Compatibility and complementarity of indigenous and scientific knowledge of wild plants in the highlands of southwest Saudi Arabia

Abstract

This study presents a survey of wild plants commonly used by local inhabitants in the highlands of southwest Saudi Arabia. Based upon literature review, direct observation of local inhabitants, and questionnaire interviews, 36 plant species were assessed and given scores according to their use. The gaps between scientific and indigenous knowledge on the use of plants were estimated using a “compatibility ratio”. The score values were estimated based on seven different use categories of ecosystem services, including food, forage, medicine, wood, beekeeping, research, and education. Additional structural categories include source of materials, shade, hedges, ornamental plantings, and soil stabilization. There are discrepancies between indigenous knowledge (IK) and scientific knowledge (SK) but in most cases, SK of the species supports the IK and plant users preference. The results also provide information that challenges assumptions about the consistency of IK with SK. Our study highlights the importance of understanding the cultural context and uses of wild plants. Biodiversity-based knowledge holds promise for contributing to sustainable use of wild plant resources and related traditions. The success of such endeavours depends on the compatibility and complementarity of indigenous and scientific knowledge.

Keywords

multipurpose use plants / importance value / compatibility ratio / Sarawat mountains / arid lands

References

[1] Agrawal A. Dismantling the divide between indigenous and scientific knowledge. Development and Change, 1995, 26: 413-439.

[2] Agrawal A. Indigenous and scientific knowledge: some critical comments. Indigenous Knowledge and Development Monitor, 1996, 3: 33-41.

[3] Alzweiri M, Al Sarhan A, Mansi K, Hudaib M, Aburjai T. Ethnopharmacological survey of medicinal herbs in Jordan, the Northern Badia region. Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 2011, 137: 27-35.

[4] Anonymous 2010. Saudi Arabian Millennium Ecosystem Assessment for Assir National Park. Main report, p.138.

[5] Belal AE, Springuel I. Economic value of plant diversity in arid environments. Nature and Resources, 1996, 32: 33-39.

[6] Briggs JA, Dickinson G, Murphy KJ, Pulfort ID, Belal AE, Moalla S, Springuel I, Ghabbour SI, Mekki A. Sustainable development and resource management of marginal environments: natural resources and their use in the Wadi Allaqi region of Egypt. Applied Geography, 1993, 13: 259-284.

[7] Collenette S. Wild Flowers of Saudi Arabia. 1999, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia: NCWCD

[8] Cordell GA, Colvard MD. Some thoughts on the future of ethnopharmacology. Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 2005, 100: 5-14.

[9] Cork SJ, Proctor W, Shelton D, Abel N, Binning C. The ecosystem services project: Exploring the importance of ecosystems to people. Ecological Management and Restoration, 2002, 3: 143-146.

[10] Darwish RM, Aburjai TA. Effect of ethnomedicinal plants used in folklore medicine in Jordan as antibiotic resistant inhibitors on Escherichia coli. BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 2010, 10: 109-116.

[11] Dekens J. Local knowledge for disaster preparedness: a literature review. 2007, Kathmandu: International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development

[12] Hegazy A K. Population ecology and implications for conservation of Cleome droserifolia: a threatened xerophyte. Journal of Arid Environments, 1990, 19: 269-282.

[13] Krishnamurthy KV. Textbook of Biodiversity. 2003, Plymouth, UK: Science Publishers, Inc., 260.

[14] MEA Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis. 2005, Washington D.C: Island Press

[15] Mercer J, Kelman I, Taranis L, Suchet-Pearson S. Framework for integrating indigenous and scientific knowledge for disaster risk reduction. Disasters, 2009, 34: 214-239.

[16] OECD Organization for Economic CooperationDevelopment. Handbook of Biodiversity Valuation: A Guide for policy Makers. 2002, Paris: OECD, 156.

[17] Pardo-de-Santayana M, Pieroni A, Puri R. Pardo-de-Santayana M, Pieroni A, Puri R. The ethnobotany of Europe, past and present. Ethnobotany in the New Europe: People, Health and Wild Plant Resources. 2010, New York: Berghahn Press, 1 15

[18] Rai LK, Prasad P, Sharma E. Conservation threats to some important medicinal plants in the Sikkim Himalaya. Biological Conservation, 2000, 93: 27-33.

[19] Reyes-Garcia V, Huanca T, Vadez V, Leonard W, Wilkie D. Cultural, practical and economic value of wild plants: a quantitative study in the Bolivian Amazon. Economic Botany, 2006, 60: 62-74.

[20] Sen B. Indigenous knowledge for development: bringing research and practice together. The International Information and Library review, 2005, 37: 375-382.

[21] Siew T-F, Doll P. Transdisciplinary research for supporting the integration of ecosystem services into land and water management in the Trim River Basin, Xinjiang, China. Journal of Arid Land, 2012, 4: 196-210.

[22] Sillitoe P. The development of indigenous knowledge. Current Anthropology, 1998, 39: 223-252.

[23] UNEP United Nations Environment Program. Global Biodiversity assessment. 1995, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1140.

[24] Von Carlowitz PG. Multipurpose trees and shrubs: opportunities and limitations. The establishment of multipurpose tree data base, 1984