Carbon stocks of different land uses in the Kumrat valley, Hindu Kush Region of Pakistan

Adnan Ahmad , Syed Moazzam Nizami

Journal of Forestry Research ›› 2015, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (1) : 57 -64.

PDF
Journal of Forestry Research ›› 2015, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (1) : 57 -64. DOI: 10.1007/s11676-014-0008-6
Original Paper

Carbon stocks of different land uses in the Kumrat valley, Hindu Kush Region of Pakistan

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Changes in land use cover, particularly from forest to agriculture, is a major contributing factor in increasing carbon dioxide (CO2) level in the atmosphere. Using satellite images of 1999 and 2011, land use and land use changes in the Kumrat valley KPK, Pakistan, were determined: a net decrease of 11.56 and 7.46 % occurred in forest and rangeland, while 100 % increase occurred in agriculture land (AL). Biomass in different land uses, forest land (FL), AL, and range land (RL) was determined by field inventory. From the biomass data, the amount of carbon was calculated, considering 50 % of the biomass as carbon. Soil carbon was also determined to a depth of 0–15 and 16–30 cm. The average carbon stocks (C stocks) in all land uses ranged from 28.62 ± 13.8 t ha−1 in AL to 486.6 ± 32.4 t ha−1 in pure Cedrus deodara forest. The results of the study confirmed that forest soil and vegetation stored the maximum amount of carbon followed by RL. Conversion of FL and RL to AL not only leads to total loss of about 56 % (from FL conversion) and 37 % (RL conversion) of soil carbon in the last decades but also the loss of a valuable carbon sink. In order to meet the emissions reduction obligations of the Kyoto Protocol, Conservation of forest and RL in the mountainous regions of the Hindu Kush will help Pakistan to meet its emissions reduction goals under the Kyoto Protocol.

Keywords

Hindu Kush / Kumrat valley / Land uses / Biomass / Carbon stocks

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Adnan Ahmad, Syed Moazzam Nizami. Carbon stocks of different land uses in the Kumrat valley, Hindu Kush Region of Pakistan. Journal of Forestry Research, 2015, 26(1): 57-64 DOI:10.1007/s11676-014-0008-6

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Andersson K, Evans TP, Richards KR. National forest carbon inventories: policy needs and assessment capacity. Clim Change, 2009, 93: 69-101.

[2]

Bolliger J, Hagedorn F, Leifeld J, Böhl J, Zimmermann S, Soliva R, Kienast F. Effects of land-use change on carbon stocks in Switzerland. Ecosystems, 2008, 11: 895-907.

[3]

Brown S, Lugo AE. The storage and production of organic matter in tropical forest and their role in global carbon cycle. Biotropica, 1982, 14: 161-187.

[4]

Cowie A, Schneider UA, Montanarella L. Potential synergies between existing multilateral environmental agreements in the implementation of land use, land-use change and forestry activities. Environ Sci Policy, 2007, 10: 335-352.

[5]

Fantaw Y, Stig L, Abdu A. Changes in soil organic carbon and total nitrogen contents in three forest covers and land use types in the Bale Mountains, south-eastern highlands of Ethiopia. For Ecol Manage, 2007, 242: 337-342.

[6]

Gainza-Carmenates R, Carlos Altamirano-Cabrera J, Thalmann P, Drouet L. Trade-offs and performances of a range of alternative global climate architectures for post-2012. Environ Sci Policy, 2010, 13: 63-71.

[7]

Gupta MK, Sharma SD. Sequestrated carbon: organic carbon pool in the soils under different land uses in Garhwal Himalayan Region of India. Int J Agricu For, 2011, 1(1): 14-20.

[8]

Haripriya GS. Estimates of biomass in Indian forests. Biomass Bioenerg, 2000, 19: 245-258.

[9]

Houghton RA. Revised estimates of the annual net flux of carbon to the atmosphere from changes in land use and land management 1850–2000. Tellus, Ser B, 2003, 55: 378-390.

[10]

Li H, Ma Y, Aide TM, Liu W. Past, present and future land-use in Xishuangbanna, China and the implications for carbon dynamics. For Ecol Manage, 2008, 255: 16-24.

[11]

Malhi Y, Baker TR, Phillips OL, Almeida S, Alvarez E, Arroyo L, Chave J, CzimczikI CI, Fiore AD, Higuchi N, Killeen TJ, Laurance SG, Laurance WF, Lewis SL, Montoya LMM, Lloyd J. The above ground coarse wood productivity of 104 Neotropical forest plots. Glob Change Biol, 2004, 10: 563-591.

[12]

Nabuurs GJ, Masera O, Andrasko K, Benitez-Ponce P, Boer R, Dutschke M, Elsiddig E, Ford-Robertson J, Frumhoff P, Karjalainen T, Krankina O, Kurz W, Matsumoto M, Oyhantcabal W, Ravindranath NH, Sanz Sanchez MJ, Zhang X (2007) Forestry. In: Metz B, Davidson OR, Bosch PR, Dave R, Meyer LA (eds) Climate change 2007: mitigation. Contribution of working group III to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

[13]

Nizami SM. The inventory of the carbon stocks in sub-tropical forest of Pakistan for reporting under Kyoto Protocol. J For Res, 2012, 23(2): 377-384.

[14]

Philip MS. Measuring trees and forests, 1994 2 Wallingford: CAB. International

[15]

Rokityanskiy D, Benitez PC, Kraxner F, McCallum I, Obersteiner M, Rametsteiner E, Yamagata Y. Geographically explicit global modeling of land-use change, carbon sequestration, and biomass supply. Technol Forecast Soc Chang, 2007, 74: 1057-1082.

[16]

Roy J, Saugier B, Mooney H. Terrestrial global productivity: past. 2001, San Diego: Academic Press

[17]

Running SW. Climate change: ecosystem disturbance, carbon, and climate. Science, 2008, 321: 652-653.

[18]

Schroter D, Cramer W, Leemans R, Prentice IC, Araujo MB, Arnell NW, Bondeau A, Bugmann H, Carter TR, Gracia CA, de la Vega-Leinert AC, Erhard M, Ewert F, Glendining M, House JI, Kankaanpaa S, Klein RJT, Lavorel S, Lindner M, Metzger MJ, Meyer J, Mitchell TD, Reginster I, Rounsevell M, Sabate S, Sitch S, Smith B, Smith J, Smith P, Sykes MT, Thonicke K, Thuiller W, Tuck G, Zaehle S, Zierl B. Ecosystem service supply and vulnerability to global change in Europe. Science, 2005, 310: 1333-1337.

[19]

Sharma S, Rai SC. Carbon sequestration with land-use cover change in a Himalayan watershed. Geoderma, 2007, 139: 371-378.

[20]

Smith P. Land use change and soil organic carbon dynamics. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst, 2008, 81: 169-178.

[21]

Strassmann KM, Joos F, Fischer G. Simulating effects of land use changes on carbon fluxes: past contributions to atmospheric CO2 increases and future commitments due to losses of terrestrial sink capacity. Tellus, Ser B, 2008, 60: 583-603.

[22]

Tanvir A, Ahmad M, Shahbaz B, Suleri A. Impact of participatory forest management on vulnerability and livelihood assets of forest-dependent communities in northern Pakistan. Int J Sustain Dev World Ecol, 2007, 14(2): 211-223.

[23]

Tappeiner U, Tasser E, Leitinger G, Cernusca A, Tappeiner G. Effects of historical and likely future scenarios of land use on above-and belowground vegetation carbon stocks of an Alpine valley. Ecosystems, 2008, 11: 1383-1400.

[24]

UNFCCC 1992 united nations framework convention on climate change, article 4. Available at http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/convkp/conveng.pdf. Accessed 10 March 2013

[25]

Walkley A, Black JA. An examination of the degtjaref method for determining soil organic matter and proposed modification of the chromic. titration method. Soil Sci, 1934, 37: 29-38.

[26]

Yan J, Zhu X, Jiaohong Z. Effects of grassland conversion to cropland and forest on soil organic carbon and dissolved organic carbon in farming pastoral ecotone of Inner Mongolia. Acta Ecol Sin, 2009, 29: 150-154.

[27]

Zang Y, Fengxue G, Shirong L, Yanchun L, Chao L. Variation of carbon stock with forest types subalpine region of South Western China. For Ecol Manage, 2012, 30: 88-95.

[28]

Zomer RJ, Trabucco A, Bossio DA, Verchot LV. Climate change mitigation: a spatial analysis of global land suitability for clean development mechanism afforestation and reforestation. Agric Ecosyst Environ, 2008, 126: 67-80.

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

129

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/