Population structure and regeneration patterns of tree species in climate-sensitive subalpine forests of Indian western Himalaya

Abstract

The population structure of tree species has been explored in order to elucidate regeneration potential of the subalpine forests of Indian western Himalaya. For this study, the subalpine forest area was divided into three strata, i.e., lower altitude (<3000 m); mid-altitude (3000–3200 m); and high altitude (>3200m). Considering the major compositional attributes, an increase in altitude came with a significant decline in tree density and the total basal area for all the sites. However, no such clear trends were observed for recruits (i.e., seedlings and saplings). Seedling density did not exhibit uniform patterns for sites and altitude strata. In general, overall seedling density was greater at the Pindari site compared to the Lata and Tungnath sites. By comparison, significant variation in seedling density along the altitude strata was recorded for the Tungnath and Pindari sites only. Likewise, sapling density patterns varied across the sites and altitude strata, and significant variation in sapling density along the altitude strata was recorded only for the Lata site. At the Pindari site, the continuous increase in sapling density along with increasing altitude was revealing. The Pindari forests of exhibited expanding population structure. In contrast, greater accumulation of individuals in the sapling class and sharp decline toward both higher tree classes and lower seedling classes was generally apparent for the Lata and Tungnath sites. This indicates that the replacement in tree size classes from sapling stage is not proportional and the population may decline in the long-term. Considerable variation in patterns of forest and dominant species population structure were evident across altitude strata. But in all cases irrespective of sites, we found growth at the high-altitude stratum, in the form of entire forests or dominant species. This trend deserves further investigation to explore its relevance under changing climate scenarios.

References

[1] Bankoti NS. Woody vegetation analysis along elevational gradient (2000–3600 m) of Pindari catchement (Kumaun Himalaya). 1990, Nainital, India: Kumaun University

[2] Barik SK, Pandey HN, Tripathi RS, Rao P. Micro-environmental variability and species diversity in treefall gaps in sub-tropical broad-leaved forest. Vegetatio, 1992, 103: 31-40.

[3] Block J, Treter U. Kaennel Dobbertin M, Bräker OU. The limiting factors at the upper and lower forest limits in the mountain-woodland steppe of Northwest Mongolia Joachim Block and Uwe Treter. Tree Rings and People, 2001 22 26

[4] Buongiorno J, Dahir S, Lu HC, Lin CR. Tree size diversity and economic returns in uneven-aged forest stands. Forest Sci, 1994, 40(1): 83-103.

[5] Chaturvedi AK, Vashistha RK, Prasad P, Nautiyal MC. Need of innovative approach for climate change studies in alpine region of India. Curr Sci India, 2007, 93(12): 1648-1649.

[6] Chen J, Franklin JF. Growing-season microclimate gradients from clearcut edges into old-growth Douglas-fir forests. Ecol Appl, 1995, 5: 74-86.

[7] Chen J, Franklin JF, Spies TA. Contrasting microclimatic patterns among clearcut, edge, and interior area of old-growth Douglas-fir forest. Agr Forest Meteorol, 1993, 63(3/4): 219-237.

[8] Clark DA, Piper SC, Keeling CD, Clark DB. Tropical rain forest tree growth and atmospheric carbon dynamics linked to interannual temperature variation during 1984–2000. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA, 2003, 100(10): 5852-5857.

[9] Clark ML, Roberts DA, Clark DB. Hyperspectral discrimination of tropical rain forest tree species at leaf to crown scales. Remote Sens Environ, 2005, 96(3–4): 375-398.

[10] Coates KD. Tree recruitment in gaps of various size, clearcuts and undisturbed mixed forest of interior British Columbia, Canada. Forest Ecol Manag, 2002, 155: 387-398.

[11] Dhar U, Rawal RS, Samant SS. Structural diversity and representativeness of forest vegetation in a protected area of Kumaun Himalaya, India: Implication for conservation. Biodiversity Conserv, 1997, 6: 1045-1062.

[12] Gairola S, Rawal RS, Dhar U. Patterns of litterfall and nutrients return across anthropogenic disturbance gradient in three subalpine forests of west Himalaya, India. J For Res, 2009, 14(2): 73-80.

[13] Gairola S, Rawal RS, Todaria NP. Forest vegetation patterns along an altitudinal gradient in sub-alpine forest of west Himalaya, India. Afr J Plant Sci, 2008, 2(6): 42-48.

[14] Garkoti SC. High altitude forests of Central Himalaya: productivity and nutrient cycling. 1992, Nainital, India: Kumaun University

[15] Hamill DN, Wright SJ. Testing the dispersion of juveniles relative to adults: A new analytic method. Ecology, 1986, 67: 952-957.

[16] Holtmeier FK. Mountain timberlines-ecology, patchiness, and dynamics. Adv Global Change Res, 2003, 14 369.

[17] Hubbell SP, Foste RB. Crawley M, Gray A, Edwards PJ. The spatial context of regeneration in a Neotropical forest. Colonization, Succession and Stability. 1987, Oxford, U.K: Blackwell, 395 412

[18] Hussain MS, Sultana A, Khan JA, Khan A. Species composition and community structure of forest stands in Kumaon Himalaya, Uttarakhand, India. Trop Ecol, 2008, 49: 167-181.

[19] Korner C. Alpine plant life: functional plant ecology of high mountain ecosystems, 2003 2nd ed. Berlin: Springer

[20] Krauchi N, Brang AP, Schonenberger W. Forests of mountainous regions: gaps in knowledge and research needs. Forest Ecol Manag, 2000, 132: 73-82.

[21] Kullman L. Subalpine Picea abies decline in the Swedish Scandes. Mt Res Dev, 1988, 8: 33-42.

[22] Kullman L. Tree-limit rise and recent warming: A geoecological case study from the Swedish Scandes. Nor Geogr, 2000, 54: 49-59.

[23] Kullman L. 20th century climate warming and tree-limit rise in the southern Scandes of Sweden. Ambio, 2001, 30: 72-80.

[24] Kultti S. Holocene changes in treelines and climate from Ural Mountains to Finnish Lapland. 2004, Helsinki: Yliopistopaino

[25] Kumar A, Ram J. Anthropogenic disturbances and plant biodiversity in forests of Uttaranchal, central Himalaya. Biodiversity Conserv, 2005, 14: 309-331.

[26] Laurance WF, Oliveira AA, Laurance SG, Condit R, Nascimento HEM, Sanchez-Thorin AC. Pervasive alteration of tree communities in undisturbed Amazonian forests. Nature, 2004, 438: 171-175.

[27] Long JN, Smith FW. Volume increment in Pinus contorta var. latifolia: the influence of stand development and crown dynamics. Forest Ecol Manag, 1992, 53: 53-64.

[28] Miura M, Manabe T, Nishimura N, Yamamoto S. Forest canopy and community dynamics in a temperate old-growth evergreen broad-leaved forest, South-Western Japan: a 7-year study of a 4-ha plot. J Ecol, 2001, 89: 841-849.

[29] Mori A, Takeda H. Effects of undisturbed canopy structure on population structure and species co-existence in an old-growth sub alpine forest in central Japan. Forest Ecol Manag, 2004, 200: 89-100.

[30] Nautiyal MC, Nautiyal BP, Prakash V. Effect of grazing and climatic changes on alpine vegetation of Tungnath, Garhwal Himalaya, India. Environ, 2004, 24(2): 125-134.

[31] North M, Chen J, Oakley B, Song B, Rudnicki M, Gray A, Innes J. Forest stand structure and pattern of old-growth western hemlock/Douglas-fir and mixed conifer forests. Forest Sci, 2004, 50: 299-311.

[32] Ohsawa M. Differentiation of vegetation zones and species strategies in the subalpine region Mt. Fuji. Vegetatio, 1984, 57: 15-52.

[33] Rawal RS, Dhar U. Sensitivity of timberline flora in Kumaun Himalaya, India: conservation implications. Arctic Alpine Res, 1997, 29: 112-121.

[34] Rawal RS, Pangety YPS. Pangtey YPS, Rawal RS. High altitude forest vegetation with special reference to timberline in Kumaun central Himalaya. High Altitudes of the Himalaya. 1994, Nainital, India: Gyanodaya Prakashan, 353 399

[35] Runkle JR. Gap dynamics of old-growth eastern forests: management implications. Nat Areas J, 1991, 11(1): 19-25.

[36] Saxena AK, Singh JS. Tree population structure of certain Himalayan forest associations and implications concerning their future composition. Vegetatio, 1984, 58: 61-69.

[37] Shankar U. A case of higher tree diversity in a sal (Shorea robusta)-dominated lowland forest of eastern Himalaya: floristic composition, regeneration and conservation. Curr Sci India, 2001, 81(7): 776-786.

[38] Shankar U, Lama SD, Bawa KS. Ecosystem reconstruction through ‘taungya’ plantations following commercial logging of a dry, mixed deciduous forest in Darjeeling Himalaya. Forest Ecol Manage, 1998, 102: 131-142.

[39] Sharma CM, Suyal S, Gairola S, Ghildiyal SK. Species richness and diversity along an altitudinal gradient in moist temperature forest of Garhwal Himalaya. J Am Sci, 2009, 5: 119-128.

[40] Singh SP, Adhikari BS, Zobel DB. Biomass productivity, leaf longevity and forest structure in the central Himalaya. Ecol Monogr, 1994, 64: 401-421.

[41] Stevens S. Tourism and deforestation in the Mount Everest region of Nepal. Geogr J, 2003, 169: 255-277.

[42] Tripathi OP. Study of distribution pattern and ecological analysis of major forest types of Meghalaya. 2002, Shillong, India: North-Eastern Hill University

[43] Walther GR, Beissner S, Burga CA. Trends in the upward shift of alpine plants. J Veg Sci, 2005, 16: 541-548.

[44] Wang T, Liang YH, Ren B, Yu D, Ni J, Ma KP. Age structure of Picea schrenkiana forest along an altitudinal gradient in the central Tianshan Mountains, northwestern China. Forest Ecol Manage, 2004, 196: 267-274.

[45] Zhang L. Eco-physiological characteristics of seed germination of Larix chinensis, a timberline tree. Acta Phytoecol Sinica, 2004, 28: 579-583.