigenous forests and woodlands in South Africa: policy, people and practice. 2004, Pietermaritzburg: University of KwaZulu-Natal Press, 473 492

[11] Cocks ML, Bangay L, Shackleton CM, Wiersum KF. Rich man–poor man: inter-household and community factors influencing the use of wild plant resources amongst households in South Africa. Int J Sustain Dev World Ecol, 2008, 15(3): 198-210.

[12] Cousins B. Invisible capital: the contribution of communal rangelands to rural livelihood in South Africa. Dev South Afr, 1999, 16: 299-318.

[13] D’Hase L, Vermeulen H (2011) The food security status of Limpopo Province: archive of interdisciplinary discussion groups and past events. http://blogs.sun.ac.za/fsi/files/2010/10/Presentation-food-security-limpopofinal1.pdf. Accessed on 26 May 2015

[14] Frost PGH (2003) Mopane woodlands and the mopane worm: enhancing rural livelihoods and resource sustainability. Annual Report 2002–03. Institute for Environmental Sustainability, University of Zimbabwe, Harare, pp 1–47

[15] Frost PGH. A guide to sustainable use of mopane worms. 2005, Harare: Institute of Environment Studies, University of Zimbabwe

[16] Ghazoul J (ed) (2006) Mopane woodlands and the Mopane worm: enhancing rural livelihoods and resource sustainability. Final Technical Report, DFID, London, pp 1–119

[17] Gondo T, Frost P, Kozanayi W, Stack J, Mushongahande M. Linking knowledge and practice: assessing options for sustainable use of mopane worms (Imbrasia belina) in Southern Zimbabwe. J Sustain Dev Afr, 2010, 12(4): 127-145.

[18] Greene WH. The behaviour of the maximum likelihood estimator of limited dependent variable models in the presence of fixed effects. Econom J, 2004, 7(1): 98-119.

[19] Gugushe NM, Grundy IM, Theron F, Chirwa PW. Perceptions of forest resource use and management in two village communities in the Eastern Cape Province, South Africa. South For: J For Sci, 2008, 70(3): 247-254.

[20] Gujarati DN, Porter DC (2009) Basic econometrics, 5th edn. McGraw-Hill/Irwin Publishers, New York, p 922

[21] Hope RA, Frost PGH, Gardiner A, Ghazoul J. Experimental analysis of adoption of domestic mopane worm farming technology in Zimbabwe. Dev South Afr, 2009, 26(10): 29-46.

[22] Hosmer D, Lemeshow S. Applied logistic regression, 2000 3 New York: A Wiley-Interscience Publication, 1 528

[23] Janse G, Ottisch A. Factors influencing the role of non-wood forest products and services. For Policy Econ, 2005, 7: 309-319.

[24] Kozanayi W, Frost P (2002) Marketing of mopane worm in Southern Zimbabwe. Internal Report DFID Project No R7822. Institute of Environment Studies, University of Zimbabwe, Harare, pp 1–31

[25] Lawes MJ, Ealey HAC, Shackleton CM, Geach BS. Indigenous forests and woodlands in South Africa: policy, people and practice. 2004, Pietermaritzburg: University of KwaZulu-Natal Press, 473 492

[26] LDLGH (2007) Districts and municipalities. Limpopo-department of local government and housing. http://www.limpopo-dlgh.gov.za. Accessed 8 May 2012

[27] Lucas TL (2010) The evolution and impacts of mopane worm harvesting: perceptions of harvesters in central Botswana. M.Sc. thesis, Faculty of Science, School of Geography, Archaeology and Environmental Studies, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, pp 1–80

[28] Makhado RA, Von Maltitz GP, Potgieter MJ, Wessels DC. Contribution of woodland products to rural livelihoods: in the northeast of Limpopo Province, South Africa. S Afr Geogr J, 2009, 91(1): 46-53.

[29] Makhado RA, Potgieter MJ, Wessels DC, Saidi AT, Masehela KK. Use of mopane woodland resources and associated woodland management challenges in rural areas of South Africa. Ethnobot Res Appl, 2012, 10: 369-379.

[30] Makhado R, Potgieter M, Timberlake J, Gumbo D. A review of the significance of mopane products to rural people’s livelihoods in southern Africa. Trans R Soc S Afr, 2014, 69(2): 117-122.

[31] Malepane A (2012) Project Consultant: Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry, Giyani

[32] Mapaure I. The distribution of colophospermum mopane (Leguminosae-caesalpinioideae) in Africa. Kirkia, 1994, 15: 1-15.

[33] Matungul PM, Lyne MC, Ortmann GF. Transaction costs and crop marketing in the communal areas of impendle and Swayimana, KwaZulu-Natal. Dev South Afr, 2001, 18(23): 347-363.

[34] Maximillian JR, O’Lauhglin J. Towards sustainable harvesting of Africa’s largest medicinal plant export (Prunus africana). A case study in Tanzania. South For: J For Sci, 2009, 71(4): 303-309.

[35] Mucina L, Rutherford MC (2006) The vegetation of South Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland. Strelitzia 19. South African Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria

[36] Ouma E, Jagwe J, Aiko GO, Abele S. Determinants of smallholder farmers’ participation in banana markets in Central Africa: the role of transaction costs. Agric Econ, 2010, 41(1): 111-122.

[37] Paumgarten F, Shackleton CM. Wealth differentiation in household use and trade in non-timber forest products in South Africa. Ecol Econ, 2009, 68: 2950-2959.

[38] Shackleton CM, Shackleton SE. The importance of non-timber forest products in rural livelihood security and as safety-nets: a review of evidence from South Africa. S Afr J Sci, 2004, 100(11&12): 658-664.

[39] Shackleton CM, Shackleton SE. Household wealth status and natural resource use in the Kat River valley, South Africa. Ecol Econ, 2006, 57: 306-317.

[40] Shackleton CM, Shackleton SE, Buiten E, Bird N. Importance of dry woodlands and forest in rural livelihoods and poverty alleviation in South Africa. For Policy Econ, 2007, 9: 558-577.

[41] Sidibe A. Farm-level adoption of soil and water conservation techniques in Northern Burkina Faso. Agric Water Manag, 2005, 71: 211-224.

[42] South Africa Weather Service (1980-2003) Long-term climate data of Giyani Area. Available at: <www.weathersa.co.za>. Accessed 6 Jan 2015

[43] Stack J, Dorward A, Gondo T, Frost P, Taylor F, Kurebgaseka N (2003) Mopane worm utilisation and rural livelihoods in Southern Africa. In: CIFOR livelihood conference May pp 19–23

[44] Statistics SA (2011) The South Africa I know, the home I understand. Available at: <http://beta2.statssa.gov.za>. Accessed 19 Jan 2015

[45] Styles CV (1994) The big value in mopane worms: farmer’s weekly 22 July, pp 20–22

[46] Thomas B. Sustainable harvesting and trading of mopane worms (Imbrasia belina) in Northern Namibia: an experience from the Uukwaluudhi area. Int J Environ Stud, 2013, 70(4): 494-502.

[47] Ticktin T. Applying a metapopulation framework to the management and conservation of a non-timber forest species. For Ecol Manag, 2005, 206: 249-261.

[48] Tietenberg T (2006) Open access resource. Available online at <http://www.eoearth.org/view/article/155050>. Accessed 8 Jan 2015

[49] Vantomme P, Gohler D, N’Deckere-Ziangba F (2004) Contribution of forest insects to food security and forest conservation. The example of caterpillars in Central Africa. ODI Wildlife Policy Briefing, London, 3:1–4

[50] Von Maltitz GP, Shackleton CE. Lawes MJ, Eeley HAC, Shackleton CM, Geach BGS. Use and management of forests and woodlands in South Africa. Indigenous forests and woodlands in South Africa: policy, people and practice. 2004, Pietermaritzburg: University of KwaZulu-Natal Press, 109 138